Competitive
Markets:
‘Equitist’
versus
Capitalist.
GLOBAL STRATEGIC
HYPOTHESES.
Dear Reader,
Competitive markets,
including for “consumer goods”, constitute a crucial economic form of the
“checks and balances” that also militate against tyranny generally.
Producing goods under – a
state-capitalist – government monopoly, even if based upon some kind of
“democratic planning”, is a recipe for “hell-on-Earth” horrors in regard to
products’ affordability and quality, and in regard to customer service quality,
or, more accurately, in regard to a total and nightmarish lack of the latter.
Such markets are not,
viably, to be ‘abstract-negated’ in the transition to Equitism, we
hold, but, on the contrary, are to be «aufheben»-conserved
in that transition, if a viable and improved outcome vis-Ã -vis
capitalism is to be achieved.
In the ‘Equitist’
constitutional model that we have proposed, the ‘Citizenship
Stewardship Equity Human Right’-based socialized producers’ cooperatives, if they
produce, under democratic self-management, in commensurate markets, must pit
their goods-output against one another, and against that of remaining
capitalist companies, in market contexts, if the buyers in those markets are to
be well-served.
The producers’ cooperative Citizen-Stewards
will take home compensation for both hours worked therein, and for shares of
the net operating surplus of their co-ops, which would otherwise accrue, as
profits, to, e.g., absentee, non-worker capital equity stock owners, in the
context of capitalist companies.
That dual compensation of
Citizen Steward’s will be in return for their (1) offering a quality product,
at a competitive price, to the buyers in their markets, and for their (2)
paying a monthly ‘Social Rent’ in return for the usufruct of their means of
production – Social Properties, loaned to them to enable them to produce what
and as they see fit, constrained by the covenants agreed to with their
sponsoring ‘Social Bank’ co-ops, and by sufficient demand for their products
from their market(s) to sustain them as going concerns, with their ‘Social
Rents’ as well as their other expense paid out of the revenues from the market
sales of their output.
However, this does not
mean that market competition in an ‘Equitist’ political-economic democracy will
remain the same as market competition in a degenerate, descendence-phase,
capitalist pseudo-representative pseudo-democracy.
It does not
mean that the conservation moment of the «aufheben»-process,
with respect to capitalist competition and capitalist markets, will be able to
escape its combination with the elevation and with the determinate-negation
moments of that «aufheben»-process.
We expect ‘Equitist’
market buyer-participants will increasingly not base their
purchase-decisions solely on product price and product quality; that such
decisions will take on ‘Patreonic’ considerations.
We expect that
considerations of their affinity with, the broader purposes of, and the mission
of their favorite co-op “brands” will increasingly figure in their purchase
decisions.
This is because, in general,
the Stewardship co-ops will be advancing the cause of increasing producer
incomes, producer democratic enterprise management, and producer grassroots
power, overcoming the abjection of the wage-labor, capitalists-dependent and
capitalists-abused proletarian existence, in the transition to Equitist
‘political-economic democracy’.
We suspect that
the majority class will increasingly prefer to ‘vote with their money’ for such
co-ops, which measure up, over ‘voting’ for capitalist companies, albeit with
similar product prices and product qualities.
The “non-profits”
phenomenon – the, relatively-recent, since the late 1800s, capitalist
phenomenon of not-for-profit corporations – is, in key ways, ‘protoic’ to such
a metamorphosis of markets.
Non-profits are, classically,
a form of trans-capitalism still within the predominance of the capital social
relation of social reproduction, along with worker-owned co-ops themselves [see
Marx’s comments thereupon, to this effect, in Capital, volume
III], which first appeared a bit before the mid-1800s.
They are motivated, not
by the profit-motive of capitalist activity – although they may be motivated,
in part, by the money-income motives of their owners and paid workers – but based upon social,
civic-values-based, «pro bono publico» [for the good of the public]
motives.
Their work force often
consists more of unpaid volunteers than of salaried employees – volunteers
motivated, at least in part, by the collective, social, public goods that such
non-profits produce. Even their salaried
employees often work for sub-standard salaries or wages, motivated, in part, by
their will to participate in creating the social, collective benefits that
these non-profits produce.
Their ‘‘‘markets’’’ are their
civic-values-based supporters, who donate the funds by which such non-profit
enterprises principally persist. The
goods and services that such non-profits produce are often given freely to the
public, or charge merely nominal fees or prices, that do not
cover the entire cost of their production.
Enough people – contemporary
proletarians in the main – have been able to eke-out enough income and enough free
time, as well, to donate to and/or to work in, as volunteers, these kinds of
non-profits, despite everything that the degenerate ruling faction of the
descendence-phase, anti-productive-forces, humanocidal capitalist ruling
class, e.g., the ‘F*ckerfeller Faction’, has been able to do, to try to immiserate,
on the way to exterminating, “95%” of the majority class.
Of course – quite predictably
– that ruling faction of the capitalist ruling class, the ‘F*ckerfellers’, has
been able to pervert the classic function of non-profit corporations, and to
spawn a plethora of “non-profit”, but really fraudulently, criminally
profitable, NGOs, with part of those criminal profits laundered back into campaign
funding for the, ‘F*ckafeller’-owned, ‘Democrap’ [crap on the people] Party – e.g., as fraudulent “hospices”, fraudulent “daycare
centers”, fraudulent “homeless shelters” and the like, by which the ‘F*ckerfellers’
partly pay their minions, with embezzled, majority-class taxpayer dollars, and
also as “NGO” ideology factories, spawning false narratives to “divide and
conquer” the majority class, seeking to keep the majority class “at each other’s
throats”, and, thereby unable to perceive, let alone to unite
against, the ‘F*ckerfellers’; ‘F*ckafeller’ ideology manufacturing paid for, of
course, not by the, ultra-monied, ‘F*ckerfellers’
themselves, but, again, by money embezzled from taxes on the majority class
itself.
Thank goodness that, starting,
in July 2025, with “USAID” [true-name: ‘F*ckefeller-Aid’], the rival, pro-productive-forces,
Trump Faction of the capitalist ruling class started to put a damper on these colossal
crimes!
For more
information regarding these
Seldonian insights, and to read and/or download, free
of charge, PDFs and/or JPGs of Foundation books, other texts, and images, please see:
www.dialectics.info
and
https://independent.academia.edu/KarlSeldon
For partially pictographical, ‘poster-ized’ visualizations of many of these Seldonian insights -- specimens of ‘dialectical art’ – as well as dialectically-illustrated books
published by
the F.E.D. Press, see –
https://www.etsy.com/shop/DialecticsMATH
¡ENJOY!
Regards,
Miguel
Detonacciones,
Voting Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.];
Elected Member, F.E.D. General Council;
Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison;
Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.
YOU are invited to post
your comments on this blog-entry below!
SOLUTION –
‘Equitist Political-ECONOMIC
DEMOCRACY’;
BOOK:
MARX’S MISSING BLUEPRINTS
Free-of-Charge Download of Book
PDF –
http://www.dialectics.info/dialectics/Applications.html
http://www.dialectics.info/dialectics/Applications_files/Edition%201.,%20DPCAIT_,_Part_1_,_%27THE_MISSING_BLUEPRINTS%27_,_begun_22JUL2022_Last_Updated_08AUG2023.pdf
Hardcover
Book Order –
http://www.dialectics.info/dialectics/F.E.D._Press.html
https://www.etsy.com/shop/DialecticsMATH
