**First Guest Author** --

I have reproduced, below, the latest blog entry of Aoristos Dyosphainthos, the Public Liaison Officer of **F**.**E**.**D**., from his blog at

www.dialectics.org:

http://www.dialectics.org/dialectics/Aoristoss_Blog/Entries/2012/5/19_The_F.E.D._Psychohistorical_Equations.html
Regards,

Miguel

"**The ****F**.__E__.__D__.** ***'''**Psychohistorical**-*__Dialectical__ Equations*'''*

The Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [**F**.__E__.__D__.] ‘‘‘Psychohistorical-Dialectical
Equations’’’ were designed, by the General Council of **F**.__E__.__D__., to create a ‘Time-Vault of
the Future’, by means of a ‘meta-planetarium projector’, -- named the ‘‘‘**F**.__E__.__D__. Prime Radiant’’’, to project
3-D holographic representations of the solution-scenarios of this system of
“simultaneous” 'dialectical meta-equations', and of their scenario-valued variables, for future values
of their time-variables, i.e., to algorithmically ‘pre-construct’
dialectical-mathematically-generated richly-determinate imagery for the future
history expected per these equations.

All but one of these seven equations utilize the ‘__Dyad__ic
Seldon Function’ formulation of dialectical ontological progressions [ **=** of [revolutionary *new*]
__kinds__-*of-being* progressions], a function which
was defined earlier in this series, and which is also defined via the following
link –

The **F**.__E__.__D__.
General Council is thereby enabled to anticipate – in timing, and in
event-content – approaching “Seldon Crises”, for more about which, in terms of their
[science-]fictional instantiation by Isaac Asimov, see –

I have listed, below, this system of seven dialectical
equations, which are to be solved ‘‘‘simultaneously’’’ for the new ontology
possibly emergent during the __t__ime period, **t****x** [denoting the generic ‘‘‘epoch’’’ of the dialectical
progression denoted by **x**] of the future value of
that __t__ime-period
variable which is to be solved-for.

The versions of the **F**.__E__.__D__.
‘‘‘Psychohistorical-Dialectical Equations’’’ rendered and partially explicated further
below, are all rendered in the rule-based ideographical algebraic language-system
of the **F**.__E__.__D__. “First Dialectical Arithmetic
/ Algebra”, denoted by __N____Q___.

The nine core algorithms, rules, or “axioms” of this
language, presented earlier in this series, are also available via the
following links –

[pp. I-144 through I-146].
-- and are also summarized, via largely ideographical symbolization, in the following '*.jpg' image --

The versions of these equations that are used by the
‘dialectical psychohistorians’ of the

**F**.__E__.__D__.
General Council, and that would be capable of driving the ‘‘‘

**F**.__E__.__D__. Prime Radiant’’’, are
formulated in a higher, richer dialectical language than that of the

**N**__Q__,
purely-qualitative algebra used here – a language that arises later in the
dialectical, ‘ideo-ontological’ progression-presentation of the

**F**.__E__.__D__. systems of dialectical
language. Needless to say, this
dialectical language is one of the

*‘*__quant__o-**qual**itative’, rather
than one of the "purely"-

**qual**itative, dialectical languages that arises in that
progression.

We do not [yet] publicly disclose the rules-system of that
dialectical language. The optimal
historical timing of its disclosure is itself a matter for the most delicate
psychohistorical-dialectical calculation.
However, immediately below, I give a summary description of the early
dialectical language systems in the order that they are covered in that
dialectical-systematic presentation, a presentation which we can summarily
model by a ‘Dyadic Seldon Function’-based dialectical equation, also formulated
in the **N**__Q__
dialectical language.

The generic [unspecified; unsolved] ontology symbols of
the **N**__Q__
dialectic are **N**__Q__ __=__ **{**__q__**1**,** **__q__**2**,** **__q__**3**,** …}**.

##
The axiomatic system that governs the
'algorithmics' of these **N**__Q__ ‘meta-numbers’ is denoted by __N____Q___.

The notational conventions adhered to herein, to the
extent that the typographical limitations of this medium allow, are summarized
here --

http://www.dialectics.org/dialectics/Welcome_files/F.E.D.,%20A%20Dialectical%20%27%27Theory%20of%20Everything%27%27,%20Volume%200,%20FOUNDATIONS,%20Edition%201.00,%20last%20updated%2029SEP2011,%20Prefatories,%20ENCYCLOPEDIA%20DIALECTICA%20NOTATION,%201st%20Module,%20JPEG,%20for%2030SEP2011.jpg
http://www.dialectics.org/dialectics/Welcome_files/F.E.D.,%20A%20Dialectical%20%27%27Theory%20of%20Everything%27%27,%20Volume%200,%20FOUNDATIONS,%20Edition%201.00,%20last%20updated%2029SEP2011,%20Prefatories,%20ENCYCLOPEDIA%20DIALECTICA%20NOTATION,%202nd%20Module,%20JPEG,%20for%2030SEP2011.jpg

http://www.dialectics.org/dialectics/Welcome_files/F.E.D.,%20A%20Dialectical%20%27%27Theory%20of%20Everything%27%27,%20Volume%200,%20FOUNDATIONS,%20Draft%20Edition%201.00%20Draft,%20last%20updated%2014JUL2012,%20E.D.%20Dialectical%20Equations%20Notational%20Conventions,%20Module%20%231%20of%202.jpg
http://www.dialectics.org/dialectics/Welcome_files/F.E.D.,%20A%20Dialectical%20%27%27Theory%20of%20Everything%27%27,%20Volume%200,%20FOUNDATIONS,%20Draft%20Edition%201.00%20Draft,%20last%20updated%2014JUL2012,%20E.D.%20Dialectical%20Equations%20Notational%20Conventions,%20Module%20%232%20of%202.jpg
In the sequel, we use the symbol ‘

__=__’
to stand in place of the phrase “is equal to, by definition”.

The underscored mnemonic symbols stand for ‘dialectical
meta-numbers’ – i.e., for purely-qualitative values that operate, arithmetically
and algebraically, according to the

**F**.__E__.__D__.
*‘Fundamental Rule of Dialectical Logic’*,
a rule that was proven deductively here, from the

__N____Q___
axioms, previously in this series. We give that proof here again, below, for ease of reader reference --

The following image presents the **generic** version of the **E**.**D**. standard 'dialectogram' formats which we will apply herein to support our readers' in visualizing the dialectical processes encoded by the various 'psychohistorical-dialectical equations' presented in this text, with emphasis on the **first triad** encoded in / predicted by / reconstructed by each such 'dialectical equation' --

