**Part**

**II**.

**B**.:

*Intuitive Account*of the**F**.

**.**

__E__**.**

__D__**--**

*Generic*__Dialectics__*Algorithm*

__Systematic__

__-__**Dialectics**

__Example__**. –**

__2__**The**’

*Opening**Triad*of Marx**s**«

**».**

__Kapital__Dear Readers,

**Part**

**II**.

**B**.:

__Systematic__

__-__**Dialectics**

__Example__**. –**

__2__**The**’

*Opening**Triad*of Marx**s**«

**».**

__Kapital__**: [All references to Marx’s**

__Introduction__**,**

__Capital__**volume I**, herein refer to the edition published originally in

**1967**by International Publishers, Inc., New York, and, specifically, to their

**1973**fifth printing of that edition. Throughout this exposition, it will be helpful to have your copies of the volumes of Marx's

**handy, and open to the pages being referenced in the various passages below.].**

__Capital__In his Preface to the First German edition of

**,**

__Capital__**volume I**, Marx wrote as follows regarding the

**category, or «**

*beginning***» category, of his**

*arché***of his systematic treatise on the human-social historical**

*method of presentation***known as “capitalist society” [**

*totality*

*emphasis*

*added***M.D.] –**

*by***“**Every

**is difficult, holds in all sciences.**

*beginning*To understand the first chapter, especially the section that contains the analysis of

**, will, therefore, present the greatest difficulty.**

*commodities*That which concerns more especially the analysis of the substance of value and the magnitude of value, I have, as much as it was possible, popularised.

The [M.D.:

**]**

*elementary*

*value**-*, whose fully-developed shape is the

**form**

*money**-*, is very

**form****and**

*elementary***.**

*simple*

*Nevertheless**,*, whilst, on the other hand, to the successful analysis of much

**the human mind has for more than 2**,**000 years sought in vain to get to the bottom of it****and**

*more composite***forms, there has been at least an approximation.**

*complex*Why?

Because the

**, as an**

*body***, is**

*organic whole***than are the**

*more easy of study***of that body.**

*cells**But in bourgeois society the*

*commodity**-*

**form***of the product of labour –*

**[M.D.:**

*or the***]**

*elementary*

*value**-*

**form**

*of the commodity**– is the*

**.**

*economic cell form*To the superficial observer, the analysis of these forms seems to turn upon minutiæ.

It does in fact deal with minutiæ, but they are of the same order as those dealt with in microscopic anatomy.

With the exception of the section on the value-form, therefore, this volume cannot stand accused on the score of difficulty.

*I pre**-*.

**suppose**,**of course, a reader who is willing to learn something new and therefore to think for himself****”**

[Karl Marx,

**,**

__Capital__**volume**

**I**, originally published

**1867**, International Publishers [New York: 1967], pp.

**7-8**,

*emphasis*

*added***M.D.].**

*by*I have previously, in this blog, presented

**of the**

__dialectical__models**of the three volumes of Marx’s**

__systematic____dialectic__**that take the more superficial of the two «**

__Capital__**» categories that Marx identifies in the “prefatory” passage quoted above – “...**

*arché**the*

*commodity**-*

**form***of the product of labour*...” -- to which the title of the first Chapter of

**,**

__Capital__**volume**

**I**answers – “

*CHAPTER I*. – Commodities” – and which generate minimally-complete

**reconstructions of Marx’s three-volume argument, reconstructions belonging to the following**

__dialectical__model

__dialectical__categories*-*,

**sum**

__dialectical__categorial*-*kind --

**progression****+**

__C__**+**

__M__

__q__**M**

**C**+

**+**

__K__

__q__**K**

**C**+

__q__**K**

**M**+

__q__**K**

**M**

**C**+

__S__-- or, i.e. --

**+**

__Commodities__**+**

__Monies__

__Monies____-__

__Mediated Circulations of__**+**

__Commodities____«__

**» +**

__Kapitals__

CommoditiesCommodities

__-«__+

**Kapitals**»

__Monies____-«__+

**Kapitals**»

__Circulations__

__of the Total Social____«__+

**Kapital**»

__Social____[__

**ist**]**Revolution**-- covering, "connotatively" and heuristically, the following portions of the [tables-of-]contents of Marx’s three volumes --

**VOLUME I**...

**The Productions-Process of**

**Capitals**

**PART I**...

**COMMODITIES**

**AND**

**MONEY**

*CHAPTER*

*I. –*Commodities,

**&**

*CHAPTER III. –*Money, or the Circulation of Commodities,

**&**

**PART II**...

**THE TRANSFORMATION OF**

**MONEY**

**INTO**

**CAPITAL**

*CHAPTER IV. --*The General Formula for Capital

*CHAPTER V. –*Contradictions in the General Formula for Capital

**&**

**VOLUME II**...

**The Circulations-Process of**

**Capitals**

**PART I**...

**THE METAMORPHOSES OF**

**CAPITAL**

**AND THEIR**

**CIRCUITS**

*CHAPTER III. –*The

**Circuit**of Commodity-Capital,

**&**

*CHAPTER*

*I. –*The

**Circuit**of Money-Capital,

**&**

**PART III**...

**THE**

**...**

**CIRCULATION**

**OF THE AGGREGATE SOCIAL**

**CAPITAL**

**&**

**VOLUME III**...

**The Whole-Process of**

**Capital**

**ist Production**

**PART V**...

**...INTEREST-BEARING**

**CAPITAL**

*CHAPTER XXVII. –*The Role of

**Credit**in Capitalist Production

**/**

**VOLUME I**...

**The Productions-Process of**

**Capitals**

**PART VIII**...

**THE SO-CALLED PRIMITIVE ACCUMULATION**

*CHAPTER XXXII. –*Historical Tendency of Capitalist Accumulation.

Now, it has been found – and not unexpectedly so -- in

**F**.

**.**

__E__**.’s research, that**

__D__**with this more superficial of the two «**

__dialectical__models beginning**» categories that Marx identifies in the “prefatory” passage quoted above –**

*arché**“*...

*the*

__commodity__*-*

**form***of the product of labour*...

*”*– cannot capture, in such connotative

**, the [table-of-]contents of Marx’s three volumes of «**

__dialectical__models

__Das__**» as**

__Kapital__**as, or in as much in detail as, can**

*deeply***that**

__dialectical__models**from the deeper of those two «**

*begin***» categories – namely, that**

*arché***from**

*begin***: "--**

*the*__elementary____form__of commodity value*...the*--".

**value**-**form**of the**commodity**We will illustrate such a

**of the contents of Marx’s «**

__dialectical__model**», in this blog entry, but only for the first three categories in the**

__Das Kapital__**[**

*categorial*

*self**-*]

**, or [**

*expansion*

*self**-*]

**, of this**

*progression*

__elementary__value*-*«

**form****». [We do plan, in a subsequent blog entry, to present a**

*arché***of**

*progression***F**.

