Seldon: The Configuration of the F.E.D. Opus Overall.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Seldon:

 

The

Configuration

 

of  the

 

F.E.D.

 

Opus

 

Overall.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Reader,

 

In the text below, our co-founder, Karl Seldon, describes our plan for the Foundation’s main publications.

 

 

 

Seldon –

 

“The 12-volumes of treatises for planned distribution by the first generation of Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica all share a common purpose and focus – to contribute toward a new worldview for a united Terran humanity, based upon modern, empirically-validated science, but based also upon an immanent critique of the myriad contra-empirical ideologies that have adulterated and continue to adulterate that science, as well as to make available a simple and “purely”-qualitative mind-tool of categorial algebra, one that is easily and widely learnable, and widely usable to facilitate the advanced feats and leaps of cognition that reveal the dialectical operations phase of human adult cognitive development.”

 

“Such a clarified, de-ideologized science, and such cognitive tools are urgently needed to support Terran humanity in traversing the up-hill passage from descendence-phase capitalism’s state-capitalist, pseudo-socialist dictatorships, to the global political-economic democracy of a base-electoral federation of sovereign nation-states: a grassroots-power-based, political-economic-democratic, planetary polis.”

 

“Our initial treatise, A Dialectical Theory of Everything, of which three of its five volumes are now extant, is intended to introduce the F.E.D. theory to its reachable audience.  Its first volume focuses on the basics of that theory, its second volume on the four pathways that led F.E.D. to its discovery, its third volume to applications of this theory to the Terran human Domain, its fourth on its applications to the dialectics of nature overall, and its fifth volume to the interconnection of dialectics and the mathematics of nonlinear integrodifferential equations.”

 

“Our second treatise, Dialectic: Users’ Manual, teaches, by technically and extensively-elaborated examples, how anyone capable of high school algebra can apply the new dialectical «organon» set forth in our initial treatise.”

 

“Our third treatise, Dialectics Made Easy, presents a no-equations, ultra-simplified, additive approach to formulating, short-hand notating, and solving the dialectical ontological categorial progressions that anyone can use to categorially analyze, and to compactly condense, via apt symbolings, the content-structures of topical Domains most diverse.”

 

“Our fourth treatise, «Dialektike»: A Handbook for Dialectics, is to be configured so as to combine a comprehensive technical specification of the F.E.D. «organon» with an encyclopedically-organized and stunning plethora of dialectogramically illustrated and commentarized examples from our reality: “everywhere dense” with, mostly-unnoted, dialectics.”

 

“Our fifth treatise, Descendence-Phase Capitalism and Its Transcendence, is to present a de-ideologizing immanent critique of the theory of one of our principal teachers, Karl Marx, albeit with his work first rescued from its fraudulent imprisonment and mis-representation by the Lenino-Stalinoid, state-capitalist, state-bureaucratic, police-state dictatorships.”

  

“Our sixth treatise, Encyclopedia Dialectica, addresses the full, onto-logic, categorial, units-kinds content of our cosmos, and of its possible – of its predicted – next-epochs’, future ontological-categorial content, per our Dialectical Theory of Everything Master Meta-Model Meta-Equation.  Its first volume provides an encyclopedic dictionary for the new terms and concepts that formulate our theory.  Its second volume is planned to exbibit solutions, i.e., definitions, textual and visualized alike, for the meanings for each of the 2,048 ontological-categorial terms generated by that model equation at its 11^th meta-exponential degree. These terms include the 512 terms on the cosmological onto-logical categories already known, by Terran humanity, to be, and/or to have been, extant, and on the 1,536 additional, algebraic-unknown terms generated by that model as predictions of the possible but not-yet-extant ontological-categorial terms potentially defining two consecutive next epochs of the cosmological future.”

 

“Our planned seventh treatise will be addressed at a later date.”

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For more information regarding these Seldonian insights, and to read and/or download, free of charge, PDFs and/or JPGs of Foundation books, other texts, and images, please see:

www.dialectics.info

and

https://independent.academia.edu/KarlSeldon

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For partially pictographical, ‘poster-ized’ visualizations of many of these Seldonian insights -- specimens of ‘dialectical art’ – as well as dialectically-illustrated books published by the F.E.D. Press, see –

https://www.etsy.com/shop/DialecticsMATH

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

¡ENJOY!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Regards,

 

 

Miguel Detonacciones,

 

Voting Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.];

Elected Member, F.E.D. General Council;

Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison;

Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.

