THE DIALECTICAL BIRTH of “Ordinary Matter” from “Dark Matter”: Elements of an Hypothesis.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

THE DIALECTICAL

 

BIRTH

 

of

 

“Ordinary Matter”

 

from

 

“Dark Matter”:

 

Elements of an

 

Hypothesis.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Reader,

 

The Encyclopedia Dialectica Research Team for volume 1 of that Encyclopedia have been searching, for some time, for a mechanism congruent with our ‘Regenerist’ sub-hypothesis, that some of the ‘contracton’ units/“particles” of “Dark Matter” gave birth to the first units of what we call ‘Bright Matter’, i.e., of “Ordinary Matter”, or “Visible Matter” – of matter that exhibits, not just gravitational interactivity, but electromagnetic interactivity as well.

 

Recent galactic observations, and deeper analyses of past galactic observations, have indicated galactic emissions of gamma ray photonic “particles”, in forms and from loci where they are not expected to arise, based upon known physical processes.  

One of the analyzers has hypothesized that these gamma rays originate from collisions of “Dark Matter particles” in galactic loci where “Dark Matter particles”, per some recent cosmological hypotheses, are expected to congregate and even to concentrate.

 

Even the characteristics of that gamma radiation appear to conform to the mathematical expectations of some versions of the “Weakly-Interacting Massive Particles” model of “Dark Matter”.

 

If it turns out true that these gamma ray emissions arise from the collisions – which may also be combinations, e.g., «aufheben» ‘self-meta-«monad»-izations’ – of “Dark Matter” «monadV», then this self-transformation of concentrated “Dark Matter” units into ‘Bright Matter’ radiation gamma photon units may be a key case of an Einsteinian, “Unified Field Theory” circumstantial – circumstances-dependent – conversion, of gravitational field energy into electromagnetic field energy.

 

It is well-known that gamma ray units, under certain conditions, self-convert into ‘Bright Matter’ particle/antiparticle pairs.  Were this to be the/a pathway of the genesis of ‘Bright Matter’ from “Dark Matter”, with the immediate re-annihilation of the pair into gamma ray photon units somehow averted, it would likely involve a solution to the, difficult, and still-unsolved problem of matter/antimatter asymmetry.

 

Despite that formidable theoretical obstacle, this gamma ray emission phenomenon could still be a clue to the mechanism by which some of the ‘contractons’ of “Dark Matter” give birth to the first “ordinary matter particles” of, e.g., the “Standard Model of Particle Physics”, i.e., by which –

 

c¹  --> c²  =  c¹ x c¹  = 

c¹ + Dc¹   |-=   c¹ +  r¹,

 

– or, re-symbolizing c by D & r by B –

   

D¹  --> D²   =   D¹  x  D¹  = 

D¹ + DD¹  |-=   D¹ + B¹.

 

¿But, if, per our hypothesis, all of the “Dark Matter particles” were precipitated, cosmos-wide, in a singular event of “Dark Energy” expandon’s spatial expansion velocity-limit excession, what would be the mechanism causing a progressively-growing physical-spatial concentration of “Dark Matter” «monadV», leading up to, and causing, the genesis of ‘Bright Matter’ “particles”, at the cores of “Dark Matter” proto-Galactic halos?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For more information regarding these Seldonian insights, and to read and/or download, free of charge, PDFs and/or JPGs of Foundation books, other texts, and images, please see:

 

www.dialectics.info

 

 

and

 

 

https://independent.academia.edu/KarlSeldon

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For partially pictographical, ‘poster-ized’ visualizations of many of these Seldonian insights -- specimens of ‘dialectical art’ – as well as dialectically-illustrated books published by the F.E.D. Press, see –

 

https://www.etsy.com/shop/DialecticsMATH

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

¡ENJOY!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Regards,

 

 

 

Miguel Detonacciones,

 

Voting Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.];

Elected Member, F.E.D. General Council;

Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison;

Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.

 

 

 

 

 

 

YOU are invited to post your comments on this blog-entry below!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Part 02: Seldon on ‘Dialectical Categorial Progressions’ Series. Categories and their Sub-Categories in NQ Dialectical Categorial Progressions and Beyond.

 

 

 

 

 

Part 02: Seldon on

 

 

‘Dialectical Categorial Progressions’ Series.