**.**

__E__**.**

__D__**of the contents of the three volumes of Marx’s**

__dialectical__models**, with each successor**

__Capital__**from a deeper «**

__dialectical__model beginning**» than did its predecessor**

*arché***, and, thereby,**

__dialectical__models**a fuller, more detailed replication of, capturing of, or reproduction of, the tables-of-contents of the multiple volumes of Marx’s master-treatise.].**

*achieving*In terms of Marx’s table of contents for

**,**

__Capital__**volume**

**I**, this deeper initial triad encompasses the following three sections –

**VOLUME I**...

**The Productions-Process of Capitals**

**PART I**...

**COMMODITIES AND MONEY**

*CHAPTER*

*I. –*Commodities

Section 3. – The Form of Value or Exchange-Value

**A. Elementary**or

**Accidental**Form of Value

**B. Total**or

**Expanded**Form of Value

**C.**The

**General**Form of Value.

Do the detailed content-characteristics of Marx’s

__Elementary__**, of his**

__Value-Form__

__Expanded__

__Value____-__, and of his

**Form**

__General__

__Value____-__categories exhibit the detailed

**Form****Gene**

**characteristics claimed by**

*ric***F**.

**.**

__E__**. to be**

__D__**for the**

*universal***of virtually all «**

*first triads***» of**

*species***?**

__dialectical__progressions

*YES !!!*They do so to a far fuller extent than, I think, most would expect, given that Marx could not have had in mind the exact, mathematically-expressed

**that**

*universal algorithm for*__dialectic__**F**.

**.**

__E__**. has discovered, and axiomatized, when he organized and wrote the material of «**

__D__

__Das Kapital__**» [although Marx clearly**

**have**

__does__*of general pattern, procedure, and/or “generic algorithm” for*

__some__kind**in mind – albeit a**

__dialectic__

*purely**-*, non-mathematically-formulated such

__qual__itative*“*, and his writings often assert to that effect, e.g., in his correspondence, in the «

**generic algorithm**”**», and in «**

__Grundrisse__

__Das Kapital__**» itself.].**

That is, Marx’s first three

*“*categories -- which are but three different root, abstract, generic expressions for

**commodity value**-**form**”*, i.e., for*

**exchange**-**relations***within the "super-«*

**the human**-**social relations of production****»" of**

*genos*

**exchange**-**value**-based*-- conform, in*

**human**-**social relations of production****detail, to**

__amazing__**F**.

**.**

__E__**.’s**

__D__**characteristics of –**

*generic first triad***+**

*Thesis***Meta**-

**+**

*Thesis***Syn**-

*Thesis*-- or --

**+**

*Posit***Meta**-

**+**

*Posit***Com**-

*Posit*-- or --

«

**» +**

*Arché***Meta-**«

**» +**

*Arché***Syn**-«

**».**

*Arché*In particular, each

**, or «**

*unit***», or**

*monad***of the**

*element***«**

*Expanded*Form of Value**», or**

*arithmos***, is –**

*assemblage of units***– a concrete-«**

__quite____precisely__**»**

*aufheben**“*«

**meta**-**»**

*monad**-*

**, or**

*ization**“*, of some or all of the

**meta**-**unit**-**ization**”**, or**

*units***, or «**

*elements***» of the «**

*monads***», or**

*arithmos***, of the**

*assemblage of units***, as we shall demonstrate, in detail, below**

*Elementary*Form of Value

*!!!*Moreover, each

**, or «**

*unit***», or**

*monad***of the**

*element*

*General***Form of Value**«

**» is a**

*arithmos*

*hybrid***,**

*unit***«**

*hybrid***», or**

*monad*

*hybrid***of an**

*element***Expanded Form of Value**«

**»’s**

*arithmos***, «**

*unit***», or**

*monad***, together with, or combined with, or “composited with” an**

*element***Elementary Form of Value**«

**»’s**

*arithmos***, «**

*unit***», or**

*monad***, such that**

*element**“half”*of each

*General***Form of Value**«

**»’s**

*arithmos***, «**

*unit***», or**

*monad***[the**

*element***Relative**"form of value" pole] comes from one of the

**Expanded Form of Value**«

**»’s**

*arithmos*

*units**'*, «

**»**

*monads**'s*, or

*elements**'*formats, and such that the

*other “half”*of each

*General***Form of Value**«

**»’s**

*arithmos***, «**

*unit***», or**

*monad***[the**

*element***Equivalent**"form of value" pole] comes from one of the

**«**

*Elementary*Form of Value**»’s**

*arithmos*

*units**'*, «

**»**

*monads**'s*, or

*elements**'*formats, as we shall also show below

*!!!*Finally, note that each

*hybrid***,**

*unit***«**

*hybrid***», or**

*monad*

*hybrid***of the**

*element*

*General***Form of Value**'s «

**», or**

*arithmos***, is a**

*assemblage of units**“*of a

**horizontal inversion****negation**”**, «**

*unit***», or**

*monad***of the**

*element***«**

*Expanded*Form of Value**», or**

*arithmos***, as also demonstrated in the illustrations presented below.**

*assemblage of units***:**

__Triad__

__A__**&**=

__B__&__C__

__Elementary__

__Value-Form__**&**.

ExpandedExpanded

__Value-Form__&

GeneralGeneral

__Value-Form__**:**

__Movement__

__Elementary__

__Value-Form__**--->**

__Elementary__

__Value-Form__**&**

__Expanded____Value-Form__--->

__Elementary__

__Value-Form__**&**.

__Expanded____Value-Form__&__General____Value-Form__**:**

__Definitions__**A**....

__Elementary__**. Marx writes of this form: “The whole mystery of the form of value lies hidden in this elementary form. Its analysis, therefore, is our real difficulty. Here two different kinds of commodities (in our example the linen and the coat), evidently play two different parts. The linen expresses its value in the coat; the coat serves as the material in which that value is expressed. The former plays an active, the latter a passive, part. The value of the linen is represented as relative value, or appears in relative form. The coat officiates as equivalent, or appears in equivalent form. The relative form and the equivalent form are two intimately connected, mutually dependent and inseparable elements of the expression of value; but, at the same time, are mutually exclusive, antagonistic extremes –**

__Value-Form__*i.e.*,

**of the same expression.” [**

*poles**ibid*., p.

