**Part**

**01**: Seldon’s

*‘‘‘*--

**Seeing**’’’__s__**Series***‘‘‘*

__-__**Self****Involution**’’’

*and*__th__e__Dialectic__al*‘*.

**-**__Meta__**Modeling**’**of Cosmological**‘‘‘**-**__Meta__**Evolution**’’’
Dear

**,***Readers*
It is my

**,***pleasure***my***and***,***honor**as***officer of the***an***Foundation****[**__Encyclopedia Dialectica__**F**.**.**__E__**.] Office of Public Liaison, to**__D__**with***share***, from time to time,***you**as**they***approved for public release by the***are***F**.**.**__E__**. General Council,**__D__*key**excerpt*__s__**the***from***i**__nt__**e**__rn__**a**__l__**,***writing*__s__*and***the***from***i**__nt__**e**__rn__**a**__l__**, of***sayings***o**__ur____co__*-*, Karl Seldon.**founder**
The

**such release in this***first**new***is entered below [***series**Some***.**__E__**.**__D__*standard**edit*__s__*have**been***, in the***applied**version***below, by the editors of the Special Council for the**__present__ed**, to the direct transcript of**__Encyclopedia__**o**__ur____co__*-*’s**founder****].***discourse*

*This*

*first instalment***the**

*addresses*

**Seldonian****of the**

*view***of**

__coinciding__

*mathematical*

*and*

__phys__ical**of the**

__meaning__s**“self-involution”.**

__term__
In

*Seldon’s***,***view**this*__coinciding__**,***resides**in***, in***particular*__th__e__single__*‘*-**-**__Dy__adic Seldon**Function**’*based**‘***-**__meta__**equation**’__t__h__a__t**, «***maps the progression*__o__f__dialectic__al**»***aufheben**equation*__s__that form**o**__ur__*ontological**-*,**categorial**__multi__*-*,**meta**__finite__**singularity***‘*,**-**__qual__o**fractal****tower**’*‘*«**-**__meta__**»**__gen__e*-***alogical**’*categorial**-***progression****of the**__formulation__*known**‘‘‘*of**-**__meta__**evolution**’’*our***, to-date, e.g.,***cosmos**starting**from***of***the ontological category**p*__r__*e**-**/sub**-***atomic***“***pa**__r__*ticle*__s__*”***«***as**a***»**__r__*ché**-*, i.e.,**category***as**the**ultimate ancestor**ontological category*__present__ly*well***to***known**modern***.***science***“**The known history of our Cosmos can be described as a process of

__recurrent__‘‘‘self-involution’’’.”

“This ‘Nature-al History’, or ‘‘‘history of Nature as a Whole’’’,
can be so described in both the Chardinian, physical sense, and in the
“archaic”, mathematical sense of this term, ‘‘‘self-involution’’’.”

“In this double sense of that term, the self-re-iterated
“self-involution -- i.e., this “raising to a power”, e.g., this ‘self-iterated’
“squaring” -- drives the ontological-categorial ‘self-meta-evolution’ of our
cosmos in actuality, and in its dialectical-mathematical representation.”

“It does so both in terms of its physical content -- the
‘erosis’ of ‘‘‘binding the ontological-categorial units, or «monad

__s__», that are ‘meta-meristemal’ in each historically-specific epoch of cosmological evolution, into ever higher unit-__ies__’’’ -- and in terms of its syntactical, mathematical, ideographical description, and formulaic prescription.”
“In its Chardinian, physical
sense, this ‘‘‘self-involution’’’ refers to the critical-threshold
‘self-internalization’ of each predecessor epoch-making ‘particulation’ of the
cosmos -- of that predecessor epoch’s changing “

__i__ndefinite number__s__”/ «arithmo__i__» / population__s__of its ‘meta-meristemal’ «monad__s__» -- in the formation of each successor such ‘particulation’, and thereby also in the formation of the successor epoch of cosmological__evolution__, whereby the «arithmos» of those successive, ontologically-progressive epochs constitutes the ‘__meta__-evolution’ of our cosmos to-date.”
“In
the mathematical sense of the term ‘‘‘self-involution’’’, it means that this
Chardinian process is described -- ideographically, formulaically -- by an
ideographical expression involving a ‘meta-exponential’ formula, i.e., a ‘meta-equation’
involving time-varying [epoch-varying] ‘meta-exponent’ values, applied
successively to a fixed numerical exponent, which, in case

