Part III. Interlude. The Psychohistorical-Dialectical 'Meta-Equation' of Human Social Formations 'Meta-Evolution'. Considerations on Epoch t = 6, and for Future Epochs, t > 6.

The Psychohistorical-Dialectical ‘Meta-Equation’ of Human-Social Formations ‘Meta-Evolution’.



Part III.:  Interlude --

A Break in Our Model’s Flow of ‘Connotational Entailments’;

Some Simpler Examples of ‘Dialectical Models’.  

Dear Readers,

Our narration of the F.E.D. psychohistorical-dialectical equation ‘meta-model’ of human-social formation(s) must here come to a temporary pause.

This is because, with the irruption of the ancient “empires” social formation, the ‘‘‘historical logic’’’, the ‘form of chronological followership’, and of ‘connotational entailment’, that has carried forward the heuristic, ‘intuitional’ flow of this ‘meta-model’ so far, from epoch t = 0 to epoch t = 5, has come to a break. 

It has come to a break because the “nation-states” social formations that, at length, succeeded and superseded the multi-“city-state” “empires” social formations, are not ‘meta-empires’, made up out of a heterogeneous multiplicity of [ whole ] empires’.

But before entering into considerations as to why this break occurred, for Terran humanity, at least, with the ancient “empires” social formations, and as to how the ‘meta-model’ formed by the F.E.D. psychohistorical equation ‘meta-model’ of human-social formation(s) can be heuristically and ‘intuitionally’ restarted, resumed -- iterating even into ‘meta-model’ epochs t > 6, epochs that represent the possible future of Terran human social formation, and, thus, register the predictions of this ‘meta-model’ for that future -- we wish to provide, to the reader, some simpler examples of ‘dialectical models’.

Perusal of these three, simpler ‘dialectical models’ by the reader should render what is going on in the far more complex F.E.D. psychohistorical-dialectical equations ‘meta-models’ -- e.g., in the far more complex ‘meta-model’ that is the F.E.D. psychohistorical-dialectical equation of human social formation(s) -- much clearer.

We plan to deliver our narrations of those three simpler ‘dialectical models’ -- simplest first, most complex last -- over the course of the next three blog-entries.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For more information regarding these Seldonian insights, please see --

 

www.dialectics.info

 

 

 

 

 

For partially pictographical, ‘poster-ized’ visualizations of many of these Seldonian insights -- specimens of ‘dialectical art’ – as well as illustrated books by the F.E.D. Press, see --

https://www.etsy.com/shop/DialecticsMATH

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

¡ENJOY!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Regards,

 

 

Miguel Detonacciones,

 

Voting Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.];

Elected Member, F.E.D. General Council;

Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison;

Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.

 

 

 

 

YOU are invited to post your comments on this blog-entry below!