The above-diagrammed

**generic** __dialectical__ interpretation of the first

**three** of the

**N**__Q__ ‘meta-natural meta-numbers’ as a

*'*__dialectical__ triad', can be

**extended**, for the

**fourth** of these

**N**__Q__ ‘meta-natural meta-numbers’,

**and beyond**, as indicated in the following tableau --

It should also be noted, at the outset, that the

**kind** of

* '***dialectical** **oppositenesses**' encountered in, and modeled, by the

**F**.__E__.__D__. Psychohistorical-Dialectical Equations, is

**not** the

**kind**, named, by Charles Muses,

*"'***Annihilatory**''' **oppositeness**,

**nor** the

**kind** that he called

*"***Complementary**" **oppositeness**, but is, primarily, of the

**kind** called, by Karl Seldon,

*'***Supplementary**' **oppositeness** --

Since all of the ‘

**F**.__E__.__D__.
Psychohistorical-Dialectical Equations’ are equations of ‘psycho

__historical__
dialectics’, we use the assignment symbol ‘

**[--->**’ to indicate an association of an
unassigned, unsolved, or “generic”

**N**__Q__ ‘meta-natural meta-number’ to
a specific, mnemonic [psycho]historical-dialectical ontological category symbol
[“kind of being” symbol], within a given [psycho]

__historical__*-*dialectical
‘[psycho]physio-ontological’ progression:

[interpreted/solved/specific historical category symbol] **[---> **[generic **N**__Q__ ‘meta-number’ symbol], e.g. --

The <<__K__apital>>-relation as a human[oid]-social
relation of production** <--->**** **__K __ **[---> **__q__**16**

However, for ‘pure idea-systems’, and for their __presentational__
‘ideo-ontological’ dialectical categorial progressions, we use the assignment
symbol, or solution symbol, ‘**[---)**’, to indicate such associations,
e.g. --

“Thesis” axioms-system; *standard*
“**N**aturals” in **1**^{st} order specification; ‘pure-quantifier’ algebra** (---)**** **__N___ **[---)**
__q__**1**

“Antithesis” system; **1**^{st} order, __non__*-*standard, dialectical ‘meta-numbers’; ‘pure-qualifier’ algebra** (---)**** **__N____Q___ **[---)** __q__**2**

The beginning – or «*arche’*» -- category and system of
‘ideas-ontology’ in the **F**.__E__.__D__.
__presentational__*-*dialectical progression for the **F**.__E__.__D__. axioms-systems of dialectical
arithmetic, is the system of the arithmetic of the “**N**atural” **N**umbers,
**N** __=__** ****{1**,** 2**,**
3**,** …}**, as formulated by only
the four Peano postulates that are expressible in “first order” formal symbolic
logic [“first order” logic here means a language of formal logic that makes
assertions about individual “**N**atural Numbers” only, but *not*
about qualities *shared* by multiple “**N**atural
Numbers”, such as “Even-ness”, “Odd-ness”, “Prime-ness”, “Composite-ness”,
etc.]. We denote that “first-order”
axioms-system of arithmetic by __N___. It is a dialectical arithmetic only in a
‘pre-vestigial’, implicit, quantitative-only sense, in that the Peano __s__uccessor
function, **s**, is a degenerate, purely-quantitative «*aufheben*»
operation: **s(n)**** = ****n**** + ****1**, given an **n** in **N**.

The algorithm that generates this system__s__*-*progression is termed, by us, a
‘meta-model’, because a “model” would cover only a single system, whereas this
progression contains a *potentially* infinite multitude of
successive systems.

We use the term *‘‘‘***evolution**’’’ to describe the
[self-]developmental dynamics *within a single system*, whether it
be a natural, physical system [‘physio-system’], a human ideas-system
[‘ideo-system’] such as a mathematical axiomatic system, or a human
psychohistorical system – i.e., an ‘ideo-physio-system’ – such as a human
socio-economic system. ‘‘‘Evolutions’’’ are *transitions between historically
successive states *__within__ a single system.

We therefore use the term *‘***meta**-**evolution**’ to describe the [revolutionary] *transitions* __between__
systems – from historical predecessor system to historical successor
system -- which involve irruptions of new ontology.

The ‘Dyadic Seldon Function Meta-Model’ of the **F**.__E__.__D__. Method of Presentation [ = ‘Meta-Systematic
Dialectic’] for this progression of dialectical-mathematical system__s__,
is therefore –

**(**__N___)^(**2****^****s)**** **

-- wherein **s** denotes a **W**hole
Number variable, **W**** **__=__** ****{0**,** 1**,**
2**,** 3**,** … }**, representing/counting the cumulative number of __s__teps
into the exposition. Four steps in,
i.e., for __s__tep **s**** = ****3**,
we solve this ‘meta-model’ as follows:

**(**__N___**)****^****(****2****^3****)****
= ****(**__N___**)****^****(****8****)****
= **a non-amalgamative
sum of **8** ‘idea-ontological’ categories, each
connoting a qualitatively different, ‘ideo-ontologically’ different dialectical-mathematical
axioms-system --

#
__N___ + __NQ___ + __NU___ + __NM___ + __Nq__MN_____ + __Nq__MQ_____+ __Nq__MQN_____+ __NA___ [---)

#
__q__1 + __q__2 + __q__3 + __q__4 + __q__5 + __q__6 + __q__7 + __q__8.

These first eight axioms-systems of dialectical arithmetic
can be summarily described as follows, using the ‘pure ideo-systems’ assignment
symbol, ‘**(---)**’—

__N___ **(---) **Thesis system of __standard__ natural numbers arithmetic
in **1**^{st} order specification, as *purely quantitative* algebra.

__N____Q___ **(---) ****1**^{st}
‘Anti-thesis’ **1**^{st} order
axioms-system, __non__*-*standard
model of __N___, **1**^{st}
dialectical ‘meta-numbers’; ‘pure-qualifier algebra’.

__N____U___ **(---) ****1**^{st} [full] ‘Synthesis’ system; **1**^{st} order, **2**^{nd} dialectical
‘meta-numbers’, ‘quantifiable <<*monad*>>-qualifier’ algebra.

__N____M___ **(---) ****2**^{nd} ‘Anti-thesis’ system of **1**^{st} order, **3**^{rd} dialectical ‘metrical qualifier meta-numbers’; purely
qualitative algebra.

__N____q__**M****N**_____ **(---) **Partial
‘synthesis’ system of **1**^{st} order, **4**^{th} dialectical ‘meta-numbers’; ‘quantifiable metrical
qualifiers’ algebra.

__N____q__**M****Q**_____ **(---) **Partial ‘synthesis’, **1**^{st} order, **5**^{th} dialectical ‘meta-numbers’; ‘compound unquantifiable
metrical qualifiers’.

__N____q__**M****Q****N**_____ **(---) ****2**^{nd} full ‘Synthesis’ system; fully-algorithmic “dimensional analysis” via
quantifiable state-variable qualifiers algebra.

__N____A___ **(---)** **3**^{rd}
‘Anti-thesis’ system of **1**^{st} order, **7**^{th} dialectical ‘*dynamical *__system__-qualifiers’;
purely qualitative algebra [implicitly,
but not yet explicitly, an ideography for *dynamical* [**&** ‘‘‘meta-dynamical’’’,
super**^0**-meta-]*systems*].