 

 

 

 

 

 

YOU are invited to post your comments on this blog-entry below!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Seldon: «Monads» Everywhere, hence «Arithmoi» Everywhere: A Latter-Day ‘Meta-Pythagorean’ Vision of Our «Kosmos». GLOBAL STRATEGIC HYPOTHESES.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Seldon:

 

«Monads» Everywhere,

 

hence

 

«Arithmoi» Everywhere:

 

A Latter-Day

‘Meta-Pythagorean’

Vision

of

Our «Kosmos».

 

 

 

GLOBAL STRATEGIC HYPOTHESES.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Reader, 

The text below, by our co-founder, Karl Seldon, ‘explicitizes’ the connection -- by means of a concurrent, ‘«aufheben»-ating’ immanent-critique/‘ideic scale’ elevation/conservation of the ideology of the ancient Pythagoreans -- to the Foundation’s ‘Dialectical Theory of Everything’ .

 

 

 

Seldon –

 

“All is «Arithmos».” 

 

“The «Monads» of being arise by kinds, in multiples.”

 

“Absolutely-unique, «sui generis» units are vanishingly rare.”

 

“Everything is made of «monads», even the «monads» themselves [Except for the «arché-monads»’ «arithmos»], but these «monads» are not Democratean “atoms”.”

 

“These «monads» include units which not only differ from one another with “individual differences”, but which collectively differ qualitatively, differ in kind – i.e., which differ ontologically.  Thus, they are groupable into categories by their shared qualities, i.e., they are mentally-groupable into kind-«arithmoi» .

“«Arithmos», a word from the ancient Greek language, means ‘‘‘number’’’, but not quite in our modern sense.”

 

“A «monad» is a unit of an «arithmos»/‘‘‘number’’’, of a given kind.”

 

“Thus, “All is number’’, in a quite concrete, reasonable, and even sensuous sense – no mysticisms required.”

 

“An «Arithmos», made up out of units, all of one kind, is a ‘kind-number’, an ‘ontological number’, an «onto-arithmos».”

 

“A ‘‘‘kind’’’ [cf. Platon’s, dialectical, «arithmoi eidetikoi»] is a mental assemblage of units, all of the same, qualitative, ontological ‘“species”’ – a ‘qualitative number’.”

 

“Arithmetic”, «Arithmetikê», was, anciently, ‘‘‘the science of [such] number(s)’’’.”

 

“The Foundation’s ‘_NQ Arithmetic’ is an arithmetic/algebra for representing, and ‘non-quantitatively calculating’ with, especially the, concrete, ontological, hence “purely”-qualitative, ‘‘‘[[meta-]Natural] [meta-]numbers’’’, i.e., indefinite numerosities of kind-«monads», by means of its ‘‘‘[meta-]numerals’’’.”

 

“Each symbolic unit/«monad» of the finite-indefinite ‘‘‘number of idea-units’’’/«ideo-arithmos» named _NQ is, in its uttermost root meaning, a symbolic, ideographical, ‘‘‘[meta-Natural-]numeralic’’’ representation of a ‘qualitative finitary ordinal number’.” 

 

“That is, the generic symbol-unit/«monad» of the _NQ «arithmos», namely q_n, incorporates the generic “natural” number, n, as denoting the nth order-count/order-place/order-number.  But the symbol q_n as a whole denotes the ordinal quality of ‘nth-ness’.”

 

“Interpreted/applied for mathematical-models of categorial progressions, generic q_n denotes the nth category in [any] such, strictly-ordered, categorial progression.” 

 

“That is, in set-theoretic language, q_n denotes the set of all categories such that each one occupies the nth order-place in its native categorial progression; the nth category generally; the ‘ideic’ quality of categorial nth-ness – the intension of the extension of all nth-in-order-place categories.”  

