“Dark
Matter”
and
‘Bright
Matter’
are
‘ANTI-antigravity’:
A Reversal of Perspective.
Part 2. of the
Series on the
‘Regenerist
Hypothesis’.
Dear Reader,
Rather than describing “Dark
Matter” – and “ordinary matter”, or ‘Bright Matter’ – as the [main]
cosmological sources of “gravity”, it would be more apt to describe “Dark
Energy” as “antigravity”, and “Dark Matter” and ‘Bright Matter’ as sources of, ‘ANTI-“Dark
Energy” –
‘ANTI-antigravity’.
This is because “Dark Energy”/“antigravity”
came first, per our, and other, hypotheses, e.g., in our hypothesis, as the actual
driver of cosmological “inflation”, and, thus, “Dark Energy” has a kind of
priority.
Or, better, if we describe “Dark
Energy antigravity” with a ‘posit-tive’ term, again because it arose first,
and, later, began to be opposed by “Dark Matter” and, later still, by ‘Bright
Matter’, per hypothesis, it would be still more apt to describe “Dark Energy”
as ‘physical-space expansivity’, hence to describe “matter” , “Dark” and
‘Bright’, as ‘anti-expansivity’, or as ‘contractivity’, or, at
least, as ‘expansivity-braking’, and even as ‘expansivity-breaking’.
For more
information regarding these
Seldonian insights, and to read and/or download, free
of charge, PDFs and/or JPGs of Foundation books, other texts, and images, please see:
and
https://independent.academia.edu/KarlSeldon
For partially pictographical, ‘poster-ized’ visualizations of many of these Seldonian insights -- specimens of ‘dialectical art’ – as well as dialectically-illustrated books
published by
the F.E.D. Press, see –
https://www.etsy.com/shop/DialecticsMATH
¡ENJOY!
Regards,
Miguel
Detonacciones,
Voting Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.];
Elected Member, F.E.D. General Council;
Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison;
Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.
YOU are invited to post
your comments on this blog-entry below!





No comments:
Post a Comment