__Full Title__:

**Part**

**III**.

**B**.

**Epoch**

**t**

_{ALL}**= 2**:

**.**

__molecules__emergent

**.**

*The Dialectic of Nature*Dear Readers,

The present blog-entry is the

**fourth**blog-entry in this series on the

**‘meta-modeling’ of the**

*dialectical*

*natural history of the total***, as presently known to science [except that the**

*cosmos**main*‘meta-model’ narrated herein does not yet

*directly*and

*explicitly*address either “Dark Energy” or “Dark Matter”].

The epoch of that

**addressed in this blog-entry is the**

*natural history of the cosmos***t**

_{ALL}**= 2**epoch, in which the initial, cosmological -- cosmos-wide -- ‘neo-ontology’ of

**is first ‘irruptant’.**

__m__oleculesRegards,

Miguel

**Part**

**III**.

**B**.:

**Depiction**--

*Dialectical**-*

**Mathematical Meta**-**Model****--**

*of our*__Story__*Cosmos***Epoch**

**t**

_{ALL}**= 2**:

__m__

__olecules__**emergent**.

**Part**

**III**.

**B**.:

**Narration**--

*Dialectical**-*

**Mathematical Meta**-**Model****--**

*of our*__Story__*Cosmos***Epoch**

**t**

_{ALL}**= 2**:

__m__

__olecules__**emergent**.

*Recounting the Story of the*__Next__Chapter of the Ontological__Self__*-*,

**Revolutions of Pre**-**Human Cosmological Nature**

*Dialectical**-*.

**Mathematically as well as Narratively****: Throughout this blog-entry, we employ two key**

__Please Note__**scientifico-philosophical terms.**

*ancient*Their resurrection in the

**also serves well to catalyze an urgently needed**

*present***transition,**

*future*to a

*‘*,

**trans**-**modern**’**--**

*science***1**. «

**», which means, e.g**

__Monad__*., “*

__qual__itative

*Unit**”*,

*“*

__qual__itative

*logical*__Individual__*”*, or

*“*

__qual__itative

__Element__*”*-- a single one of the many like-kind constituents represented,

**, by a**

*collectively**“*, and;

**category**”**2**. «

**» [plural: «**

*Arithmos***»], which means a**

*arithmo*__i__*“*, e.g

**category**”*.*an

*“*, a

**ensemble**”*“*, a

**multitude**”*‘“*, or an

**population**”’*“*of «

**assemblage**”**» -- i.e., of**

*monads**“*

__qual__itative

*units**”*, of

*“*

__qual__itative

*logical individuals**”*, or of

*“*

__qual__itative

*elements**”*-- all of which «

**» share a common**

*monads***, or a common**

__qual__ity**, i.e., a «**

*predicate***» in common; a like “kind”.**

__categore__ma**: Many of the special, technical words employed below are also hypertext links to definitions of those words [often for the first occurrence of each such word**

__Please Note Also__*only*].

*The*

*Dialectical**‘*

**Theory of Everything**’**for Epoch**

__Equation__**t**

_{ALL}**= 2**--

*Irruption of the*

__molecules__*-*

**as**-**Monads**‘**Cosmo**-**Ontology**’**via**‘

*Self**-*

**Meta**-**Monad****ization**’

*of***«**

__atoms__**».**

*Monads*The

**‘meta-equation meta-model’ of**

__dialectical__**which we will be exploring, and iterating, for escalating values of its “discrete**

*the total cosmos***ime” parameter, or ‘epoch parameter’, denoted by**

__t__**t**

**, and whose story we will be narrating throughout this series, is the following --**

_{ALL}

_{ALL}**>-|-<**

_{t}

_{ALL}**= <**

_{ALL}

__r__**>**

^{2}

^{t}

^{ALL}-- wherein

_{ALL}**denotes the primordial ‘cosmo-ontological category’ of p**

__r__**e-nuclea**

__r__**“pa**

__r__**ticles”, i.e., denotes the category of “**

__r__**elementary**”

**, as well as of anything else actually existent in primordial**

*bosons and fermions*__and____composite__**Nature**, but presently

**known to the human sciences.**

__un__In the present blog-entry of this series of blog-entries, we will be narrating those parts of our, and of its,

*‘‘‘*, that inhere in the

**story of everything**’’’**2**nd epoch, per this ‘meta-equation’, i.e., that inhere in the

**that inheres in this ‘meta-equation’ for the**

*equation***t**

_{ALL}**= 2**value of its discrete-

**ime,**

__t__**,**

*epoch parameter***t**

**.**

_{ALL}**2**.

**Epoch**

**t**

_{ALL}**=**

**2**:

__molecules__**ontology**

*‘*--

**irruptant**’A general overview of the crucial role of specifically

**‘cosmo-ontology’ can be gleaned from the concluding summary of the**

__m__*olecular***2013**book

__The Cosmic__*:*

__-__**Chemical Bond****, by D. A. Williams and T. W. Harquist --**

*Chemistry from the Big Bang to Planet Formation***“**The [MD: rather recent] discovery of

**molecules**in interstellar space has revolutionized astronomers’ view of the

**Universe**.”

“...It is now recognized that

**molecules**are required to provide

**for gas in the processes of collapse to form**

__cooling__mechanisms

*proto**-*and

**galaxies**

*proto**-*.

