Monday, July 09, 2018

Part 03: Seldon’s Message Series -- ‘Cumulation’.


Part 03:  Seldon’s Message Series -- ‘Cumulation’.




Dear Reader,



It is my pleasure, and my honor, as an officer of the Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.] Office of Public Liaison, to share with you, from time to time, as they are approved for public release by the F.E.D. General Council, key excerpts from the internal writings, and from the internal sayings, of our co-founder, Karl Seldon.

The third such release in this new series is entered below [Some E.D. standard edits have been applied, in the version presented below, to the direct transcript of our co-founder’s discourse].


For more information regarding, and for [further] instantiations of, these Seldonian insights, please see --




ENJOY!




Regards,


Miguel Detonacciones,

Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.],
Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison,
Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.









“... In a ‘multi-ontic evolute cumulum’, with its every advancing ‘self-involutive self-iteration’, and, thus, with every one of its self-generated successive, progressive epochs, the ‘multi-qualitative’ richness of this ‘cumulum’ -- its ontological diversity -- burgeons even further, and ever further.”

“With each new epoch-making ‘self-involution’ of the ‘[so-far-]whole’ manifold of ontologies, the crowning, last-epoch’s-first-irrupted, ‘self-hybrid’, ‘neo-ontological’ population interacts, ‘possibilistically’, with the populations of all earlier-irrupted ‘self-hybrid’ and ‘mere-hybrid’ ontological populations, and thereby gives birth to new, ‘possibilistic’, ‘mere-hybrid’ populations, and to a new, crowning -- momentaneously, transiently ultimate -- ‘self-hybrid’ ontology. 

We say ‘possibilistically’ and ‘possibilistic’ because there may be given instances of such ‘multi-ontic cumula’ and of such Domains wherein some of the ‘allo-interactions’ and ‘auto-interactions’ of the newest with all older ontologies may not give rise to relatively stable ‘neo-«monads»’ ...”























No comments:

Post a Comment