Karl Seldon’s Sagacious Sayings Series -- #7. Mechanisms of ‘[Self-]Meta-«Monad»-ization’: Generic versus Specific.

 

[My] Full Title:  Karl Seldon’s Sagacious Sayings Series, #7 --

Mechanisms of ‘[Self-]Meta-«Monad»-ization’:   Generic versus Specific.

Dear Reader,

From time to time, I like to share with you some of the gems of insight that leap from out of the ‘‘‘multilogues’’’, among Karl Seldon and other members of the Foundation, and from the transcribed versions, published internally, including of those ‘‘‘multilogues’’’ in which I did not happen to participate, when and if those [edited] transcripts are cleared for public sharing by the Foundation’s General Council.


Below is an excerpt of Karl Seldon's remarks from the edited transcript of a recent such ‘‘‘multilogue’’’. 

Regards,

Miguel

 

 

 

[Karl Seldon]:

 

“For a «Genos», like that of dialectics, which is universal in its scope, and in its span, the diversity implicit within it, the vastness of the «differentia specifica», that separate, and that distinguish, its «species», and all of the individual differences of their specimens/instances, or «monads», must be maximal; must be the widest imaginable, or even wide beyond any possible human[oid] anticipatory imagination.  Only experience and exploration, only “induction”, can, at length, ever hope to encompass such an expanse.”

“Similarly:  Given the universality of the dialectical, «aufheben» processes that we have named ‘meta-«monad»-ization’, and ‘meta-unit-ization’, in the formation of new kinds of units, or of «monads», and, thus, in the formation of new «arithmoi», of new ‘‘‘numbers’’’ of these new kinds of units, and, thus, in the formation of new ontology, of new [ontological] categories, for human[oid] minds, in our cosmos, it is to be expected, upon generic dialectical grounds, that the specific mechanisms of this general «aufheben» process will exhibit enormous variation in detail, from each predecessor taxonomy level one ‘self-hybrid’ «monads»-formation, to its successor ‘self-hybrid’ «monads»-formation, across the entire expanse of the ‘meta-genealogy’ of our cosmos, such as has been actualized in cosmological history to-date.”

“From the protons and neutrons as nuclear sub-atomic «monads», as ‘meta-«monads»’ of their “quark” and “gluon” ‘sub-«monads»’, each held together, internally, by gluonic “color forces”, to the electrically neutral “atom” «monads», as ‘meta-«monads»’ of their ‘sub-«monads»’ -- electron and proton/neutron nuclei -- bound together by “electrodynamic forces”, to the “molecule” «monads», as the more massive ‘meta-«monads»’ of their ‘sub-«monads»’ -- atom «monads» -- also bound together by “electrodynamic forces”, to the pre-eukaryotic living cells, as still more massive ‘meta-«monads»’ of their ‘sub-«monads»’ -- molecule  «monads» -- bound together by “mechanical forces”, and beyond, the mechanisms that generate, and that sustain, all of this ‘neo-monado-genesis’, exhibit a vast ‘[natural-]historically specific’ diversity, one of diverse mechanisms that all generate, from a ‘[natural-]historically generic’ point-of-view, 'essence-ially' the same, unified generic outcome:  the outcome that we call  dialectical, ‘[self-]«aufheben»’, ‘[self-]meta-«monad»-ization’, forming the ‘metafinite qualo-fractal’ -- ‘qualo-fractal’ both ~synchronically and diachronically, both presently-spatially and historically-temporally -- process and product of the self-construction of our cosmos.”

“What would be momentous would be to be able to model a ‘meta-genealogical meta-evolution’ of this progression of specific mechanisms/“forces” of monadic composition as a ‘meta-monadic’ dialectic in its own right.”