EXAMPLE: HYBRID Category-Symbols and Subscript REVERSAL Operations – Part 1. ‘Hybrid Monads’ & ‘Ontological Hybridizations’ Series.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

EXAMPLE:

 

HYBRID

 

Category-Symbols

 

and

 

Subscript

REVERSAL 

Operations –

 

 

Part 1.

‘Hybrid

Monads’

&

‘Ontological

Hybridizations’

Series.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Reader,

 

A recent internet article by Joseph Shavit –

 

Complex building blocks of life form spontaneously in space, study finds

 

– based on a 20 January 2026 Phys.org piece from Aarhus University –

 

Complex building blocks of life form spontaneously in space, research reveals

 

– recounts recent research that reveals, via laboratory simulations and astronomical observations of “frigid zones” within interstellar “molecular clouds”, clouds that, typically, later, “self-gravitationally” collapse to form “proto-planetary disks” [“proplyds”] and, later still, stellar/planetary systems, that chemistry therein may give rise to ‘proto-proteinic’ polypeptide amino-acid chain ‘meta-molecules’, or ‘meta-mer’ polymers, that are key components of biological life, catalyzed via irradiation of those “molecular clouds”, in their “frigid zones”, under certain conditions, via high-energy cosmic ray protons.

 

 

“Protons” in general are ‘pre-atomic’ “particles” which can combine, often with neutrons, to form the nuclei of atoms.

 

 

However, cosmic ray protons also cause the opposite effect, in certain cases, destroying such ‘proto-proteinic’ molecules in such “molecular clouds”.

 

 

This phenomenology constitutes a specific, “dialectics of nature” example, for the Encyclopedia Dialectica ‘Dialectic of Nature Meta-Model’ – expressed using the ideogramic language of the _NQ ‘dialectical ideography’ – of the semantic effect of syntactic ‘subscript reversal operations’ in such ‘meta-models’.

 

 

If we consider the fifth category-symbol term in the _NQ ‘Dialectic of Nature Meta-Model’, that symbolizes ‘pre-atomic’  “particles” as its «arché»-category, 

q_r [---> q₁, 

i.e., the category-symbol q_mr – for the category of the 

interactions/combinations of  “particle” «monads» and molecule «monads», namely q_m [---> q₄ – such that q_mr connotes molecule units arising via “particle” 

units, here protons, in the q_mr [---> q₅ syntactic 

arrangement of its two subscripts: molecules “conversions” of cosmic-ray protonic-effects into bigger, more-macro, ‘meta-molecules’.

 

 

However, in the reverse, q_rm [---> q₅, syntactic arrangements of the subscripts, per the Encyclopedia Dialectica canons of interpretation, it connotes, semantically, the very opposite: the “conversions”, e.g., the disintegrations, of already-formed, e.g., ‘proto-proteinic’ molecules, via their cosmic-ray protons bombardments.     

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For more information regarding these Seldonian insights, and to read and/or download, free of charge, PDFs and/or JPGs of Foundation books, other texts, and images, please see:

 

www.dialectics.info

 

 

and

 

 

https://independent.academia.edu/KarlSeldon

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For partially pictographical, ‘poster-ized’ visualizations of many of these Seldonian insights -- specimens of ‘dialectical art’ – as well as dialectically-illustrated books published by the F.E.D. Press, see –

 

https://www.etsy.com/shop/DialecticsMATH

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

¡ENJOY!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Regards,

 

 

 

Miguel Detonacciones,

 

Voting Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.];

Elected Member, F.E.D. General Council;

Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison;

Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.

 

 

 

 

 

 

YOU are invited to post your comments on this blog-entry below!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Antithesis at the Root of Reality, per ‘Regenerism’. Part 4. of the Series on the ‘Regenerist Hypothesis’.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Antithesis

 

at the Root

 

of

 

Reality,

  

per

 

‘Regenerism’.

 

 

Part 4. of the

Series on the

‘Regenerist

Hypothesis’.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Reader,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For more information regarding these Seldonian insights, and to read and/or download, free of charge, PDFs and/or JPGs of Foundation books, other texts, and images, please see:

 

 

www.dialectics.info

 

 

and

 

 

https://independent.academia.edu/KarlSeldon

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For partially pictographical, ‘poster-ized’ visualizations of many of these Seldonian insights -- specimens of ‘dialectical art’ – as well as dialectically-illustrated books published by the F.E.D. Press, see –

 

https://www.etsy.com/shop/DialecticsMATH

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

¡ENJOY!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Regards,

 

 

 

Miguel Detonacciones,

 

Voting Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.];

Elected Member, F.E.D. General Council;

Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison;

Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.

 

 

 

 

 

 

YOU are invited to post your comments on this blog-entry below!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SPACE: Vacuum or Plenum – the Irony of Ancient Atomism per ‘Regenerism’. Part 3. of the Series on the ‘Regenerist Hypothesis’.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SPACE:

 

Vacuum

 

or

 

Plenum –

 

the

 

Irony

 

of

 

Ancient Atomism

 

per

 

‘Regenerism’.

 

 

Part 3. of the

Series on the

‘Regenerist

Hypothesis’.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Reader,

 

There is a kind of philosophical, psychohistorical, ‘psychē-ic’, cognitive and ideational ‘«aufheben» meta-«monads»-ization’ – i.e., a dialectic – in the relation between the ancient Parmenidean universe-model of “BEING”, and the Leucippean, Democritean, Epicurean and Lucretian universe-model of “atoms and the void”. 

