**Part**

**12**: Seldon

**--**

__Present__s Series
‘

*‘***Oppositional Product**’__s__*and**‘‘‘*,**Product**’’’__s__of Opposition__s__*Boolean***.***vs**‘*. ’**-**__Contra__**Boolean**’
Dear

**,***Readers*
It is my pleasure,

**my honor,***and**as***officer of the***an***Foundation****[**__Encyclopedia Dialectica__**F**.**.**__E__**.] Office of Public Liaison, to**__D__**with***share***, from time to time,***you**as***are approved for public release by the***they***F**.**.**__E__**. General Council, key**__D__**from the***excerpt*__s__**i**__nt__**e**__rn__**a**__l__**,***writing*__s__**from the***and***i**__nt__**e**__rn__**a**__l__**, of***saying*__s__**o**__ur____co__*-*, Karl Seldon.**founder**
The

**such release in this***twelfth**new***is entered below [Some***series***.**__E__**. standard edits**__D__*have**been***, in the***applied**version***below, to the direct transcript of**__present__ed**o**__ur____co__*-*’s**founder****].***discourse*
For

**,***more information*__regarding__**for [***and***]***further**instantiation*__s__**, these Seldonian**__of__**, please***insight*__s__**--***see*
ENJOY!

Regards,

Miguel Detonacciones,

Member,

**Foundation****[**__Encyclopedia Dialectica__**F**.**.**__E__**.],**__D__
Participant,

**F**.**.**__E__**. Special Council for Public Liaison,**__D__
Officer,

**F**.**.**__E__**. Office of Public Liaison.**__D__**“**...

**the**

*Perhaps*

*starkest***to**

*way*

*portray*

*the***--**

*difference*

*even*

*the**‘*-- of

**-**__opposite__**ness**’

*the*

*original*

*Boolean***in**

*algebra***to**

*relation***o**

__ur__*‘*, is

**-**__contra__**Boolean’****algebra****:**

*this*
“

**(1)**In*Boolean***, the***logic***,**__gen__eric*algebraic***for***representation**physical***[***opposite*__s__*“*]**primary****proposition**”__s__**for***or*__propositional__**[***opposite*__s__*“*] is**secondary proposition**”__s__*the***:***following***(x)**

**.**

*vs***(1**

**–**

**x)**.”

“In

*Boolean***, there is***logic*__no____reconciliation__*of*__speci__fic**,***opposite*__s__*or**of***-***opposition**in**-*. “__gen__eral
“The

**of***product**two**opposite*__s__**,**__produces____precisely____NOTHING__**0**--*a**‘‘‘*in which both**lose**-**lose****situation**’’’*“*are**side**”__s__**--***lost***(x)**

**x**

**(1**

**–**

**x)**

**=**

**0**,

which
is

**the***also**Boolean***of Aristotle’s ‘‘‘Law of***expression*__NON__*-*Contradiction’’’;
This

*expression**also**algebraically***that --***implies***x**

**-**

**x**

^{2}**=**

**0**,

which

*further**algebraically***--***implies***x**

**=**

**x**

^{2}
--
which is

*algebraically***to --***equivalent***x**

^{2}**=**

**x**

--
which is Boole’s

*“*,**Fundamental Law of Thought**”*or**“*. It**Law of**”__Du__ality**that**

*implies*

*logical*

__NON__*-*

**linearity**

*reduces***to**

__im__mediately

__absolute__**.**

__linearity__

*There*

*is*

*no**‘*

__expanded__**reproduction****of ideas**

*/m*__e__me__s__*’*

*modeled***.**

*here*
For

*Boolean***,***logic**there**is***the***only**‘‘‘*of**’’’**__simple__reproduction*ideas**/categor*__ies__*/*__classes__
[

*‘***Boolean***‘‘‘*(**-**__self__**)***s**election**’’’*is*gainless**’*].”
“

**(2)**In the**Foundation**’**s***‘*,**-**__contra__**Boolean***,*__dialectic__al**Logic**’**,***on the*__contra__ry

__x__

^{2}**=**

__x__+

__Delta__**,**

__x__

*modeling*

*a*

__qual__itatively

__expanding__

*reproduction***[**

*of*

__ideo__*-*]

*ontological***,**

*categor*__ies__**the**

*via***on**

*second term*

*this***’**

*equation*

*s*

*Right**-*,

**Hand Side**

__Delta__**,**

__x__

*as well as*

*conserving the Boolean moment via the recurrence of the***,**

__x__*variable as the first term*

*also on the Right**-*. The

**Hand Side of****this equation****of**

*product*

*categorial*

*opposite*__s__

*always*

__possibly__**,**

*yields***,**

*again***, the**

*yes**‘‘‘*of

**’’’**__simple__reproduction

*those*

*opposite*

*categor*__ies__

*as*

*free**-*,

**standing**

__un__reconciled**,**

*opposite*__s__

*but***,**

*also***[**

__plus__**+**],

*a*

__possible__**,**

*reconciliation*

*a**‘‘‘*,

**’’’**__syn__thesis

*or**‘‘‘*

**complex**

__unit__y*’’’*, of the

*two*

*thus*

*become***,**

__one__**<<**

*a**>>*

**tertium quid**

*category**-*

**--**

**named**__unit__

__q___{ }

_{Delta }

_{x}_{;}

_{ }

**.**

_{x}

**the**

*Using**‘*

**-**__meta____gen__ealogical__e__volute**product****rule**’**,**

*axiom***have --**

*we*

__x__**x**

__Delta__

__x__**=**

__x__**+**

__Delta__

__x__**+**

__q___{ }

_{Delta }

_{x}_{;}

_{ }

**.**

_{x}**”**