Monday, November 27, 2017

Part 10: Seldon’s Insights Series -- ‘‘‘Dialectic of Nature’’’, “Dark Energy” as ‘«Arché» Ontological Category’, Possible Uniqueness as Non-Monadic.





Part 10:  Seldon’s Insights Series -- ‘‘‘Dialectic of Nature’’’, “Dark Energy” as ‘«Arché» Ontological Category’, Possible Uniqueness as Non-Monadic.







Dear Reader,




It is my pleasure, and my honor, as an Officer of the Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.] Office of Public Liaison, to share with you, from time to time, as they are approved for public release by the F.E.D. General Council, key excerpts from the internal writings, and from the internal sayings, of our co-founder, Karl Seldon.

The tenth such release in this new series is entered below [Some E.D. standard edits have been applied, in the version presented below, to the direct transcript of our co-founder’s discourse].


For more information regarding, and for [further] instantiations of, these Seldonian insights, see --




ENJOY!




Regards,


Miguel Detonacciones,

Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.],
Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison,
Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.







“...The “Dark Matter” ‘cosmological-ontological’ category, which we denote by c, standing for the ‘cosmological gravitic self-contractionary force’, is the ‘first contra-category’ of a version of our whole-«kosmos», ‘‘‘dialectic of Nature’’’ ‘meta-model’ that we are currently considering and exploring.”

“IT may be typical of ‘physi[c]o-[ideo-]ontological’[, as well as of “purely” ‘ideo-ontological’,] categories, as we have typically encountered them, in virtue of IT too representing an ontological «arithmos»-of-«monads», in that IT is [probably] -- and is expected to be, by the consensus of today’s physicists -- ‘multi-monadic’; ‘multiplicitous’, taking the form of a multitude of «monads»         / units / “particles”, i.e., of a cosmological “population”, albeit with a content probably residing outside of “The Standard Model of Particle Physics”.”

“ITs [we hold] predecessor ‘cosmological-ontological’ category, that of “Dark Energy”, we are exploring, in the same candidate version of our whole-«kosmos», ‘‘‘dialectic of Nature’’’ ‘meta-model’, as today’s deepest-known «arché» ‘cosmological-ontological’ category, in that same, presently most advanced, if still speculative, of our ‘dialectical meta-equation meta-models’ of ‘‘‘the dialectic of Nature’’’ as a whole.  We denote this candidate «arché» category by x, standing for the ‘anti-gravitic self-expansionary force’ of our cosmos as a whole.”

“IT may turn out to be atypical.” 

“IT may be the/an exception, in that IT may not be ‘multi-monadic’; ‘multiplicitous’.”

“The ‘cosmological-ontological’ category of “Dark Energy” may represent a ‘singleton «arithmos»’, thus contradicting the very meaning of the ancient concept of “«arithmoi»”.”

“IT may be so, e.g., unless further experiment upholds the developing view that physical space itself is better modeled as “granular”, i.e., as ‘multi-monadic’ [e.g., as ‘‘‘quantized’’’], rather than being better modeled as a “CONTINUOUS” multi-dimensional manifold.”

“If so, then x might be seen -- or might be ‘seeable’ -- as a self-proliferation of the ‘units of space’, i.e., as an oft-acceleratory [including sometimes superluminally so] self-expanding self-reproduction of the ‘monads of physical space’ itself. ...”
























No comments:

Post a Comment