The **first triad** of this Method of Presentation [ = ‘Meta-Systematic
Dialectic’] for this progression of dialectical-mathematical system__s__ can be depicted as follows --

The system of seven ‘dialectical meta-equations’ which constitute
‘the **F**.__E__.__D__. Psychohistorical-Dialectical Meta-Equations’
are the following --

1. **The Meta**-**Equation of ***Human Ideology/Knowledge* Meta-**Evolution**.

2. **The Meta**-**Equation of ***Human**-***Social **__Forces__ of Production** Meta**-**Evolution**.

3. **The Meta**-**Equation of ***Human**-***Social **__Relations__ of Production** Meta**-**Evolution**.

4. **The Meta**-**Equation of** *Human**-***Social **__Formation__(__s__)
**Meta**-**Evolution**.

5. **The Meta**-**Equation of the** *Human Genome/Human **‘***Phenome**’ **Systematic Dialectic**.

6. **The Meta**-**Equation of the Meta-Evolution of ***Planetary Human**ities*.

7. **The Meta**-**Equation of ***The Psychohistorical Dialectic of the Dialectic Itself*.

In terms of

**Encyclopedia Dialectica** standard notation, all seven of these 'psychohistorical-dialectical meta-equations' share the following common form --

Of course, all seven of
these ‘psycho-historical dialectical meta-equations’ cohere in the context of
the **F**.__E__.__D__. *‘‘‘*__Dialectical__ Theory of
Everything meta-equation’’’, or *‘*__Dialectic__ of Nature meta-equation’,
for the **total cosmos** as presently known to *Terran* __h__umanity.

They all describe,
categorially, a *‘*__sub__-**universe**’
of that, our *total*,
__universe__: they describe aspects of what __has__
gone on, what __is__ going on, and what -- ‘predictedly’ -- __will__
go on, ‘‘‘inside’’’ the presently most-advanced term of that *‘‘‘***Everything**
meta-equation’’’, i.e., in the term representing the ontological category of
‘planetary __h__uman [meta-]societies’, such as our own.

This overarching,
singular *‘‘‘*__Dialectic__ of Nature’’’ *‘***meta**-**equation**’ is __not__ defined, in our terminology, as
a *‘***psychohistorical**-__dialectical__ **meta**-**equation**’ in the same, strict, **direct** sense, that
the seven equations named above are termed, by us, *‘***psychohistorical**-__dialectical__ **meta**-**equations**’.

That is because this
overarching, singular *‘‘‘*__Dialectic__ of Nature’’’ *‘***meta**-**equation**’ does *not* __directly__ address [__h__uman-]**Phenomic**, ‘‘‘memetic’’’,
*‘*__psych__eic’ matters -- __collective__-**psych**ological, ‘intersubjectively-objective’, *‘*__psycho__historical material’, until
its **t****ALL** **=**** 8**th
epoch, cosmological *epoch* **8**, and beyond, and thus until its **256**th category-term, __h__ [which connotes the
‘cosmo-ontological category’ of [planetary] __h__uman[oid]
societies], and beyond [or, arguably, *incipiently*, until its **t****ALL**** ****=**** 7**th epoch, cosmological *epoch* **7**, and thus until its **128**th
category-term, __l__, which connotes the ‘cosmo-ontological
category’ of proto-__l__anguage-based
anima__l__ societies, and beyond].

However, __in__directly, this *‘‘‘*__Dialectic__ of Nature’’’ *‘***meta**-**equation**’ is also at least a *‘**HALF*-__psycho__*historical’* ‘meta-equation’.

It is so because the
analogies, the metaphors, the terms-of-reference, the names, the categories,
the concepts in which any __h__uman theory -- including in
which any __h__uman *“***Theory **__of__ __Everything__” -- are framed, grasped, and transmitted
can, only belong to the __h__uman language, to the __h__uman
«*mentalitÃ©*»
[inescapably also including the __h__uman *ideology*], to the human
‘‘‘memes-pool’’’, to the human, collective mind, and hence, to the terms of the
collective __h__uman, cognitive *and affective* *‘***psyche**-**ology**’ -- in short, to the terms of the total ‘__h__uman
*Phenome**’*
that is extant, and that is ambient, in the time, and in the place, in which
that theory arises.

For this *‘‘‘*__Dialectic__ of Nature’’’ as __a__
whole, as __THE__ whole
-- as the __Totality__
of our «*Kosmos*»
to the degree that we presently know it, and for its “highest”, most general
ontological categories [for the __E__.__D__. domain **x**** ****=**** ****ALL**], with ‘**t****ALL**_{}’
denoting a “Natural’’ number, i.e., from the set --

**{1**, **2**, **3**, ...**}**

-- and with **t****ALL** also counting, and __labeling__ [numerically, cardinally *‘‘‘*__naming__’’’], the *epochs* of *cosmological-ontological
***revolution**, we have --

**ALL**__>____-|-____<___{tALL}_{}_{}**
****= **_{}**ALL**__n__^{v}^{}^{t}^{ALL}^{}^{} _{}

-- such that ‘_{}__n__’
connotes the ‘physi[c]o-ontological category’ of the ‘‘‘sub-__n__uclear’’’ “particles”, that is, of the *‘‘‘*__non__-composite bosons’’’ [e.g.,
excluding the mesons], and of the *‘‘‘*__non__-composite
fermions’’’ [e.g., the quarks and the leptons, excluding, e.g., the proton,
neutron, and hyperon composite “particles”], and such that **v**** ****=**** 2** or **3**, and such that ‘**t**_{ALL}’, with its ‘**ALL******’
‘‘‘suffix’’’ component, indicates that the “independent” variable , **t**_{ALL},
takes on, __successively__,
the value **1**, then the value **2**,
then the value **3**, then **4**, then, ..., __consecutively__.

For **t**_{ALL}** ****=**** 8**, i.e.,
for cosmological *epoch* **8**, per this ‘‘‘equation-model’’’, the RHS [__R__ight-__H__and
__S__ide] of this equation, when the **8**-fold
‘‘‘self-involution’’’ [‘‘‘self-multiplication’’’] of _{ALL}__n__
is carried out, generates a *‘*__cumulum__’ of **2**^{8}** ****=**** 256** category-symbols for the **v**** ****=**** 2** version of this ‘‘‘equation-model’’’
--

_{ALL}__>____-|-____<___{8}**
****= **_{ALL}__n__^{2}^{8}**
****= **_{ALL}__n__^{256}**
****= **

** **_{ALL}__n__ **+**** ****. . . ****+**** **_{ALL}__h__** **

-- wherein the **256**th category-symbol, _{ALL}__h__, connotes the
‘cosmo-ontological category’ of [planetary] __h__uman[oid]
societies.

This ‘meta-model’ still
falls short of being *‘***a **__dialectical__ model of everything __now__ __known__’,
in particular, because it does not yet explicitly address so-called “Dark
Energy” and “Dark Matter”, which are, it must be said, at present, just barely
entering into the *‘***now known**’. Nonetheless, **Foundation** researchers are well underway in the
work of bringing these new ‘‘‘matters’’’ -- and these new ‘‘‘energies’’’ --
into the very heart of this ‘meta-model’, via a new, deeper «*archÃ©*», and a new, deeper,
*‘***first**** ***meta**-*«*physis*»’.

