The Dialectic of HOLISMS versus ATOMISMS. Part 5.: Cases of Dialectic Series.

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Dialectic

 

of

 

HOLISMS

 

versus

 

ATOMISMS.

 

Part 5.:

 

Cases of Dialectic Series.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Reader,

 

As we see it, the human-natural, ‘ideo-ontological’ and ideological dialectic of ‘holisms versus atomisms’, has a dialectical synthesis category, or ‘uni-category’, which resides at the heart of the Seldonian dialectical worldview.

This dialectic, we hold, goes like this –

1.  «arché» category: of Holistic ideology-units, of the category signed by q_H, tend to envision ‘“a dark night

 in which all cows are black”’ [cf. Hegel], i.e., constituting a worldview which is weak on the parts, particulars and ‘particulations’ that constitute the units of our real world;

 

2.  first contra-category: of Atomistic ideology-units, of the category signed by q_A, tend to envision absolutely

 discrete, un-interconnected and “uncuttable” units, supposedly separated, and thereby also connected, but by “nothingness”, by nothing at all; a world picture that sees only “atoms and the void”;

 

3.  first uni-category: of ‘Monadistic’ or ‘ArithMistic’ conceptual-units, of the category signed by q_M, envision

the universe as composed of qualitatively different ‘«Arithmoi» of «Monads»’ which are even ‘meta-genealogically’ inter-connected, both internally and externally, in that each predecessor kind of «Monads» ‘‘‘begets’’’ its successor kind, and some of its units are «aufheben»-contained inside each of those successor units, while also some of the «Monads» of the predecessor kind still remain, ‘evolutely’, outside of the «Monads» of the successor kind.  The units upheld per the Monadisms’ theory-units are relatively discrete, similar to the atom units of the Atomisms ideologies in that way, but are not “uncuttable”, because each such «Monad» has some of the former units, of its predecessor kinds of units, inside it, and can be cut-back, dis-assembled, or dis-integrated, into earlier kinds of «Monads», by sufficiently energetic means, except, perhaps, for the «archê-monads» of the «arché»-category of a given Domain.

 

 

Note: The q_HH |-º q_A solution is not so much an

 assertion that each ideological unit of the Atomisms category is made up out of a heterogeneous multiplicity of ideological units of the Holisms category – although Atomisms’ native ideology-units can often be grasped as taking the ultra-macroscopic “Whole” of the holistic totality, and shrinking it down and multiplying it into a plethora of “uncuttable”, immutable, microscopic atom-units, an ancient-version ‘‘‘multiverse’’’ «arithmos» of shrunken universe units – but more like, as in many systematic dialectics, a self-critique of the initial implicit claim that holistic ideologies exhaust the “kinds”, or ‘ideo-ontological’ categories, of the ‘World Pictures’ Domain.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For more information regarding these Seldonian insights, and to read and/or download, free of charge, PDFs and/or JPGs of Foundation books, other texts, and images, please see:

 

www.dialectics.info

 

 

and

 

 

https://independent.academia.edu/KarlSeldon

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For partially pictographical, ‘poster-ized’ visualizations of many of these Seldonian insights -- specimens of ‘dialectical art’ – as well as dialectically-illustrated books published by the F.E.D. Press, see –

 

https://www.etsy.com/shop/DialecticsMATH

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

¡ENJOY!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Regards,

 

 

 

Miguel Detonacciones,

 

Voting Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.];

Elected Member, F.E.D. General Council;

Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison;

Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.

 

 

 

 

 

 

YOU are invited to post your comments on this blog-entry below!