Sunday, February 17, 2019

Part 05: Seldon’s Message Series -- ‘The Conservation of “Contradiction”’.



Part 05:  Seldon’s Message Series --

The «Aufheben»-Conservation of Contradiction”’.







Dear Readers,



It is my pleasure, and my honor, as an officer of the Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.] Office of Public Liaison, to share with you, from time to time, as they are approved for public release by the F.E.D. General Council, key excerpts from the internal writings, and from the internal sayings, of our co-founder, Karl Seldon.

The fifth such release in this new series is entered below [Some E.D. standard edits have been applied, in the version presented below, to the direct transcript of our co-founder’s discourse].


For more information regarding, and for [further] instantiations of, these Seldonian insights, please see -- 


and



ENJOY!




Regards,


Miguel Detonacciones,

Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.],
Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison,
Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.







The «Aufheben»-Conservation of Contradiction”’.

... ‘‘‘Conflicts’’’, dialectical ‘‘‘contradictions’’’, ‘intra-dualities’ and ‘intra-multi-alities’ are, typically, in our experience, not ‘‘‘convolutely’’’ erased, or ‘‘‘abstractly negated’’’/turned into ‘‘‘nothingnesses’’’ [cf. Hegel]. 

Such conflicts are, instead, typically only imperfectly & partially «aufheben»-contained, and ‘‘‘evolutely’’’ «aufheben»-conserved/-retained, within yet-larger-scale conflictual/self-conflictual ‘content-structures’. ... .







Monday, February 11, 2019

The Dialectic of human Sexual Preferences REVISITED.







The Dialectic of human Sexual Preferences REVISITED.







Dear Readers,

We originally presented, in this blog, our narration of the systematic dialectic of human sexual preferences on May 22nd, 2014 --


The above led later to an extended dialogue with a reader, also posted as a blog-entry hereto --


-- dated July 17th, 2014.

That reader is a person of transgender orientation, having reluctantly lived as a male in adult life, until arranging a gender change operation, and thereafter living as a female.

Based upon a too-limited, unrepresentative sample of a mere handful of people of transgender orientation that the members of the Foundation had observed, up to the time of this dialogue, we had concluded that transgender orientation was an entirely heterosexual phenomenon, with no traces of either homosexual or bisexual orientation exhibited in it.  We had, based upon that limited experience, hypothesized only two Sub-Species of the transgender Species of human sexual orientation ‘psych-ontology’ --

Sub-Species 1.  Persons with female genitalia objectively, but subjectively identified with the male gender, and sexually attracted to females.

Sub-Species 2.  Persons with male genitalia objectively, but subjectively identified with the female gender, and sexually attracted to males.

However, the reader with whom we dialogued about this Domain of Human Sexual Orientations explained to us that she was both of the transgender orientation, and bisexual -- sexually attracted to both males and females. 

Confronted with this evidence, and with this empirical falsification of our original hypothesis about the transgender sexual orientations category, we revised our hypothesis.

Our current hypothesis is that the category of transgender sexual orientations is a microcosm of the preceding three categories in our systematic-dialectical order of presentation -- namely, the categories of heterosexual orientations, homosexual orientations, and bisexual orientations.

That is, we now expect that the transgender sexual orientations Species-category has three Sub-Species categories -- representing transgender analogs of heterosexuality, homosexuality, and bisexuality.

The estimated fraction of the human population that is of the transgender Species-category of sexual orientations was estimated, in 2011, to be ~ 0.3%.

However, from the qualitative, ontological point-of-view native to the N_Q_ dialectical ideography, and to many of its dialectical progeny in the dialectical progression of the Seldonian ‘Dialectical Ideographies’, it does not matter that some of these Sub-Species categories may represent tiny percentages of the present human population, situated deep into the tails of the frequency-distribution of sexual preference types.  These categories, however rare, represent qualitatively distinct human sexual orientations ontology, ontologically distinct phenomena of human sexuality.

We have amended the ‘dialectograms’ regarding the Domain of Human Sexual Orientations
according to our new hypothesis.  We have posted all of those amended JPEG images both here, and also in the original blog-entries cited above.  The 'dialectogram' posted above is the one principally affected by this revision.


FYI:  Much of the work of Karl Seldon, and of his collaborators, including work by “yours truly”, is available, for your free-of-charge download, via --


and




Regards,

Miguel Detonacciones,
Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.],
Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison