Interactions of “Dark Matter” units and/with ‘Bright-Matter’ units. Part 2.: DialecticS of NATURE Main Sequence.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interactions

of

“Dark Matter”

units

and/with

‘Bright-Matter’

units.

 

 

Part 2.:

DialecticS

of

NATURE

Main

Sequence.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Reader,

 

Background.  According to the, prevailing, “Lambda Cold Dark Matter” [LCDM] model of our cosmos, “Dark Energy” [now about 70% of the total energy-density of our cosmos] has existed since the very beginning, during the “Big Bang”, but “Dark Matter” [»25%] and “ordinary matter” [»5%], the latter reactive to electromagnetic radiation – hence herein called ‘Bright Matter’ – were born together, in the immediate aftermath of the “dilaton field’s” causation of “exponential cosmological inflation”.

 

Only partially to the contrary, according to the Seldonian “Self-Resurging Big Surge Hypothesis”, also known herein as the “Regenerist” cosmological hypothesis, we conjecture the following. 

 

“Dark Energy”, as the expanse of contiguous ‘spandetron’ units that constitute “empty” space also came first, but it was just the accelerating, anti-gravitic self-expansion of space, caused by an incessant and ceaseless spandetron self-replication – unchecked by any opposing, space-contractive, gravitic effects from “Dark Matter” and “ordinary matter”, ‘Bright Matter’, both of which did not yet exist, that caused the “exponential cosmological inflation”, or space self-expansion acceleration.

 

Per that ‘Regenerist Hypothesis’, “Dark Matter” was born as clumps of gravitating ‘meta-spandetron’ units, no longer able to self-replicate, and exhibiting gravitational, or anti-anti-gravitic effects, that formed as clouds of self-damaged spandetrons – damaged when the accelerating, hyper-explosive “inflation” of physical space breached an inherent limit to the velocity of space-expansion, albeit at a velocity far in excess of the light velocity, c, that limits rates of motion for ‘Bright Matter” units at least.

 

The ‘Regenerist Hypothesis’ further conjectures that, some-what as in the LCDM Model, “Dark Matter”,, clumping formed “structures” in the shape of, e.g., “mini-halo” gravity wells, soon after its advent, as part of its interplay-with/- resistance-to “Dark Energy” space-expansion, creating the scaffolding for the later “cosmic web”.

 

The ‘existentiation’ of ‘Bright Matter’, per this hypothesis, occurred at the bottom of the very “gravity wells” that the ‘pre-Bright Matter cosmic web’ formed, where ‘quasi-bosonic’ units of “Dark Matter” concentrated, condensed and densified sufficiently for increasingly frequent and intense interactions among “Dark Matter” units, q_cc, to result, and to create ‘meta-meta-spandetron’ units, i.e., ‘Bright Matter’ units, q_r, e.g., the “Standard Model of Paritcle Physics” particles – each single unit of “non-composite” such “particles” being made up out of a heterogeneous multiplicity of damaged, ‘meta-spandetron’, “Dark Matter” units. 

 

Thereby, the mere “Dark Matter/Dark Energy” initial scaffolding of the “cosmic web”, initially empty of ‘Bright Matter’, became populated with “particles” – initially perhaps mainly or only a “plasma” of “quarks” and “leptons” – that thereafter gradually ‘meta-evolved’ into the super-galactic-cluster filaments/walls and voids, the galactic super-clusters, galactic clusters, and galaxy units that we detect today, at the largest scale of our observable universe, containing “voids”, in which space continues to expand, again at an accelerating rate, and gravitationally “bound” material ‘clusterings’, within which “Dark-Energy”-driven space-expansion has been arrested by their gravitational and self-gravitational interactivity.

 

The overall ‘dialectic of Nature’ model for the “Dark Matter”/‘Bright Matter’ processes, including those still ongoing today, via the _NQ dialectical language’s dyadic Seldon function, operating upon the ‘Regenerist Hypothesis’ “Dark Energy” ‘spandetron’ units’ «arché»-category, q_x, is solved by us as follows –

 

q_x²³  =  q_x⁸   |-=  

 

q_x <+> q_c <+> q_cx <+> q_r <+>     

 

 

q_rx <+> q_rc <+> q_rcx <+> q_a 

 

– with q_a, or q_rr, solved as representing the cosmo-ontological category of atoms. 