To afford you a feeling
for this ‘**ALL**
super-domain’ *‘*__dialectical__ Totality model’, the
image below expands upon our *‘‘‘*__Dialectic__ of
Nature’’’ as a whole model, or *‘*__Dialectical__
Theory of Everything
[*known*]’
model, for just the first triad of the **v**** ****=**** 3** version: for just its _{ALL}**t**_{3}** ****=**** 1**
‘dialectical equation’ --

The version of the *‘‘‘*__Dialectical__ Theory of
Everything meta-equation’’’, or *‘*__Dialectic__ of Nature meta-equation’,
which is specified, and illustrated, in the next two images, below, is an
**abbreviated**, *“***lumped**** **«*archÃ©*»”
version of the __Encyclopedia Dialectica__
*‘*__Dialectic__ **of** **Nature** meta-model’
for the ontological-categorial content of the *totality* of the *known universe* just described above.

The version described
below *“***lumps together**” the ontological categories of the ‘pre-/sub-__n__uclear’ “particles” versus of the ‘nuclear
pre-/__s__ub-atomic’ “particles”, or of the ‘‘‘__n__on-composite bosons and fermions’’’ versus of
the ‘‘‘compo__s__ite bosons and fermions’’’,
into a single *starting
category*, or «*archÃ©*»
ontological category, that of the ‘p__r__e-atomic’
“particles” [bosons and fermions, non-composite and composite alike].

Its ‘meta-equation
meta-model’ is --

_{ALL}__>____-|-____<___{tALL}_{}_{}**
****= **_{ALL}__r__^{2}^{t}^{ALL}^{}** **_{}

-- and, for **t**_{ALL}** ****=**** 7**, i.e., for cosmological *epoch* **7**, per its ‘‘‘equation-model’’’, the RHS [__R__ight-__H__and
__S__ide] of its equation, when the **7**-fold ‘‘‘self-involution’’’ [‘‘‘self-multiplication’’’] of _{ALL}__r__ is carried out, generates a *‘*__cumulum__’ of **2**^{7}** ****=**** 128**
category-symbols for this, **v**** ****=**** 2**, version of
this ‘‘‘equation-model’’’ --

_{ALL}__>____-|-____<___{7} **= **_{ALL}__r__^{2}^{7}**
****= **_{ALL}__r__^{128}**
****= **_{ALL}__r__ **+ . . . + **** **_{ALL}__h__** **

-- wherein, in this
case, the **128**th category-symbol, _{ALL}__h__, connotes the
‘cosmo-ontological category’ of [planetary] __h__uman[oid]
societies.

The following image
provides a ‘‘‘models specification’’’ for the various ‘‘‘single-epoch models’’’
contained in that

*‘***lumped** «

*archÃ©*»’,

**abbreviated** version of this

*‘***Everything**
meta-model’ --

The next image depicts
this **abbreviated**, *‘***lumped** «*archÃ©*»’ meta-model’s **1**st **2**
stages of __dialectical__,
«*aufheben*» *‘*__self__-**meta**-**monad**-**ization**’
--

The __N____Q___
and ‘Dyadic Seldon Function’ formulation of these psychohistorical-dialectical
equations can be rendered, and briefly described, as given below.

##
I. The Equation of Human
__I__deology/__K__nowledge Meta-Evolution

**a**.
<<*Arche’*>>: __Mythologies__, __M__ **[--->** __q__**1**.

**b**.** **‘Dyadic Seldon Function’ Formula:** ****<**__M__>^(**2^****t****k****)**.

**c**.
Solution to epoch **t****k**** = ****4**:

**<**__M__>^(**2^****4)** = **<**__M__>^(**16****)** =

__M__** + **__R__** + **__q__**R****M**** + **__P__** + **__q__**P****M**** + **__q__**P****R**** + **__q__**P****R****M**** + **__K__** + **

__q__**K****M**** + **__q__**K****R**** + **__q__**K****R****M**** + **__q__**K****P**** + **__q__**K****P****M**** + **__q__**K****P****R**** + **__q__**K****P****R****M**** + **__Y__ **[--->**

__q__**1** + __q__**2** + __q__**3** + __q__**4** + __q__**5** + __q__**6** + __q__**7** + __q__**8** + __q__**9** + __q__**10** + __q__**11** + __q__**12** + __q__**13** + __q__**14** + __q__**15** + __q__**16**.

**d**. Key
categories from the first sixteen categories of the fields/forms of *human
ideology/knowledge* can be summarily described using the
‘historical-systems’ assignment symbols, ‘**<--->**’ and ‘**[--->**’ --

__M__ **<---> **__Mythopoeias__, “Myths-Makings”;
“**Mythologies**” **[---> **__q__**1**.

__R__ **<---> **__Religions__, codified /
standardized / dogmatized, i.e., *‘*__Meta____-____Mythologies__’ **[---> **__q__**2**.

__q__**R****M** **<---> **Reconciliations
of __R__ **&** __M__ / conversions from __M__ into __R__, e.g., Ancient Rome’s Pantheon **[---> **__q__**3**.

__P__ **<---> **__Philosophies__, i.e., *‘*__Meta____-____Religions__’
**[--->
**__q__**4**.

.

.

.

__q__**P****R** **<---> **__R__**|**__P__ reconciliations,
even __q__**R**P retrograde __P__ to __R__ conversions, e.g., Aquinas’ __Summa Theologica__
**[---> **__q__**6**.

.

.

.

**K ****<--->
****Scientific **__K__**nowledges**, i.e.,** ***‘*__Meta__*-***Philosophies**’** ****[---> **__q__**8****.**

.

.

.

__q__**KP****R** **<---> **Includes
__q__**P****R****K** retrograde __K__**|**__R__ to __P__ conversions, e.g., Hegel’s __Encyclopedia of the
Philosophical Sciences__ **[---> **__q__**14**.

__q__**KP****R****M** **<--->**Advanced science, __K__, subsuming/explaining __P__hilosophy, __R__eligion, **&** __M__ythology [not yet fully actual on Earth] **[---> **__q__**15**.

**Y**** ****<---> **‘‘‘**Ps**__Y__**chohistories**’’’, i.e.,** ***‘*__Meta__*-***Sciences**’,
e.g., Marx’s theory** ****[---> **__q__**16**.

