Tuesday, November 04, 2025

Marx: “The Development of the Social Individual” -- an Amendment.

 



Marx:

 

 The Development

 

of the

 

Social Individual;

 

 

an Amendment.

 

 

 

GLOBAL STRATEGIC HYPOTHESES.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Reader,

 

 

We wish to propose, as illustrated in the diagram posted above, an amendment to Marx’s Productive forces and social relationships – the two different sides of the development of the social individual…

[David McLellan, The Grundrisse: Karl Marx, Harper & Row, NY,, 1971, p. 148].

 

 

We hold that there are, not just two, but four fundamental dimensions of the historical development of the human-social individual that should be highlighted in any contemporary extension of Marxian theory, that is adequate to the growth of scientific knowledge since Marx’s time. 

 

Those four dimensions are –

 

1.  Yes, the history of the ‘social self-force of human-societal self-re-production’: “productive forces” or “technologies [of human life-expansion]” for short;

 

2. Yes, the ‘social relations of human-societal self-re-production’: “social relationships”, or [the history of human] “livelihood relations” for short;

 

3.  But also: the history of human social formations

and;

 

4.  The [psycho]history of

 human ideologies\knowledges.

 

These four “sides” of the development of the human-social individual, as depicted above, are shown as four historical-dialectical categorial progressions, radiating from the four ‘‘‘poles’’’ – two horizontal and two vertical – of the social- individual “core” of this diagram.

 

The «arché» category, and the subsequent ‘self-hybrid’ ontological categories of these four Domains of dialectical categorial progression, to-date, are, we hold –

 

A.  Social Formations:

1.  «arché» category: b, for hunter-gatherer bands;

2.  c, for hunter-gatherer camps;

3.  v, for agricultural villages;

4.  f, for multi-village chiefdoms;

5.  s, city-states;

6.  e, for multi-city-state ancient empires;

7.  n, for nation-states.    

 

B.  Livelihood Relations 

[“social relations of production”]:

1.  «arché» category: A, for raw-Nature Appropriations by humans [e.g., hunter-gatherer-scavenger foraging & cannibalisms];

2.  G, for human-labor-modified Nature, i.e. Goods/Gifts;

3.  C, for bartered Commodities;

4.  M, for commodity-exchange-mediating Monies;

5.  K, for money-profits-targeting Kapitals.

 

C.  Society-Expanding Technologies 

[“Productive Forces”]:

1.  «arché»: h, human communities’ cooperative labor as energy-resource [e.g., communal hunting and gathering];

2.  l, social animals as energy-resources [e.g., herding];

3.  b, de-socialized multi[-eukaryotic-]cellular bodies as energy-resources, e.g., human slavery [and ‘animal slavery’];

4.  e, eukaryotic cells as energy-resources [e.g., yeast cells for our “daily bread”, as well as for beers and wines];

5.  p, prokaryotic cells as energy-resources [e.g., bacteria-based cheeses – technologies for food preservation];

6.  m, molecules as energy-resources 

[e.g., natural gas];


7.  a, atoms as energy-resources [e.g., atomic power].    

 


D.  Ideologies\Knowledges:


1.  «arché» category: L for [initially only spoken]

Languages;


2.  A, for [e.g., initially only cave-wall, petroglyph & figurine] Arts;


3.  M, for the story-units of Mythopoeias, or Mythologies;


4.  R, for doctrinaire, dogmatic Religions;


5.  P, for speculative Philosophies

philosophical schools;


6.  K, for observationally/experimentally corroborated

     Knowledges [e.g., sciences];

 

Of course, it must be admitted that, while each of these progressions, within each of these four dimensions of the human-social individual, and of the development thereof in human history, is relatively distinct and autonomous, and are worthwhile to take notice of separately, but all are ultimately driven by, and predicated upon, just one of them – on the growth of “the social forces of production” [Marx].

 

This is so, in a subtlest form, even for the [psycho]historical development of --

ideologies\knowledges.

