Tuesday, June 29, 2021

‘Kurt Goedel on the “Dumbing-Down” of Humanity.’ GLOBAL STRATEGIC HYPOTHESES.

 

‘Kurt Goedel on the “Dumbing-Down” of Humanity.’

GLOBAL STRATEGIC HYPOTHESES.

 

 

Dear Reader,

Kurt Goedel was the immensely capable discoverer of the Completeness Theorem for the first order predicate calculus scale of formal symbolic logic, and the Incompleteness Theorems for all higher orders of predicate calculus symbolic, or ideographical, formal logic, and a close friend of Albert Einstein’s at the Princeton University-associated Institute for Advanced Study – Goedel being a friend who achieved a closed-form, analytical, special solution to the 10 simultaneous nonlinear partial differential equations-system that constitutes Einstein’s theory of gravity, his General Theory of Relativity.  That special solution featured “closed time-like” world-lines.

 

Moreover, Goedel’s take on his Incompleteness Theorems was not the statical interpretation that passes in official academia today.  Goedel’s view was that his theorems established axiomatic mathematics as a progression of ever-richer, ever more complex, but ever-incomplete axioms-systems/languages, what Errol Harris would call a “dialectical scale”, and what we call a ‘qualo-fractal consecuum-cumulum’ dialectic of ‘ideo-ontological’ categories of mathematical axiomatic systems.

 

Goedel described his discovery as that of “the incompletability” and “inexhaustibility” of mathematics.

 

But Goedel was also alive to the machinations of the ruling class, as described, in but one example, in the 2005 book Incompleteness, by Rebecca Goldstein, from which I quote below, pp. 247-248:

 

“In Goedel’s estimation Leibniz was an even greater thinker than posterity has realized and had carried his ideas for a characteristica universalis – or an alphabet of thought, which would be used to represent thoughts in a logical way, rendering their internal logical relations transparent – to a more advanced stage than the written testimony suggests. 


Goedel had confided in Karl Menger his suspicions that some of Leibniz’s “important writings . . . had not only failed to be published, but [had been] destroyed in manuscript.” ”

      “ “Who could have an interest in destroying Leibniz’s writings?” Menger had queried.”

      “ “Naturally, those people who do not want men to become more intelligent,” was the logician’s reply.”

     “…Menger mentioned the interchange to Oskar Morgenstern, who had something of his own to relate on the subject of Leibniz and Goedel.”

 

“He, too, had been alerted by Goedel as to the deliberate suppression of Leibniz’s contributions and had tried to argue the logician out of his conviction.”

 

“Finally, to convince Morgenstern, Goedel had taken the economist to the university’s Firestone Library and gathered together “an abundance of really astonishing material,” in Morgenstern’s words.”

 

“The material consisted of books and articles with exact references to published writings of Leibniz, on the one hand, and the very works cited, on the other.  The primary sources were all missing the material that had been cited in the secondary sources.”

     “ “This material was really highly astonishing,” a flabbergasted (if unconvinced) Morgenstern admitted.”

 

 

Now, the official academic “party line” on Goedel is that he was brilliant but paranoid, and this view regarding Leibniz’s writings suppression, as well Goedel’s misgivings about at least one ‘loophole for dictatorship’ that Goedel detected in the U. S. Constitution, were merely Goedel’s paranoid delusions.

But didn’t someone once say that “only the paranoid survive”, and didn’t another someone once say that “just because you are paranoid, doesn’t mean that they aren’t really out to get you”.

J. Edgar Hoover had been plotting to deport Goedel’s friend, Einstein, because of Einstein’s socialist views, and both Einstein and Goedel quite likely got a whiff of that plot.

 

Goedel was paranoid that “the powers that be” were trying to poison him.  But, given that Goedel was a man who could solve a system of 10 simultaneous nonlinear differential equations, and, if he might have turned his skills to unsolved nonlinear differential equations of greater immediate engineering application, such as those that might disclose the optimal design for a fusion power reactor, and given, shall we say, the ‘technodepreciating’ and liberating implications of such a discovery, wouldn’t the ‘Rocke-Nazi’ faction have a compelling motive to “liquidate” such a “threat” [to their power]?