**stars****”**

[D. A. Williams and T. W. Harquist,

__The Cosmic__*:*

__-__**Chemical Bond****, The Royal Society of Chemistry [Cambridge:**

*Chemistry from the Big Bang to Planet Formation***2013**], p.

**199**,

**M.D.].**

*emphases*by__added__**2**

**.**

**1**

__Formulaic Summary for the__*Second*Full Epoch of__‘__. An ‘Ideo

**Cosmological***Meta**-***Evolution**’**ized’ /- ‘ideo**

__graph__**ized’, “shorthand” summary of the narrative rendition below.**

__gram__If

**t**

_{ALL}**= 2**, then --

_{ALL}**>-|-<**

_{t}

_{ALL}**=**

_{ALL}**>-|-<**

**2**

**=**

**<**

_{ALL}

__r__**>**

^{22}**=**

**<**

_{ALL}

__r__**>**

^{4}**=**

_{ALL}

__r__

^{2}**x**

_{ALL}

__r__

^{2}**=**

_{ }**<**

_{ALL}

__r__**+**

_{ALL}

__a__**>**

**x <**

_{ALL}

__r__**+**

_{ALL}

__a__**> =**

**<**

_{ALL}

__r__**+**

_{ALL}

__a__**>**

**+**

__Delta__**<**

_{ALL}

__r__**+**

_{ALL}

__a__**> =**

_{ALL}

__r__**+**

_{ALL}

__a__**+**

_{ALL}

__q__

_{a}

_{r}**+**

_{ALL}

__q__**.**

_{aa}-- as

**t**

_{ALL}**=**

**1**

**→**

**t**

_{ALL}**=**

**2**.

The ‘epoch

**2**’ equation will feature a ‘poly-

**inomial’ and “non-amalgamative sum”, containing of**

__qual__**2**

^{2}**= 4**category-symbols.

The ‘epoch

**2**’ equation will still include the ‘since epoch

**0**’ ontology of our «

**» cosmological**

*arché*category, denoted by

_{ALL}**, as [possibly] still existent, as well as the ‘since epoch**

__r__**1**’ ontology of

**, denoted by**

__atoms__

_{ALL}**, as [possibly] still existent as of and throughout ‘epoch**

__a__**2**’.

However, our ‘epoch

**2**’ equation also includes a

**‘cosmo-ontological’ category-symbol, for a**

*third*predicted /

*‘*dicted’ / reconstructed [possible] new ontology, that of a new,

__retro__**,**

*third*

**hybrid**/

**«**

*synthesis***» of «**

*arithmos*

*m*

*o*

*n*

*a*

*d***», one of a**

*s***itatively different kind of «**

__qual__

*m*

*o*

*n*

*a*

*d***»,**

*s*or of

**, than the**

*units***of the**

*units***,**

__first__

_{ALL}**, «**

__r__**» of «**

*arithmos***», and than the**

*monads***of**

*units*the

**,**

__second__

_{ALL}**, «**

__a__**» of «**

*arithmos***», and such that this**

*monads***[possible] «**

*third***»**

*arithmos*of «

*m*

*o*

*n*

*a*

*d***» is denoted, ‘‘‘algebraically’’’, by**

*s*

_{ALL}

__q__

_{a}**.**

_{r}Moreover, our ‘epoch

**2**’ equation includes, in addition, a

**‘cosmo-ontological’ category-symbol, for another predicted / ‘retrodicted’ / reconstructed [possible] new ontology, that of a new,**

