Wednesday, September 18, 2019

The Power of Dialectical Synthesis.










The Power of Dialectical Synthesis
to Heal Apparently Radical Dualisms.







Dear Readers,




Seldon believes, most deeply, in the power of dialectical, immanent critique, and in the power of dialectical synthesis -- in the ‘ideo-onto-dynamical’ formation of hybrid, ‘ideo-ontological uni-categories’ -- to heal ruling-class exacerbated, balkanizing, divide-and-conquer dualisms, even apparently radical dualisms, constructed, as part of their ‘ideology engineering’ PsyOps, by our dominant, eugenicist, anti-humanist, ‘humanocidal’ ruling class faction.

After all, his awakening as a conscious, self-aware individual; his awakening to what he made to be[come] his life-mission -- his awakening as ‘Karl Seldon’ -- was occasioned by a dream-vision of the hardest dialectical synthesis of them all; by a dream-vision of the unification of Science, Philosophy, and Religion.  The very logo of the Foundation attests to that [see image below].

The abbreviated Seldonian ‘Psychohistorical-Dialectical Meta-Equation’ reconstructing the [psycho]historical ‘ideo-meta-evolution’ of human[oid] ideology\knowledge ideo-formations is, given that --
R  =  theideo-ontological category of Religions;
P  =  theideo-ontological category of Philosopies;
S  =  theideo-ontological category of Sciences, and;
PSI  =  theideo-ontological category of PSIchohistories,
-- the following non-amalgamative sum of qualities/categories --

R(^2^3)  |-=   R + P + qPR + S + qSR + qSP + qSPR + PSI

--  wherein qSPR represents the uni-category, or ‘‘‘dialectical synthesis’’’, of S, P, and R; of Religions, Philosopies, and Sciences.

We have come to understand, over the years, that, in that dream-vision, Seldon experienced a dream-reality of that dialectical synthesis; the feeling of the [dream-]reality of a civilization that had achieved such a dialectical synthesis of Science, Philosophy, and Religion. 
And, ever since he experienced that dream-vision, he has worked to bring about that feeling, that level of civilization, that ‘‘‘human phenome’’’, into our shared experience, into the ‘exo-dream’ reality of our waking world, here on planet Terra.





For more information regarding these Seldonian insights, please see --

and

For partially pictographical, ‘poster-ized’ visualizations of many of these Seldonian insights -- specimens of dialectical art -- see:




¡ENJOY!



Regards,


Miguel Detonacciones,

Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.],
Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison,
Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.





















Tuesday, September 17, 2019

‘Algorithmicities vs. Heuristicities’.










 The Systematic Dialectic of Algorithmicities vs. Heuristicities.







Dear Readers,



The purpose of this blog-entry, is to call your attention to the dialectical interconnexion among the ideo-ontological categories that, respectively, represent cases of algorithmic methods of solution of general classes of problems, cases of heuristic methods of solution, and cases of what we call algorithmic heuristic or heuristic algorithmic methods of solution.

It might be considered that the latter case has long been extant, and includes the ancient methods of iterative calculation of the values of “purely”-quantitative “irrational” numbers, such as “Heron’s Method”, and the ancient Mediterranean method of «Anthyphairesis».  These methods are “algorithmic”, in that they involve exact mathematical recipes for each of their iterations.  But these methods are also are “heuristic” in that they provide, not a single, unique, and uniquely correct value, but a potentially-infinite [in Aristotle’s sense] sequence of improving approximate values, with each further increment of their iteration.

However, the algorithmic heuristic that we have most in mind, here, is the purely”-qualitative method of solution for categorial combinatoric problems which we call the Seldonian NQ Dialectical Method -- The Universal Algorithmic Heuristic Dialectical Method.

A dialectogram depicting this dialectic’, plus a commentary on thatdialectogram’, is appended below.







For more information regarding these Seldonian insights, please see --

and

For partially pictographical, ‘poster-ized’ visualizations of many of these Seldonian insights -- specimens of dialectical art -- see:




¡ENJOY!



Regards,


Miguel Detonacciones,

Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.],
Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison,
Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.























Thursday, September 12, 2019

Part 09: 'Ontological Self-Diversification'. Seldon's Seeings Series.