The academic "party line" -- no doubt "sponsored" by the same ruling class faction that had it in for Einstein and, we hypothesize, for Goedel as well -- is that Goedel was delusional.  But Rebecca Goldstein, in her book, let something slip through -- perhaps to her peril.

 

 

 

 

 

 

For more information regarding these Seldonian insightsplease see --

 

http://www.dialectics.org/dialectics/

 

and

 

www.dialectics.info

 

 

 

 

 

For partially pictographical, ‘poster-ized’ visualizations of many of these Seldonian insights -- specimens of dialectical art -- see:

https://www.etsy.com/shop/DialecticsMATH

 

 

 

 

¡ENJOY!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Regards,

 

 

Miguel Detonacciones,

 

Voting Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.];

Elected Member, F.E.D. General Council;

Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison;

Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.


 

 

 

 

Please post your comments on this blog-entry below!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sunday, June 20, 2021

COMMENT Just Posted about Asimov's Fictional Foundation.

 


Dear Readers,


I just posted a comment at --

Apple TV’s summer preview includes tantalizing glimpses of Foundation series – Melody Club

-- as follows:


The best use, IMHO, to which Asimov's fictional Foundation heptalogy could be put, would be a non-fictional and down-to-Earth use:  develop Asimov's ideas of "psychohistory" so as to counter the actual New/Final Dark Age that looms here on planet Terra!  Those wishing to develop this "use case" may want to consider allying with others so engaged, such as Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica.


Regards,

Miguel

Tuesday, June 15, 2021

'«Aufheben»-Containment of Predecessor «Monads» Inside Successor «Monads»’. -- Part 04: The Seldonian Revolution Series.

 

 

‘«Aufheben»-Containment of Part of Predecessor Self-Hybrid «Monads» Inside Successor Self-Hybrid «Monads»’.

 

-- Part 04: The Seldonian Revolution Series.

  

 

 

Dear Reader,

 

It is my pleasure, and my honor, as an elected member of the Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.] General Council, and as a voting member of F.E.D., to share, with you, from time to time, as they are approved for public release, by the F.E.D. General Council, key excerpts from the internal writings, and from the internal sayings, of our co-founder, Karl Seldon.

 

The fourth release in this new such series is posted below [Some E.D. standard edits have been applied, in the version presented below, by the editors of the F.E.D. Special Council for the Encyclopedia, to the direct transcript of our co-founder’s discourse].

 

In this 4th installment, Seldon addresses the «aufheben» dialectical principle of the ‘‘‘evolute containment’’’ of only part of the ontological units of each predecessor ‘self-hybrid’ «arithmos»-of-units in each ontological unit of its successor ‘self-hybrid’ «arithmos»-of-units.

 

 

Seldon –


 


 


 

 


For more information regarding these Seldonian insights, please see --

 

http://www.dialectics.org/dialectics/

 

and

 

www.dialectics.info

 

 

 

 

 

For partially pictographical, ‘poster-ized’ visualizations of many of these Seldonian insights -- specimens of dialectical art -- see:

https://www.etsy.com/shop/DialecticsMATH

 

 

¡ENJOY!

 

 


 

Regards,

 

Miguel Detonacciones,

Voting Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.];

Elected Member, F.E.D. General Council;

Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison;

Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.

 

 

 

 

Please post your comments on this blog-entry below!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Friday, June 11, 2021

‘Dialectical Categorial Progressions’. -- Part 03: The Seldonian Revolution Series.


Dialectical Categorial Progressions’.

 

-- Part 03: The Seldonian Revolution Series.

 

 

Dear Reader,

 

It is my pleasure, and my honor, as an elected member of the Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.] General Council, and as a voting member of F.E.D., to share, with you, from time to time, as they are approved for public release, by the F.E.D. General Council, key excerpts from the internal writings, and from the internal sayings, of our co-founder, Karl Seldon.