**48**,

*emphasis***by M.D.].**

*added*The

*“*, or

**elementary**”*“*, or

**accidental**”*“*[Marx]

**isolated**”*form of*

*commodity*[ultimately,

*commodity-*]

**capital**-*value*is the simplest, or least complex -- and the most abstract, or least concrete, least “determinate”, or least “determinations-rich” --

**, or «**

*category***»**

*arithmos***«**

*of***» [**

*monads**“*], in which the

**assemblage of****units**”**-- or**

__dialectical__polarity*“*, to use

**intra**-**duality**”**F**.

**.**

__E__**.’s term -- of**

__D__

*use**-*is still preserved as explicit, and, therefore, in which the historical / diachronic, and also present / synchronic,

**value**-__versus__exchange**value****of the Capital-relation as predominant, “real-subsuming” social relation of production is still explicitly evident, i.e., such that any further abstraction, or any further simplification, would submerge/repress this**

__root__*"*

**self**-**dual**"**into “implicitude”, so that the**

__root__**«**

*elementary*form of value**», or**

*arithmos***, is the simplest, most abstract such category that is still suitable to serve as the «**

*category***»-category, or**

*arché*

*beginning**-*category, of a

__systematic__*-*

__dialectical__**-- or theoretical reconstruction/reproduction and explanation -- of the self-reproductive dynamics, and of the social-reproduction process, of the capitals-system [**

*model**only*], including its historical limits as well, on both its past and its future time-sides -- because the [w]

**[e] of the capitals-system, i.e., of its “essence-ial”, core “internal contradiction”, is still**

*hol**“*ographically” /

**hol****onomically explicitly-enough “contained” in the**

*hol***-**

*elementary*value**form**as

**»**

*arché***/ «**

*category***».**

*arithmos*Each

**, or «**

*unit***», or**

*monad***of the**

*element***«**

*elementary*value-form**», or**

*arithmos***, or**

*assemblage***, can be represented as a set of**

*category*

*exchange**-*, or

**value**-**.-**__vs__**use**-**value**

*relative**-*,

**value**-**-**__pol__e**.-**__vs__**equivalent**-**value**-**‘**__pol__e**’**__pol__ads*of ‘*expressed via either the “algebraical”, or “variable” forms, or of the “constant”, or “arithmetical” forms, as given by Marx [

**’**__pol__ads**,**

__Capital__**volume**

**I**,

*ibid*., p.

**48**] –

“x commodity A = y commodity B, or

.x commodity A is worth y commodity B.

20 yards of linen = 1 coat, or

20 yards of linen are worth 1 coat.”

-- or, in

**F**.

**.**

__E__**. "algebraical" shorthand --**

__D__**x**=

__A__**y**

__B__-- wherein x and y are

**variables standing for counts of the standard**

__quant__ifier**of commodity A and of commodity B, respectively -- of the quantity of**

*units***of A -- x -- needed to be able to exchange them directly for, i.e. to have the equivalent value to, a quantity of exactly y**

*units***of commodity B – and wherein A and B are what**

*units***F**.

**.**

__E__**. terms**

__D__*“*– i.e.,

**-**__quan__tifiable ontological**category**-**as**-**unit**__qual__**ifier variables**”**algebraic variables standing for**

__qual__itative*“*ifiable

__quant__**-of-commodity**

__kind__

*category**-*”[e.g., in the case of B

__qual__**ifiers**

__=__**], or for standard, implicltly-combined, "qualitative-multiplication"-combined,**

*coat*

*metrical**-*

**unit**-__qual__ifier*“*, or

**of**”*“*,

**times**”**-of-commodity**

__kind__

*category**-*variables [e.g., in the case of A

**as**-**unit**-__qual__**ifier**

__=__

*yards*

*of*

*linen*

__=__

*yards**“*

**times**”**].**

*linen*The contents of the

**, i.e., of the «**

*category***»**

*arithmos***«**

*of***», of the**

*monads***, can be rendered explicitly, using the examples of the truncated universe[-of-discourse] of commodities that Marx explicitly exemplifies in**

*elementary*form of value**Section 3**. of

**volume I**of

**, using them as a**

__Capital__**, as follows –**

__set__of__elements__The

**, as “**

__Elementary____Value-Form__**intension**”, corresponds to the following

**42**-element

**of**

*set**‘*«

**polad**’**», or**

*monads***, as [a truncated example of] its “**

*elements***extension**”, using only Marx’s seven-commodity “exemplificatory” universe of discourse from

*Ch*.

*I*., Sec. 3, of

__Capital__**I**–

**{[**20 yds. linen = 1 coat

**]**,.............

**[**1 coat = 20 yds. linen

**]**,..

**[**10 lbs. tea = 20 yds. linen

**]**,...

**[**40 lbs. coffee = 20 yds. linen

**]**,

...

**[**20 yds. linen = 10 lbs. tea

**]**,......

**[**1 coat = 10 lbs. tea

**]**,......

**[**10 lbs. tea = 1 coat

**]**,..............

**[**40 lbs. coffee = 1 coat

**]**,

...

**[**20 yds. linen = 40 lbs. coffee

**]**,.

**[**1 coat = 40 lbs. coffee

**]**,.

**[**10 lbs. tea = 40 lbs. coffee

**]**,.

**[**40 lbs. coffee = 10 lbs. tea

**]**,

...

**[**20 yds. linen = 1 qr. corn

**]**,.......

**[**1 coat = 1 qr. corn

**]**,.......

**[**10 lbs. tea = 1 qr. corn

**]**,........

**[**40 lbs. coffee = 1 qr. corn

**]**,

...

**[**20 yds. linen = 2 oz. gold

**]**,.......

**[**1 coat = 2 oz. gold

**]**,......

**[**10 lbs. tea = 2 oz. gold

**]**,........

**[**40 lbs. coffee = 2 oz. gold

**]**,

...

**[**20 yds. linen = ½ ton iron

**]**,......

**[**1 coat = ½ ton iron

**]**,......

**[**10 lbs. tea = ½ ton iron

**]**,.......

**[**40 lbs. coffee = ½ ton iron

**]**,

...

**[**1 qr. corn = 20 yds. linen

**]**,

...

**[**1 qr. corn = 1 coat

**]**,

...

**[**1 qr. corn = 10 lbs. tea

**]**,

...

**[**1 qr. corn = 40 lbs. coffee

**]**,

...

**[**1 qr. corn = 2 oz. gold

**]**,

...

**[**1 qr. corn = ½ ton iron

**]**,

...

**[**2 oz. gold = 20 yds. linen

**]**,..

**[**½ ton iron = 20 yds. linen

**]**,

...

**[**2 oz. gold = 1 coat

**]**,.............

**[**½ ton iron = 1 coat

**]**,

...

**[**2 oz. gold = 10 lbs. tea

**]**,......

**[**½ ton iron = 10 lbs. tea

**]**,

...

**[**2 oz. gold = 40 lbs. coffee

**]**,.

**[**½ ton iron = 40 lbs. coffee

**]**,

...

**[**2 oz. gold = 1 qr. corn

**]**,.......

**[**½ ton iron = 1 qr. corn

**]**,

...

**[**2 oz. gold = ½ ton iron

**]**,......

**[**½ ton iron = 2 oz. gold

**]**

**}**

-- using Marx’s “arithmetical” or “constant(s)” form, or, using

**F**.

**.**

__E__**.’s abbreviation of Marx’s “algebraical” or “variables(s)” form, to --**

__D__**{[z**=

__A__**u**,..

__B__]**[u**=

__B__**z**,..

__A__]**[v**=

__C__**z**,..

__A__]**[w**=

__D__**z**,..

__A__]**[x**=

__E__**z**,..

__A__]**[y**=

__F__**z**,..

__A__]**[a**=

__G__**z**

__A__**]**,

...