*fourth***, «**

*fourth***», one of a**

*arithmos***itatively different kind of**

__qual__**, or of**

*monads***, than the**

*units***of**

*units*the

**,**

__first__

_{ALL}**, «**

__r__**» of «**

*arithmos***», and than the**

*monads***of the**

*units***,**

__second__

_{ALL}**, «**

__a__**»**

*arithmos*of «

**», as well as than the**

*monads***of the**

*units***possible --**

*third***hybrid**-- «

**»**

*arithmos*of «

*m*

*o*

*n*

*a*

*d***», denoted, ‘‘‘algebraically’’’, by**

*s*

_{ ALL}

__q__

_{a}**, with this**

_{r}**possible «**

*fourth***»**

*arithmos*of «

**» being denoted, ‘‘‘algebraically’’’, by**

*monads*

_{ ALL}

__q__**.**

_{aa}Our task, with respect to this epoch

**t**

_{ALL}**= 2**model-equation, of our overall

*‘meta-*model

*meta-*equation’, is the “solve for” the meanings of these

**new terms,**

*two*

_{ALL}

__q__

_{a}**and**

_{r}

_{ALL}

__q__**,**

_{aa}that is, to identify the

**already known categories of ‘cosmos-ontology’ that came into**

*two*existence next

**the irruption into existence of**

__after__

_{ALL}**,**

__a__*and as an outgrowth of/from*

_{ALL}**,**

__a__by means of -- respectively -- a

**interaction of «**

*hybridizing***» of the**

*monads*

_{ALL}**«**

__a__**»**

*arithmos*with «

**» of the**

*monads*

_{ALL}**«**

__r__**», and of a**

*arithmos*

*self**-*«

**»**

*aufheben**‘*

**self**-**meta**-**monadization**’of «

**» of the**

*monads*

_{ALL}**«**

__a__**».**

*arithmos*The standard “first try” method of solution for ‘dialectical-algebraic unknown’ terms of the form,

_{ALL}

__q__**, is to scan our knowledge of Nature for**

_{aa}**, or «**

*units***», each of which can be**

*monads*aptly characterized as ‘a

**meta**-

_{ALL}

__a__**, each one made up out of a heterogeneous multiplicity**

*unit*of

_{}

_{ALL}

__a___{ }units’ -- i.e., ‘a

**meta**-“

**tom”**

__a__**, each one made up out of a [typically] heterogeneous**

*unit*multiplicity of “

**toms” ’.**

__a__To our minds, the natural formation that “fills this bill” is called the “molecule”.

Each typical “molecule” unit is made up out of

**or more “**

*two***tom” units.**

__a__But the simplest such

*‘*«

**meta**-**»’ -- a kind of**

*monad**‘*«

**meta**-**»’ that is composed of a**

*monad*‘homogeneous multiplicity’ of

_{ALL}**“**

__a__**tom” «**

__a__**»**

*monads**-- i.e., the simplest and*

*most*

*cosmologically-prevalent*

**«**

__m__olecule**» -- especially so during the epoch of the first**

*monad*

*‘*of

**irruptancy**’**in our**

__m__olecular ontology**, i.e., in**

*cosmos***t**

_{ALL}**= 2**-- is the

**atomic**

__di__

__H__ydrogen**,**

__m__olecule**H**, which is a

_{2}*‘*geneous

__homo__**multiplicity’ of thus**

__minimal__exactly

**2**,

*mutually chemically**-*

**bonded**

__H__ydrogen**tom «**

__a__**» --**

*monads*

*two*_{ ALL}

__a__**.**

*units*The rare,

*most complex*such

*‘*«

**meta**-**»’ so far found in interstellar space**

*monads***, i.e., in**

__today__the

**cosmological epoch --**

__present__**which are, indeed, made up out of**

__m__olecules

*‘*geneous higher multiplicities of

__hetero__

_{ALL}**«**

__a__**»’ -- include**

*monads***[**

*methanol***CH**,

_{3}OHcontaining

**6**

**toms],**

__a__**[**

*ethanol***CH**, containing

_{3}CH_{2}OH**9**

**toms],**

__a__

*dimethyl ether*[

**CH**, containing

_{3}OCH_{3}**9**

**toms], and**

__a__**[**

*propanal***CH**, containing

_{3}CH_{2}CHO**10**

**toms],**

__a__as well as

**[**

*cyanodecapentayne***HC**, containing

_{10}CN**13**

**toms] -- discovered first in**

__a__interstellar space; only later, guided by that astronomical characterization, duplicated in

Earthly laboratories -- and, perhaps also [“the jury is still out” as of this writing],

__P__olycyclic

__A__romatic

__H__ydrocarbon**[**

__s__**PAHs**], which may contain up to

**100**

**toms,**

__a__with

__C__arbon**toms in hexagonal arrays [i.e., in graphite-like arrays], terminated by**

__a__peripheral

__H__ydrogen**toms or by other**

__a__

__m__olecular**sub**-

**structures**.

However, most of this latter-day abundance, and richness of diversity, of

__m__olecular

*species*in the interstellar medium of our galaxy, and of other galaxies, is the product,

__of__

**not**

_{ALL}

__q__**,**

_{aa}i.e.,

**of the**

__not__*“*of

**original accumulation**”**«**

__m__olecular**», and of the epoch of the**

*monads*

*‘“*, of

**formal subsumption**”’**, and of**

__a__tomic**, ‘cosmo-ontology’, by**

*previous*

__m__olecular‘cosmo-ontology’, i.e., does

**belong to our model’s epoch**

__not__**t**

_{ALL}**= 2**.

