Tuesday, November 07, 2017

Part 07: Seldon’s Insights Series -- ‘Too Simple and Too Complex at the Same Time?’.




Part 07:  Seldon’s Insights Series --

‘Too Simple and Too Complex at the Same Time?’.







Dear Reader,


It is my pleasure, and my honor, as an Officer of the Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.] Office of Public Liaison, to share with you, from time to time, as they are approved for public release by the F.E.D. General Council, key excerpts from the internal writings, and from the internal sayings, of our co-founder, Karl Seldon.

The seventh such release in this new series is entered below [Some E.D. standard edits have been applied, in the version presented below, to the direct transcript of our co-founder’s discourse].


For further information regarding, and for [further] instantiations of, these Seldonian insights, see --




ENJOY!




Regards,


Miguel Detonacciones,

Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.],
Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison,
Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.







“... One is likely, after learning even just our starting system, that of the NQ_ dialectical «organon», to find oneself, for a time, sustainedly oscillating between seeing it_ as complex, and/versus seeing it_ as simple -- indeed, between seeing it_ as far too complex, and, then again, seeing it_ as far too simple.”

“And rightly so.”

“Seen at only the ‘gene-ric’ point of view, at only the vantage point of it s single «genos», i.e., at just the vantage point of it s abstracted unity, it_ IS far too simple.”

“Seen at only the ‘speci-fic’ point of view, at only the vantage point of it s more ‘thought-concrete’ ‘specificities’, i.e., at just the vantage point of it s many «species» -- at just the vantage point of the vast diversity which it s generality and generalization encompasses and embraces -- it_ IS far too complex. ...”







Saturday, November 04, 2017

Part 06: Seldon’s Insights Series -- ‘Bringing Dialectics ‘‘‘into’’’ Modern Mathematics, and [Modern] Mathematics [back] ‘‘‘into’’’ Dialectics’.








Part 06:  Seldon’s Insights Series --

‘Bringing Dialectics ‘‘‘into’’’ Modern Mathematics, and [Modern] Mathematics [back] ‘‘‘into’’’ Dialectics’.







Dear Reader,




It is my pleasure, and my honor, as an Officer of the Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.] Office of Public Liaison, to share with you, from time to time, as they are approved for public release by the F.E.D. General Council, key excerpts from the internal writings, and from the internal sayings, of our co-founder, Karl Seldon.

The sixth such release in this new series is entered below [Some E.D. standard edits have been applied, in the version presented below, to the direct transcript of our co-founder’s discourse].


For more information regarding, and instantiations of, these Seldonian insights, see --




ENJOY!




Regards,


Miguel Detonacciones,

Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.],
Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison,
Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.







“... The objective of our work in furtherance of ‘the mathematics of dialectics’, and, in particular, in furtherance of the ‘‘‘algebras of dialectics’’’, and of the ‘arithmetics of dialectics’, is -- at long last -- to bring dialectics itself explicitly ‘‘‘into’’’ modern mathematics, that is, ‘‘‘into’’’ the modern «mathesis universalis»; into the ‘‘‘universally learnable [subject-]matter’’’ -- to bring dialectics to within the ‘human-phenomic’ domain of the universally learnable, of the universally usable, and of the universally used «organon»; the cognitive instruments of human ‘‘‘universal labor’’’ and of human ‘‘‘collective labor’’’ [cf. Marx].”

“This work has the ‘commutative reflux’ of also bringing modern mathematics [back] ‘‘‘into’’’ dialectics, e.g. resurrecting the Platonian «arithmoi eidetikoi», «arithmoi monadikoi», and «arithmoi aisthetoi» in a demystified, trans-Platonian fashion, one which ‘‘‘assimilates all of the wealth of [Plato-]subsequent [mathematical, +] development’’’...”











Thursday, November 02, 2017

Part 05: Seldon’s Insights Series -- ‘Some Observations on the ‘Languaging’ of ‘Ordinalities’ in Modern English and Related Dialectical-Arithmetical Matters’.





Part 05:  Seldon’s Insights Series --

‘Some Observations on the ‘Languaging’ of ‘Ordinalities’ in Modern English and Related Dialectical-Arithmetical Matters’.







Dear Reader,




It is my pleasure, and my honor, as an Officer of the Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.] Office of Public Liaison, to share with you, from time to time, as they are approved for public release by the F.E.D. General Council, key excerpts from the internal writings, and from the internal sayings, of our co-founder, Karl Seldon.

The fifth such release in this new series is entered below [Some E.D. standard edits have been applied, in the version presented below, to the direct transcript of our co-founder’s discourse].


For more information regarding, and instantiations of, these Seldonian ‘insights’, see --




ENJOY!