**[z**=

__A__**v**,..

__C__]**[**

**u**=

__B__**v**,..

__C__]**[v**=

__C__**u**,..

__B__]**[w**=

__D__**u**,..

__B__]**[**

**x**=

__E__**u**,.

__B__]**[y**=

__F__**u**,..

__B__]**[a**=

__G__**u**,

__B__]...

**[z**=

__A__**w**,.

__D__]**[u**=

__B__**w**,.

__D__]**[v**=

__C__**w**,.

__D__]**[w**=

__D__**v**,..

__C__]**[x**=

__E__**v**,.

__C__]**[y**=

__F__**v**,..

__C__]**[a**=

__G__**v**,

__C__]...

**[z**=

__A__**x**,..

__E__]**[u**=

__B__**x**,..

__E__]**[v**=

__C__**x**,...

__E__]**[w**=

__D__**x**,..

__E__]**[x**=

__E__**w**,.

__D__]**[y**=

__F__**w**,.

__D__]**[a**=

__G__**w**,

__D__]...

**[z**=

__A__**y**,..

__F__]**[u**=

__B__**y**,..

__F__]**[v**=

__C__**y**,...

__F__]**[w**=

__D__**y**,..

__F__]**[x**=

__E__**y**,..

__F__]**[y**=

__F__**x**,...

__E__]**[a**=

__G__**x**,

__E__]...

**[z**=

__A__**a**,..

__G__]**[u**=

__B__**a**,..

__G__]**[v**=

__C__**a**,..

__G__]**[w**=

__D__**a**,..

__G__]**[x**=

__E__**a**,..

__G__]**[y**=

__F__**a**,..

__G__]**[**

**a**=

__G__**y**

__F__]}**B.**

__Expanded__**. Marx “notates” this value-form as follows –**

__Value-Form__“z Com. A = u Com. B or = v Com. C or = w Com. D or = x Com. E or = &c.

(20 yards of linen = 1 coat or = 10 lbs. tea or = 40 lbs. coffee or = 1 quarter corn or = 2 ounces gold or = ½ ton iron or = &c.)”

-- or, in

**F**.

**.**

__E__**. shorthand --**

__D__**z**=

__A__**u**=

__B__**v**=

__C__**w**=

__D__**x**=

__E__**y**=

__F__**a**

__G__-- and describes it thusly [

*ibid*., pp.

**62**-

**63**] --

“The value of a single commodity, the linen, for example, is now expressed in terms of numberless other elements of the world of commodities. Every other commodity now becomes a mirror of the linen’s value. It is thus that, for the first time, this value shows itself in its true light as a congelation of undifferentiated human labour. For the labour that creates it, now stands expressly revealed, as labour that ranks equally with every other sort of human labour, no matter what its form, whether tailoring, ploughing, mining, &c., and no matter, therefore, whether it is realized in coats, corn, iron, or gold. The linen, by virtue of the form of its value, now stands in a[n exchange-value – M.D.] social relation, no longer with only one [other – M.D.] kind of commodity, but with the whole world of commodities[, itself excepted – M.D.]. As a commodity, it is a citizen of that world. At the same time, the interminable series of value equations implies, that as regards the value of a commodity, it is a matter on indifference under what particular form, or kind, of use-value it appears.”

-- which, note well, also indicates that the

**, «**

*units***», or**

*monads***of the**

*elements***«**

__Expanded____Form of Valu__e**» /**

*arithmos***, are,**

*category***,**

__precisely__*“*,

**meta**-**units**”*“*«

**meta**-**»”, or**

*monads**“*of the

**meta**-**elements**”**, «**

*units***», or**

*monads***of the**

*elements***Elementary Form of Value**, so that the «

**» /**

*arithmos***of the “**

*category*

__Expanded__**” is a**

__Value-Form__*“*«

**meta**-**»”,**

*arithmos**“*, or

**meta**-**set**”*“*of the

**meta**-**category**”*“*

__Elementary__**”«**

__Value-Form__**» /**

*arithmos***/**

*category***.**

*set*The contents of the

*“*, i.e., of the

**meta**-**category**”*“*«

**meta**-**»”**

*arithmos*

*of**“*«

**meta**-**»”, of the**

*monads***expanded form of value**, can be rendered explicitly, using the examples of the truncated universe[-of-discourse] of commodities that Marx explicitly exemplifies in

**Section 3**. of

**volume I**of

**, as a**

__Capital__*“*, as follows –

**meta**-**set**”**of**“**meta**-**elements**”The

**,**

__Expanded____Value-Form__**as**“

**intension**”, corresponds to the following

**7**-

**element set**of

*‘*

**polad**’**, as [a truncated example of] its “**

*elements***extension**”, using only Marx’s seven-commodity “exemplificatory” universe of discourse –

**{**[20 yds. linen = 1 coat = 10 lbs. tea = 40 lbs. coffee = 1 qr. corn = 2 oz. gold = ½ ton iron],

...[1 coat = 10 lbs. tea = 40 lbs. coffee = 1 qr. corn = 2 oz. gold = ½ ton iron = 20 yds. linen],

...[10 lbs. tea = 40 lbs. coffee = 1 qr. corn = 2 oz. gold = ½ ton iron = 20 yds. linen = 1 coat],

...[40 lbs. coffee = 1 qr. corn = 2 oz. gold = ½ ton iron = 20 yds. linen = 1 coat = 10 lbs. tea],

...[1 qr. corn = 2 oz. gold = ½ ton iron = 20 yds. linen = 1 coat = 10 lbs. tea = 40 lbs. coffee],

...[2 oz. gold = ½ ton iron = 20 yds. linen = 1 coat = 10 lbs. tea = 40 lbs. coffee = 1 qr. Corn],

...[½ ton iron = 20 yds. linen = 1 coat = 10 lbs. tea = 40 lbs. coffee = 1 qr. corn = 2 oz. gold]