 

 

 Categories

 

and

 

their Sub-Categories

 

in _NQ

 

Dialectical

 

Categorial

 

Progressions

 

and

 

Beyond.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Reader,

 

 

 

It is my pleasure, and my honor, as an elected member of the Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.] General Council, and as a voting member of F.E.D., to share, with you, from time to time, as they are approved for public release by the F.E.D. General Council, Seldon’s commentaries on key Encyclopedia Dialectica concepts of Seldonian Theory.

 

 

This 2nd text in this new such series is posted herewith, together with supporting text-images and diagrams [Some E.D. standard edits have been applied, in the version presented below, by the editors of the F.E.D. Special Council for the Encyclopedia, to the direct transcript of our co-founder’s discourse].

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Seldon –

 

“Consider the generic stage 8 ‘categorial combinatoric’ [proxy for the generic, undergirding ‘monadic-combinatoric’] dialectical categorial progression, in the _NQ algebra, 

using the simplest, the ‘Qualo-Peanic’, Dialectical Method:

 

a [+] b [+] q_ba [+] g [+] q_ga [+] q_gb [+] q_gba [+] d.

 

It sometime fits to interpret the “merely-hybrid” category q_ba as a [relative species] sub-category of [relative «genos»] ‘self-hybrid’ category b º q_b.”

 

 

 

“Likewise, it sometimes fits to interpret “merely-hybrid” categories –

q_ga & q_gb & q_gba  

– as more-determinate, more ‘thought-concrete [relative species] sub-categories of more abstract, less-determinations-rich, more general [relative «genos»] ‘self-hybrid’ category g º q_g.”

 

 

 

“Even in cases of historical-dialectics – not merely in cases of systematic-dialectics – categorial progressions, e.g., q_ga [+] q_gb [+] q_gba, may not work as a chronologically-ordered, ‘chronologically ordinal’ sub-progression. They may, instead, fit as an all-together-at-once, simultaneous, synchronic/-systematic/-taxonomic triad of dialectical sub-categories.”*

 

“In some cases, there may be additional sub-categories, beyond, e.g., the three in standard ordinal positions fifth, sixth and seventh, and also for some, or even all, of the other ordinal positions in this generic progression – even for the eighth position, and beyond.”

 

“In such cases, including all of those, implicit, sub-categories explicitly in your ontological-categorial, categorial-progression, dialectical ‘meta-model’ may require recourse to even the 56^th,

q__GBA, 

arithmetic/algebra for modeling dialectics, in the,

_NQ-expressed, dialectical ‘ideo-ontological’ categorial 

progression/-axioms-systems progression, long-form ‘meta-model’ of the Encyclopedia Dialectica arithmetics/algebras for modeling dialectics.”

 

“*[A case in point is the simplified, e.g., circulation value-forms-only, systematic-dialectical categorial progression model of the ‘content-structure’ of volumes I and II of Marx’s «Das Kapital».” 

 

“With categorogram K or q_K representing the category 

of circulation value-form ‘“Capital in General”’, the excerpt –

 

K Å q_KC Å q_KM Å q_KMC 

 

– may be fittingly interpreted as representing the «genos»-category of ‘“Capital in General”’, followed by its three, circulation value-form species sub-categories –

 

‘“Commodity-Kapitals”’, plus

‘“Money-Kapitals”’, plus

‘“Circulations of the Total Social Kapital”’.” 

 

 

“This sub-progression arises in the context of the simplified, seven-category dialectical categorial progression model of the volumes I and II «Das Kapital» tables of contents –

 

C Å M Å q_MC Å K Å q_KC Å q_KM Å q_KMC

 

– wherein the ‘merely-hybrid categorogram’

q_MC 

stands for the ‘“Monies-mediated circulations of Commodities”’ category.”

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For more information regarding these Seldonian insights, and to read and/or download, free of charge, PDFs and/or JPGs of Foundation books, other texts, and images, please see:

 

www.dialectics.info

 

 

and

 

 

https://independent.academia.edu/KarlSeldon

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For partially pictographical, ‘poster-ized’ visualizations of many of these Seldonian insights – specimens of ‘dialectical art’ – as well as dialectically-illustrated books published by the F.E.D. Press, see:

 

https://www.etsy.com/shop/DialecticsMATH

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

¡ENJOY!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Regards,

 

 

 

Miguel Detonacciones,

 

Voting Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.];

Elected Member, F.E.D. General Council;

Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison;

Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.

 

 

 

 

 

 

YOU are invited to post your comments on this blog-entry below!