Rather, most of the diversity of the mass-energy in our

*, that is organized up to the*

**cosmos**

__m__olecular**level of organization of matter-energy**,

**, is the product of the**

*but no higher***,**

*later*

*next***of cosmological ‘‘‘meta-evolution’’’, namely, of epoch**

*epoch***t**

_{ALL}**= 3**, the

**of**

*epoch*the

*‘*of

**’**__reproductive__accumulation**‘cosmo-ontology’; the epoch of the**

__m__olecular*‘‘‘*

__real__*of prior,*

**subsumption**’’’**, and**

__a__tomic**, ‘cosmo-ontology’, by**

*earlier*

__m__olecular‘cosmo-ontology’, as represented by new terms/category-descriptions of the

**t**

_{ALL}**= 3**equation,

such as

_{ALL}

__q__

_{m}**and**

_{a}

_{ALL}

__q__

_{m}

_{a}**.**

_{r}

We can assert [‘

**|-.**’] this solution for the meaning / “intension” / “connotation” of the algebraic

**known term**

__un__

_{ALL}

__q__**, formally, as follows, using**

_{aa}

_{ALL}**to connote the**

__m__**category**named

“

**molecules**” --

_{ALL}

__q__

_{aa}**|-.=**

_{ALL}**.**

__m__Our

*partial*solution,

*so far*, to our epoch

**t**

_{ALL}**= 2**dialectical-algebraic equation --

_{ALL}**>-|-<**

**2**

**=**

_{ALL}

__r__**+**

_{ALL}

__a__**+**

_{ALL}

__q__

_{a}

_{r}**+**

_{ALL}

__q__

_{aa}-- containing

*two*initially**, or previously solved, category-symbols --**

__known__

_{ALL}**, and**

__r__

_{ALL}

__a__-- and

**initially**

*two***known category-symbols --**

__un__

_{}

_{ALL}

__q__

_{a}**, and**

_{r}

_{ALL}

__q__

_{aa}-- is therefore now --

_{ALL}**>-|-<**

**2**

**=**

_{ALL}

__r__**+**

_{ALL}

__a__**+**

_{ALL}

__q__

_{a}

_{r}**+**

_{ALL}

__m__-- an equation which now contains

*three***category-symbols for epoch**

__known__**2**--

_{ }

_{ALL}**and**

__r__

_{ALL}**and**

__a__

_{ALL}

__m__-- and

**remaining “unsolved-for” / “to be solved-for”,**

*one***known category-symbol:**

__un__

_{ }

_{ALL}

__q__

_{a}**.**

_{r}In the above -- thus partially “solved” -- equation, the

_{ALL}**term is still there, because some**

__r__epoch

**0**p

**e-atomic “particles” still persist in[to] epoch**

__r__**1**, and because some epoch

**1**

interactions among p

**e-atomic “particles” -- e.g., some high energy collisions among**

__r__the

_{ALL}**, which produce other constituents of**

__r__

_{ALL}**-- still reproduce results that remain**

__r__[within]

_{ALL}**.**

__r__The

_{ALL}

__q__

_{rr}**|-.=**

_{ALL}**term is also still there, in that equation, to represent those lasting**

__a__products of

_{ ALL}**with**

__r__

_{ALL}**interactions that produce**

__r__**a**

**toms**, the category denoted by

_{ALL}**.**

__a__Our remaining task, with respect to this epoch

**t**

_{ALL}**= 2**model-equation -- an equation that

inheres in our overall

*‘meta-*model

*meta-*equation’ -- is the “solve for” the meaning of the

remaining new term,

_{ALL}

__q__

_{a}**, that is, to identify that already known category of**

_{r}‘cosmological-ontology’ that came into existence next

**the irruption-into-existence of**

__after__

_{ALL}**, and by means of a**

__a__**interaction of «**

*hybridizing***» of the**

*monads*

_{ALL}**«**

__a__**»**

*arithmos*with «

**» of the**

*monads*

_{ALL}**«**

__r__**»,**

*arithmos**and as a*

**j****oint**outgrowth of/from

_{ALL}**, and**

__a__

_{ALL}**.**

__r__The standard “first try” method of solution for ‘dialectical-algebraic unknown’ terms of the form,

_{ALL}

__q__

_{a}**, is to scan our knowledge of Nature for**

_{r}**, or «**

*units*

*m*

*o*

*n*

*a*

*d***», each of which can be**

*s*aptly characterized as a

**,**

*combination***, or**

*composite**‘‘‘*of

**complex****unity**’’’**of the**

*units*

_{ }

_{ALL}

__q__**«**

_{a}**»/**

*arithmos***, with**

*category***of the**

*units*

_{ALL}

__q__**«**

_{r}**»/**

*arithmos***-- e.g.,**

*category*a

*‘‘‘*of

**synthesis**’’’

_{ ALL}

__q__**s and**

_{a}

_{ALL}

__q__**s, and/or a formation that converts**

_{r}

_{ALL}

__q__**s**

_{r}into

_{ALL}

__q__**s, and in which that conversion of**

_{a}

_{ALL}

__q__**s is**

_{r}**by the presence, and**

__catalyzed__involvement, of

_{ALL}

__q__**s.**

_{a}To our minds, the ‘natural self-formations’ that “fill this bill” are, primarily, those intra-galactic