**}**

-- using Marx’s “arithmetical” or “constant(s)” form, or, using

**F**.

**.**

__E__**.’s abbreviation of Marx’s “algebraical” or “variables(s)” form, to --**

__D__**{[z**=

__A__**u**=

__B__**v**=

__C__**w**=

__D__**x**=

__E__**y**=

__F__**a**,

__G__]...

**[u**=

__B__**v**=

__C__**w**=

__D__**x**=

__E__**y**=

__F__**a**=

__G__**z**,

__A__]...

**[v**=

__C__**w**=

__D__**x**=

__E__**y**=

__F__**a**=

__G__**z**=

__A__**u**,

__B__]...

**[w**=

__D__**x**=

__E__**y**=

__F__**a**=

__G__**z**=

__A__**u**=

__B__**v**,

__C__]...

**[x**=

__E__**y**=

__F__**a**=

__G__**z**=

__A__**u**=

__B__**v**=

__C__**w**,

__D__]...

**[y**=

__F__**a**=

__G__**z**=

__A__**u**=

__B__**v**=

__C__**w**=

__D__**x**,

__E__]...

**[a**=

__G__**z**=

__A__**u**=

__B__**v**=

__C__**w**=

__D__**x**=

__E__**y**

__F__]}-- which can be equivalently rendered as --

**{[z**=

__A__**u**, or

__B__**(z**=

__A__)**v**, or

__C__**(z**=

__A__)**w**, or

__D__**(z**=

__A__)**x**, or

__E__**(z**=

__A__)**y**, or

__F__**(z**=

__A__)**a**,

__G__]...

**[u**=

__B__**v**, or

__C__**(u**=

__B__)**w**, or

__D__**(u**=

__B__)**x**, or

__E__**(u**=

__B__)**y**, or

__F__**(u**=

__B__)**a**, or

__G__**(u**=

__B__)**z**,

__A__]...

**[v**=

__C__**w**, or

__D__**(v**=

__C__)**x**, or

__E__**(v**=

__C__)**y**, or

__F__**(v**=

__C__)**a**, or

__G__**(v**=

__C__)**z**, or

__A__**(v**=

__C__)**u**,

__B__]...

**[w**=

__D__**x**, or

__E__**(w**=

__D__)**y**, or

__F__**(w**=

__D__)**a**, or

__G__**(w**=

__D__)**z**, or

__A__**(w**=

__D__)**u**, or

__B__**(w**=

__D__)**v**,

__C__]...

**[x**=

__E__**y**, or

__F__**(x**=

__E__)**a**, or

__G__**(x**=

__E__)**z**, or

__A__**(x**=

__E__)**u**, or

__B__**(x**=

__E__)**v**, or

__C__**(x**=

__E__)**w**,

__D__]...

**[y**=

__F__**a**, or

__G__**(y**=

__F__)**z**, or

__A__**(y**=

__F__)**u**, or

__B__**(y**=

__F__)**v**, or

__C__**(y**=

__F__)**w**, or

__D__**(y**=

__F__)**x**,

__E__]...

**[a**=

__G__**z**, or

__A__**(a**=

__G__)**u**, or

__B__**(a**=

__G__)**v**, or

__C__**(a**=

__G__)**w**, or

__D__**(a**=

__G__)**x**, or

__E__**(a**=

__G__)**y**

__F__]}-- revealing more clearly how

__each__**of the**

*element*

__Expanded Form of Commodity Value__**is made out of six of the**

*set**'*

**polad**'**of the**

*elements*

__Elementary Form of Commodity Value__**.**

*set*Note that, in the above,

__each__**, or «**

*unit***», or**

*monad***of the above-rendered**

*element***, or «**

*set***», for the**

*arithmos*

__Expanded Form of Commodity Value__**is a**

*category*

*META**-*

__Elementary Form of Commodity Value__*-*,

**unit***-*«

**», or**

*monad**-*.

**element**That is,

__each__*"*is a

**one**"

*META**-"*, or

**one**"

*META**-*, or

**unit**

*META**-*«

**», or**

*monad*

*META**-*, of the

**element***"*, or

**ones**"**, or «**

*units***», or**

*monads***of the**

*elements***, or «**

*set***», of the**

*arithmos*

__Elementary Form of Commodity Value__**,**

*category*

__each__*"*being made up out of the heterogeneous multiplicity of the

**one**"*"*, or

**ones**"**, or «**

*units***», or**

*monads***of the**

*elements***, or «**

*set***», of the**

*arithmos*

__Elementary Form of Commodity Value__**, and hence the**

*category***«**

__Expanded Form of Commodity Value__**» /**

*arithmos***is a**

*category*

*META**-*«

**», or**

*arithmos*

*META**-*, of the

**set**

__Elementary Form of Commodity Value__

*category**/*«

**», or**

*arithmos*

*set**.*

Thus,

__each__**,**

*unit***«**

__each__**», or**

*monad*

__each__**of the**

*element*

__Expanded Form of Commodity Value__**/ «**

*category***», is an «**

*arithmos***»**

*aufheben***[**

*determinate change**"*] of, a

**determinate negation**"**of, and a scope-/scale-**

*conservation***of, the**

*elevation***, «**

*units***», or**

*monads***of the**

*elements*

__Elementary Form of Commodity Value__**/ «**

*category***».**

*arithmos*Thus the

**ric expectations of the**

*gene***F**.

**.**

__E__**.**

__D__**are exhaustively fulfilled in this**

*generic algorithm for*__dialectic__**al case -- in this**

*speci***al**

*speci***for**

*algorithm***of the**

*the opening triad***of Marx's**

__systematic__-__dialectical__categorial progression**, in which the w**

__Capital__**e of the rest of the content of Marx's**

*hol***is implicitly,**

__Capital__**ographically,**

*hol***onomically,**

*hol***"contained", for those who at least "chaotically" [Marx], "phenomenologically" experience/empirically know the capitals-system, and from which the rest of the**

*immanently***of that**

*totality***content of Marx's**

*immanent***is**

__Capital__**,**

__systematic__ally**derived therein.**

__dialectic__allyThis

*“*«

**meta**-**»**

*monad**-*character of the

**ic**”

__Expanded____Value____-__«

**Form****», relative to the**

*monads*

__Elementary____Value____-__«

**Form****», is even more visibly apparent in the following rendering, which applies the principle of the rendering that Marx uses for the «**

*monads***» of the**

*monads*

__General__

__Value____-__–

**Form****Value**-

**Form C**. – which are

*“*of the «

**horizontal inversion negations**”**» of the**

*monads***,**

__Expanded____Value-Form__**Value-Form B**., viz. –

...............................................

**1 coat**

*/*.............................................

**10 lbs. of tea**

*/*...........................................

**40 lbs. of coffee**

*/*.........................................

**/**1 quarter of corn

20 yards of linen....

**=**...

**<**

.........................................

**\**2 ounces of gold

..........................................

**½ ton of iron**

*\*...........................................

**x com. A., etc.**

*\*-- or, in

**F**.

**.**

__E__**. shorthand --**

__D__........................

*/***u**

__B__.....................

*/***v**

__C__...................

*/***w**

__D__.................

**/ x**

__E__**z**..

__A__**=**..

**<**

................

**\ y**

__F__.................

*\***a**

__G__..................

*\***b**

__H__-- so that the seven elements of the restricted

__Expanded Value-Form__**are rendered, after this fashion, in Marx’s “algebraical”, or “variables-only”, mode, using the**

*set***F**.

**.**

__E__**. shorthand, as --**

__D__**{**......................

*/***u**

__B__......................

*/***v**

__C__....................

*/***w**

__D__..................

**/ x**

__E__[

**z**..

__A__**=**..

**<**

..................