 

 

“Dark Matter” and/versus ‘Bright Matter’.  Within this cosmological-ontological, dialectical [i.e., multi-«aufheben»] categorial-progression, is the sub-progression that forms the focus of this blog-entry, namely –

 

 

q_r <x>  q_c    |-=   q_c <+> q_rc .

 

 

 

This component-subprocess, categorizing and [algebraic-] ‘character-izing’ ‘Bright Matter’/“Dark Matter” inter-actions, could stand for combinations/hybridizations/-complex-unities/dialectical partial «physis»-syntheses, ‘uni-physes’, or ‘syn-physes’, of the two, or conversions of the one kind into the other kind, generically.

 

¿But which of these processes – which of these different generic kinds of dialectical, physical synthesis – are actually, presently known to exist specifically, for the case of the q_rc process, and its result(s)?

 

Current scientific-community consensus appears to be that “Dark Matter” and “ordinary matter” have only one way of interacting, the gravitational way.  If that consensus view continues to be corroborated by ever deepening and more accurate observations, then that is all that ‘hybrid category’ q_rc can ever mean.

 

However, some physicists are hypothesizing that the – otherwise presently unexplained – “gamma ray glow” of our galaxy is the product of the mutual, pairwise [self-] annihilation of “Dark Matter particles”, whatever those “particles” may turn out to be.

 

This, if borne-out by future observations and theorizations, would means that, although “Dark Matter particles” do not respond to electromagnetic radiation impinging on them, they do generate – emit – high energy electromagnetic radiation when the mutually annihilate.  This would constitute a sub-species of the Seldon Hypothesis’s posited ‘self-hybrid’ species of q_cc-becoming-q_r;

 

It would mean that hybrid ontological category q_rc or q_cr has at least two species: (1) mutual gravitation of ‘Bright Matter’ and “Dark Matter” “particles”, and (2) the impact of “Dark Matter” annihilations-emitted gamma ray photons on [other] “Bright Matter particles”, q_cr. 

 

We have as yet detected no evidence that there is a q_rc sub-species of ‘conversion formations’, within which ‘Bright Matter’ “particles” interact with, and catalyze conversions of, “Dark Matter particles”, into more ‘Bright Matter’ “particles’.

 

We note again, this time more explicitly, that q_cr [generically q₆ = q₂₊₄] has the same order-number [‘ordinal-quality generic subscript index’, i.e., the 6 in q₆ = q₄₊₂] as q_rc, and is another syntactically possible species of “Dark Matter” units’ interactions with ‘Bright Matter’ units.  

 

Category q_cr might also describe cosmological ‘conversion formations’ within which “Dark Matter particles” interact with, and catalyze ‘retro-conversions’ of, ‘Bright Matter’ particles”, back into “Dark Matter particles”. 

 

If corroborated by future observations and theorizations, species q_cr might thus also describe yet another sub-species of the ‘Bright Matter’/“Dark Matter” interactions hybrid species, with “Dark Matter” annihilations-emitted gamma-ray photon units’ impacts on ‘Bright Matter’ units as the other sub-species of species q_cr.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For more information regarding these Seldonian insights, and to read and/or download, free of charge, PDFs and/or JPGs of Foundation books, other texts, and images, please see:

 

www.dialectics.info

 

 

and

 

 

https://independent.academia.edu/KarlSeldon

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For partially pictographical, ‘poster-ized’ visualizations of many of these Seldonian insights -- specimens of ‘dialectical art’ – as well as dialectically-illustrated books published by the F.E.D. Press, see –

 

https://www.etsy.com/shop/DialecticsMATH

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

¡ENJOY!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Regards,

 

 

 

 

Miguel Detonacciones,

 

Voting Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.];

Elected Member, F.E.D. General Council;

Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison;

Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.

 

 

 

 

 

 

YOU are invited to post your comments on this blog-entry below!