The **first triad** of this **reconstructed**, *historical *'<<**speci**>>-ation' of* *the historical progression of the 'ideo-ontological categories' / kinds of human **I**deologies\

__K__nowledges in this

*'***psycho****historical** **dialectic**' of human

**I**deologies\__K__nowledges Form[ation]s [using the Marxian definition of "Ideology"], can be depicted as follows --

Models Specification --

The next image depicts
this meta-model’s **1**st **2**
stages of __dialectical__,
«*aufheben*» *‘*__self__-**meta**-**monad**-**ization**’
--

For
more amplitude about this particular ‘dialectical meta-model’ and ‘‘‘psychohistorical-dialectical
equation’’’, see –

[pp. **B-09** through **B**-**17**]

##

##

##

##
II. The Equation of Human-Social __Forces__
of Production Meta-Evolution

**a**. <<*Arche’*>>: Whole
[proto-]__h__uman communities*
*[e.g., hunting bands]
as Prime Energy Resources for their own Human
Societal Self-[Re-]Production, __R__**h** **[--->** __q__**1**. *in
reverse*. The deeper/earlier reaches
of the ontology of the cosmos become accessible, for human __A__ppropriation,
as energy __R__esources, in the *reverse
order* of their formation, and, as such energy __R__esources, form the
core of the Marxian “social forces of production”. We are using the term “energy __R__esources”
here in a more concretely determinate, more specific, less ahistorically abstract,
less reductionist sense of the term ‘‘‘energy’’’ than is usually the case in contemporary
discourse.

**b**.** **‘Dyadic Seldon Function’ Formula:** ****<**__R__**h****>^(****2^****t****f****)**.

**c**. Solution to **t****f**** = ****4**:

**<**__R__**h****>^(****2^****4)** = **<**__R__**h****>^(****16****)** =

__R__**h**** + **__R__**l**** + **__R__**l****h**** + **__R__**b**** + **__R__**b****h**** + **__R__**b****l**** + **__q__**b****l****h**** + **__R__**e**** + **

__R__**e****h**** + **__R__**e****l**** + **__R__**e****l****h**** + **__R__**e****b**** + **__R__**e****b****h**** + **__R__**e****b****l**** + **__R__**e****b****l****h**** + **__R__**p** **[--->**

__q__**1** + __q__**2** + __q__**3** + __q__**4** + __q__**5** + __q__**6** + __q__**7** + __q__**8** + __q__**9** + __q__**10** + __q__**11** + __q__**12** + __q__**13** + __q__**14** + __q__**15** + __q__**16**.

**d**.
Key categories from the first sixteen categories of *‘***the** **existential **__self__-**force**
**of human society**’ -- of *‘***human**-**societal self**-**reproductive
self**-**force**’ -- can be

summarily described as follows, using the ‘historical-systems’ assignment symbols, ‘**<--->**’
and ‘**[--->**’
--

__R__**h**
**<---> **Entire [proto-]__h__uman communities* *[e.g., __h__unting __b__ands] as prime __R__esource
for predation-based social __R__e-production **[---> **__q__**1**.

__R__**l** **<---> ****Other** proto-__l__anguage-based
animal societies/ plant communities, as human energy resources **[---> **__q__**2**.

__R__**l****h** **<---> **Reconciliations
of __R__**l** **&** __R__**h** / conversions
from __R__**h** into __R__**l** **[---> **__q__**3**,
e.g., herding **&** horticulture.

__R__**b**
**<---> **__a__social animals **&** multi-cellular/’meta-__b__iotan’ animal bodies, including human slaves’ bodies,
as exploited

energy __R__esources for human societal self-__R__eproduction,
e.g., draft animals; slave rowers, etc. **[---> **__q__**4**.

.

.

.

__R__**e** **<--->**
__e__ukaryotic cells as energy resources for human societal
self-[re-]production **[---> **__q__**8**, e.g., breads,
beers,

wines/vinegars/cheeses/jerkies/yogurts/kefirs/pickles/chutneys,
other “spoiled food”/fermented products, as food preservation tech.

.

.

.

__R__**p ****<--->
**__p__rokaryotic, e.g., anaerobic, cells as energies
for social __R__eproduction [e.g., methane-generating “digesters”]** ****[---> **__q__**16**.

**e**.
Categories of interest irrupting into possibility in later epochs, **t****f** **>** **4** --

__R__**mb **comprises much ancient Roman technology, up
to, e.g., U.S. Civil War technology** ****[--->
**__q__**36**:

·
Ancient Roman *temples*
-- using stone [__m__];
“drum cranes” using wood [meta-__b__iota, __b__],
rope [__b__], **&** sinew [__b__].

· Ancient Roman waterworks
*flour
mills* -- using stone [__m__]; water
[__m__], grain [__b__], wood [__b__], rope
[__b__], etc.

·
Ancient Roman *aqueducts*
-- using stone [__m__];
“drum cranes” using wood [meta-__b__iota, __b__],
rope [__b__], **&** sinew [__b__].

·
Ancient Roman *glassworks*
-- using stone [__m__];
fire [__m__], metal [__m__] tools, wood [__b__] tools **&** fuels, glass-sand [__m__], diamond [__m__] cutting tools, etc., including to produce
unsurpassed “Portland vases” and “caged glass”.

·
*circa* 200
B.C.E.+ Chinese / Japanese *“Magic
Mirrors”* -- using metals [__m__],
fire [__m__], intensive hand
polishing [__b__].

·
17th Century
Japanese <<*karakuri*>> doll automatons [mechanical robots] -- using
wood [__b__], metal [__m__] springs, etc.

·
Ancient Roman
<<*ballista*>> *catapults *-- using stone missiles [__m__]; wood [__b__],
plant fiber/hair rope [__b__], **&** sinew [__b__].

·
Ancient Roman
<<*hypocaust*>> *public baths* -- using stone [__m__]; “drum cranes” [__b__], wood [__b__]
parts **&**
fuels, **&** fire
[__m__], water [__m__], air [__m__],
clay [__m__] pipes, socializing
human beings [__h__],
etc.: **<--->** __R__**mbh ****[---> **__q__**37**.

·
Bushnell’s *“***Turtle**”
single-occupant proto-submarine, U. S. First Revolutionary War vintage -- tar [__b__], wood [__b__],
cork [__b__], flint [__m__], glass [__m__],
lead [__m__], steel [__m__] bands, trapped water[__m__], trapped air [__m__], black powder [__m__], human-muscle-powered [hand-cranked] propeller [__b__].

·
Confederate *H. L.
Hunley* eight-person crew “fish boat” “torpedo boat”, or “torpedo fish” proto-submarine,
vintage U. S. Second Revolutionary [“Civil”] War -- wood [__b__], rope [__b__], rubber
[__b__], glass [__m__], iron [__m__], copper
[__m__] wire, “blue light”
pyrotechnic signal flare [__m__],
trapped water[__m__],
trapped air [__m__],
black powder [__m__], eight-persons
*“social”* crew, with a seven-persons-hand-cranked
propeller [__h__]: **<--->** __R__**mbh ****[--->
**__q__**37**; both steam-powered [__m__] and electrical motored [__a__] propulsion was tried, but **failed**; there are possible
recently-discovered archaeological indications of chemical/molecular
battery-powered electrical [__a__;** **__m__]
torpedo detonation: **<--->** __R__**ambh ****[---> **__q__**101**.

__R__**amh **encompasses much recent *‘‘‘***android robotics**’’’
technology** ****[---> **__q__**97**:

·
Tokyo University
of Science, Dr. Hiroshi Kobayashi’s <<*Saya*>> *android
proto**-***robot**, using electronics [__a__], metals [__m__],
human behaviors [__h__],
etc.

