The Most Familiar ‘Meta-Unit-ization’. -- Part 3: Quoting Seldon Series.

The Most Familiar ‘Meta-Unit-ization’.

 

-- Part 3: Quoting Seldon Series.

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Reader,

 

 

 

It is my pleasure, and my honor, as an elected member of the Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.] General Council, and as a voting member of F.E.D., to share, with you, from time to time, as they are approved for public release, by the F.E.D. General Council, key excerpts from the internal writings, and from the internal sayings, of our co-founder, Karl Seldon.

 

This third release in this new such series is posted below [Some E.D. standard edits have been applied, in the version presented below, by the editors of the F.E.D. Special Council for the Encyclopedia, to the direct transcript of our co-founder’s discourse].

 

In this 3rd installment, Seldon describes the tie between the «aufheben» processes generally, and processes of ‘meta-unit-ization’.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Seldon –

 

“The «monads» level – the units level – ‘meta-unit-ization’ dialectogram, above, depicts what, to my mind, depicts the most familiar kind of »synchronic-dialectical, «aufheben» relationship, of ‘meta-unit-ization’, that humans encounter, incessantly, and not always consciously, in their daily lives.”

 

“That ‘qualo-fractal dialectogram’ depicts two, qualitatively distinct levels or scales of [ideo-]ontology: a lower scale, consisting of seven phonetic character units, combined with a higher-scale, consisting of a single word unit.”

 

“The connecting arrows, issuing from the highest points of the phonetic character units’ ovals, and converging at, to, and in the lowest point of the single word unit’s oval, are there to suggest that the many character units unite or fuse to form the single word unit, for the word “MEANING”.”

 

They depict the nature of this word meta-unit as being made up out of the heterogeneous multiplicity of seven distinct, qualitatively different character [sub-]units [except that one of the character-units occurs twice: ‘N’].”

 

Of course, the character units level, and the word unit level, in the »synchronic-dialectical, «aufheben» relation depicted above, do share something in common.  They are all sounds symbols, each to be “sounded”; each representing a sound of human speech.  Each phonetic character is to be sounded separately on its own level.  In the word unit, the individual sounds of this word’s component characters are sounded in a way which sonically “blurs” their individual characters’ sound-values into a new, unified sounding.”

 

Despite their unity in both representing speech-soundings, the word unit scale gains, over and above the character-units’ scale, a vast new determination, one that is absent from the phonetic character scale, or latent in its individual character units: MEANING!”

 

“The written word unit has meaning, calls for a semantic sounding, and is a semantic written symbol, whereas the written phonetic character units are not – they are ‘sub-sematic’ symbols.”

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For more information regarding these Seldonian insights, please see --

 

www.dialectics.info

 

 

 

 

 

For partially pictographical, ‘poster-ized’ visualizations of many of these Seldonian insights -- specimens of ‘dialectical art’ – as well as illustrated books by the F.E.D. Press, see --

https://www.etsy.com/shop/DialecticsMATH

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

¡ENJOY!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Regards,

 

 

Miguel Detonacciones,

 

Voting Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.];

Elected Member, F.E.D. General Council;

Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison;

Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.

 

 

 

 

YOU are invited to post your comments on this blog-entry below!