**\ y**

__F__...................

*\***a**]

__G__**,**

.........................

*/***z**

__A__......................

*/***v**

__C__...................

*/***w**

__D__.................

**/ x**

__E__[

**u**..

__B__**=**..

**<**

.................

**\ y**

__F__..................

*\***a**]

__G__**,**

........................

*/***z**

__A__.....................

*/***u**

__B__...................

*/***w**

__D__.................

**/ x**

__E__[

**v**..

__C__**=**..

**<**

.................

**\ y**

__F__..................

*\***a**]

__G__**,**

...........................

*/***z**

__A__........................

*/***u**

__B__.....................

*/***v**

__C__...................

**/ x**

__E__[

**w**..

__D__**=**..

**<**

..................

**\ y**

__F__...................

*\***a**]

__G__**,**

..........................

*/***z**

__A__.......................

*/***u**

__B__....................

*/***v**

__C__..................

**/ w**

__D__[

**x**..

__E__**=**..

**<**

..................

**\ y**

__F__...................

*\***a**]

__G__**,**

....................

*/***z**

__A__.................

*/***u**

__B__..............

*/***v**

__C__............

**/ w**

__D__[

**y**..

__F__**=**..

**<**

............

**\ x**

__E__..............

*\***a**]

__G__**,**

..........................

*/***z**

__A__.......................

*/***u**

__B__....................

*/***v**

__C__..................

**/ w**

__D__[

**a**..

__G__**=**..

**<**

..................

**\ x**

__E__....................

*\***y**]

__F__**}**

-- or, after this same fashion, in Marx’s “arithmetical” or “constants-only” mode, as --

**{**............................................

**1 coat**

*/*.............. .............................

**10 lbs. of tea**

*/*............ ............................

**40 lbs. of coffee**

*/*................ ......................

**/**1 quarter of corn

[20 yards of linen..

**=**..

**<**

......... .............................

**\**2 ounces of gold

............... .........................

**½ ton of iron]**

*\***,**

.......................................

**20 yards of linen**

*/*....................................

**10 lbs. of tea**

*/*.................................

**40 lbs. of coffee**

*/*...............................

**/**1 quarter of corn

[1 coat.......

**=**.......

**<**

...............................

**\**2 ounces of gold

................................

**½ ton of iron]**

*\***,**

........................................

**20 yards of linen**

*/*.....................................

**1 coat**

*/*..................................

**40 lbs. of coffee**

*/*................................

**/**1 quarter of corn

[10 lbs. of tea..

**=**..

**<**

.................................

**\**2 ounces of gold

...................................

**½ ton of iron]**

*\***,**

..............................................

**20 yards of linen**

*/*...........................................

**1 coat**

*/*........................................

**10 lbs. of tea**

*/*......................................

**/**1 quarter of corn

[40 lbs. of coffee..

**=**..

**<**

......................................

**\**2 ounces of gold

........................................

**½ ton of iron]**

*\***,**

..............................................

**20 yards of linen**

*/*...........................................

**1 coat**

*/*........................................

**10 lbs. of tea**

*/*......................................

**/**40 lbs. of coffee

[1 quarter of corn..

**=**..

**<**

......................................

**\**2 ounces of gold

........................................

**½ ton of iron]**

*\***,**

..............................................

**20 yards of linen**

*/*...........................................

**1 coat**

*/*........................................

**10 lbs. of tea**

*/*......................................

**/**40 lbs. of coffee

[2 ounces of gold..

**=**..

**<**

......................................

**\**1 quarter of corn

........................................

**½ ton of iron]**

*\***,**

.........................................

**20 yards of linen**

*/*......................................

**1 coat**

*/*...................................

**10 lbs. of tea**

*/*.................................

**/**40 lbs. of coffee

[½ ton of iron..

**=**..

**<**

.................................

**\**1 quarter of corn

...................................

**2 ounces of gold]**

*\***}**

**.**

__C__

__General__**. Marx “notates” this value-form as follows [**

__Value-Form__*ibid*., p.

**65**] –

**“**1 coat.....................

*\*10 lbs. of tea..........

*\*40 lbs. of coffee....

*\* 1 quarter of corn..

*\*................................................

**>**...**=**...20 yards of linen 2 ounces of gold..

*/* ½ ton of iron.......

*/* x com. A., etc.

*/***”**-- or, in

**F**.**.**__E__**. shorthand --**__D__**u**........

__B__

*\***v**...........

__C__

*\***w**..........

__D__

*\***x**...............

__E__**\**

...........................

**>**...**=**...**z**__A__**y**................

__F__**/**

**a**............

__G__

*/***b**........

__H__

*/*-- and Marx describes the

__General__**, and the**__Value-Form____dialectical__transition**the***to*__General____Value-Form__**the***from*__Expanded__**, and the subsequent**__Value-Form____dialectical__transition**the***from*__General____Value-Form__**the***to***, in the following, exceedingly brilliant, way [**__Money____Value-Form__*ibid*., pp.**64**-**70**,*emphasis**added***M.D.] --***by***“**3.

**Defects**of the Total or Expanded form of value. In the first place, the relative expression of value is incomplete because the series representing it is interminable. The chain of which each equation of value is a link, is liable at any moment to be lengthened by each new kind of commodity that comes into existence and furnishes [it with – M.D.] the material for a fresh expression of [its – M.D.] value.

In the second place, it is a many-coloured mosaic of disparate and independent expressions of value.

And lastly, if, as must be the case, the relative value of each commodity in turn, becomes expressed in this expanded form, we get for each of them a relative value-form, different in every case, and consisting of an interminable series of expressions of value.

The defects of the expanded relative value form are reflected in the corresponding equivalent form.

Since the bodily form of each single commodity is one particular equivalent form amongst numberless others, we have, on the whole, nothing but fragmentary equivalent forms, each excluding the others.

In the same way, also, the special, concrete, useful kind of labour embodied in each particular equivalent, is presented only as a particular kind of labour, and therefore not as an exhaustive representative of human labour generally.

The latter, indeed, gains adequate manifestation in the totality of its manifold, particular, concrete forms. But, in that case, its expression in an [M.D.:

*practically-*]infinite series is ever incomplete and deficient in unity.The expanded relative value-form is, however, nothing but the sum of the elementary relative expressions or equations of the first kind, such as

..........................................................20 yards of linen..=..1 coat

..........................................................20 yards of linen..=..10 lbs. of tea, etc.

Each of these implies the corresponding inverted equation,

............................................................1 coat..=..20 yards of linen

..........................................................10 lbs. of tea..=..20 yards of linen, etc.

In fact, when a person exchanges his linen for many other commodities, and thus expresses its value in a series of other commodities, it necessarily follows, that the various owners of the latter exchange them for the linen, and consequently express the value of their various commodities in one and the same third commodity, the linen. If then, we reverse the series, 20 yards of linen = 1 coat or = 10 lbs. of tea, etc., that is to say, if we give expression to the converse relation already implied in the series, we get,

...........................................................

