Thursday, June 25, 2015

Karl Seldon’s Sagacious Sayings Series -- #9. '''>>AUTO-Kinesis<<''' and/versus '''>>ALLO-Kinesis<<'''.










[My] Full TitleKarl Seldons Sagacious Sayings Series, #9 --

'''<<AUTO-Kinesis>>''' and/versus '''<<ALLO-Kinesis>>'''.







Dear Readers,



From time to time, I like to share with you some of the gems of insight that leap from out of the ‘‘‘multilogues’’’, among Karl Seldon and other members of the Foundation, and from the transcribed versions, published internally, including of those ‘‘‘multilogues’’’ in which I did not happen to participate, when and if those [edited] transcripts are cleared for public sharing by the Foundations General Council.


Below is an excerpt of Karl Seldon's remarks from the edited transcript of a recent such ‘‘‘multilogue’’’. 

 

Regards,

 

Miguel



 

 

 

F.E.D. Definition of the term 'Dialectical <<Auto-Kinesis>>' --  

http://feddialectics-miguel.blogspot.com/search?q=dialectical+auto-kinesis

 


 

 

 

[Karl Seldon]:

 

 

 










Wednesday, June 24, 2015

‘Rocke-Nazi’ Stealth ‘Humanocide’: Maternal Mortality Rate DOUBLES in the United States -- GLOBAL STRATEGIC HYPOTHESES.



Rocke-Nazi Stealth Humanocide:  Official Maternal Mortality Rate DOUBLES in the United States -- GLOBAL STRATEGIC HYPOTHESES.







Dear Readers,


GLOBAL STRATEGIC HYPOTHESES:  The [so-called] “Scientific” American magazine, having long ago prostituted itself to the Rocke-Nazi Plutocracy, and to their strategy of ‘‘‘Eugenocidal’’’, ‘“people are pollution’’’ population reduction, and of reversal of the historic growth of the social forces of production in general, including protracted reduction in the standards of living of the U. S. working class in particular, as well as of the world working class entire -- of course, all on pious [PSEUDO-]“ecological” grounds -- recently found itself having to make a most uncomfortable admission, and to try to defuse that admission in a most clumsy and contrived fashion. 

In a 08 June 2015 on-line posting, “Scientific” “American” wrote as follows -- “statistics in recent years have revealed a worrisome trend:  the rate of maternal mortality in the U.S. has more than doubled in the past few decades. Whereas 7.2 women died per 100,000 births in 1987, that number swelled to 17.8 deaths per 100,000 live births in 2009 and 2011. The uptick occurred even as maternal mortality dropped in less-developed settings around the world. Now women giving birth in the U.S. are at a higher risk of dying than those giving birth in China or Saudi Arabia. The reason for this disturbing trend has eluded researchers, however.”

The Huffington Post, in a 19 June 2015 on-line posting, offered a rather more honest assessment of this disgusting and inexcusable catastrophe --


American maternal mortality rates rose over a 20-year period at a rate that places the U.S. in the company of war-torn countries like Afghanistan and impoverished nations like Chad and Swaziland, according to a new report.”


“The findings were recently published in the Lancet by the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, a global health research center at the University of Washington. They comprise over 20 years of maternal health data from around the globe. The report shows that there are 18.5 maternal deaths per 100,000 live births in the U.S., up from 12.4 deaths per 100,000 births in 1990.”




“Dr. Nicholas Kassebaum, the lead author of the study and a pediatric anesthesiologist at Seattle Children's Hospital, said the findings show that America has a long way to go when it comes to identifying and caring for women at risk of pregnancy-related complications.”

“ "In the global context, yes -- the United States has a low maternal mortality rate," Kassebaum told The Huffington Post. "But we rank 60th in the world, and below virtually every other developed nation. We're close to triple the rate of the U.K. and eight times that of Iceland, the world's leader." ”

“What is it about the U.S. that makes pregnancy more deadly?”