 

“This generic ‘categorial-ordinal arithmetical language’ can therefore be used to symbolize strictly-ordered categorial progressions of myriad kinds, for myriad ontological Domains – for ‘[ideo-]physi[c]o-ontological’ Domains, for myriad “pure” ‘ideo-ontological’ Domains, and for myriad ‘‘‘mixed’’’, i.e., for ‘ideo-physio-ontological’ Domains as well.”

 

“Starting from a chosen, specific-Domain «arché»-category, or starting-category/‘categorial premise’, which is always assigned to generic _NQ category-symbol q₁, the generic _NQ arithmetic/algebra can be used/specified so as to help elicit, from Domain-expert user(‘)s(’) mind(s), the entire progression of categories, synchronic, systematic or diachronic, historical – reflecting the progression of the kinds of units of the actual reality of that Domain – which if achieved by a given user, constitutes the, user-comprehended, ontological content-analysis of that Domain.”

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For more information regarding these Seldonian insights, and to read and/or download, free of charge, PDFs and/or JPGs of Foundation books, other texts, and images, please see:

www.dialectics.info

and

https://independent.academia.edu/KarlSeldon

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For partially pictographical, ‘poster-ized’ visualizations of many of these Seldonian insights -- specimens of ‘dialectical art’ – as well as dialectically-illustrated books published by the F.E.D. Press, see –

https://www.etsy.com/shop/DialecticsMATH

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

¡ENJOY!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Regards,

 

Miguel Detonacciones,

Voting Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.];

Elected Member, F.E.D. General Council;

Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison;

Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.

 

 

 

 

 

 

YOU are invited to post your comments on this blog-entry below!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

«Aufheben» Meta-Unit-ization and Identity Consolidation. GLOBAL STRATEGIC HYPOTHESES.

 

 

 

 

 

«Aufheben»

Meta-Unit-ization

and

Identity

Consolidation.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

GLOBAL STRATEGIC HYPOTHESES.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Reader,

 

Is the ‘identity consolidation’ that goes along with the ‘universal architectonic’ processes of «aufheben» ‘meta-unit-ization’ just a human, subjective perception, without any objective reality?

 

¿For example,

 

in q_a ® q_a2 = q_a <+> q_aa |-º q_a <+> q_m, 

is the shift from the separately-identified identities for individual atoms to multiple atom units merged into the singular identity of a molecule ‘meta-unit’ – is that just a human perception, or, given that both atoms and molecules are too small in scale to be perceptible by our senses, just a subjective, human-mental conception?

 

¿Or, is there some objective truth to such ‘identity consolidations’, independent of human perceptions and conceptions?

 

We hold that there is objective as well as human-subjective merit to the concept of ‘actual identity consolidation’.

 

 

We so hold because the objects in question actually behave more as single, ‘hol’ units, rather than as mere clusters of multiple, separate ‘hol’ units.

 

However, in the ‘‘‘complex unity’’’, the ‘meta-unity’, of such ‘meta-units’,  the individual existences of their mere units are still present, «aufheben»-conserved, if in a behaviorally-constrained, subsumed fashion.

 

 

Their «aufheben»-conserved presence, especially under certain conditions, will still obtrude into more obvious manifestation.

 

Consider, for example, the, albeit relatively weak, Van der Waals forces of molecules, e.g., the distance-dependent electrostatical attractions between neutral atoms contained in molecules, which result from chemical-bonds-related differential electron densities in the contained atoms.

 

Thus, what is obtruding in this example, is not only the atom units «aufheben»-conserved within the molecule units, but also the sub-atomic “particle” units, e.g., the electrons, «aufheben»-conserved within those atom units.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For more information regarding these Seldonian insights, and to read and/or download, free of charge, PDFs and/or JPGs of Foundation books, other texts, and images, please see:

www.dialectics.info

and

https://independent.academia.edu/KarlSeldon

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For partially pictographical, ‘poster-ized’ visualizations of many of these Seldonian insights -- specimens of ‘dialectical art’ – as well as dialectically-illustrated books published by the F.E.D. Press, see –

https://www.etsy.com/shop/DialecticsMATH

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

¡ENJOY!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Regards,

 

Miguel Detonacciones,

Voting Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.];

Elected Member, F.E.D. General Council;

Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison;

Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.

 

 

 

 

 

 

YOU are invited to post your comments on this blog-entry below!