Saturday, May 23, 2026

THE DIALECTIC of Fermions and/versus Bosons. Part 01.: Everywhere-Dense Dialectic Series.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

THE DIALECTIC

 

of

 

Fermions

and/versus

Bosons.

 

 

 

Part 01.:

 

Everywhere-Dense

Dialectic

Series.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Reader,

 

 

 

For a long time, the qualitative distinction between the “Standard Model of Particle Physics” binary division of its Domain into the categories of fermions and/versus bosons appeared to be a radical diremption, an absolute either/or dichotomy, with no room for or reality of any «tertium quid»: any third category.

 

Bosons, such as photons and gluons, can crowd into the same quantum state in droves, whereas the fermions’ “exclusion principle” means that they are forced to occupy separate quantum states, a principle that makes for the substantiality and impenetrability of ordinary “solid” matter, albeit nonetheless composed mostly of “empty space”.

 

But the rise of the quark theory began to suggest that fermion/boson “complex unities” – combinations of “non-composite” fermions, such as quarks, with “non-composite” bosons, such as gluons – might in fact reside at the root of ordinary matter: protons and neutrons, as well as mesons and hyperons. 

 

Protonic, neutronic and hyperonic complex unities of quarks and gluons behave, collectively, as “composite” fermions, whereas mesonic complex unities of quarks and gluons – quark/anti-quark pairs “glued together” by gluonic bosons – behave, collectively, as “composite” bosons.

 

Beginning as hypothetical particles, but lately gaining some empirical existential corroboration under highly-restrictive conditions, the “anyon quasi-particles” are thought to transcend the fermion/boson dichotomy.  “Anyons” are so named because they are thought to instantiate exchange statistics situated anywhere in-between the “Fermi-Dirac” statistics enacted by fermions, and the “Bose-Einstein” statistics enacted by bosons. 

 

The anyons have just recently been joined, in their proposed transcendence of the fermion/boson dichotomy, by another, still hypothetical, category of “particles”, presently called “paraparticles”.

 

Two Rice University physicists – Kaden Hazzard and Zhiyuan Wang – published, in May 2026, in Nature, a mathematical proof of the existence, given mathematical assumptions which they believe to be conformant to physical reality, of these “paraparticles”, state-exhibiting exchange statistics which diverge substantially from those exhibited by both bosons and fermions.

 

Although this mathematical result shows that, in principle, our cosmos could contain “paraparticles” that are neither fermionic nor bosonic, “the jury is still out” for so long as such «monad»s have not been observed in nature. 

 

The speculative nature of these trans-fermionic/trans-bosonic “particles” claims is why we have coded their oval category-container, in the pre-pended ‘dialecto-gram’, with dotted lines, rather than with solid lines.

 

Such “paraparticles”, if they exist in physical reality, would reside outside the horizons of the “Standard Model of Particle Physics”.  No “particles” outside of that “Standard Model” have so far been reported in peer-reviewed sources.

 

However, since that “Standard Model” pertains to only ~5% of the presently-observed energy-density of our cosmos – that of “ordinary matter”, or what we call ‘Bright Matter’ – whereas ~25% of that energy-density appears to be in the form of “Dark Matter”, and ~70% in the form of “Dark Energy”, it is possible that the latter two forms of mass or energy are also particulate, and composed of exotic, previously and still unknown units; composed ofNON-Standard-Model” «monad»s, some of which might even turn out to fit the “paraparticles” category.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For more information regarding these Seldonian insights, and to read and/or download, free of charge, PDFs and/or JPGs of Foundation books, other texts, and images, please see:

 


www.dialectics.info

 

 

and

 

 

https://independent.academia.edu/KarlSeldon

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For partially pictographical, ‘poster-ized’ visualizations of many of these Seldonian insights -- specimens of dialectical artas well as dialectically-illustrated books published by the F.E.D. Press, see

 

https://www.etsy.com/shop/DialecticsMATH

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

¡ENJOY!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Regards,

 

 

 

 

Miguel Detonacciones,

 

Voting Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.];

Elected Member, F.E.D. General Council;

Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison;

Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.