 

The third release in this new such series is posted below [Some E.D. standard edits have been applied, in the version presented below, by the editors of the F.E.D. Special Council for the Encyclopedia, to the direct transcript of our co-founder’s discourse].

 

In this 3rd installment, Seldon addresses the ‘contental’ -- as opposed to the formal – nature of dialectical categorial progression theory-presentations.

 

 

Seldon –

A dialectical categorial progression presents -- and ‘‘‘analyzes’’’, then ‘‘‘synthesizes’’’ -- the content of its target Domain, i.e., presents a theory of the systematic or holistic unity of the content of the ontological Domain that it addresses, including as to how the distinct elements of that content inter-relate/inter-connect.”

 

“Once the general constituent categories of an ontological Domain are articulated into, and evoked in, their ‘inter-mutual’ distinctness – into their «differentia specifica» – at the extremum of their moment of analysis, a ‘qualitative superposition’ arises in the mind of their analyst/synthesist, via the beholding of their ‘concurrent irreducible co-representation’, or «asumbletoi» ‘‘‘sum’’’-ation.”

 

“This ‘qualitative superposition’ effects an enriched, higher, more-determinate, more-systematic ‘re-synthesis’ of the knowledge of that Domain in the mind of its analyst/synthesist, which reaches back, but also reaches beyond, to ‘univocality’ again, but at a higher, more advanced level of unified comprehension vis-à-vis the more abstract/omissive/implicit perception/-cognition of the Domain that existed in the analyst’s/synthesist’s mind when the dialectical categorial analysis first began.”

 

“…Dialectical categorial analysis tells you what the Domain of your concern is ‘‘‘made of’’’ --speci-fically’, ontologically, categorially…”

 

“…The NQ dialectical method provides a generic ‘thought-wave-guide’, an «organon», a reliable if not infallible recipe – an ‘algebraic algorithmic heuristic’ --  that helps its users to produce such dialectical ontological Domain analyses/syntheses.”

 

“…‘Dialectical-Categorial Decomposition’ of your Domain of interest leads you to a higher ‘re-composition’ and ‘re-comprehension’/‘re-cognition’ of that Domain.

 

 

 

 

 

For more information regarding these Seldonian insights, please see --

 

http://www.dialectics.org/dialectics/

 

and

 

www.dialectics.info

 

 

 

 

 

For partially pictographical, ‘poster-ized’ visualizations of many of these Seldonian insights -- specimens of dialectical art -- see:

https://www.etsy.com/shop/DialecticsMATH

 

 

 

 

¡ENJOY!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Regards,

 

 

Miguel Detonacciones,

 

Voting Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.];

Elected Member, F.E.D. General Council;

Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison;

Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.

 

 

 

 

Please post your comments on this blog-entry below!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Thursday, June 10, 2021

‘Human Labor-Time Value’. -- Part 02: The Seldonian Revolution Series.

 

 

Human Labor-Time Value’.

 

-- Part 02: The Seldonian Revolution Series.

 

GLOBAL STRATEGIC HYPOTHESES.

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Reader,

 

 

 

It is my pleasure, and my honor, as an elected member of the Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.] General Council, and as a voting member of F.E.D., to share, with you, from time to time, as they are approved for public release, by the F.E.D. General Council, key excerpts from the internal writings, and from the internal sayings, of our co-founder, Karl Seldon.

 

The second release in this new such series is posted below [Some E.D. standard edits have been applied, in the version presented below, by the editors of the F.E.D. Special Council for the Encyclopedia, to the direct transcript of our co-founder’s discourse].

 

In this 2nd installment, Seldon addresses the labor-time theory of economic value featured in the capitalist-ideology-compromised “science” of “classical political economy”, in relation to Marx’s «aufheben» partial-determinate-negation, partial-conservation, and scientific elevation of that ideology-distorted feature.