__R__**ameb **encompasses much recent *‘‘‘*__G__enetically-__M__odified __O__rganisms’’’
[GMO] technology** ****[--->
**__q__**108**:

·
Japanese
interferon-producing GMO silk worms, created using electronics [__a__], metals [__m__],
silk worm __e__ukaryotic cell nucleus [__e__] DNA [__m__],
silkworms [__b__],
etc.

__R__**am **encompasses many recent speculative designs for** **__sub__luminal
interstellar drive engines **[---> **__q__**96**:

·
Ion engines,
using electronics [__a__], [ionized]
atoms [__a__], metals parts [__m__], etc.

__R__**nam **encompasses much now-emergent or
speculative technology** ****[--->
**__q__**352**:

·
Dr. Robert
Bussard’s “polywell” fusion power reactor, involving photons [__n__], vacuum-propagating atomic [sub-]orbitals’ free electrons [__n__], ionized
[plasma] atoms [__a__], and
metal parts [__m__],
etc.
__R__**nsam **also encompasses much now-emergent or
speculative technology** ****[--->
**__q__**470**:

·
“Stellar Wind Sail”
starship designs, using solar/stellar photon [__n__] "winds", **&**/or
[__s__ub-atomic]“particle” "winds", e.g., space-proagating solar/stellar protons [__s__],
“atom” [ion] plasma "winds" [__a__], metal
parts [__m__], etc.

·
**F**.__E__.__D__.
‘tachyonic meta-phase’ __super__luminal interstellar-drive design-hypothesis described
earlier in this series.

The **first triad** of this **reconstructed**, *historical *'<<**speci**>>-ation' of* *the historical progression of *'''***historically**-<<**speci**>>*-fic'''* [cf. Marx] **historical**-<<**species**>> of the human "social forces of production" [cf. Marx] *'***psycho****historical** **dialectic**' can be depicted as follows --

Models Specification --

##
III. The Equation of Human-Social __Relations__
of Production Meta-Evolution

###

###

###
a. <<*Arche’*>>: __A__ppropriations [of products
of pre-/extra-human Nature, in “raw” form], __A__ [---> __q__1.

**b**.** **‘Dyadic
Seldon Function’ Formula:** ****<**__A__>^(**2^****t****r****)**.

###
c. Solution to epoch tr = 4:

**<**__A__>^(**2^****4)** = **<**__A__>^(**16****)** =

** **__A__** + **__G__** + **__q__**GA**** + **__C__** + **__q__**CA**** + **__q__**CG**** + **__q__**CGA**** + **__M__** + **

** **__q__**MA**** + **__q__**MG**** + **__q__**MGA**** + **__q__**MC**** + **__q__**MCA**** + **__q__**MCG**** + **__q__**MCGA**** + **__K__ **[--->**

__q__**1** + __q__**2** + __q__**3** + __q__**4** + __q__**5** + __q__**6** + __q__**7** + __q__**8** + __q__**9** + __q__**10** + __q__**11** + __q__**12** + __q__**13** + __q__**14** + __q__**15** + __q__**16**.

**d**. Key
categories from the first sixteen categories of *human social relations of societal self-re-production* can be summarily described as follows, using the
‘historical-systems’ assignment symbols, ‘**<--->**’ and ‘**[--->**’ --

__A__ **<---> **“**Raw**”__ A__**ppropriations**, “Predations” **[---> **__q__**1**.

__G__ **<---> **__G__**oods Production**, ‘multi-appropriations’ [e.g., **burins** from glassy stones]; ‘__Meta____-____Appropriations__’ **[---> **__q__**2**.

__q__**GA** **<---> **Reconciliations
of __G__ **&** __A__ / conversions from __A__ into __G__ **[---> **__q__**3**,
e.g., spears applied in hunting.

__C__ **<---> **Bartered
__C__**ommodities**, i.e., ‘__Meta____-____Goods__’ **[---> **__q__**4**.

.

.

.

__M__ **<--->
**__M__**onies**,
i.e., ‘__Meta____-__**Commodities**’** ****[---> **__q__**8****.**

.

.

.

__q__**MC ****<---> **Subsumption
of __C__**ommodities** by __M__**onies**, i.e., __M__**onies**-mediated
circulations of** **__C__ommodities** ****[---> **__q__**12**.

.

.

.

__K__** ****<--->
<<**__K__apitals*>>*, i.e.,

** ‘**__Meta____-__**Monies****’ ****[---> **__q__**16**.
The **first triad** of this **reconstructed**, *historical *'<<**speci**>>-ation' of the '''forms of human-social intercourse''' [cf. Marx and Engels, **The German Ideology**] * **'''***historically**-<<**speci**>>*-fic'''* [cf. Marx] **historical**-<<**species**>> of this *'***psycho****historical** **dialectic**', can be depicted as follows --

**e**.
Categories of interest, observed as having, or predicted to, irrupt into
possibility in later epochs, **t****r** **>**
**4**
--

__q__**KG ****<---> **Real
subsumption/reshaping of __G__oods-production by the <<__K__apital>>-relation; **&** including <<__K__apital>> __G__oods **[---> **__q__**18**.** **

__q__**KC ****<---> **Real
subsumption of the __C__ommodity-relation by the <<__K__apital>>-relation;
includes “__C__ommodity <<__K__apital>>” **[---> **__q__**20**.** **

__q__**KM ****<---> **Real
subsumption of the __M__oney-relation by the <<__K__apital>>-relation;
includes “__M__oney <<__K__apital>>” **[---> **__q__**24**.** **

__q__**KK ****<---> **__E__** <---> **__Self__*-*subsumption of the <<__K__apital>>-relation; The Generalized ‘__E__quity-arian’ ‘Political-__ECONOMIC__
__DEMOCRACY__’ of “the associated producers” [Marx], i.e.,
‘Democratic Communism’ **[---> **__q__**32**.
Models Specification --
The next image depicts
this meta-model’s **1**st **2**
stages of __dialectical__,
«*aufheben*» *‘*__self__-**meta**-**monad**-**ization**’
--
For
more amplitude regarding *'***Political**-**ECONOMIC**** ****DEMOCRACY**', see –
http://www.equitism.org/Equitism/Theory/PoliticalEconomicDemocracy/PoliticalEconomicDemocracy.htm ** **

[pp. **B-24** through **B**-**38**]

##
IV. The Equation of Human-Social For__m__ation(s)
Meta-Evolution

**a**. <<*Arche’*>>: __b__ands/extended
families of hunter-gathers/scavengers/foragers/predators, __b__ **[--->** __q__**1**.