Regards,


Miguel Detonacciones,

Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.],
Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison,
Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.







“... We don’t say, in Modern English, ‘1th’, ‘2th’, and ‘3th’.” 

“We don’t say ‘firstth’, ‘secondth’, and ‘thirdth’.”

“But we do say “4th”, “5th”, “6th”, “7th”, etc.”

“That is, the first three ordinal numbers still each retain a unique name, i.e., each with its own unique ordinal suffix or ending -- “1st”, “2nd”, “3rd” -- perhaps reflecting early impressions as to the ‘«arché»-ic’, ‘epitomic’ and paradigmatic character of the first three -- and most frequently encountered -- ordinal numbers for our [partially latent] concept of ‘ordinalities’ as a whole.”

“It “just so happens” also that our ‘‘‘dyadic’’’ and ‘‘‘triadic’’’ ‘dialectical functions’ for and of the N Q_ ‘gene-ric «arché»-value’, q1, also agree, in their ‘gene-ric solution’ interpretations, only for this first triadic ‘gene-ric consecuum’ of N Q_ ‘ordinal ontological arithmetical qualifiers’, q1 +  q2 +  q3, making that triad of these first three ‘gene-ric meta-numbers’ a ‘‘‘primitive undifferentiated unity’’’ of the interpreted meaning(s) for our ‘dyadic dialectical function’ and our ‘triadic dialectical function’.”

“However, note too that, unlike in the case of our ‘triadic dialectical function’, in the case of our ‘dyadic dialectical function’, this first dialectical triad that these two ‘dialectical functions’ “have in common” -- again, ‘gene-rically’,  q1 +  q2 +  q3  -- does not arise from any “Natural” number or “Whole” number ‘meta-exponent’ of the dyadic exponent, 2.”   

“When that ‘meta-exponent’ is 1, so that the entire power of the ‘gene-ric «arché»-value’ for the ‘ultimate ancestor’ category of the ‘gene-ric categorial meta-genealogy’ is 21, the resulting  
‘gene-ric consecuum’ ‘‘‘underflows’’’ to just ‘q121  =   q12  =   q1 +  q2’.” 

“When that ‘meta-exponent’ is 2, so that the entire power of the ‘gene-ric «arché»-value’ for the ‘ultimate ancestor’ category of the ‘gene-ric categorial meta-genealogy’ is 22, the resulting  
‘gene-ric consecuum’ ‘‘‘overflows’’’ to ‘q122  ~~   q14    ~~   q1 +  q2 +  q3 +  q4’.”

“Both of these ‘meta-exponent’ values, as well as all other possible N or W ‘meta-exponent’ values, fail to produce just the first dialectical triad -- ‘gene-rically’, q1 +  q2 +  q3.”

“Whereas, when the “Natural” number or “Whole number” ‘meta-exponent’ of the triadic exponent, 3, is 1, so that the entire power of the ‘gene-ric «arché»-value’ for the ‘ultimate ancestor’ category of the ‘gene-ric categorial meta-genealogy’ is 31, the resulting ‘gene-ric consecuum’ is precisely 
‘q131  =   q13  =   q1 +  q2 +  q3’. ...”






















Saturday, October 28, 2017

Proudhonian/Fourierist “Serialism” in relation to Seldonian Dialectical Method.


Proudhonian/Fourierist “Serialism” in relation to Seldonian Dialectical Method.






Dear Reader,



FYI:  Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.] plans to post a new text module, stating our findings regarding “serial laws”, to the Applications Page of the www.dialectics.info web site, as part of the preparations for the forthcoming essay, to be entitled ‘Universal Algorithmic-Heuristic Categorial-Combinatoric Ideographical Dialectical Method’, by our co-founder, Karl Seldon. --



For your convenience, I have also posted this new text module above.


ENJOY!



Regards,


Miguel Detonacciones,

Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.],
Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison,
Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.











Friday, October 27, 2017

‘Dialectogram’ Formats, Part 1: Encyclopedia Dialectica Standards: 'Platonian Formats'.


 ‘Dialectogram’ Diagram Formats, Part 1:  Encyclopedia Dialectica Standards:  'Platonian Formats'.







Dear Reader,



FYI:  Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.] has posted three new diagrams, summarizing the Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.] standards for our ‘Dialectogram’ formats, to the Applications Page of the www.dialectics.info web site, as part of the preparations for the forthcoming essay, to be entitled ‘Universal Algorithmic-Heuristic Method’, by our co-founder, Karl Seldon. --



For your convenience, I have also posted these three diagrams below.


ENJOY!



Regards,


Miguel Detonacciones,

Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.],
Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison,
Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.