“It all comes down to health care access ... the pitfalls and perils of trying to gain access to affordable care in the U.S. compared to other nations.”[http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/05/19/us-maternal-mortality-rate_n_5340648.html]



OUR HYPOTHESIS.  Ironically, and in a way in which the Huffington Post writer no doubt never intended, in her comparison of the U. S. maternal death rate to those of “war torn countries”, the U. S. too is a ‘“war torn country”’. 

But the ‘‘‘war’’’ that is tearing the U.S. apart is a somewhat -- to some eyes -- invisible war, a stealth war of ‘humanocide’, against the U. S. working class, and, indeed, against “the 99%” of the people of the United States entire, by the Rocke-Nazi ‘‘‘invisible dictatorship’’’. 

The rising U. S. maternal death rates, we hypothesize, are just one more outcome of that stealth humanocide.

The Rocke-Nazis, as they converge toward their planned global, humanocidaldictatorship, seem to fear the people of the United States more than any other people. 

They seem to be quite self-assured that their state-capitalist ‘partner-dictatorships’, and their state-capitalist ‘servant-dictatorships’, that impose low-wage near-slavery upon their local working classes, elsewhere in the world -- especially in state-capitalist China, and even in their newest ‘partner-dictatorship’:  state-capitalist Cuba! -- can keep their people down, quite reliably, as well as that the burgeoning EU dictatorship, which is, e.g., murdering Greece, the original home of democracy, and in which unconstitutional police-state surveillance legislation, legalizing universal human rights violating practices that rival those of the U. S. NSA, are passing apace, can, using Greece as a model, grind down the rest of the European peoples into servile submission, and into even-further-accelerated “population reduction”. [For more about the global demographic decline that the stealth humanocide program of the Rocke-Nazishas already achieved, see Jonathan V. Last, What To Expect When No One’s Expecting, Encounter Books, 2013, which is one of the few recent books to analyze this demographic debacle, though it is also, unfortunately, marred by various right-wind delusions].

However, when it comes to the people of the U.S. -- who seem, to superficial observation, to be perhaps the most deluded and “dumbed-down” of all among the global “sheeple” -- the Rocke-Nazishave embarked upon the most comprehensive and coordinated multi-vectored stealth humanocideattack in their whole horrific history.

By ‘de-industrializing’ the U.S., hemorrhaging U.S. manufacturing jobs to their state-capitalist, low-wage,  near-slavery ‘servant-dictatorships’ abroad, thereby de-unionizing, unemploying’, and impoverishing the U. S. working class so that more and more U. S. workers cannot afford nutritious real foods, healthy residential environments, or basic medical care; by denying the universal health care access that is standard in the rest of the “First World”; by formulating and promoting deadly-bacteria-infested, obesity-inducing, diabetes-inducing, heart-disease-inducing, cancer-inducing, and dementia-inducing pseudo-foods and dietary policies; by engineering and mass-prescribing deadly designer-side-effects-inducing pseudo-medicines, and by “treating” the resulting, engineered-in side-effects cascades with ever more prescriptions of further designer-side-effects-inducing pseudo-medicines, and by further inducing exponentially-rising autism and dementia epidemics [with autism afflicting 1 in 110 U. S. children as of 2009; see graph below] in part, via adulterated vaccines, laced with squalene, to “over-rev” the recipients’ immune systems, inducing auto-immune diseases, and with thiomersal, to impose Mercury-poisoning on those recipients, and with cancer-causing formaldehyde, and with viruses, including those causing the paralyzing Guillain-Barre' syndrome, the Rocke-Nazishave mounted a withering assault on the cognitive powers, the powers to resist the rising Rocke-Nazidictatorship, and the very survival, of the American people --








That the Rocke-Nazisstill feel they still must conduct these mass murders in ‘‘‘stealth’’’ mode, means that humanity still has a fighting chance to rid itself of the Rocke-Nazi Pest[ilence]’ -- if enough of us wake up, and take pro-humanity ACTION, in time!