 

And, also of course, each of these four distinct ontological-dialectical progressions interacts with each of the others, in exceedingly complex ways.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For more information regarding these Seldonian insights, and to read and/or download, free of charge, PDFs and/or JPGs of Foundation books, other texts, and images, please see:

 

www.dialectics.info

 

 

and

 

 

https://independent.academia.edu/KarlSeldon

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For partially pictographical, ‘poster-ized’ visualizations of many of these Seldonian insights -- specimens of dialectical artas well as dialectically-illustrated books published by the F.E.D. Press, see

 

https://www.etsy.com/shop/DialecticsMATH

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

¡ENJOY!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Regards,

 

 

 

 

Miguel Detonacciones,

 

Voting Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.];

Elected Member, F.E.D. General Council;

Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison;

Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.

 

 

 

 

 

 

YOU are invited to post your comments on this blog-entry below!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Monday, October 27, 2025

The 'META-Pythagorean Proposition' REVISITED.

 

 















The

META-Pythagorean Proposition

REVISITED.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

GLOBAL STRATEGIC HYPOTHESES.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Reader,

 

 

Reality is composed of manifold, intermingled, ‘numbers of «monads»’, that is, of ‘«arithmoi» of units; assemblages of objects, of discrete individual things, sorted conceptually, categorially into their qualitatively different kinds, but intermingled in physical space – that is the non-mystical, concrete, sensuous, empirical meaning of the Pythagorean motto “All is number”.

 

These, qualitative, ‘numbers of units’ were divided into multitudinous, qualitatively different kinds”, of «genos» and species – per the systematic/“eternal” dialectic of Socrates and Plato; of their «arithmoi eidetikoi».

 

That saying also implies that absolutely unique objects, absolute singletons, “one of a kind” objects, «sui genera», are rare to non-existent in our universe.

 

 

We embrace this implication of the ‘Pythagorean Postulate.

 

 

We also uphold a “tweak” to – that is, an immanent critique of – not just the Pythagorean world view, but the world view of the humanity of ‘ancient Mediterranea’ entire.

 

 

A key psychohistorical root of that world view is exhibited in the following quotes from foundational texts attesting to the ancient Mediterranean ‘human phenome’: 

 

“EUCLID defines in the Elements, VII, 2, a number as “the multitude made up of units” having previously (Elements, VII, 1) said that a unit is “that by virtue of which each of existing things is called one.”  

As a unit is not composed of units, neither EUCLID nor ARISTOTLE regard a unit as a number, but rather as “the basis of counting, or as the origin [Gk: «arché» – M.D.] of number.

 

[H.-D. Ebbinghaus, et al., Numbers, Springer-Verlag, NY, 1991, p. 12.  Emphasis added by M.D.]

 

 

We hold that, on the contrary, ubiquitously, throughout exo-human Nature and human Nature alike, ‘units are composed of units’; units contain [sub-]units; [meta-]units are made up out [of multiplicities] of units.

 

 

The fuller evidence of this reality that has been cumulatively unearthed by modern science was, of course, not extant in the times during which those quotes were written. 

 

 

However, ample examples of the presence of ‘meta-«monad»-icity’, and of the process of ‘«aufheben» meta-«monad»-ization’ as the cause of ‘onto-dynamasis’, were already extant in those times.

 

 

Today, in our work, ‘meta-«monad»-icity’, and the process of ‘«aufheben» meta-«monad»-ization’, as the cause of ‘onto-dynamasis’, form the core of our world view.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For more information regarding these Seldonian insights, and to read and/or download, free of charge, PDFs and/or JPGs of Foundation books, other texts, and images, please see:

 

www.dialectics.info

 

 

and

 

 

https://independent.academia.edu/KarlSeldon

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For partially pictographical, ‘poster-ized’ visualizations of many of these Seldonian insights -- specimens of dialectical artas well as dialectically-illustrated books published by the F.E.D. Press, see

 

https://www.etsy.com/shop/DialecticsMATH

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

¡ENJOY!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Regards,

 

 

 

Miguel Detonacciones,

 

Voting Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.];

Elected Member, F.E.D. General Council;

Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison;

Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.

 

 

 

 

 

 

YOU are invited to post your comments on this blog-entry below!