The ‘Full Zero’ Axiom -- Part 01: ‘Seldon on Record’ Series

 

 

 

The ‘Full Zero’ Axiom  -- Part 01: ‘Seldon on the Record’ Series.

 

 

 

Dear Reader,

 

 

 

It is my pleasure, and my honor, as an officer of the Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.] Office of Public Liaison, and as a voting member of F.E.D., to share, with you, from time to time, as they are approved for public release by the F.E.D. General Council, key excerpts from the internal writings, and from the internal sayings, of our co-founder, Karl Seldon.

 

The first release in this new such series is posted below [Some E.D. standard edits have been applied, in the version presented below, by the editors of the F.E.D. Special Council for the Encyclopedia, to the direct transcript of our co-founder’s discourse].

 

In this 1st installment, Seldon describes the intuitive basis, and the F.E.D. ‘semantification’, or meaning-interpretation, of an ‘ideo-ontologically’ new ‘meta-numeral’ value that arises in the E.D. seventh, ‘Mu dialectical arithmetic’, and beyond, in the systematic dialectical, categorial-progression/axioms-systems-progression presentation of the E.D. ‘Dialectic of the Arithmetics for Dialectic’.

 

 

 

Seldon --

 

For more information regarding these Seldonian insights, please see --

 

http://www.dialectics.org/dialectics/

 

and

 

www.dialectics.info

 

 

 

 

 

For partially pictographical, ‘poster-ized’ visualizations of many of these Seldonian insights -- specimens of ‘dialectical art’ -- see:

https://www.etsy.com/shop/DialecticsMATH

 

 

 

 

¡ENJOY!

 

 

 

 

 

Regards,

 

 

Miguel Detonacciones,

 

Voting Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.],

Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison,

Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.

 

 

 

 

Please post your comments on this blog-entry below!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Present ‘Comprehendedness’ vs. Actuality.

 

 

 

 

Present ‘Comprehendedness’ vs. Actuality.

 

 

Dear Reader,

 

 

Just because we presently comprehend something not, does not means that it IS not, or that it will never be.

 

Many a premature dismissal, many a denial -- later much regretted -- based upon false certainty, can be averted if we keep this principle “in mind”, and thence ‘in action’.

 

Even many, even everyday things, that we may feel certain that we comprehend in toto, may later be discovered to rely, at least in part, on processes, eventually to be translated into our physical principles, which we have not yet even noticed, and of which we have not yet even taken note(s).

 

In the days much before this new century, would you have believed someone who told you that our universe is not only expanding, but is accelerating in its expansion? Or would you, instead, have dismissed that claim -- and them -- out of hand?

 

If someone had told you, also then, that most of the matter in our universe is inherently invisible, would you have even considered the possibility that they were right?

 

Suppose that someone had told, in 1900, that space is “curved” by nearby mass; that space-time is curved by mass-energy; that relatively greater gravity in their vicinity makes clocks, and all mass-energy-interior activity’, run at a slower rate relative to clocks, etc., in lower gravity; that there are places so under sway of such massiveness that not even light, once entering them, can ever leave them again as light, and that such places, in motion, can “ring” the very fabric of space-time itself; that gravity bends light waves; that objects grow in mass as they accelerate; that adding energy to an object increases its mass, and that matter can be converted wholly into energy, e.g., via contact with something called “anti-matter”.  Would you have even considered the possibility that the person was correct?  Or would you have called instantly for the strait-jacket thought-police?

 

 

 

 

Please post your comments on that article below!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For more information regarding these Seldonian insights, please see --

 

http://www.dialectics.org/dialectics/

 

and

 

www.dialectics.info

 

 

 

 

 

For partially pictographical, ‘poster-ized’ visualizations of many of these Seldonian insights -- specimens of ‘dialectical art’ -- see:

https://www.etsy.com/shop/DialecticsMATH

 

 

 

 

¡ENJOY!

 

 

 

 

Regards,

 

 

Miguel Detonacciones,

 

Voting Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.],

Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison,

Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

‘Categorial NON-Confinement’ -- Part 12: ‘The Seldon Files’ Series.

 

 

 

‘Categorial Non-Confinement’ -- Part 12:  ‘The Seldon Files’ Series.

 

 

 

Dear Reader,

 

 

 

It is my pleasure, and my honor, as an officer of the Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.] Office of Public Liaison, and as a voting member of F.E.D., to share, with you, from time to time, as they are approved for public release by the F.E.D. General Council, key excerpts from the internal writings, and from the internal sayings, of our co-founder, Karl Seldon.