Regards,

Miguel























Sunday, June 21, 2015

Karl Seldon’s Sagacious Sayings Series -- #8. 'Memeo-mnemonisis' and 'Memeo-genesis'.










[My] Full TitleKarl Seldons Sagacious Sayings Series, #8 --

'Memeo-mnemonisis' and 'Memeo-genesis'.







Dear Readers,



From time to time, I like to share with you some of the gems of insight that leap from out of the ‘‘‘multilogues’’’, among Karl Seldon and other members of the Foundation, and from the transcribed versions, published internally, including of those ‘‘‘multilogues’’’ in which I did not happen to participate, when and if those [edited] transcripts are cleared for public sharing by the Foundations General Council.


Below is an excerpt of Karl Seldon's remarks from the edited transcript of a recent such ‘‘‘multilogue’’’. 

 

 

Regards,

 

Miguel



 

 

 


[Karl Seldon]:

 

". . . Use of the NQ_ dialectical arithmetic is, with respect to the "memes" already generated in the formation/constitution of the present 'human phenome', 'MEMEO-MNEMONIC' -- that is, its use serves to remind its users of those "memes", in their inner, systematic[-dialectical] interconnexion."

"Use of the NQ_ dialectical arithmetic is, with respect to the birthing of new "memes" from out of the "memes" generated in the past, and already/still present within the present 'human phenome', 'MEMEO-GENETIC' -- that is, its use tends to guide and to catalyze its users in the discovery/invention of those new "memes" that inhere in "the adjacent possible" for those users' psychohistorical epoch. . . ."




Friday, June 19, 2015

E. D. Notation. Signs for '[Self-]Meta-UNIT-ization' >>Aufheben<< Relations/Processes.








Dear Readers,



A new 'text+ module', specifiying the Encyclopedia Dialectica designs & definitions for the signs representing its KEY Concepts of <<Aufheben>> '[Self-]Meta-<<MONAD>>-ization' -- symbols for the core relations and/or processes that characterize typical dialectical progressions -- has recently been cleared for posting to the www.dialectics.org  Glossary Page.


I have also posted this 'text+ <<monad>>' here, below, for your convenience.



Regards,

Miguel






















Wednesday, June 17, 2015

Karl Seldon’s Sagacious Sayings Series -- #7. Mechanisms of ‘[Self-]Meta-«Monad»-ization’: Generic versus Specific.










[My] Full TitleKarl Seldons Sagacious Sayings Series, #7 --

Mechanisms of ‘[Self-]Meta-«Monad»-ization:   Generic versus Specific.







Dear Readers,



From time to time, I like to share with you some of the gems of insight that leap from out of the ‘‘‘multilogues’’’, among Karl Seldon and other members of the Foundation, and from the transcribed versions, published internally, including of those ‘‘‘multilogues’’’ in which I did not happen to participate, when and if those [edited] transcripts are cleared for public sharing by the Foundations General Council.


Below is an excerpt of Karl Seldon's remarks from the edited transcript of a recent such ‘‘‘multilogue’’’. 

 

 

Regards,

 

Miguel



 

 

 


[Karl Seldon]:

 




For a «Genos», like that of dialectics, which is universal in its scope, and in its span, the diversity implicit within it, the vastness of the «differentia specifica», that separate, and that distinguish, its «species», and all of the individual differences of their specimens/instances, or «monads», must be maximal; must be the widest imaginable, or even wide beyond any possible human[oid anticipatory imagination.  Only experience and exploration, only “induction”, can, at length, ever hope to encompass such an expanse.”

“Similarly:  Given the universality of the dialectical, «aufheben» processes that we have named meta-«monad»-ization’, and meta-unit-ization’, in the formation of new kinds of units, or of «monads», and, thus, in the formation of new «arithmoi», of new ‘‘‘numbers’’’ of these new kinds of units, and, thus, in the formation of new ontology, of new [ontological] categories, for human[oid] minds, in our cosmos, it is to be expected, upon generic dialectical grounds, that the specific mechanisms of this general «aufheben» process will exhibit enormous variation in detail, from each predecessor taxonomy level one self-hybrid «monads»-formation, to its successor self-hybrid «monads»-formation, across the entire expanse of the meta-genealogy of our cosmos, such as has been actualized in cosmological history to-date.”

