‘«Auto-Aufheben» and/versus «Allo-Aufheben» Degrees of «Arché-Monads» Involution’.
-- Part 03: Seldon’s Maths Series.
Dear Reader,
It
is my pleasure,
and my honor, as an elected member
of the Foundation Encyclopedia
Dialectica [F.E.D.] General Council, and as a voting member of F.E.D., to share, with you, from time to time, as they are approved for public release by the F.E.D. General Council, key excerpts from the internal writings, and from the internal sayings, of our co-founder,
Karl Seldon.
This 3rd release of
this new such
series is posted below
[Some E.D.
standard edits have been applied, in the version presented below, by the editors
of the F.E.D. Special Council for the Encyclopedia,
to the direct transcript of our co-founder’s
discourse].
In this 3rd installment, Seldon describes the ‘content-structure’ of ‘dialectical
meta-equation meta-model’-generated dialectical categorial progressions, using
the NQ ‘dyadic dialectical function’, via a unified
definition, in terms of the contrast between their ‘meta-genealogical’ «auto-aufheben»
and «allo-aufheben» degrees of «arché-monads» [self-]involution.
Seldon –
“Per our NQ ‘dyadic dialectical function’-based [‘«aufheben»-function’-based] ‘meta-models’, and their ‘meta-equations’,
ontological reality is constituted, ‘meta-genealogically’, by way of ‘‘‘self-activity’’’
[cf. Marx].”
“This occurs, first, by the self-escalation of the depth of the ‘self-«aufheben»’, ‘self-involutionary’ [cf. Chardin] [self-]interactions among the ultimate ancestor «monads» of the Domain being so modeled.”
“This
yields, as the value of the historical epoch time parameter advances/increases,
the manifold different degrees of the ‘self-«aufheben»-ation’ of those oldest
known ancestor «monads» of that Domain.”
“Then,
secondarily, ontological reality is modeled as so constituted by the, included,
‘inter-involutionary’, ‘«allo-aufheben»-ic’ inter-actions
of the ‘objects-cum-processes’ [i.e., the ‘event-entities’
or ‘‘‘eventities’’’ [cf. Alfred North Whitehead; Archie Bahm]] as «monads»
of the resulting different degrees of ‘self-«aufheben»’, ‘self-meta-«monad»-ic’,
dyadic self-involution/-‘‘‘self-re-entry’’’ [cf. G. Spencer Brown].”
“In
the ‘dyadic dialectical function meta-models’, the «auto-aufheben»
degrees will all be “Natural” number powers of the dyad, 2, while the «allo-aufheben»
degrees will not, but will “fill-in”,
consecutively, all of the other “Natural” number --‘non-dyadic’
-- degrees of «arché-monads’» involution, up to and
including each ‘2-to-the-time-/epoch-parameter’
“Natural”
number value, for each ‘dialectical equation’ within the ‘dialectical meta-model
meta-equation’ for the given Domain.”
For more
information regarding these
Seldonian insights, please see --
For partially pictographical, ‘poster-ized’ visualizations of many of these Seldonian insights -- specimens of ‘dialectical art’ – as well as dialectically-illustrated books
by the F.E.D. Press, see --
https://www.etsy.com/shop/DialecticsMATH
¡ENJOY!
Regards,
Miguel Detonacciones,
Voting Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.];
Elected Member, F.E.D. General Council;
Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison;
Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.
YOU are invited to
post your comments on this blog-entry below!