**C****.****The General form of value** ..1 coat......................

*\*10 lbs. of tea...........

*\*40 lbs. of coffee.....

*\*.. 1 quarter of corn...

*\*.................................................

**>**...**=**...20 yards of linen...2 ounces of gold...

*/*...½ ton of iron........

*/*...x com. A., etc.

*/**1*.

*The altered character of the form of value*

All commodities now express their value (1) in an

**form, because in a**__elementary__**commodity; (2) with**__single__**, because in one and the same commodity. This form of value is***unity***and**__elementary__**, therefore**__the same for all__**.**__general__. . .

[M.D.: This]

**is a form of***universal equivalent form***.***value in general*It can, therefore, be assumed by any commodity.

On the other hand, if a commodity be found to have assumed the universal equivalent form (

**form C**), this is only because and in so far as it has been excluded from the rest of all other commodities as their equivalent, and that by their own act.And from the moment that this exclusion becomes finally restricted to one particular commodity, from that moment only, the general form of relative value of the world of commodities obtains real consistence and general social validity.

The particular commodity, with whose bodily form the equivalent form is thus socially identified, now becomes the money-commodity, or serves as money.

It becomes the special social function of that commodity, and consequently its social monopoly, to play within the world of commodities the part of the universal equivalent.

Amongst the commodities which, in

**form B**, figure as particular equivalents of the linen, and in**form C**, express in common their relative values in linen, this foremost place has been attained by one in particular -- namely, gold.If, then, in

**form C**we replace the linen by**gold**, we get,...........................................................

**D. The Money**-**form** ..1 coat.........................

**=**......*\*10 lbs. of tea............

**=**........*\*40 lbs. of coffee.....

**=**........*\*.. 1 quarter of corn.

**=**..........*\*..............................................................

**>**....**2 ounces of gold**20 yards of linen....

**=**.........*/*...½ ton of iron..........

**=**.....*/*...x com. A., etc. .....

**=**.*/*. . .

The difficulty in forming a concept of

**the money**-**form**, consists in comprehending the universal equivalent form, and as a necessary corollary,**the general form of value**,**form C**.The latter is deducible from

**form B**,**the expanded form of value**, the essential*component***of which, we saw, is***element***form A**, 20 yards of linen = 1 coat or x commodity A = y commodity B.The

**simple commodity form**is therefore the**of***germ***the money-form**.**”**The seven elements of the restricted

__General Value-Form__**are rendered, in Marx’s “algebraical”, or “variables-only”, mode, using the***set***F**.**.**__E__**. shorthand, as --**__D__**{**

**[u**........

__B__

*\*...

**v**.........__C__*\*...

**w**..........__D__*\*...

**x**...............__E__**\**...........................

**>**...**=**...**z**__A__]**,**...

**y**...............__F__**/**...

**a**...........__G__*/***[z**........

__A__

*\*...

**v**.........__C__*\*...

**w**..........__D__*\*...

**x**...............__E__**\**..........................

**>**...**=**...**u**__B__]**,**...

**y**...............__F__**/**...

**a**...........__G__*/***[z**..........

__A__

*\*...

**u**..........__B__*\*...

**w**..........__D__*\*...

**x**...............__E__**\**..........................

**>**...**=**...**v**__C__]**,**...

**y**...............__F__**/**...

**a**...........__G__*/***[z**.........

__A__

*\*...

**u**..........__B__*\*...

**v**...........__C__*\*...

**x**...............__E__**\**..........................

**>**...**=**...**w**__D__]**,**...

**y**...............__F__**/**...

**a**...........__G__*/***[z**.........

__A__

*\*...

**u**..........__B__*\*...

**v**...........__C__*\*...

**w**.............__D__**\**.........................

**>**...**=**...**x**__E__]**,**...

**y**...............__F__**/**...

**a**...........__G__*/***[z**..........

__A__

*\*...

**u**...........__B__*\*...

**v**.............__C__*\*...

**w**..............__D__**\**...........................

**>**...**=**...**y**__F__]**,**...

**x**...............__E__**/**...

**a**...........__G__*/***[z**........

__A__

*\*...

**u**...........__B__*\*...

**v**.............__C__*\*...

**w**..............__D__**\**...........................

**>**...**=**...**a**__G__]...

**x**.................__E__**/**...

**y**..............__F__*/***}**

-- or, after this same fashion, in Marx’s “arithmetical” or “constants-only” mode, as --

**{**

**[**1 coat......................

*\*10 lbs. of tea...........

*\*40 lbs. of coffee.....

*\*.. 1 quarter of corn...

*\*.................................................

**>**...**=**...20 yards of linen**]****,**...2 ounces of gold...

*/*...½ ton of iron........

*/***[**20 yards of linen....

*\*..10 lbs. of tea................

*\*..40 lbs. of coffee..........

*\*..1 quarter of corn..........

*\*......................................................

**>**...**=**...1 coat**]****,**..2 ounces of gold.........

*/*...½ ton of iron............

*/***[**20 yards of linen....

*\*.....1 coat........................ .....

*\*..40 lbs. of coffee..........

*\*..1 quarter of corn...........

*\*........................................................

**>**...**=**...10 lbs. of tea**]****,**..2 ounces of gold..........

*/*...½ ton of iron.............

*/***[**20 yards of linen....

*\*.....1 coat........................ .....

*\*..10 lbs. of tea...................

*\*.....1 quarter of corn.........

*\*........................................................

**>**...**=**...40 lbs. of coffee**]****,**..2 ounces of gold..........

*/*...½ ton of iron.............

*/***[**20 yards of linen....

*\*.....1 coat........................ .....

*\*..10 lbs. of tea...................

*\*..40 lbs. of coffee.............

*\*.........................................................

**>**...**=**...1 quarter of corn**]****,**..2 ounces of gold...........

*/*...½ ton of iron..............

*/***[**20 yards of linen....

*\*.....1 coat.....................

*\*..10 lbs. of tea.............

*\*..40 lbs. of coffee..........

*\*.............................................

**>**...**=**...2 ounces of gold**]****,**.....1 quarter of corn......

*/*...½ ton of iron............

*/***[**20 yards of linen........

*\*.....1 coat........................

*\*..10 lbs. of tea................

*\*..40 lbs. of coffee............

*\*..............................................

**>**...**=**...½ ton of iron**]****,**.....1 quarter of corn.......

*/*.....2 ounces of gold...

*/***}**.