__s__where that fixed exponent is the “**W***hole**”***value***Number***2**, thus expresses, and calls for, a recurring ‘‘‘self-squaring’’’ [cf. Mandelbrot] of the represented ontological content of the cosmos -- content-representation that, after ‘epoch**0**’, was ‘«gene»-rated’ by the preceding such ‘self-squaring’, i.e., all the way back down to, and starting from, the**2****precursor to the first such,**^{0}**2****‘‘‘self-squaring’’’.”**^{1}
“This description works when,
e.g., we take

*p*__r__*e*-*atomic**“pa*__r__*ticle*denoted by__s__”,__r__*,***«***as**a***»**__r__*ché**-*, i.e.,**category***as**the**well**known**ultimate ancestor***of our cosmos.”***ontological category*
“We hypothesize that this dual pattern, of ‘«aufheben»
self-involution’, can be extended backwards in time to an epoch before the
epoch “vanguarded” by the

*p*__r__*e*-*atomic**“pa*__r__*ticle*«arithmos».”__s__”*“We mean an epoch of*“Dark Energy” [ so-called], wherein an

__anti__*-*gravitic “Dark Energy”-only cosmos, one of “pure time” manifesting as the accelerating self-expansion/self-“inflation”/expanded self-reproduction of that «arithmos» of «monad

__s__» which, we hold, emerges as “empty” space itself, when that «arithmos» brooked -- at the finite limit of the mutually-catalytic, mutually-accelerating rate of the intact ‘self-stretching’, ‘meta-mitotic’ self-replication of the ‘contiguum’ of those thus rapidly growing-in-number ‘«monad

__s__» of space itself’ -- a ‘self-resistance’ to its by then super-light-speed rate of expansion of the radii of the cosmos, in the form of [so-called] “Dark Matter”, whose own ‘‘‘self-involution’’’ gave rise, later, to our more familiar ‘‘‘Bright Matter’’’, of ‘electro-gravitic+’ «monad

__s__»/“particles”.”

“That is, in a further deepening
of our ‘Pythagorean Psychohistorical Materialism’, space would thus be grasped
as the emergent manifestation of a [vast, growing, but still and ever finite]
population -- or «arithmos»/‘‘‘indefinite number’’’
-- of ‘spaceonic’ «monad

__s__», whose existence, at a scale into which our present technologies cannot penetrate, is thus such that these «monad__s__» are**, presently, directly “discernible” [cf. Leibniz]/distinguishable for us, in their actual***not***-identity / ‘inter-mutual’ “mere”**__non__**-- i.e., in their ‘inter-mutual’***similarity***that never collapses in ‘inter-mutual’***similitude**“**identity**”*.”
“This ‘self-recurrent’
‘‘‘self-involution’’’ process is, in ‘«gene»-ral’, an «aufheben» process, i.e.,
a process of combined self-transformation/self-conservation/self-elevation-in-

*‘*__qual__o*-*-scale of the «monad**fractal**’__s__» that are ‘meta-meristemal’ in a given epoch of cosmological history.”
“That is, this recurring
‘‘‘self-involution’’’ process is none other than

__t__he__dialectic__al*process**par excellence*, the very**that constitutes and advances the [***process***]***singular***.**__Dialectic__of Nature__i__t__s__e__l__f**”**
For

**these***more information*__regarding__*Seldonian***, please***insight*__s__**--***see*

*and*
For ‘poster-ized’

**of***visualizations***of***many***--***these Seldonian insights***of***specimen*__s__*‘*--**’**__dialectic__al art**:***see*

*¡ENJOY!*
Regards,

Miguel Detonacciones,

Member,

**Foundation****[**__Encyclopedia Dialectica__**F**.**.**__E__**.],**__D__
Participant,

**F**.**.**__E__**. Special Council for Public Liaison,**__D__
Officer,

**F**.**.**__E__**. Office of Public Liaison.**__D__
## No comments:

## Post a Comment