THE
SYSTEMATIC
DIALECTIC
within
the
Category
of
Dialectical
Synthesis
Units
as
«Genos»-
Category.
Part 02.:
Everywhere-Dense
Dialectic
Series.
Dear Reader,
Over the course of long
experience with ‘dialectograming’ and analyzing a plethora of individual
triadic and also more-extended systematic, historical, ‘diachronico-synchronic’
and psychohistorical dialectics, for a vast variety of subject-matter Domains, we have gradually come to notice
a triadicity in the sub-categories of the ‘dialectical uni-categories’ within a
given Domain – i.e., of the sub-categories whose units represent
dialectical syntheses, or hybridizations, of some
of the units of an '«arché»-category' and/with some units of its 'contra-category' – of units of a 'thesis-category' and of/with those of its 'antithesis-category'.
The three species-categories
that we have so far noticed, recurrently, within the 'dialectical
synthesis category', taken as their relative «genos»-category,
are as follows:
1. The most common kind of dialectical ‘uni-category’, or ‘synthesis-category’, encountered by us so far, is a category whose units are a Hegelian-like, combinatoric ‘“Complex unity”’ hybrid of the ‘thesis-category’ units and/with the ‘antithesis-category’ units.
An ‘exo-human’ dialectic-of-Nature example of this kind of synthesis/hybrid, complex-unity unit would be a first-generation star. Such a star is a combination of an outer shell of atoms [e.g., of Helium nuclei], with an inner core of “particles” [e.g., of a plasma of dissociated protons and electrons], category-symbol qar.
An example from the dialectic of human Nature is the complex unity of the human Genome and the language-based human Phenome within, and constituting, each acculturated human individual, category-symbol qPG.
The units of
such a hybrid category are, quite aptly, designated as consisting of BOTH
‘thesis-units’ and ‘antithesis-units’.
2. The dialectical-synthesis kind second-most commonly encountered by us, to-date, is the interMediate or ‘‘‘Mean-like’’’ ‘uni-category’ of dialectical-synthesis units.
An ‘exo-human’ dialectic-of-Nature example of this kind of dialectical-synthesis category unit would be the “anyons particles” category of the dialectical unity of particle ‘Bosonicity’ and/with ‘Fermionicity’, whose observed “statistics” may fall “anywhere in-between” “Fermi-Dirac statistics” and their, polar-opposite, “Bose-Einstein statistics”[For more, see: F.E.D. Dialectics: THE DIALECTIC of Fermions and/versus Bosons. Part 01.: Everywhere-Dense Dialectic Series.].
A dialectic-of-human-Nature example is that of Aristotle’s “Doctrine of the Mean” ethical theory, whereby optimal human conduct quality locates as a biased mean between the extremes of the given Domain of human conduct qualities [for more about this dialectical synthesis, see: F.E.D. Dialectics: ‘The Dialectic of Aristotle's Ethics, circa 335 B.C.E.-- ‘Dialectogram’: ‘A Systematic-Dialectic Method of Presentation for the Domain of the Aristotelian Philosophy of Ethical Behavior’, Single Triad'.].
The units of this species of ‘dialectical-synthesis category’ are, quite aptly, designated as residing BETWEEN the category for the ‘thesis-units’ and the category for the ‘antithesis-units’ of the given Domain.
3. The third and more rarely encountered, by us, dialectical-synthesis species-category is that of the ‘‘‘Transcending’’’ kind of dialectical-synthesis units, whose units appear to escape or exit the level within which the ‘thesis-units’ and the ‘antithesis-units’ are mutually, qualitatively opposed and apparently radically distinct.
An ‘exo-human’ dialectic-of-Nature example of this kind of dialectical-synthesis category unit would be the “anyons paraparticles” category of the dialectical unity of particle ‘Bosonicity’ and/with particle ‘Fermionicity’, whose theoretical, not yet observed “statistics” are located “beyond” both the “Fermi-Dirac statistics” and their, polar-opposite, “Bose-Einstein statistics”[For more, see: F.E.D. Dialectics: THE DIALECTIC of Fermions and/versus Bosons. Part 01.: Everywhere-Dense Dialectic Series.].
A dialectic-of-human-Nature example is that of the later, modern historical synthesis of the initially ancient forms of wage-labor – e.g., in the forms of some ancient civilizations’ paid-soldiering – and/with capital, whose ancient, “antediluvian” forms included merchant capital, usurers’ capital, and slavery-based latifundial agricultural productive capital.
The modern synthesis of capital and/with wage-labor, the irruption of the capital-wage-labor social relation of social re-production, at length, seeded the “modernist” form of society – industrial-capital-based capitalist society, by far qualitatively and quantitatively transcending the limits of ancient and medieval societies.
The
units of such a ‘dialectical-synthesis category’ are, quite aptly, designated as
consisting of NEITHER ‘thesis-units’ or ‘antithesis-units’.
For more
information regarding these
Seldonian insights, and to read and/or download, free
of charge, PDFs and/or JPGs of Foundation books, other texts, and images, please see:
and
https://independent.academia.edu/KarlSeldon
For partially pictographical, ‘poster-ized’ visualizations of many of these Seldonian insights -- specimens of ‘dialectical art’ – as well as dialectically-illustrated books
published by
the F.E.D. Press, see –
https://www.etsy.com/shop/DialecticsMATH
¡ENJOY!
Regards,
Miguel
Detonacciones,
Voting Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.];
Elected Member, F.E.D. General Council;
Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison;
Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.
YOU are invited to post
your comments on this blog-entry below!