**b**.** **‘Dyadic
Seldon Function’ Formula:** ****<**__b__>^(**2^****t****m****)**.

** **

**c**. Solution to epoch **t****m**** = ****4**:

**<**__b__>^(**2^****4)** = **<**__b__>^(**16****)** =

__b__** + **__c__** + **__q__**cb**** + **__v__** + **__q__**vb**** + **__q__**vc**** + **__q__**vcb**** + **__f__** + **

__q__**fb**** + **__q__**fc**** + **__q__**fcb**** + **__q__**fv**** + **__q__**fvb**** + **__q__**fvc**** + **__q__**fvcb**** + **__s__ **[--->**

__q__**1** + __q__**2** + __q__**3** + __q__**4** + __q__**5** + __q__**6** + __q__**7** + __q__**8** + __q__**9** + __q__**10** + __q__**11** + __q__**12** + __q__**13** + __q__**14** + __q__**15** + __q__**16**.

**d**. Key categories from the
first sixteen categories of *human social/**‘***meta**-**geological**’** formation**(*s*)
can be summarily described as follows, using the ‘historical-systems’
assignment symbols, ‘**<--->**’ and ‘**[--->**’ --

__b__ **<---> **__b__ands/extended families
of hunter-gathers/scavengers/foragers/predators **[---> **__q__**1**.

__c__ **<---> **__c__**amps**, ‘multi-band’ semi-permanent
home bases; ‘__meta____-____bands__’ **[---> **__q__**2**.

__q__**cb** **<---> **Reconciliations/hybridizations
of __c__ **&** __b__ / conversions
from __b__ into __c__ **[---> **__q__**3**, e.g., advantaged,
expanding __c__amps.

__v__ **<---> **__v__**illages**, ‘multi-camp’,
long-duration settlements, ‘__meta____-____camps__’ **[---> **__q__**4**.

.

.

.

__f__ **<--->** **chie**__f__**doms**,
multi-village, “tribal” domains; ‘__meta____-__**villages**’
**[--->
**__q__**8**.

.

.

.

__s__** ** **<---> ****city**-__s__**tates**,
i.e., ‘__meta____-__**chiefdom**’, or ‘__meta____-__**tribal**’,
social formations **[---> **__q__**16**.

The **first triad** of this **reconstructed**, *historical *'<<**speci**>>-ation' of* *the historical progression of *'''***historically**-<<**speci**>>*-fic'''* [cf. Marx] **historical**-<<**species**>> of human society in this *'***psycho****historical** **dialectic**' of '''human-social for**m**ation(s)''' [cf. Marx], can be depicted as follows --

**e**.
Categories of interest, observed as having, or predicted to, irrupt into
possibility in later epochs, **t****m** **>**
**4**
--

__e__** ****<---> **__e__**mpires**,
multi-city-state ‘__meta____-__**city**-**states**’ **[---> **__q__**32**.** **

__n__** ****<---> **__n__**ation**-**states**,
multi-empire-remnant ‘__meta____-__**empires**’ **[---> **__q__**64**.** **

__p__** ****<---> **__p__**lanetary**-__p__**oli**,
multi-nation-state ‘__meta____-__**nation**-**states**’ [not yet known extant]
**[--->
**__q__**128**.** **

__m__** ****<---> **__m__**ulti**-__p__**lanetary federations**;
‘__meta____-__**planetary**-**poli**’ [not yet known extant]
**[--->
**__q__**256**.

Models Specification --

The next image depicts
this meta-model’s **1**st **2**
stages of __dialectical__,
«*aufheben*» *‘*__self__-**meta**-**monad**-**ization**’
--

For
more amplitude about this particular ‘dialectical meta-model’ and ‘‘‘psychohistorical-dialectical
equation’’’, see –

Robert Wright, __NONZERO__:** ***The Logic of Human Destiny*, Pantheon [New York: 2000],

pp. **20**,** 78**-**92**,**
102**,** 109**,** 110**-**111**,** 12**,** 113**,** 125**,** 165**,** 353**,** 355**,** 357**,** 363**,** 365**,** 368**,** 376**,** 402**, etc.

[p. **B-23**]

[slides **54**-**59**]

##
V. The Equation of
the Human Genome / Human ‘Phenome’ Systematic-Dialectic

**a**.
«*Arche’*»: The human __G__enome, as a mediately[
‘Darwinianly’]-developing meta-system, from its proto-human origin, __G__ **[---)**
__q__**1**.

**b**.** **‘__Triad__ic Seldon Function’ Formula:** ****(**__G__)^(**3^1****)**.

**c**. Solution to epoch **t****G**** = ****1**:

**(**__G__)^(**3^1****)** = **(**__G__)^(**3****)** =

__G__** + **__P__** + **__q__**P****G**** ****[---)**
__q__**1 **+** **__q__**2 **+** **__q__**3**.

**d**. The categories of *human
genomic/human phenomic* *‘***co**-**meta**-**evolution**’ can be summarily
described as follows, using the ‘systematic-dialectics’ assignment symbols,
‘**(---)**’
and ‘**(****--->**’
--

__G__ **(---) **The ‘meta-evolving’ “human __G__enome”
**[---)
**__q__**1**.

__P__ **(---) **The ‘meta- evolving’ ‘human __P__henome’ of *non-*chromosomal, phenotypic, cultural,
“acquired characteristics” **[---) **__q__**2**.

__q__**P****G** **(---)
**Their ‘‘‘co-meta-evolving’’’ hybrid;
the ‘‘‘complex unity’’’ of the human __P__henome/human __G__enome **[---) **__q__**3**.

The **overall triad** of this Method of Presentation [ = '''Systematic
Dialectic'''] for this progression of *'***ideo**-**ontological**' conceptions of human Nature be depicted as follows --

For
more amplitude about this particular ‘dialectical meta-model’ and ‘‘‘psychohistorical-dialectical
equation’’’, see –

##
VI. The Equation of the Meta-Evolution of Planetary Human[oid]ities

**a**. <<*Arche’*>>: planetary '**humanitys**', __h__ **[--->** __q__**1**.

**b**.** **‘__Dyad__ic
Seldon Function’ Formula:** ****<**__h__>^(**2^****t****h****)**.

**c**. Solution
to epoch **t****h**** = ****1**:

**<**__h__>^(**2^1****)** = **<**__h__>^(**2****)** = __h__** **+** **__delta____-____h__ = ** **

__h__** **+** **__y__** ****[---> ** __q__**1 **+** **__q__**2**.
This predicted, next-epoch '<<**gene**>>-ation' of __delta____-____h__ = __y__, the next new 'self-hybrid' <<**genos**>> of 'cosmo-ontology', can be depicted as follows --

**d**. The
two ‘[psycho]physio-ontological categories’ for this *meta**-***evolution of planetary human**[*oid*]*ities*
equation, and the three __sub__*-*categories of the second-to-emerge into possibility of those categories,
can be summarily described as follows, using the ‘historical-systems’
assignment symbols, ‘**<--->**’ and ‘**[--->**’ --

__h__ **<---> **‘planetized’** **‘__h__umanitys’ [or ‘planetized
human[oid]ities’] **[---> **__q__**1**.

__delta____-____h__ **<---> **__y__ **<---> ***‘*__meta__*-*humanit**y**s’ **[---> **__q__**2**; a ‘taxonomy level **1**’ «*genos*»
with **3** «*species*» --

**<**__g__>^(**3^****t****g****)** = **<**__g__>^(**3^1****)** = **<**__g__>^(**3****)** =

** **__g__** **+** **__r__** **+** **__q__**r****g**** ** = __g__** **+** **__r__** **+** **__c__** ** **[--->** __q__**1 **+** **__q__**2 **+** **__q__**3 **--

__g__ **<---> **‘**Thesis**’
<<*species*>>:** **‘meta-humanit__y__’ via human-__g__enomic self-re-engineering **[---> **__q__**1**.

