New Worldview for a United Humanity: ¿WHY DIALECTICAL? GLOBAL STRATEGIC HYPOTHESES.

 

                              

                              

                 VS.

New

Worldview

for a

United

Humanity:

 

¿WHY

DIALECTICAL?

 

 

 

GLOBAL STRATEGIC HYPOTHESES.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Reader,

 

The subtitle of our, recently published, volume 0., of our, planned multi-volume, Encyclopedia Dialectica, reads –

‘Encyclopedic Dictionary toward a New, Dialectical Worldview for a United Humanity’. 

 

We of F.E.D. are striving, along with many, many, mostly “unsung”, others, to create the seeds of, and to sow those seeds of, a new, higher human culture – the seeds of a new, humanity-wide ‘human phenome’ – that will be able to initially-produce, to ‘ongoingly’ reproduce, and to continually further-develop and extend, a civilization characterized by political-ECONOMIC DEMOCRACY.

 

¿But, why is it that we hold that this ‘Worldview of a United Humanity’ must be ‘‘‘Dialectical’’’?

 

We do so because we perceive that the global majority class of humanity, in order to electorally and peacefully come to global democratic power, must become cognitively capable, individually, publicly and electorally, of resolving the spurious, seemingly ‘Kantianoid’ antinomies, the “absolute” dualisms, the “radical” diremptions, the “eternal” conflicts, and the “absolute” oppositions by which the ‘descendence-phase’, COVERED-IN-BLOOD ‘Rocke-Nazi’ ruling class faction keeps our majority class divided against itself, and “at each others throats”, within itself, paralyzing us against any progress toward the [electoral] overthrow of their planned global police-state tyranny and planned global humanocide.

 

That is, to survive, and then to thrive, in the first-ever Global Renaissance of our planet, of which we then become capable, the majority class at large must become capable of the critical, dialectical synthesis solution and reconciliation of such, falsely-eternalized, antitheses, thereby becoming increasingly immune to the divide-and-conquer ideologies, manufactured by the ‘ideology-factories’ of the “legacy”, ‘main sewer’ mass media, via their ‘news-whores’ and ‘hired liars’, and by the ‘Rocke-Nazi’-prostituted reaches of academia.

 

For perhaps the biggest example of such divides, consider the propositional contradiction of the ‘Left-Wingers are ALWAYS and ABSOLUTELY WRONG.’ prevailing propositions on the “Right”, versus the Right-Wingers are ALWAYS and ABSOLUTELY WRONG.’ prevailing propositions on the “Left”.

 

To survive, and then to prosper, like never before, the ‘Global Majority Class’ must become a ‘“class-for-itself’’’ – a global communion of people who know that we are, not only a social class, but that we are ‘The Majority Class’, and that a hyper-capital-wealthy, ethically ultra-degenerate, ‘Epsteinesque’, and politically-hyperpowerful ‘descendence-phase’ capitalist ruling class faction, the ‘Rocke-Nazi’ Faction, is arrayed against us, planning to exterminate “95%” of us, and always trying, ideologically, to dupe us into always working against our own interests, and always working for their bloody interest, in humanocide, and to divide us against ourselves.

 

Perhaps the first glimmers of that emergence – of ‘“class-for-itself’’’ collective self-awareness, will be the waning of the ‘Rocke-Nazi’-distorted “Left” versus the ‘Rocke-Nazi’- distorted “Right” divisions within the ‘Majority Class’.

 

In particular, we note to you that Karl Seldon’s successor-system constitutional proposal, in his “…Missing Blueprints…” book, linked-to below, presents contributions to an immanent critique, and a critical synthesis, or dialectical ‘‘‘complex unity’’’, of “grains of truth” drawn from both prevailing Rightist and prevailing Leftist ideologies.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For more information regarding these Seldonian insights, and to read and/or download, free of charge, PDFs and/or JPGs of Foundation books, other texts, and images, please see:

 

 

www.dialectics.info

 

and

 

https://independent.academia.edu/KarlSeldon

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For partially pictographical, ‘poster-ized’ visualizations of many of these Seldonian insights -- specimens of ‘dialectical art’ – as well as dialectically-illustrated books published by the F.E.D. Press, see –

 

https://www.etsy.com/shop/DialecticsMATH

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

¡ENJOY!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Regards,

 

 

 

Miguel Detonacciones,

 

Voting Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.];

Elected Member, F.E.D. General Council;

Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison;

Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.

 

 

 

 

 

 

YOU are invited to post your comments on this blog-entry below!

 

 

 

 

 

 

SOLUTION –

 

‘Equitist Political-ECONOMIC DEMOCRACY’; 

 

BOOK:

 

MARX’S MISSING BLUEPRINTS

Free-of-Charge Download of Book PDF –

http://www.dialectics.info/dialectics/Applications.html

http://www.dialectics.info/dialectics/Applications_files/Edition%201.,%20DPCAIT_,_Part_1_,_%27THE_MISSING_BLUEPRINTS%27_,_begun_22JUL2022_Last_Updated_08AUG2023.pdf

 

Hardcover Book Order –

http://www.dialectics.info/dialectics/F.E.D._Press.html

https://www.etsy.com/shop/DialecticsMATH

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The ‘Meta-Peanic’, Qualitative, Categorial Successor Functions and the F.E.D. Dialectical Method.

 

 

 

                          

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The

‘Meta-Peanic’,

Qualitative,

Categorial

Successor

Functions

and the

F.E.D.

Dialectical

Method.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Reader,

 

 

 

The Encyclopedia Dialectica ‘Qualo-Peanic Dialectical Method’ is founded on a qualitative, ontological-categorial version of the Peano ordinal successor function of the “Peano-Dedekind Postulates”, the four, “first-order-logic” axioms for the Standard “Natural” Numbers, N.

