Marx’s “Single Science”: ‘Dialectical Science’ and Universal Science. Part 10.: Karl Seldon on Karl Marx Series.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Marx’s “Single Science”:

 

‘Dialectical Science’

 

and

 

Universal Science.

 

 

 

Part 10.:

 

Karl Seldon on Karl Marx Series.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

GLOBAL STRATEGIC HYPOTHESES.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Reader,

 

 

It is my pleasure, and my honor, as an elected member of the Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.] General Council, and as a voting member of F.E.D., to share, with you, from time to time, as they are approved for public release by the F.E.D. General Council, Karl Seldon’s commentaries on the world-historic breakthrough work of Karl Marx – work not to be confused with the world-historic catastrophe of Leninism’s bait-and-switch fraud: state-capitalist, police-state hell hole dictatorships.

 

 

This 10th text in this by now long-running series is posted herewith, together with supporting text-images and diagrams [Some E.D. standard edits have been applied, in the version presented below, by the editors of the F.E.D. Special Council for the Encyclopedia, to the direct transcript of our co-founder’s discourse].

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Seldon –

“In The German Ideology, written jointly, by Marx and Engels, during 1845 and 1846, with Europe on the verge of the 1848, continent-wide anti-monarchist revolutions, on its second page, the start of its section entitled “1. Ideology in General, German Ideology in Particular”, reads as follows –

 

“We know only a single science, the science of history.  One can look at history from two sides and divide it into the history of [K.S.: ‘exo-human’ ]nature and the history of humanity[, K.S.: I.e., of human Nature].  The two sides are, however, inseparable; the history of nature and the history of humanity are dependent on each other so long as humans exist.  The history of [K.S.: ‘exo-human’ ]nature, so-called natural science, does not concern us here; but we will have to examine the history of humanity, since almost the whole of ideology amounts either to a distorted interpretation of this history, or to a complete abstraction from it.  Ideology is itself only one of the [K.S.: ‘‘‘psychohistorical’’’] aspects of this history.”* 

 

– but is not the first invocation of “the single science” in the Marxian legacy.”

 

“In Marx’s writings of 1844, the year before he started working with Engels on The German Ideology, in the private texts later, by others, titled “The Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts”, Marx had already stated the following –

 

“[K.S.: human ]History itself is a real part of natural history, of the development of [K.S.: pre-human ]nature into humanity.  Natural science will one day incorporate the science of human Nature, just as the science of human Nature will one day incorporate natural science [K.S.: I.e., the science of ‘exo-human Nature’]; there will be a single science.”**

 

– although further elaboration of this astounding insight into a future “single science” had to await later years in the development of Marxian Theory, including via Engels’ attempts, in the unfinished manuscripts posthumously published under the title “Dialectics of Nature” – to extend that theory to encompass exo-human Nature, albeit formulated at a time before natural science had penetrated exo-human Nature deeply enough to discern the universal, «aufheben» architectonic of our cosmos.”

 

“Moden science does not notice – at least not officially – does not cognize, and does not leverage, theoretically, or mathematically, the Grand Universal Pattern and Unity of Cosmological Nature, a Pattern and a Unity which its own, protracted observations have, gradually and implicitly, disclosed.”

 

“And the Dialectical Science, implicit in Marxian Theory, is also, and thereby – by virtue of its very ‘dialecticality’ – a Unified and Universal Science.” 

“It breaks with the tacit and ‘Kantianoid’ expectation, detected in some topoi of the contemporary “scientific community”, of a virtual antinomy between “natural science” and “social science”.” 

“This is scene in the, oft-detected, assumptions that “social science” will need a radically distinct and separate mathematics, to adequately model human-social “processes and phenomena”, from the mathematics that is adequate for “natural science” – adequate to model the “processes and phenomena” addressed by the “physical”, “hard” sciences.” 

 

“The mathematics of dialectical categorial progressions, that F.E.D. has developed, applies equally to modeling the earlier, pre-human-social realities and history of universal Nature as known to us today, and to modeling the later, human-social realities and history of the human portion of Nature, as known to us today.” 

 

“Of course, that mathematics, of explicit dialectical categorial progressions, in its first ‘ideo-formation’ – its first axioms-systems ‘ideo-ontological’ category – is “purely”-qualitative, “purely” ontological-categorial, via a “purely”-qualitative axiomatic system of “non-standard” arithmetic/‘contra-Boolean’ algebra.” 