“From the protons and neutrons as nuclear sub-atomic «monads», as meta-«monads»’ of their quark and gluon sub-«monads»’, each held together, internally, by gluonic color forces, to the electrically neutral atom «monads», as meta-«monads»’ of their sub-«monads»’ -- electron and proton/neutron nuclei -- bound together by electrodynamic forces, to the molecule «monads», as the more massive meta-«monads»’ of their sub-«monads»’ -- atom «monads» -- also bound together by electrodynamic forces, to the pre-eukaryotic living cells, as still more massive meta-«monads»’ of their sub-«monads»’ -- molecule  «monads» -- bound together by mechanical forces, and beyond, the mechanisms that generate, and that sustain, all of this neo-monado-genesis, exhibit a vast ‘[natural-]historically specific diversity, one of diverse mechanisms that all generate, from a ‘[natural-]historically generic point-of-view, the same, unified generic outcome:  the outcome that we call  dialectical, ‘[self-aufheben»’, ‘[self-]meta-«monad»-ization’, forming the metafinite qualo-fractal -- qualo-fractalboth synchronically and diachronically, both presently-spatially and historically-temporally -- process and product of the self-construction of our cosmos.”

“What would be momentous would be to be able to model a meta-genealogical meta-evolution of this progression of specific mechanisms/forces of monadic composition as a meta-monadic dialectic in its own right.











Monday, June 15, 2015

Dialogue on 'Full Zero and Singularity Semantification' -- Hermes de Nemores and "J2U".








Dear Readers,



FYI:  The edited transcript of a recent dialogue, via correspondence, between frequent www.dialectics.org website guest author "Joy-to-You" ["J2U" for short], and Hermes de Nemores ["HdN" for short], F.E.D.'s Secretary-General, and Chairperson of the F.E.D. General Council, on the topic of 'the full zero 'meta-number' and singularity semantification', is now being posted to the www.dialectics.org website, as a new entry within Aoristos's Blog.




Regards,

Miguel Detonacciones,
Member, F.E.D.,
Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison







Tuesday, June 09, 2015

E. D. Definition. '''Dialectical Negation'''.








Dear Readers,



A new 'text-module', specifiying the Encyclopedia Dialectica definition for one of its key concepts, 'Dialectical Negation', has been cleared for posting to the www.dialectics.org  Glossary Page.


I have also posted this 'text-<<monad>>' here, below, for your convenience.



Regards,

Miguel






















E. D. Definition. ‘Dialectical «Auto-Kinesis»’.








Dear Readers,



A new 'text-module', specifiying the Encyclopedia Dialectica definition for one of its key concepts, 'Dialectical <<Auto-Kinesis>> [Self-Change]', has been cleared for posting to the www.dialectics.org  Glossary Page.


I have also posted this 'text-<<monad>>' here, below, for your convenience.



Regards,

Miguel






















Saturday, June 06, 2015

Karl Seldon’s Sagacious Sayings Series -- #6. The Opening Sentence of Marx’s Das Kapital.











Full TitleKarl Seldons Sagacious Sayings Series, #6 --

The Opening Sentence of Marxs «Das Kapital»

and the -- Meta-Pythagorean’ -- ‘Universal Theory of «Arithmoi»’.



 

 

 

 

Dear Readers,


From time to time, I like to share with you some of the gems of insight that leap from out of the ‘‘‘multilogues’’’, among Karl Seldon and other members of the Foundation, and from the transcribed versions, published internally, including of those ‘‘‘multilogues’’’ in which I did not happen to participate, when and if those [edited] transcripts are cleared for public sharing by the Foundations General Council.


Below is an excerpt from the transcript of a recent such ‘‘‘multilogue’’’. 