Part 09:  Seldon’s ‘‘‘Seeings’’’ Series --

 Ontological Self-Diversification via Self-Iterated Self-Reflexive Self-Involution.







Dear Readers,



It is my pleasure, and my honor, as an officer of the Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.] Office of Public Liaison, to share with you, from time to time, as they are approved for public release by the F.E.D. General Council, key excerpts from the internal writings, and from the internal sayings, of our co-founder, Karl Seldon.

The ninth such release in this new series is entered below [Some E.D. standard edits have been applied, in the version presented below, by the editors of the Special Council for the Encyclopedia, to the direct transcript of our co-founder’s discourse].

This 9th instalment addresses the root of the dialectical principle of Meta-Genealogy.







Seldon:

...What the Dyadic and Triadic «aufheben»-functions [E.D. Editors:  What we -- all except for Seldon himself -- call ‘the Dyadic and Triadic Seldon Functions’.] describe is the ontological self-diversification of a given [sub-]universe[-of-discourse] that results from self-iterated, self-reflexive, self-refluxive, «aufheben» self-involution, beginning from the ‘ultimate ancestor ontology, or «arché»-ontology, of that [sub-]universe or Domain.”

“...Indeed, it is this ‘ontological self-diversification’ which creates what we call a ‘meta-genealogy’ -- a [generally] non-DNA-based, more comprehensive sort of ‘‘‘genealogy’’’.”

“...In such, dialectical or «aufheben» self-diversification of the «arché» of a given Encyclopedia Dialectica-identified Domain’, D, ‘self-continuates’ beyond that stage one or epoch one -- beyond, e.g., Dt2 = 1, or Dt3 = 1, in terms of its Domain’s ‘dialectical meta-model’ -- creating a ‘meta-lineage’, a non-DNA-based ontological lineage.”

“...As such, in that ‘meta-lineage’, every successive ontological kind is ‘familialy’ connected -- connected by ancestry -- all the way back to the «arché» kind, so that, explicitly, every successive ontological kind is already connected to every other that irrupted into existence before it, by way of ontological, «aufheben» ‘self-hybridization’ [‘self-meta-unit-ization’] or by ontological, «aufheben» ‘allo-hybridization’...”

“This way of describing the process sounds like this description holds only for diachronic, ‘“historical dialectics”’.  

But synchronic, ‘“systematic dialectics”’ follow a parallel course, at their most abstract, generic root.







For more information regarding these Seldonian insights, please see --

and

For partially pictographical, ‘poster-ized’ visualizations of many of these Seldonian insights -- specimens of dialectical art -- see:




¡ENJOY!



Regards,


Miguel Detonacciones,

Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.],
Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison,
Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.


























Sunday, September 08, 2019

‘‘‘Equitism’’’ Discovery. Part 11: EQUITISM AMENDMENT Proposal for the U.S. Bill of Rights -- GLOBAL STRATEGIC HYPOTHESES.



















 ‘‘‘Equitism’’’ Discovery.  Part 11:  EQUITISM AMENDMENT Proposal for the U.S. Bill of Rights --
GLOBAL STRATEGIC HYPOTHESES.







Dear Readers,



GLOBAL STRATEGIC HYPOTHESES -- 

We of F.E.D. have recently compiled, from the accumulated recountings to us, by Karl Seldon, about the course of his discovery of our proposed higher successor system to the present, [State-]Capitalist System -- this series on that higher system, which we call ‘Political-ECONOMIC DEMOCRACY, or ‘Equitism’. 

The next step in our summary of this compilation is presented via the JPEG slide images pasted-in above, and below, for your information.

This eleventh part of this new series addresses the Equitism Constitutional Amendment proposal itself, plus the Preamble to the Associated Constitutional Annex, both key components of Seldon’s proposed solution to ‘‘‘The Social Problem’’’ of modern humanity; of modern human society -- i.e., of capitalist society. 

For more about this ‘‘‘successor system’’’ hypothesis, please see --

http://www.creativecoherence.org/2019/08/08/equitism-summary-presentation-video/ . 



For more information regarding these Seldonian insights, please see --

and

For partially pictographical, ‘poster-ized’ visualizations of many of these Seldonian insights -- specimens of dialectical art -- see:




¡ENJOY!



Regards,


Miguel Detonacciones,

Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.],
Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison,
Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.