**/ p**

__a__tomic nuclei**e-atomic “pa**

__r__**ticles” co-formations known as**

__r__**tars, primarily in the internal**

__s__**tellar processes known collectively as**

__s__**(1)**“

**tellar**

__s__**nucleo**

**ynthesis”.**

__s__Secondary processes that also fit this

_{ALL}

__q__

_{a}**description include:**

_{r}**(2)**processes of

p

**e-atomic “pa**

__r__**ticle(s)”**

__r__**and ab**

__capture__**orption by**

__s__**, including those associated**

__a__tomic nucleiwith novae and

**uper-novae end-stage**

__s__**tellar self-explosions,**

__s__**(3)**processes of

**pontaneous**

__s__radioactive decay of

**, typically emitting p**

__a__tomic nuclei**e-atomic “pa**

__r__**ticles” in that process,**

__r__and

**(4)**those processes of “

**pallation”, in which bombardment of**

__s__**by, e.g.,**

__a__tomic nuclei“cosmic ray” p

**e-atomic “pa**

__r__**ticles”, converts some of the [e.g., more abundant]**

__r__**of**

*species***into some of the [e.g., rarer]**

__a__tomic nuclei

__a__tomic nuclei**.**

*species*Processes

**(3)**in the list above are described, by Harry Y. McSween, Jr., and Gary R. Russ, in their

**2010**book

**, as follows --**

__Cosmochemistry__**“**In addition to the processes of

**, there are two other ways in which isotopes are produced.”**

*stellar*__nucleo__synthesis“One is

*radioactive decay*.”

“Many of the

**produced by**

*nuclides***[M.D.: Our ‘**

*explosive*__nucleo__synthesis**(2)**’ in the list above] are unstable and

**to stable**

*decay***with timescales ranging from a fraction of a second to billions of years.”**

*nuclei*“Those with very short half-lives decayed completely into their daughter

**before any evidence of their existence was recorded in objects from our solar system. However, radioactive**

*isotopes***from**

*nuclei***that have half-lives of**

*stellar*__nucleo__synthesis**>**

**100**,

**000**years left a record in solar system materials.”

“The ultimate fate of all

*radioactive***is to**

*nuclides***to their stable daughter**

*decay***.”**

*nuclides*“Thus, the only real distinction between

**produced by**

*isotopes***and those produced by**

*stellar*__nucleo__synthesis

*radioactive***produced by**

*nuclides***[M.D.: in particular, by**

*stellar*__nucleo__synthesis*“*

**explosive**”**, e.g., in**

*stellar*__nucleo__synthesis

*stellar supernovae*

*star***] is the time scale of their**

*death***.**

*decay***”**

[Harry Y. McSween, Jr. and Gary R. Huss,

**, Cambridge University Press [NY:**

__Cosmochemistry__**2010**], p.

**80**,

**M.D.]**

*emphases*__added__byProcesses

**(4)**in the list above are described, in the same text, as follows --

*“*

*I*

*r*

*r*

*a*

*d*

*i*

*a*

*t*

*i*

*o***of**

*n***by**

*matter***, primarily**

*high energy particles***and [**

*protons*

*alpha**-*]

**[M.D.: i.e.,**

*particles***], can change one**

*Helium nuclei***into**

*isotope***.”**

*another*“These high-energy particles are typically called

*cosmic rays*, and they can originate either in the

**or in a variety of environments elsewhere in the galaxy.”**

*Sun**“*

__S__

*p*

*a*

*l*

*l*

*a*

*t*

*i*

*o*

*n***are those in which a**

*reactions***is split by an incoming**

*nucleus***into two or more smaller**

*cosmic ray***. Much of the**

*nuclides***,**

*lithium***, and**

*beryllium***boron**in the galaxy is produced by

*cosmic**-*induced

**ray**-**on abundant**

*spallation***such as**

*species*

^{12}**C**,

^{16}**O**,

^{20}**Ne**,

^{24}**Mg**, and

^{28}**Si**.”

*“*

__S__

*p*

*a*

*l*

*l*

*a*

*t*

*i*

*o*

*n***often release**

*reactions***, which can be captured by**

*neutrons*

*other***. In the outer meter or so of asteroids and other solid objects, these secondary**

*nuclides***from**

*neutrons*

*spallation***in the surface layer can produce measurable changes in the**

*reactions***of the constituent**

*isotopic compositions***.**

*elements***”**

[Harry Y. McSween, Jr. and Gary R. Huss,

**, Cambridge University Press [NY:**

__Cosmochemistry__**2010**], pp.

**80**-

**81**,

**M.D.]**

*emphases*__a____dded__byWe therefore denote the univocal category for all four of these

_{ALL}

__q__

_{a}**processes by**

_{r}

_{ALL}**.**

__s__We can assert [‘

**|-.**’] this solution for the meaning / “intension” / “connotation” of the algebraic

**known term**

__un__

_{ALL}

__q__

_{a}**, formally, as follows, using**

_{r}

_{ALL}**to connote the**

__s__**category**of

“

**nucleo**

**ynthetic” processes --**

__s__

_{ALL}

__q__

_{a}

_{r}**|-.=**

_{ALL}**.**

__s__Our

*full*solution to our epoch

**t**

_{ALL}**= 2**dialectical-algebraic equation, whose unsolved form [for its latter two terms] is --