 

 

Seldon –

Marx’s critical theory of capital-value holds that, within a capital-dominated society – a society dominated by “the capital-relation” [Marx] as predominant “social relation of social [re]production” – economic value, the monetary value of a “product”, e.g., of a “good” or “service”, tends to be enforced by the competition among [commodity-]capitals as a kind of “time-binding” [cf. Korzybski]; as some multiple of the amount of typical past generic human labor-duration needed to produce that product at the time of its original production.”

 

However, Marx holds, also, that this value can be overridden, and is continually being overridden, by changes in more recent labor-duration requirements to reproduce products of the same kind, e.g., by reductions in that human generic labor-time duration of their production, due to the increase of the productive force, or ‘‘‘productivity’’’, with which that kind of product is more recently reproduced – once such products of more recent productivity arrive in markets, and compete with products of that kind, produced via the older level of productive force for that kind of product.”

 

“This second stipulation is crucial to Marx’s entire theory of the [meta-]dynamics and ultimate fate of the capitalist ‘‘‘[meta-]dynamical-system’’’.  It is the key to the causation of the entire 'descendence phase' of the capitalist system.  It is the key to what drives what Marx named "the law of the tendency of the rate of profit to fall", and "the economic law of motion of modern society".  It is the key to what drives the 'taxis to totalitarianism', the 'descendence-phase' convergence to totalitarian state-capitalism, about which Engels wrote, in Anti-Duhring, not only in the "Second World" and "Third World", but in the "First World" as well, and that forms the 'Marx-Orwell-F.E.D. Law' of the 'self-meta-evolution' of the capitalist system.”  

 

“This stipulation is key to the way in which the growth of the social forces of social reproduction – a growth which is incentivized and driven by the capital-relation-of-production itself, by the competition of capitals itself – brings about the [thus self-]negation of capital[ism]; to the way in which ‘human-social self-reproductive self-force growth’ depreciates, devalues, destroys the value of, increasingly, the predominant forms in which capitalists hold, and attempt to retain and accumulate, capital-value: fixed capital plant and equipment, which is also the form in which the growth of ‘human-societal self-reproductive self-force’ is embodied and objectified, and the bank loan capital-assets and capital equity stock assets used to finance those gigantic fixed-capital construction projects.”

 

“Marx’s second proviso about [capital-]value is the key to what drives the ‘descendence-phase’- ruling, “relative-surplus-value, real domination of capital over labor phase”-ruling, dominant faction of the capitalist class – in our case, the ‘Rockefeller Faction’, as opposed to the ‘Roosevelt Faction’ -- through a series of escalating policy disasters that ultimately drive that ruling faction to seek global humanocidethe “95%” extermination of the human species – and a kind of ‘re-feudalization’ [actually, human-species-extinction], by a route which includes the late 1800s+ propagation of Malthusian, “Eugenics” and “Social Darwinist” ideologies, including Naziism, to the imposition of the Federal Reserve Central Bank system in the U.S., and of the Federal Income Tax there – designed not to provide the kind of tax-funded working class benefits later implemented by the ‘Roosevelt Faction’ under pressure of “The Great Depression”, but, on the contrary, to fund ‘Rockefeller-Faction’-subservient military dictatorships in the otherwise rapidly industrializing semi-periphery and periphery of geographical core of initial industrial capitalism [e.g., U.K, France, U.S.], through the ‘Rockefeller Faction’ creation, thereby, of the “Third World”, and of the horrific conditions in Russia and China that led, at length, to the formation of an Orwellian state-bureaucratic ruling-class, state-capitalist “Second World”.”

 

 

“The resulting toxic straitjacket, seeking to suffocate global productive-forces advancement, e.g., via U.S. Federal-Income-Tax-funded, U.S. taxpayer-funded, ultra-violent and ‘ultra-vile’ military ‘servant-dictatorships’ of the ‘Rockefeller Faction’, in what thereby became the “Third World”, served the ‘Rockefeller Faction’ by reversing the incipient growth of the productive forces, e.g., of increasing agricultural productivity and incipient industrialization, in those thus soon-to-be “Third World” nation-states.”