 

The content of this ‘‘‘multilogue’’’ extract should be grasped in the light of previous content presented here, regarding the F.E.D. Meta-Pythagorean Proposition’, and Universal Theory of «Arithmoi»’ --

 

http://www.dialectics.org/dialectics/Glossary_files/Glossary,Definition,Plate_1_of_3,The_Seldonian_Synthesis_of_Ancient_Arithmoi_Theory_and_Modern_Arithmetic_Theory,02NOV2014.jpg

 

http://www.dialectics.org/dialectics/Glossary_files/Glossary,Definition,Plate_2_of_3,The_Seldonian_Synthesis_of_Ancient_Arithmoi_Theory_and_Modern_Arithmetic_Theory,02NOV2014.jpg

 

http://www.dialectics.org/dialectics/Glossary_files/Glossary,Definition,Plate_3_of_3,The_Seldonian_Synthesis_of_Ancient_Arithmoi_Theory_and_Modern_Arithmetic_Theory,02NOV2014.jpg.

 

http://feddialectics-miguel.blogspot.com/2011/09/fed-meta-pythagorean-proposition.html

 

 

 

Regards,

 

Miguel



 

 

 


[Karl Seldon]: 
... For example, the global capitalist system is, from one fundamental point of view, an «arithmos» of commodity units [later, in a systematic-dialectical, categorial-progression presentation of such, seen, after the progressive evocation of somewhat greater explicitude, to consist, primarily, of units of the commodity-CAPITALs category, qKC [---) q5] -- a ‘‘‘number’’’ of commodities in the ancient sense, i.e., an assemblage of qualitative units, or «monads», each of which is an individual commodity, but also in the modern sense, that of an exact abstract “number” which represents the global census of commodities, e.g., at/for a given instant of historical time.”

 

However, that exact “number” of commodities, in the modern sense, may not be known with certainty, for any given instant of historical time -- may never be so known -- and need not be so known, e.g., for the presentation of Marx’s scientific theory of the global, world-market, capitals-system. 

 

That exact numerosity, that precise count, can remain indefinite -- a generic, ‘‘‘indefinite number’’’, never specified -- without that condition detracting from that presentation one iota!

 

It is the characteristics, the qualities, that all such units share in common, that is important, for connoting, and for knowing the essence of, the category, or the concept, that Marx named commodities [qC = C [---) q1].

 

Of course, in the course of his systematic, critical presentation of the global, world-market, capitals-system, Marx goes on to show that, and to show how, this concrete/qualitative ‘‘‘number’’’, or assemblage, of commodities exists in systematic interconnexion to/with other such concrete/qualitative ‘‘‘numbers’’’, assemblages, or «arithmoi».

 

E.g., the capitals category is also, from various points-of-view, an «arithmos» of monetary units [qCC  qM  = M [---) q2], and an «arithmos» of [abstract, and of concrete] labor hour units, and an «arithmos»  of individual capital units, etc.

 

Marx wrote, in his Preface to the first German edition of Capital, volume I, as follows, about his choice of the «arché» category, or starting category, for his systematic-dialectical, categorial-progression presentation of the modern, present, capitalist, system of human-social reproduction --  

 

“...in bourgeois society the commodity-form of the product of labour -- or the value-form of the commodity -- is the economic cell-form.” [Karl Marx, Capital I, NW, 1867, p. 8].

 

 

The opening sentence of that same masterpiece of critical human-social science, of that same ‘‘‘immanent critique’’’ of ideology-contaminated science, and of that pioneering work of psychohistorical meta-science, conveys this concrete/qualitative ‘‘‘number’’’ character -- this «arithmos» character -- of the opening category of its categorial progression, or progression of «arithmoi»’, in the following words -- 

 

“The wealth of those societies in which the capitalist mode of production prevails, presents itself as “an immense accumulation of commodities,”1 its unit being a single commodity.”

 

1 Karl Marx, “Zur Kritik der Politischen Oekonomie.” Berlin, 1859, p. 3.”