_{ALL}**>-|-<**

**2**

**=**

_{ALL}

__r__**+**

_{ALL}

__a__**+**

_{ALL}

__q__

_{a}

_{r}

**+**

_{ALL}

__q__

_{aa}-- containing

**, initially**

*two***, or previously solved, category-symbols --**

__known__

_{ALL}**, and**

__r__

_{ALL}**-- and**

__a__**initially**

*two***known category-symbols,**

__un__

_{ALL}

__q__

_{a}**, and**

_{r}

_{ALL}

__q__**, is therefore now --**

_{aa}

_{ALL}**>-|-<**

**2**

**=**

_{ALL}

__r__**+**

_{ALL}

__a__**+**

_{ALL}

__s__**+**

_{ALL}

__m__-- an equation which now contains

*only***category-symbols --**

__known__

*exactly four*__known__category-symbols, for epoch

**2**:

_{ALL}**and**

__r__

_{ALL}**and**

__a__

_{ALL}**and**

__s__

_{ALL}**.**

__m__**1**

**.**

**2**

**for ‘epoch**

__Narrative Summary__**t**

_{ALL}**= 2**’.

Suppose that we extend, ‘‘‘universalize’’’, or ‘«

**»**

*gene**-*realize’ Marx’s

*‘*«

**»**

*speci**-*al’ application

of his terms

*“*versus [followed by]

**”**__formal__subsumption*“*-- and of his

**”**__real__subsumptionterm

*“*

__original__

*accumulation**”*, versus [followed by]

*‘‘‘*-- from

**’’’**__reproductive__accumulationthe historically- «

**»**

*speci**-*fic contexts of subsumption

**/ by “the capital relation”, and**

*by*__capital__of

**accumulation, to the processes of**

__capital__**in**

*the historical*__dialectic__of nature**ral.**

*gene*If we do so, we can then comprehend the ‘meta-model’ epoch in which the «

**»**

*monads*that constitute the

**‘cosmo-ontological category’ --**

__molecules__

_{ }

_{ }

_{}

_{ALL}

__q__

_{aa}**|-.=**

_{ALL}

__m__-- first irrupt into existence, namely, ‘epoch

**t**

_{ALL}**= 2**’, as the cosmological epoch of the

*‘‘‘*of all ‘cosmo-ontology’ ‘irruptant’ prior to the irruption of

**’’’**__REAL__subsumption

_{ }

_{ ALL}**[namely,**

__a__

_{ALL}**], by the superseding ‘cosmo-ontology’of**

__r__**,**

__atoms__

_{ALL}**.**

__a__We can also comprehend epoch

**2**as that of the merely

*“*

**”**__FORMAL__subsumption

*of*

__all__epoch-

**2**-extant ‘cosmo-ontology’, ‘irruptant’ prior to the irruption of

_{ALL}**[namely,**

__m__

_{ALL}

__r__and

_{ALL}**],**

__a__

__by__

_{ALL}**, where**

__m__

_{ALL}**is**

__m__**of the**

*one***‘newly-irruptant’ ‘cosmo-ontologies’**

*two*of epoch

**2**.

Epoch

**2**is

**yet the epoch of the**

__not__*‘‘‘*

**’’’**__REAL__subsumption

*of*

_{ALL}**, and of**

__r__

_{ALL}**,**

__a__

__by__

_{ALL}**.**

__m__That distinction awaits epoch

**t**

_{ALL}**= 3**.

As of ‘meta-model’ epoch

**2**, the superseding ‘cosmo-ontology’ of

**,**

__molecules__

_{ALL}**, has just**

__m__come into existence, from out of the densest hearts the cosmological nucleation zones of its

immediate-predecessor ‘self-hybrid’ ‘cosmo-ontology’,

_{ALL}**.**

__a__However, as of the end of ‘meta-model epoch

**t**

_{ALL}**= 2**’, the

**ontology has**

__molecules__**yet**

__not__had time to interact with any of, and thus to [partially] [

__REAL__*-*ly]

**, the**

*subsume**remaining*

__p__

__re____-__

**atomic**

__“__

**pa****” ontology of the**

__rticles__**, or the**

*cosmos**remaining*

**ontology of the**

__atoms__

**.**

*cosmos*But the interaction, hence the

*‘‘‘*, of

**’’’**__REAL__subsumption

_{ALL}**, by**

__r__

_{ALL}**-- connoted by the**

__a__**category-symbol of this categorial progression, the**

__third__**category-symbol / [**

__hybrid__**]**

__dialectical__**category-symbol**

__synthesis__

_{ALL}

__q__

_{a}

_{r}**-- does ensue, per this ‘meta-model’, during its epoch**

_{ }**t**

_{ALL}**= 2**.