 

“We have yet to publish proofs that the later, ‘qualo-quant-itative’ axioms-systems of arithmetic/algebra in that first system’s own further dialectical categorial progression, are scientifically effective at modeling both pre-human-social and human-social reaches of universal nature. 

 

“Thus, the Foundation’s work is only just getting started.”  

 

 

 

 

 

*[Karl Marx and Frederick Engels, The German Ideology, Progress Publishers, Moscow, 1968, p. 28.  K.S.: To update this text to the contemporary context, in which a wider partial liberation of women – in a cause which Marx championed, from his “Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts” of 1844, onward – has impacted prevailing language, we have changed occurrences of the word “men" to the word “humans”, or to the word “humanity”.].

**[Karl Marx, Early Writings, McGraw-Hill, NY, USA, 1964, p. 164.  K.S.: as in the immediately-previous citation, and for the same reasons, we have changed occurrences of the word “man” to the word “humanity”, or to the phrase “human Nature”.].

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For more information regarding these Seldonian insights, and to read and/or download, free of charge, PDFs and/or JPGs of Foundation books, other texts, and images, please see:

 

www.dialectics.info

 

 

and

 

 

https://independent.academia.edu/KarlSeldon

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For partially pictographical, ‘poster-ized’ visualizations of many of these Seldonian insights -- specimens of ‘dialectical art’ – as well as dialectically-illustrated books published by the F.E.D. Press, see –

 

https://www.etsy.com/shop/DialecticsMATH

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

¡ENJOY!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Regards,

 

 

 

 

Miguel Detonacciones,

 

Voting Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.];

Elected Member, F.E.D. General Council;

Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison;

Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.

 

 

 

 

 

 

YOU are invited to post your comments on this blog-entry below!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SOLUTION –

 

‘Equitist Political-ECONOMIC DEMOCRACY’; 

 

BOOK:

 

MARX’S MISSING BLUEPRINTS

Free-of-Charge Download of Book PDF –

http://www.dialectics.info/dialectics/Applications.html

http://www.dialectics.info/dialectics/Applications_files/Edition%201.,%20DPCAIT_,_Part_1_,_%27THE_MISSING_BLUEPRINTS%27_,_begun_22JUL2022_Last_Updated_08AUG2023.pdf

 

Hardcover Book Order –

http://www.dialectics.info/dialectics/F.E.D._Press.html

https://www.etsy.com/shop/DialecticsMATH

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

THE DIALECTIC of Fermions and/versus Bosons. Part 01.: Everywhere-Dense Dialectic Series.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

THE DIALECTIC

 

of

 

Fermions

and/versus

Bosons.

 

 

 

Part 01.:

 

Everywhere-Dense

Dialectic

Series.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Reader,

 

 

 

For a long time, the qualitative distinction between the “Standard Model of Particle Physics” binary division of its Domain into the categories of fermions and/versus bosons appeared to be a radical diremption, an absolute either/or dichotomy, with no room for or reality of any «tertium quid»: any third category.

 

Bosons, such as photons and gluons, can crowd into the same quantum state in droves, whereas the fermions’ “exclusion principle” means that they are forced to occupy separate quantum states, a principle that makes for the substantiality and impenetrability of ordinary “solid” matter, albeit nonetheless composed mostly of “empty space”.

 

But the rise of the quark theory began to suggest that fermion/boson “complex unities” – combinations of “non-composite” fermions, such as quarks, with “non-composite” bosons, such as gluons – might in fact reside at the root of ordinary matter: protons and neutrons, as well as mesons and hyperons. 

 

Protonic, neutronic and hyperonic complex unities of quarks and gluons behave, collectively, as “composite” fermions, whereas mesonic complex unities of quarks and gluons – quark/anti-quark pairs “glued together” by gluonic bosons – behave, collectively, as “composite” bosons.

 

Beginning as hypothetical particles, but lately gaining some empirical existential corroboration under highly-restrictive conditions, the “anyon quasi-particles” are thought to transcend the fermion/boson dichotomy.  “Anyons” are so named because they are thought to instantiate exchange statistics situated anywhere in-between the “Fermi-Dirac” statistics enacted by fermions, and the “Bose-Einstein” statistics enacted by bosons. 