 

The simple essence of this ‘Qualo-Peanic Dialectical Method’, is to append the subscript of the ordinally first category-symbol in your category-symbols progression – the «arché»-category’s symbol – next to and on the right-hand-side of the subscript(s) of a duplicate of the category-symbol that you have most recently formed, in order to form the consecutive next category-symbol in your progression, be it a ‘self-hybrid’ or ‘merely-hybrid’ next category-symbol.  This procedure is equivalent to applying an ‘ordinal-qualitative’ version of the, ultra-simple, ordinal-quantitative, Peano successor function –  

 

s(n) = n+1, for any “Natural” number n.

 

This qualitative successor function inheres in the Seldonian NON-Standard Model of the first-order-logic axioms of the “Natural” Numbers, the _NQ Model.

 

As we have often noted before, the Standard Peano successor function, s, is already an ultra-simplified, vestigial case of the dialectical «aufheben» function itself.  That is, when s operates on n – 

s(n) = n + 1 

– where n is a variable standing for any Standard “Natural” Number, the effect of s on n is to determinately negate n, making it into a not-n in the determinate form of – 

n + 1 

– which also, visibly, conserves n, but also elevates n, by one ordinal unit, ‘1’, up into the consecutively-next, next-higher – the successor – Standard, Peano “Natural” Numbers ordinal scale.

The rules of the Encyclopedia Dialectica, algorithmic-heuristic, ‘Qualo-Peanic Dialectical Method” are as follows:

§1.  First write down your category-symbol for what you take to be the starting-category, or ‘«arché»-category’, for the subject-matter field that you want to, ‘condensedly’, model; to learn; or to present – call it, generically, q_a.

 

§2.  Next, place, to the right of that first category-symbol, right after placing one blank space, a non-amalgamative “plus sign”, ‘Å’, at script-level, and then, after placing another blank space to the right of that “plus sign”, place a second category-symbol, but with the subscript of your very first category-symbol, ‘_a’, re-appended, again, next to and to the right of the subscript of your very first, or «arché», category-symbol, also ‘_a’.  The ‘Å’ sign, for “physical addition” – e.g., for “non-amalgamative” addition – goes, at script level, between those, now two, similarly-subscripted category-symbols, thus ‘‘‘adding’’’ a second category-symbol, ‘q_aa’, to your initial, arché» category-symbol, q_a; a second category-symbol with a double, repeat subscript: generically,

‘q_a Å q_aa’.

 

§3.  Next, replace that repeat-subscript of that second category-symbol, if you can, with a single, different subscript, generically, ordinally, ‘_b’, that abbreviates a name for your meaning for the new units-kind represented by that new, second category-symbol, and replacing its two, repeat subscripts, ‘_aa’, with that subscript, ‘_b’.  This second, new units-kind category-symbol, q_b, is so as to ‘‘‘contain’’’, referentially, multiple new units, each of which is a new, unifying combination of two or more former units of your starting-category, q_a.  Generically, your dialectical, ontological, categorial progression is now ‘q_a Å q_b’. 

§4.  From then on, to construct each next category-symbol in your category-symbols progression for your chosen subject-matter Domain, just copy your last/most-recent, right-most category-symbol, and place that copy to the right of itself, after placing a non-amalgamative addition operation-sign, ‘Å’, there first, between them, at script level. Then, simply append the subscript for your starting category – generically, here, ‘_a’ – to the right of the subscript(s) of that copy of your last category-symbol.  Next, try to find a single character that ‘character-izes’, or abbreviates the name of, and thus can mnemonically replace, the resulting multiple subscripts, by a lesser number of subscripts; best by a single subscript.  For example, the next step to our generic example, above, is to form the sequence q_a Å q_b Å q_ba.  Then find, if you can, a single-word name for category description q_ba, and abbreviate that name by its initial letter, if non-redundant – perhaps “g”, the ordinally third letter of the Greek alphabet – as subscript, thus obtaining: ‘q_a Å q_b Å q_g’.  Continue iterating this step, together with applying rule §5., below, whenever rule §5. is applicable, until a category-symbol results whose potential meaning you do not recognize, and cannot define or name.

 

§5.  If this adding of the subscript of the starting category-symbol, generically ‘_a’ , creates a repeat subscript, then, for consistency, replace that repeat subscript with the single subscript by which you replaced that repeat subscript previously, earlier in your category-symbols progression so far.  Or, if this repeat subscript is new – has not arisen before in your category-symbols progression so far – then replace it with, if you can, a single-character subscript, abbreviating the name of the category that you recognize as the next higher ‘self-hybrid’ units-kind that fits for what this new category-symbol describes for you.

 

The JPG images posted at the top of this blog-entry may help to clarify this ‘algorithmic-heuristic’ method further.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For more information regarding these Seldonian insights, and to read and/or download, free of charge, PDFs and/or JPGs of Foundation books, other texts, and images, please see:

 

www.dialectics.info

 

and

 

https://independent.academia.edu/KarlSeldon

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For partially pictographical, ‘poster-ized’ visualizations of many of these Seldonian insights -- specimens of ‘dialectical art’ – as well as dialectically-illustrated books published by the F.E.D. Press, see –

 

https://www.etsy.com/shop/DialecticsMATH

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

¡ENJOY!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Regards,

 

 

 

 

Miguel Detonacciones,

 

Voting Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.];

Elected Member, F.E.D. General Council;

Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison;

Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.

 

 

 

 

 

 

YOU are invited to post your comments on this blog-entry below!