‘Meta-model epoch

**t**

_{ALL}**= 2**’ is also the epoch of the

*‘‘‘*, or of the

**’’’**__original__accumulation

*‘‘‘*, of the

**’’’**__primitive__accumulation**‘cosmo-ontology’,**

__molecules__

_{ALL}**, in which**

__m__**of the**

__some__«

**» of the**

*monads***‘cosmo-ontology’,**

__atoms__

_{ALL}**,**

__a__**, and by processes which may be**

__initially__

*‘*’and

__transitory__

__un__*sustainable*,

**into [**

*convert*__themselves__*]«*

**meta**-**» of the**

*monads*

__molecules__‘cosmo-ontology’,

_{ ALL}**.**

__m__The

*‘‘‘*of

**’’’**__reproductive__accumulation**‘cosmo-ontology’,**

__molecules__

_{ALL}**-- by means of**

__m__new processes which represent pathways for the

**,**

__continual__**,**

__ongoing__**conversion of**

__sustained__

_{ }

_{ALL}**into**

__a__

_{ ALL}**,**

__m__**the presence, and by the involvement, of the**

__catalyzed____by__

_{ALL}**already,**

__m__earlier created, as well as by

_{ ALL}**created later, by these new processes themselves -- only**

__m__arrives with the arrival of ‘meta-model epoch

**t**

_{ALL}**= 3**’.

It arrives in the form of its / this meta-model’s

**,**

__fifth__**, and**

*sixth***category-symbols --**

*seventh*

_{ }

_{ALL}

__q__

_{m}**,**

_{r}

_{ ALL}

__q__

_{m}**, and**

_{a}

_{ALL}

__q__

_{m}

_{a}**, respectively -- which connote the conversion of**

_{r}the products of the interactions,

__OF__

_{ALL}**,**

__r__

_{ALL}**and**

__a__

_{ALL}

__q__

_{a}**ontology, catalyzed to do so**

_{r}

**the presence of, and by the involvement of, i.e., with the help of,**

__BY__

_{ALL}**ontology,**

__m__

__INTO__

_{ }

_{ALL}**ontology, especially, initially, via the ontology that resides on the borderline between**

__m__

_{ }

_{ALL}**and**

__m__

_{ALL}**, namely**

__a__*“*

**-**__Di__**”**

__a__tomic**Hydrogen**

**, denoted by**

__molecules__

__H__**.**

_{2}It thus arrives in the form of the

_{ALL}**/**

__r__

_{ALL}**/**

__a__

_{ALL}

__q__

_{a}**-mediated**

_{r}**catalysis of**

__auto__

_{ALL}**.**

__m__These later processes, connoted by our meta-model’s ‘cosmo-ontological category-symbols’,

_{ }

_{ALL}

__q__

_{m}**,**

_{r}

_{ ALL}

__q__

_{m}**, and**

_{a}

_{ALL}

__q__

_{m}

_{a}**, include processes that cosmologists describe as the**

_{r}formation of galactic, interstellar

*“*, within which later-generation stars are born, and, with sufficient “metallization” via stellar

**”**__molecular clouds__**synthesis, etc., and with sufficient**

*nucleo**‘‘‘*formation, within which also planets -- indeed, within which combined, stellar/planetary systems -- are born.

**molecular coolants**’’’Cosmologists call the earlier process, connoted by

_{ALL}

__q__**-- the process of what we call**

_{aa}the

*‘‘‘*

__original__

*accumulation**’’’*, or

*‘‘‘*, of the first

**’’’**__primitive__accumulation

__molecular__«

**» -- by names like**

*monads**‘“*, or ‘“primordial

**primordial****”’**__cosmochemistry__astrochemistry”’, or ‘“primordial galactic chemical evolution”’, as distinct from the later,

*‘‘‘*forms, in which existing-

**’’’**__reproductive__accumulation**catalyzed the**

__molecules__synthesis of new

**, connoted by**

__molecules__

_{ALL}

__q__

_{m}**,**

_{r}

_{ALL}

__q__

_{m}**, and**

_{a}

_{ALL}

__q__

_{m}

_{a}**.**

_{r}The detailed vicissitudes of the irruption of

**‘cosmo-ontology’ from out of the**

__m__olecules

*‘‘‘in*action’’’ of

**-**__tra__**‘cosmo-ontology’, connoted by**

__a__toms

_{ALL}

__q__**, and of the**

_{aa}**-catalyzed**

__a__tomsformation of higher

**es of**

*speci***[“**

__a__toms**s**tellar

**nucleo**synthesis”, etc.] from p

**e-atomic “pa**

__r__**ticles”**

__r__[e.g., from

**bare**-- “ionized Hydrogen”], connoted by

*protons*

_{ALL}

__q__

_{a}**, are addressed by our**

_{r}epoch

**2**‘dialectical equation’ model,

**“connotationally”, or “intensionally”, and summarily --**

__only__

_{ALL}**>-|-<**

**2**

**=**

_{ALL}

__r__**+**

_{ALL}

__a__**+**

_{ALL}

__s__**+**

_{ALL}

__m__-- and

**with deep implicitude, i.e.,**

__only__**at their highest level of**

__only__*rality, and*

**gene**-

__only__

*purely**-*.