 

The anyons have just recently been joined, in their proposed transcendence of the fermion/boson dichotomy, by another, still hypothetical, category of “particles”, presently called “paraparticles”.

 

Two Rice University physicists – Kaden Hazzard and Zhiyuan Wang – published, in May 2026, in Nature, a mathematical proof of the existence, given mathematical assumptions which they believe to be conformant to physical reality, of these “paraparticles”, state-exhibiting exchange statistics which diverge substantially from those exhibited by both bosons and fermions.

 

Although this mathematical result shows that, in principle, our cosmos could contain “paraparticles” that are neither fermionic nor bosonic, “the jury is still out” for so long as such «monad»s have not been observed in nature. 

 

The speculative nature of these trans-fermionic/trans-bosonic “particles” claims is why we have coded their oval category-container, in the pre-pended ‘dialecto-gram’, with dotted lines, rather than with solid lines.

 

Such “paraparticles”, if they exist in physical reality, would reside outside the horizons of the “Standard Model of Particle Physics”.  No “particles” outside of that “Standard Model” have so far been reported in peer-reviewed sources.

 

However, since that “Standard Model” pertains to only ~5% of the presently-observed energy-density of our cosmos – that of “ordinary matter”, or what we call ‘Bright Matter’ – whereas ~25% of that energy-density appears to be in the form of “Dark Matter”, and ~70% in the form of “Dark Energy”, it is possible that the latter two forms of mass or energy are also particulate, and composed of exotic, previously and still unknown units; composed of “NON-Standard-Model” «monad»s, some of which might even turn out to fit the “paraparticles” category.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For more information regarding these Seldonian insights, and to read and/or download, free of charge, PDFs and/or JPGs of Foundation books, other texts, and images, please see:

 

www.dialectics.info

 

 

and

 

 

https://independent.academia.edu/KarlSeldon

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For partially pictographical, ‘poster-ized’ visualizations of many of these Seldonian insights -- specimens of ‘dialectical art’ – as well as dialectically-illustrated books published by the F.E.D. Press, see –

 

https://www.etsy.com/shop/DialecticsMATH

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

¡ENJOY!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Regards,

 

 

 

 

Miguel Detonacciones,

 

Voting Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.];

Elected Member, F.E.D. General Council;

Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison;

Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.

 

 

 

 

 

 

YOU are invited to post your comments on this blog-entry below!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

Part 1. AI dialogues series. A NON-STANDARD MODELOFTHE “NATURAL” NUMBERS, & A ‘CONTRA-BOOLEAN ALGEBRA’.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Part 1. AI dialogues

series.

 

A

NON-STANDARD

MODEL

OF THE

“NATURAL”

NUMBERS,

&

A

‘CONTRA-BOOLEAN

ALGEBRA’.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Reader,

 

The following is our edited transcript of a dialogue between one of our volunteers and a prominent, representative AI – ‘protoic’ to expected future android robot ‘meta-humans’, equipped with AI ‘‘‘minds’’’.

 

Our edited/readability-enhanced transcript follows.  The AI was able to produce a good rendition of the Encyclopedia Dialectica standard notation for key symbols of the generic _NQ arithmetic – ‘meta-numerals’ and ‘non-quantitative inequality relation-symbol’ alike – so we have simply substituted our standard symbols, from our ‘ideograms-palette’, into the AI’s responses, and have also enhanced their representation in our volunteer’s queries to the AI, to beyond what the typography available for the AI’s inputs allows.

 

Where we perceive errors in the volunteer’s or the AI’s assertions, we have commented, in magenta-colored bold & sometimes italicized or underscored text, all inserted within square brackets.

 

                        
                       

For more information regarding these Seldonian insights, and to read and/or download, free of charge, PDFs and/or JPGs of Foundation books, other texts, and images, please see:

 

www.dialectics.info

 

 

and

 

https://independent.academia.edu/KarlSeldon

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For partially pictographical, ‘poster-ized’ visualizations of many of these Seldonian insights -- specimens of ‘dialectical art’ – as well as dialectically-illustrated books published by the F.E.D. Press, see –

 

https://www.etsy.com/shop/DialecticsMATH

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

¡ENJOY!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Regards,

 

 

Miguel Detonacciones,

 

Voting Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.];

Elected Member, F.E.D. General Council;

Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison;

Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.

 

 

 

 

 

 

YOU are invited to post your comments on this blog-entry below.