__r__ **<---> ***‘***Anti****thesis**’
<<*species*>>:** **‘meta-humanit__y__’ via android __r__obotics **[---> **__q__**2**.

__q__**r****g**** ****<---> **__c__
**<--->** *‘***Syn****thesis**’ <<*species*>>:** ***‘‘‘***complex unity**’’’ of __r__ **&** __g__;

‘meta-humanit__y__’
via __c__yborg prosthetics/bionics **[---> **__q__**3**.

The **triad** of this predicted, next-epoch '<<**speci**>>-ation' of the body-forms <<**species**>> of this new <<**genos**>> 'cosmo-ontological' category, '**the meta**-**human**', can be depicted as follows --
For
more amplitude about this particular ‘dialectical meta-model’ and ‘‘‘psychohistorical-dialectical
equation’’’, see –

[p. **I**-**19**]

##

##

##
VII. The Equation of The
Psychohistorical Dialectic of the Dialectic Itself

**a**. <<*Arche’*>>: __S__ystematic
/ __S__ynchronic
Dialectics, __S__ **[--->**
__q__**1**.

**b**. ‘Dyadic Seldon Function’ Formula:** ****<**__S__>^(**2^****t****#****)**.

**c**. Solution to epoch **t****#**** = ****2**:

**<**__S__>^(**2^****2)** = **<**__S__>^(**4****)** =

__S__** **+** **__q__**SS**** **+** **__q__**SSS**** **+** **__q__**SSSS**** = **

__q__**S**** **+** **__q__**H**** **+** **__q__**H****S**** **+** **__q__**HH**** = **__q__**S**** **+** **__q__**D**** **+** **__q__**D****S**** **+** **__q__**DD**** = **

__S__** **+** **__H__** **+** **__M__** **+** **__Y__ **[---> ** __q__**1** + __q__**2** + __q__**3** + __q__**4**.

**d**. These four
‘human-historical ideo-ontological’ categories of *Dialectics* can be
summarily described as follows, using the ‘[psycho]historical-systems’
assignment symbols, ‘**<--->**’ and ‘**[--->**’ --

__S__ **<---> **__S__ystematic
/ __S__ynchronic
Dialectics, __S__ **[---> **__q__**1**.

__H__ **<---> **__H__istorical
/ __D__iachronic
Dialectics, __H__ **[---> **__q__**2**.

__M__** ** **<--->
**__M__eta-Systematic
/ __D__iachronico-__S__ynchronic Dialectics,
__M__ **[---> **__q__**3**.

__Y__ **<---> **Ps__Y__chohistorical Dialectics, __Y__ **[---> **__q__**4**.

The **tetrad** of the historical <<**species**>> of the <<**genos**>> of **dialectics**, can be depicted as follows --
For
more amplitude about this particular ‘dialectical meta-model’ and ‘‘‘psychohistorical-dialectical
equation’’’, see –

*Key Challenges* for ‘“**Simultaneous**”’
**and** *‘*__QUANT__O*-*__Qual__itative*’
***Solution**** of these** **7** [*Meta**-*]*Equations*.

**1**. Correlating
the different ‘‘‘tempos’’’/temporalities/‘epochalities’ of the **six** *psycho*__HISTORICAL__ [*meta**-*]*equations* among the **seven** [*meta**-*]*equations* presented above, since, in general, and given that ‘_{R}**t****(****·****)**’ denotes a function which converts *ordinal times* to *real*, *historical* ‘“__R__eal”’** ***times* [*real*ly, to ‘‘‘**Rational**-**Number** *times**’’’*] --

**
****{**_{R}t**(****t**_{I}_{\K}**)}** ~= **{**_{R}t**(****t**_{F}**)}** **~=** **{**_{R}t**(****t**_{R}**)}** **~=** **{**_{R}t**(****t**_{m}**)}** **~=** **{**_{R}t**(**_{ALL}**t**_{2}**)}** **~=** **{**_{R}t**(****t**_{#}**)}**;

**2**. Modeling the thus coordinated __quant__itative
‘epochality’ using “continuous” rather than “discrete” arithmetical *models* of __t__ime, e.g., using *time**-***value**
_{R}**t** *not* in **W**; i.e., more specifically, using
*time**-***value** _{R}**t** *in*
**R ****| R** **in**
the set of the “__R__eal” **Numbers** -- **R **contains _{R}**t** *not in** ***W**;

**3**.
Re-expressing the *‘*__qual__ity __meta__-**dynamics**’,
or *‘*__ontology__ __meta__-**dynamics**’,
of the __qual__ifier*-***sums**
in these “purely”-__qual__itative, “purely”-*ontological *[*meta**-*]*equations*, more
determinately, as ‘‘‘[space-]time varying’’’ *evolution *__state__ __trajectory__**/**[*self**-*]__control__ __path__
dynamics, with [‘__meta__finite*’*,
*ontologically**-*__r__*evolutionary*] *‘‘‘*__singularities__’’’, for
*time**-***function**-__quant__ifier __quant__ified
state-variables and control-parameters, expressed in the higher, later
__dialectical__*-***ideographical
languages** of
combined, *dynamical* and *‘*__meta__-**dynamical**’ [super^{z}-][*meta**-*]*systems*, by means of *‘***singularity semantification**’, resulting fro*m **‘***ontological**** **and *metrical* __qual__ifier*’*
*‘***re**-__qual__ification of
*“***standardly**” *‘‘‘*__un__qualified’’’,
__quant__ifier(s)-__only__ *dynamical equations* [also by *division**-***by**-**zero**
*‘***semantification**’
**&** ‘**meta**__finit__ization’, via the_{ }_{}_{}_{R}__mu__+ axioms for the __r__*evolutionary* new *mathematical* *‘***ideo**-**ontology**’ of ‘full zero’];

**4**. Facilitated by **1**.
**&** **2**. **&** **3**.,
solving this system of **7** [*meta**-*]*equations* ‘‘‘__simultaneously__’’’;

**5**. *Modeling* the ‘inter-mutual’ interactions among
the *ontologically distinct*
but co-existing actualities described by these **7** [*meta**-*]*equations*, i.e., __dialectically__ modeling the interactions
of the actualities described by each such [*meta**-*]*equation* with the other,
co-extant actualities described by each of the other such [*meta**-*]*equations*.

**6**. Deriving a *single* *‘*__super__-**meta**-**equation**’,
unifying all **7** of the [*meta**-*]*equations* presented above.

Dialogically yours,

Aoristos
Dyosphainthos"