__qual__itativelyThe

_{N}**Q_**

**dialectical***-*ideographical language can also be used to more fully ‘explicitize’

those details, by the formulation of

__sub__*-*models, tracking the

**“dynamics” and**

__qual__itative‘meta-dynamics’ “internal” to those categories, i.e., of the

__sub__*-*categories of / “within”

categories like

_{ALL}**and**

__r__

_{ALL}**and**

__a__

_{ALL}**and**

__s__

_{ ALL}**, sometimes also plus nested**

__m__

__sub__*-*models, tracking the

**-**__sub__

__sub__*-*categories, and so on.

**-**__sub__The detailed

**determinations of these “dynamics” and ‘meta-dynamics’ are**

__quant__itative**captured by models that use the language of**

__not__*‘*

**the Seldonian First Dialectical Arithmetic/Algebra***’*--

**N**

__q__

_{NN}**=**

**N**

**Q_**

**[--->**

__q__**.**

_{1}To ‘explicitize’ the population

**ity “dynamics” of the successive cosmological ontological category’**

__quant__*‘*[meta-]dynamics’ “as a function of time” would require at least

**-**__qual__o__quant__itative*‘*

**the Seldonian Second Dialectical Arithmetic/Algebra***’*--

**N**

__q__

_____

_{Q}

_{N}

**=**

**N**

__U___**[--->**

__q__**.**

_{3}To go further into mathematical-linguistic descriptive richness capability, to explicitly describe the state-variable and control-parameter

*‘*

**-**__qual__o__quant__**itative**’ ‘

**eal[-numbers]’ “dynamics” and ‘‘‘meta-dynamics’’’ of the successive cosmological ontological categories, “as a function of ‘**

__R__**eal[-number] time’, would require at least**

__R__*‘*

**the Seldonian Sixth Dialectical Arithmetic/Algebra***’*over the “

**R**eal Numbers Field” --

**R**

__q__

_____

_{M}

_{Q}

_{N}

**=**

**R**

__q__

_____

_{M}

_{U}

**=**

**R**

__Mu___**[--->**

__q__

_{7}-- and would be better served by formulation in later “

**R**eal Numbers Field”-subsuming versions of the Seldonian

**/ axioms-systems, such as the**

*dialectical ideographies***15**th axioms-system, in which explicit [

*]*

**meta**-

__dynamical__

*systems***can be directly expressed, or such as the**

**31**st axioms-system, in which such systems with explicit

__sub__*-*systems can be directly expressed, or such as the

**63**rd axioms-system, in which such systems with explicit

__sub__*-*systems, each with explicit

__sub__*-*systems of their own, can be directly expressed, etc. -- i.e., respectively, per the following categories, representing the axioms-systems of the ‘meta-systematic dialectical’ progression of the Seldonian dialectical arithmetics/algebras ‘ideo-ontology’--

**-**__sub__**R**

__q__

_____

_{A}

_{M}

_{Q}

_{N}

**=**

**R**

__q__

_____

_{A}

_{M}

_{U}

__=__

**R**,

*Alpha*

__Mu___**[--->**

__q__

_{15}_{-- and -- }

**R**

__q__

_____

_{B}

_{A}

_{M}

_{Q}

_{N}

**=**

**R**

__q__

_____

_{B}

_{A}

_{M}

_{U}

__=__

**R**,

*Beta*

__Mu___**[--->**

__q__

_{31}_{-- and --}

_{ }**R**

__q__

_____

_{G}

_{B}

_{A}

_{M}

_{Q}

_{N}

**=**

**R**

__q__

_____

_{G}

_{B}

_{A}

_{M}

_{U}

__=__

**R**,

*Gamma*

__Mu___**[--->**

__q__

_{63}_{-- all of which represent solutions for individual category-symbols, or axioms-system-symbols, generated by the ‘meta-model meta-equation’ for the dialectic of the Seldonian dialectical arithmetics }

_{itself --}

_{ }

_{#_}**)-|-(**

_{s}

_{# }**= <**

_{#_}

__N___**>**

^{2}

^{t}

^{#_}-- wherein the «

**» axioms-system of arithmetic category,**

*arché*

_{#_}**, connotes the**

__N___

__first__*-*[

**order****] axioms-system of the “**

__only__**N**atural” Numbers.

**.**

*TO BE CONTINUED***--**

__NEXT__

**The**.

*Dialectic*of Nature**Part**

**III**.

**C**.

**Epoch**

**t = 3**:

**-**

__p__re**eukaryotic living cells**

**emergent**.

## No comments:

## Post a Comment