Finally, note that we have shown, above, in detail, that each

*“*, «**logical individual**”**»,***monad***, or***unit***of the***element**“*of**category***individuals**”*, “«**» of «***arithmos***»”,***monads**“*of**assemblage***units**”*, or*“***set****of***elements**”*known herein as (**3**) [Marx’s]__General__**, or**__Value-Form____Value Form C____.__, is a*“*, or**complex unity**”*“*, or__dialectical__**synthesis**”*“*of (**hybrid**”**2**)*“*, «**logical individuals**”**»,***monads***, or***units***of the***elements**“*of**category***individuals**”*, “«**» of «***arithmos***»”,***monads**“*of**assemblage***units**”*, or*“***set****of***elements**”*known herein as [Marx’s]__Expanded__**, or**__Value-Form____Value Form B____.__, which is the first*“*«**meta**-**»”, first***arithmos**“*or first**meta**-**assemblage**”,*“*of the**meta**-**set**”__dialectical__**of***progression***, which constitutes Marx’s «***categories***», and of, and in intimate inner “unitation” with (**__Kapital__**1**)*“*, «**logical individuals**”**»,***monads***, or***units***of the***elements**“*of**category***individuals**”*, “«**» of «***arithmos***»”,***monads**“*of**assemblage***units**”*, or*“***set****of***elements**”*known herein as [Marx’s]__Elementary__**, or**__Value-Form____Value Form A____.__, which is the “«**»-«***arché***»”, or***arithmos**beginning***of Marx’s multi-volume «***category***» entitled***magnum opus***:**__Capital__**, and which is the category from which all subsequent categories in Marx’s «***A Critique of Political Economy***» “descend” [or “ascend”, in terms of explicit explanatory richness / complexity/ “thought-concreteness” / ”determinateness”].**__Kapital__The “poladic” units, «

**», or elements – the “polads” – of***monads*__Value Form C____.__each arise as a hybridization of “polads” of__Value Form A____.__with “polads” of__Value Form B____.__.The generic unit, «

**», or element of***monad*__Value Form C____.__, the*“**General Form of Commodity Value**”*, requires the following format to express its meaning –**[**

**a**......

__A__

*\*..

**b**.........__B__*\*....

**.**............**>**...**=**...**x**__X__**]**....

**.**..........**/**...

**w****.**__W__*/*Each “polad” of

__Value Form C____.__takes the “solitary” format of its “**Equivalent**” pole from that of the “**Equivalent**” pole of the “polads” of__Value Form A____.__, the*“**Elementary Form of Commodity Value**”*, whose generic unit, «**», or element is –***monad***[**

**a**...

__A__**=**...

**w**

__W__**]**.

Each “polad” of

__Value Form C____.__takes the “array” format of its “**Relative**” pole from that of the “**Equivalent**” pole of the “polads” of__Value Form B____.__, the*“**Expanded Form of Commodity Value**”*, and has that format applied to its “**Relative**” pole. The generic unit, «**», or element of***monad*__Value Form B____.__*is –*....................

.................

.................

...................

*/***a**__A__.................

**...***/***b**__B__**[****x**...__X__**=**...**<**.......**.**.................

**\**....**.**...................

**.***\***w**__W__**]**.Thus, each

__Value Form C____.__unit is both (**i**.) a**of***hybridization*__Value Form A____.__with__Value Form B____.__, in which the format unique to the “**Equivalent**” pole of__Value Form A____.__supplies the format for the “**Equivalent**” pole of__Value Form C____.__, and in which the format unique to the “**Equivalent**” pole of__Value Form B____.__supplies the format for the “**Relative**” pole of__Value Form C____.__, and (**ii**.) a*“*of each unit of**horizontal**-**reversal****negation**”__Value Form B____.__, i.e., is a poles[-formats-]reversal of the poles[-formats] of the units of__Value Form B____.__.**: The**

__Commentary__**«**

*progression of***»[ of «**

*arithmoi***»] implicit in the**

*monads*

*progression of**“*that models the

**categorograms**”**of Marx’s**

*opening*__dialectical__triad**, namely, the**

__Capital__*“*--

**categorograms**-**progression**”

__Value Form A____.__..

**--->**

__Value Form A____.__

**+**

__Value Form B____.__..

**--->**

__Value Form A____.__

**+**

__Value Form B____.__

**+**

__Value Form C____.__..

**--->...**

-- is, using F.E.D.’s shorthand for Marx’s “algebra” --

**{**

**[**

**a**...

__A__**=**...

**w**

__W__**]**

**}**..

**--->**

...............................................................

............................................................

............................................................

..............................................................

*/***a**__A__............................................................

**....***/***b**__B__**{****[****a**...__A__**=**...**w**__W__**]****}**....**&**....**{****[****x**.....__X__**=**.....**<**......**.**............................................................

**\**...**.**..............................................................

**..***\***w**__W__**]****}**..**--->**................................................................

.............................................................

*/***a**...........................__A__**{****[****a**.......__A__*\*.............................................................

**...***/***b**.................................__B__**b**.........__B__*\***{**

**[**

**a**...

__A__**=**...

**w**

__W__**]**

**}**....

**&**....

**{**

**[**

**x**.....

__X__**=**.....

**<**........

**.**..............

**&**..............

**.**...............

**>**...

**=**...

**x**

__X__**]**

**}**

**...**

.............................................................

**\**....**.**.............................**.**............**/**...............................................................

**..***\***w**__W__**]****}**...................**w****..**__W__*/*-- or --

The set of all

**. “polads”**__Form A__**--->**The set of all

**. “polads”..**__Form A__**&**..The set of all**. “polads”**__Form B__**--->**The

**. “polads” set..**__Form A__**&**..The**. “polads” set..**__Form B__**&**..The**. “polads” set..**__Form C__**--->...**.

__Value Form A____.__is the ultimate «

**»**

*arché**-*/ «

**category****» Marx’s multi-volume «**

*arithmos***», corresponding to the F.E.D.**

*magnum opus*

__dialectical__*-*symbol

**algebraic**

__A__

__=__

__q__**A**.

__Value Form B____.__is the «

**» formed by the «**

*arithmos***»**

*aufheben**“*«

**meta**-**»**

*monad**-*of the

**ization**”*«*

**» the**

*monads*

__Value Form A____.__«

**»«**

*arché***», as we have seen above, corresponding to the F.E.D.**

*arithmos*

__dialectical__*-*symbol

**algebraic**

__B__

__=__

__q__**B**

**=**

__q__**AA**.

The format of each «

**» of the***monad*__Value Form C____.__«**» is a***arithmos**“*of formats of the «**complex unity**”**» of***monads*__Value Form A____.__with those of__Value Form B____.__, as we have also seen above, corresponding to the F.E.D.__dialectical__*-*symbol**algebraic**__C____=____q__**C****=**__q__**B****A**.**TO BE CONTINUED**.

**Next**:

**Part**

**II**.

**C**.:

*Intuitive Account*of the**F**.

**.**

__E__**.**

__D__**--**

*Generic*__Dialectics__*Algorithm*[

__Meta__

__-____]__

*Systematic***Dialectics****Example****. –**

__3__**The Opening**

*Triad*of**F**.

**.**

__E__**.’**

__D__**s**

**.**

__Dialectic__of the__Dialectical__Arithmetics
## No comments:

## Post a Comment