 

“This “protected” the Rockefeller Faction’s fixed capital, etc., investments, in the U.S. and the U.K., from massive ‘technodepreciation’ due to World Market competition from industrial commodities newly produced in newly-industrializing nations, which would begin with the latest, most productive-force-advanced fixed capital plant and equipment, AND with far lower labor-costs, initially, than in the U.S. and the U.K.”  

 

“The ‘Rockefeller Faction’ feared something similar to what their principals experienced in ‘The Great Techno-Deflation’ of the late 1800s -- about which, e.g., Thorstein Veblen wrote -- “endogenously”, within the U.S. economy itself, and something like what Post-WWII-resurgent Japanese industry, e.g., in the automobile market, did to the U.S. automobile industry.” 

 

“From creating the “Third World” -- and the conditions which spawned the “Second World” of state-bureaucratic, police-state, state-capitalism -- the ‘Rockefeller Faction’ went on, by blocking, via its servant-dictatorships, the “Demographic Transition” in its “Third World”, to perceive a threat of “overpopulation” there, when it was unable to completely block the humanitarian diffusion of modern medical and public health technologies into its “Third World” dictatorships, thereby somewhat increasing life-spans there, and somewhat reducing infant mortality rates there.”

 

“The ‘Rockefeller Faction’ therefore mounted a de facto coup d’état against the ‘Roosevelt Faction’, that had been in power since the Great Depression, by, e.g., exterminating the Kennedys, Martin Luther King, Jr., etc., etc. -- the public leadership of the ‘Roosevelt Faction’ -- and by then engineering and propagating anti-productive-force and, ultimately, anti-human new ideologies – the human population being always the «aufheben»-core of ‘human-social self-reproductive self-force’ – ideologies of “Zero Population Growth”, “Zero Economic Growth”, “Back to Nature”, “Small is Beautiful”, and the “People Are Pollution” pseudo-“ecology” movement.

 

By now, the ‘Rockefeller Faction’ is already maximizing its many global ‘Stealth Humanocide’ pogroms/programs, that have already imposed accelerated contracted social reproduction, via two recent “recessions”, in rapid-fire succession -- the latest imposed via a global ‘plan-scam-panic-demic’ – “recessions” that each far exceeded the human suffering and economic destruction caused by their “Great Depression”, and that have further helped to induce accelerating negative population growth across the “First World” at least.”

 

“The ‘Rockefeller Faction’ are now planning to finish off their global “hit job” of “95%” human population extermination, via a combination of ‘Global Warming Hyper-Austerity’, beginning with hyper-escalation of “carbon-taxed” energy prices, such as already provoked the – seldom media-mentioned – nationwide “Yellow Vests” revolt in France, and ‘Eric Pianka Plagues’, whose next episode, if the prediction and prescription [¿proscription of humanity?], by Eric Pianka himself, is fulfilled, may be a ‘genomically-engineered’, breathing-spread version of the Ebola Virus, a hyper-pandemic for which the present global ‘plan-scam-panic-demic’ will have served merely as a global “dress rehearsal”.”

 

“Perhaps only a global, citizens-demanded, Nuremberg-style trial of the ‘Rocke-Nazi’ Faction, for its myriad Crimes Against Humanity, can avert this planned ‘global extinction event’ – an ‘extinction event’ for the human species itself.

 

 

 

 

 

For more information regarding these Seldonian insights, please see --

 

http://www.dialectics.org/dialectics/

 

and

 

www.dialectics.info

 

 

 

 

 

For partially pictographical, ‘poster-ized’ visualizations of many of these Seldonian insights -- specimens of dialectical art -- see:

https://www.etsy.com/shop/DialecticsMATH

 

 

 

 

¡ENJOY!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Regards,

 

 

Miguel Detonacciones,

 

Voting Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.];

Elected Member, F.E.D. General Council;

Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison;

Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.

 

 

 

 

Please post your comments on this blog-entry below!