 

The twelfth release in this new such series is posted below [Some E.D. standard edits have been applied, in the version presented below, by the editors of the F.E.D. Special Council for the Encyclopedia, to the direct transcript of our co-founder’s discourse].

 

In this 12th installment, Seldon describes how later ontological categories in a given, typical dialectical categorial progression break out of the Domain in which their «arché»-category inheres.  They thereby break into a higher ontological Domain.  Or, they break into the expected future of the Domain within which their categorial progression began, e.g., either in the form of a reconstruction of that Domain’s past, or of a presentation of that Domain’s present.

 

 

 

Seldon --

For more information regarding these Seldonian insights, please see --

 

http://www.dialectics.org/dialectics/

 

and

 

www.dialectics.info

 

 

 

 

 

For partially pictographical, ‘poster-ized’ visualizations of many of these Seldonian insights -- specimens of ‘dialectical art’ -- see:

https://www.etsy.com/shop/DialecticsMATH

 

 

 

 

¡ENJOY!

 

 

 

 

 

Regards,

 

 

Miguel Detonacciones,

 

Voting Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.],

Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison,

Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.

 

 

 

 

Please post your comments on this blog-entry below!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

‘Leveraging Nextness’ -- Part 11: ‘The Seldon Files’ Series.

 

 

 

 

‘Leveraging Nextness’  -- Part 11:  ‘The Seldon Files’ Series.

 

 

 

Dear Reader,

 

 

 

It is my pleasure, and my honor, as an officer of the Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.] Office of Public Liaison, and as a voting member of F.E.D., to share, with you, from time to time, as they are approved for public release by the F.E.D. General Council, key excerpts from the internal writings, and from the internal sayings, of our co-founder, Karl Seldon.

 

The eleventh release in this new such series is posted below [Some E.D. standard edits have been applied, in the version presented below, by the editors of the F.E.D. Special Council for the Encyclopedia, to the direct transcript of our co-founder’s discourse].

 

In this 11th installment, Seldon describes a solution-procedure for _NQ dialectical equations that is “perhaps the easiest categorial advance-and-solution procedure, both to understand and to use, ... the ‘additive procedure’, AKA the ‘Qualo-Peanic Successor-Function, Term-by-Term, Category-by-Category, One Category-Symbol-at-a-Time’ Solution-Procedure”.

 

 

 

Seldon --

 

 

 

For more information regarding these Seldonian insights, please see --

 

http://www.dialectics.org/dialectics/

 

and

 

www.dialectics.info

 

 

 

 

 

For partially pictographical, ‘poster-ized’ visualizations of many of these Seldonian insights -- specimens of ‘dialectical art’ -- see:

https://www.etsy.com/shop/DialecticsMATH

 

 

 

¡ENJOY!

 

 

 

Regards,

 

 

Miguel Detonacciones,

 

Voting Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.],

Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison,

Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.

 

 

Please post your comments on this blog-entry below!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

THE Dialectic -- Part 10: ‘The Seldon Files’ Series.

 

 

 

THE Dialectic -- Part 10:  ‘The Seldon Files’ Series.

 

 

 

Dear Reader,

 

 

 

It is my pleasure, and my honor, as an officer of the Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.] Office of Public Liaison, and as a voting member of F.E.D., to share, with you, from time to time, as they are approved for public release by the F.E.D. General Council, key excerpts from the internal writings, and from the internal sayings, of our co-founder, Karl Seldon.

 

The tenth release in this new such series is posted below [Some E.D. standard edits have been applied, in the version presented below, by the editors of the F.E.D. Special Council for the Encyclopedia, to the direct transcript of our co-founder’s discourse].

 

In this 10th installment, Seldon describes ‘The ONE Dialectic’, of All Known Reality.

 

 

 

Seldon --

For more information regarding these Seldonian insights, please see --

 

http://www.dialectics.org/dialectics/

 

and

 

www.dialectics.info

 

 

 

 

 

For partially pictographical, ‘poster-ized’ visualizations of many of these Seldonian insights -- specimens of ‘dialectical art’ -- see:

https://www.etsy.com/shop/DialecticsMATH

 

 

 

¡ENJOY!

 

 

 

Regards,

 

 

Miguel Detonacciones,

 

Voting Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.],

Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison,

Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.

 

 

Please post your comments on this blog-entry below!