 

 

We are addressing ancient philosophical ideologies here –

Parmenideanism and Atomism – yet their discussion here bears upon contemporary times as well, for ideologies deeply influenced by and akin to Parmenideanism and Atomism still figure prominently in the unscientific, ideological biases of many present-day scientists, especially many “particle physicists” and “social-atomist” economists.

 

Parmenides’s universe, of “being”, was supposed to be a ‘‘‘substance’’’, one which is entirely homogeneous, immutable, eternal, statical, and organized as a sphere, in the form of a single, part-less. universal, unmodifiable unity. 

 

Hence, all human sensuous perception of qualitative difference, differentiation, movement, and change-in-general, is mere delusion per Parmenides.

 

The atomists’ worldview, on the contrary, posits a vast multiplicity of invisibly tiny, moving and colliding units that are “uncuttable” [Gr. «a-tom-on»] – “indivisible”, with the ‘«a-»’ serving as a negatory prefix.

 

However, these “a-toms”, or “not-toms” [cf. “tom-o-graph-y”] are also, each one in its own right, “entirely part-less, homogeneous, immutable, eternal, and statical internally”.

 

Thus, we may see that the “atoms” of Democritus, et al., are, each one, somewhat like a tiny ‘Parmenideanoid’ “sphere”, although they interact/collide with one another, and move, mechanically, externally, eternally.

 

Thus the Democritean, etc., ontological category-unit for our universe as a whole can be grasped as an «arithmos» that is made up out of a vast number, a [somewhat] heterogeneous gargantuan multiplication of Parmenidean “Being”(s) as its «monads», deriving, by an «aufheben»-negation, a determinate-negation/-elevation/conservation, of the single “Being” unit(y) of the Parmenidean “singleton” ontological category for our universe, the latter thus not an «arithmos» in the ancient Greek sense, because it involves only one unit(y)/«monad».  One unit did not a “quantity” make, was not a “number”, per the ancient Mediterranean «arithmos» theory, and its «arithmêtikê».

 

The Atomists’ universe, as a single unit in its own right, was, in effect, made up out of a heterogeneous multiplicity of the single unit that constituted the Parmenidean universe, by means of a vast multiplication/replication-with-difference of that Parmenidean universe unit.

 

With the Parmenidean singleton-category model of our universe, as the ‘«arché»-category’, and the high-multiplicity of «monads» of the Atomists’ «arithmos» ontological category as ‘first contra-category’, we might wonder if there can be a synthesis of these two ontological categories; their ‘first uni-category’.

 

However, we will leave that question unaddressed here, because we need to address another feature of the Atomists’ universe-model, also a ‘contra-Parmenidean’ feature.  For the Atomists did not just ontologically posit “atoms”, ‘contra-Parmenidean’ by virtue of their multiplicity and their external, mechanical movement.

 

They posited atoms and the void.

 

The “void” was conceived as a mere ‘‘‘substance-less’’’ nothingness, an opposite to each and every, ‘substance-full’, “atom”, and ‘anti-atom’ whose only virtue was to separate the atoms so that they could be; could be “atoms”; could be distinct from one another, and thus form a multiplicity.

 

Parmenides abhorred the very notion of “nothingness”.  He would not countenance his “BEING” having any other; any opposite.

 

The irony of the ancient Atomists’ ‘voidism’, from the point of view of our ‘Regenerist Hypothesis’, is that, per this hypothesis, “atoms” in the modern sense – quite cuttable – and the “particles” into which they can be “cut”, and, maybe also, the, still unknown, units or «monads» of “Dark Matter”, come from physical space, come from the supposed “vacuum” of that space, evacuated of all “atoms”, of all “substance(s)”; they all come from the Atomists’ “void”; in fact were generated by their so-called “void”.

 

Per the ‘Regenerist Hypothesis’, the physical space of our cosmos is a “plenum”, a ‘flowing fullness’, not an “emptiness”; not a “vacuum” at all!

 

And that ‘[out-]flowing fullness’ is what the physicists and cosmologists are calling “Dark Energy”.

 

Per Hypothesis, our physical space is in reality a ‘plenum of replitrons’, or of ‘spandetrons’, that constitute “Dark Energy” – an all-pervading substance, but a substance that our Darwinianly-adapted sensoria are not equipped to detect, but that we have detected, by means of complex instruments and calculations that extend our senses, beyond our genome, via our ‘‘‘phenome’’’, albeit only quite recently, only yesterday, via very difficult-to-make measurements, that reveal the self-accelerating self-expansion of universal space – a phenomenon that mainstream physics and cosmology never even considered, theoretically, conceptually, until it was thrust upon them by empirical observation.

 

However, it would be premature to conclude that our hypothetical ‘spandetron’/‘replitron’ «monads» are “the a-toms of space” – are “a-toms” in the ancient sense of being [the ultimate] “uncutables”; the ultimate “elementary particles”,  because we still know so little about “Dark Energy” as of the present time.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For more information regarding these Seldonian insights, and to read and/or download, free of charge, PDFs and/or JPGs of Foundation books, other texts, and images, please see:

 

 

www.dialectics.info

 

 

and

 

 

https://independent.academia.edu/KarlSeldon

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For partially pictographical, ‘poster-ized’ visualizations of many of these Seldonian insights -- specimens of ‘dialectical art’ – as well as dialectically-illustrated books published by the F.E.D. Press, see –

 

https://www.etsy.com/shop/DialecticsMATH

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

¡ENJOY!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Regards,

 

 

Miguel Detonacciones,

 

Voting Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.];

Elected Member, F.E.D. General Council;

Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison;

Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.

 

 

 

 

 

 

YOU are invited to post your comments on this blog-entry below!