Dialectics Itself Instances a Dialectically-Expected Dialectical Synthesis. -- Part 3: Seldon’s Worldview Series.

 

 

 Dialectics Itself

Instances a Dialectically-Expected Dialectical Synthesis.

 

-- Part 3: Seldon’s Worldview Series.

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Reader,

 

 

 

It is my pleasure, and my honor, as an elected member of the Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.] General Council, and as a voting member of F.E.D., to share, with you, from time to time, as they are approved for public release, by the F.E.D. General Council, key excerpts from the internal writings, and from the internal sayings, of our co-founder, Karl Seldon.

 

The third release in this new such series is posted below [Some E.D. standard edits have been applied, in the version presented below, by the editors of the F.E.D. Special Council for the Encyclopedia, to the direct transcript of our co-founder’s discourse].

 

In this 3rd installment, Seldon describes a case in which the dialectical method itself instantiates a dialectically-expected dialectical synthesis.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Seldon –

 

“Dialectically, one would expect there to exist specific units/cases of ‘methods-in-general’ which are ‘‘‘complex unities’’’ – in other words, which are dialectical syntheses – of units/cases of heuristic methods and of units/cases of algorithmic methods.”

 

“But what might be unexpected for many – for many others, including for many dialecticians – is our finding that a prime instance of such complex unit[ie]s is in the case of ‘‘‘dialectics’’’ itself – is in the case of the ‘‘‘dialectical method’’’ itself.”

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For more information regarding these Seldonian insights, please see --

 

www.dialectics.info

 

 

 

 

 

For partially pictographical, ‘poster-ized’ visualizations of many of these Seldonian insights -- specimens of ‘dialectical art’ -- see:

https://www.etsy.com/shop/DialecticsMATH

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

¡ENJOY!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Regards,

 

 

Miguel Detonacciones,

 

Voting Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.];

Elected Member, F.E.D. General Council;

Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison;

Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.

 

 

 

 

YOU are invited to post your comments on this blog-entry below!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The ‘Historical-Dialectical Process’ – Generic Narration. -- Part 2: Seldon’s Worldview Series.

 

The ‘Historical-Dialectical Process’ –

Generic Narration.

 

-- Part 2: Seldon’s Worldview Series.

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Reader,

 

 

 

It is my pleasure, and my honor, as an elected member of the Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.] General Council, and as a voting member of F.E.D., to share, with you, from time to time, as they are approved for public release, by the F.E.D. General Council, key excerpts from the internal writings, and from the internal sayings, of our co-founder, Karl Seldon.

 

This second release in this new such series is posted below [Some E.D. standard edits have been applied, in the version presented below, by the editors of the F.E.D. Special Council for the Encyclopedia, to the direct transcript of our co-founder’s discourse].

 

In this 2nd installment, Seldon narrates the generic aspects of the dyadic version pattern of the historical-dialectical, epochal process-in-general.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Seldon –

 

“In epoch 1 of the historical-dialectical process in general, the «arché-arithmos» ‘self-subsumes’, thereby both recreating/sustaining itself/its own «monads», but also giving birth to a ‘meta-«arithmos»’, when some of its «arché-monads» combine/fuse to form the ‘meta-units’ of that ‘meta-«arithmos»’, that second «arithmos-of-monads».”

 

“Thereafter, a recurring, widening, multi-dimensional ‘‘‘helical’’’ pattern, of mounting scales of ever-qualitatively-new recurrence, ensues.”

 

“Each successive epoch’s leading new ontological category/«arithmos-of-monads», produced by the self-subsumption of its predecessor leading ontological category/«arithmos-of-monads», also subsumes all other, earlier ontological categories/«arithmoi-of-monads», including that last leading ontological category/«arithmos-of-monads» itself, until this process of self-iterating ‘auto-subsumptions’ and ‘allo-subsumptions’ reaches this new leading category itself.

 

“Then, there, this new leading ontological category subsumes itself, reproducing itself, its «monads», yes, but also giving birth to the new next leading, ‘self-hybrid’ ontological category/its ‘meta-units’, thereby completing this epoch, and launching the next historical epoch, in which this newest leading, ‘self-hybrid’ ontological category at its end carries out its own new process(es) of self[-and-other]-subsumption.”

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For more information regarding these Seldonian insights, please see --

 

www.dialectics.info

 

 

 

For partially pictographical, ‘poster-ized’ visualizations of many of these Seldonian insights -- specimens of ‘dialectical art’ -- see:

https://www.etsy.com/shop/DialecticsMATH

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

¡ENJOY!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Regards,

 

 

Miguel Detonacciones,

 

Voting Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.];

Elected Member, F.E.D. General Council;

Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison;

Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.

 

 

 

 

YOU are invited to post your comments on this blog-entry below!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The ‘Qualo-Fractal’ of Our Cosmos is NOT a “Hierarchy”! -- Part 1: Seldon’s Worldview Series.

 

The ‘Qualo-Fractal’ of Our Cosmos is not a “Hierarchy”!

 

-- Part 1: Seldon’s Worldview Series.

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Reader,

 

 

 

It is my pleasure, and my honor, as an elected member of the Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.] General Council, and as a voting member of F.E.D., to share, with you, from time to time, as they are approved for public release, by the F.E.D. General Council, key excerpts from the internal writings, and from the internal sayings, of our co-founder, Karl Seldon.

 

This first release in this new such series is posted below [Some E.D. standard edits have been applied, in the version presented below, by the editors of the F.E.D. Special Council for the Encyclopedia, to the direct transcript of our co-founder’s discourse].

 

In this 1st installment, Seldon explains why a ‘qualo-fractal’ is NOT a “Hierarchy”.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Seldon –

 

“The ‘«aufheben»-ic’, or dialectical, ‘mutual-similarities regress’, or _NQualo-fractal’, of our universe as a unity, as, too, of the ‘«aufheben»-ic’ _NQualo-fractal’ sub-universes that it contains, and by which it was and is constituted, do not constitute, do not qualify as, a “hierarchy”.”

 

“Calling it a “hierarchy” is simply a ruling-class, ideological self-projection of the narcissistic, sociopathic «mentalité» of the ‘descendence-phase’, ‘capitalist/anti-capitalist’ ruling class, a so-distorted view of the radical ‘dialecticity’/interconnectedness of Nature.”

 

“Our ‘qualo-fractal’ cosmos is not a “hierarchy” because, in it, the units or «monads» of each scale/level are typically accessible to interaction with the units/«monads» of every other scale/level.”

 

“In a true “hierarchy”, or class-society “chain of command”, the units/«monads» of each level can only, officially act upon the units/«monads» of the level immediately below it, and the latter in this “ladder” can only, officially act upon the units/«monads» of the level immediately below the latter.  And so on.”

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For more information regarding these Seldonian insights, please see --

 

www.dialectics.info

 

 

 

 

 

For partially pictographical, ‘poster-ized’ visualizations of many of these Seldonian insights -- specimens of ‘dialectical art’ -- see:

https://www.etsy.com/shop/DialecticsMATH

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

¡ENJOY!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Regards,

 

 

Miguel Detonacciones,

 

Voting Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.];

Elected Member, F.E.D. General Council;

Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison;

Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.

 

 

 

 

YOU are invited to post your comments on this blog-entry below!