 

 

 

 

 

 

YOU are invited to post your comments on this blog-entry below!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

Monday, May 18, 2026

Part 1. AI dialogues series. A NON-STANDARD MODELOFTHE “NATURAL” NUMBERS, & A ‘CONTRA-BOOLEAN ALGEBRA’.

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Part 1. AI dialogues

series.

 

A

NON-STANDARD

MODEL

OF THE

NATURAL

NUMBERS,

&

A

CONTRA-BOOLEAN

ALGEBRA.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Reader,

 

The following is our edited transcript of a dialogue between one of our volunteers and a prominent, representative AI – ‘protoic’ to expected future android robot ‘meta-humans’, equipped with AI ‘‘‘minds’’’.

 

Our edited/readability-enhanced transcript follows.  The AI was able to produce a good rendition of the Encyclopedia Dialectica standard notation for key symbols of the generic NQ arithmetic – ‘meta-numerals’ and ‘non-quantitative inequality relation-symbol’ alike – so we have simply substituted our standard symbols, from our ‘ideograms-palette’, into the AI’s responses, and have also enhanced their representation in our volunteer’s queries to the AI, to beyond what the typography available for the AI’s inputs allows.

 

Where we perceive errors in the AI’s assertions, we have commented, in magenta-colored bold & sometimes italicized or underscored text, all inserted within square brackets.

 












For more information regarding these Seldonian insights, and to read and/or download, free of charge, PDFs and/or JPGs of Foundation books, other texts, and images, please see:

 


www.dialectics.info

 

 

and

 

https://independent.academia.edu/KarlSeldon

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For partially pictographical, ‘poster-ized’ visualizations of many of these Seldonian insights -- specimens of dialectical artas well as dialectically-illustrated books published by the F.E.D. Press, see

 

https://www.etsy.com/shop/DialecticsMATH

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

¡ENJOY!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Regards,

 

 

Miguel Detonacciones,

 

Voting Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.];

Elected Member, F.E.D. General Council;

Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison;

Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.

 

 

 

 

 

 

YOU are invited to post your comments on this blog-entry below.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Monday, May 11, 2026

PRESENT TIME: Its ‘Intra-Duality’ & Dialectic. Part 12.: Cases of Dialectic Series.

 

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


PRESENT

TIME:

 

Its

 

Intra-Duality

&

Dialectic.

 

 

 

Part 12.:

 

Cases of Dialectic Series.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Reader,

 

For the final part of this series, we focus on a systematic dialectic of time itself; a systematic dialectic of the rich, differentiated ontological content hidden in present time; in each unit of that “passage of time” which we call “present”.

 

The present of time is a continually fleeting “moment” of time, always eroding into the past – always becoming-past – while also drawing into actualization, and drawing from, its potential future, to replace, as new present, the now that it has lost to the past, and, thereby, also continually forging the present seeds that will constitute and grow as the future.

 

The present is also, in part, a gift of the past, a present ‘pre-sent’ from the past to the now.

 

There is thus a tension, an ‘intra-duality’, in the humanly- experienced present, between the ‘past-ness’ and the ‘now-ness’ of the present. 

This internal contrariety is resolved in the present by the combination, the “complex unity”, of that ‘past-ness’ and/with that ‘now-ness’, in which, via the action solely accessible in the now – impossible in the settled past and in the not-yet-extant future – by which the present materials, the ontological content of the present, act among and upon themselves, changing themselves, and thereby sowing the seeds that will become the future.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For more information regarding these Seldonian insights, and to read and/or download, free of charge, PDFs and/or JPGs of Foundation books, other texts, and images, please see:

 


 

www.dialectics.info

 

 

and

 

 

https://independent.academia.edu/KarlSeldon

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For partially pictographical, ‘poster-ized’ visualizations of many of these Seldonian insights -- specimens of dialectical artas well as dialectically-illustrated books published by the F.E.D. Press, see

 

https://www.etsy.com/shop/DialecticsMATH

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

¡ENJOY!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Regards,

 

 

 

 

Miguel Detonacciones,

 

Voting Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.];

Elected Member, F.E.D. General Council;

Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison;

Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.

 

 

 

 

 

 

YOU are invited to post your comments on this blog-entry below!