Dialectic and Harmony.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dialectic

 

and

 

Harmony.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Reader,

 

Temporal dialectic is development via the outbreak of discord from out of the internal duality of a lower form of harmony, to the higher ‘re-harmonization’ of that discord in a higher form of harmony.

 

But then, again, that higher harmony itself, at length, breaks out in a new kind of discord... .

 

This dialectic pattern is certainly claimed for some – well-constructed – symphonic music, albeit somewhat esoterically, e.g., in terms of “chord progressions”.

 

One can see this pattern – somewhat more palpably – in well-designed TV series, in which the resolution of the central conflict of a previous episode or season grows into a new conflict in later episode(s) or season(s).

 

If the series is well-thought-through from the start, the new outbreak can feel to follow, with due probability and/or necessity, from the preceding resolution.

 

If the series is not so well-designed, the new conflict can feel “tacked-on”, arbitrary or contrived.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For more information regarding these Seldonian insights, and to read and/or download, free of charge, PDFs and/or JPGs of Foundation books, other texts, and images, please see:

 

www.dialectics.info

 

 

and

 

 

https://independent.academia.edu/KarlSeldon

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For partially pictographical, ‘poster-ized’ visualizations of many of these Seldonian insights -- specimens of ‘dialectical art’ – as well as dialectically-illustrated books published by the F.E.D. Press, see –

 

https://www.etsy.com/shop/DialecticsMATH

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

¡ENJOY!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Regards,

 

 

Miguel Detonacciones,

 

Voting Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.];

Elected Member, F.E.D. General Council;

Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison;

Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.

 

 

 

 

 

 

YOU are invited to post your comments on this blog-entry below!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

‘The Spandetron Hypothesis’: ‘Monadism/Arithmism’ versus Atomism.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

‘The Spandetron

 

Hypothesis’:

 

‘Monadism/Arithmism’

 

versus

 

Atomism.

 

 

 

GLOBAL STRATEGIC HYPOTHESES.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Reader,

 

 

Per our ‘spandetron hypothesis’, summarized in the text images poster above, about the nature of “Dark Energy”, and the genesis of “Dark Matter” and of “Bright Matter”, our hypothetical ‘spandetron’ “particles of space” might be seen as the ultimate “uncutables” – as the ultimate ‘“a-toms’’’.

 

But, if they were to be so seen, then the irony would be that these “uncutables” do nothing but cut themselves; they continually ‘mitate’, each one continually splitting itself, dividing itself into two new ‘spandetron’ units, where once, a bit before, there was but one unit.

 

Moreover, the hypothesized ‘spandetrons’ are not simply a contiguous plethora of little replicas of Parmenidean “Being”, little “being” universes unto themselves, eternally statical, immutable – both unchanging by any other, and un-self-changing – like the “atoms” of certain Ancient Greek philosophers. 

 

The ‘spandetrons’ are, on the contrary, defined as continually dynamical, continually self-changing – continually self-replicating. 

 

Furthermore, from there – from the ‘spandetron’ «arché» level/scale of not-so-empty space, of the hypothesized, ‘spandetron’, ‘meta⁰-«monads»’ – new levels/scales continually ‘meta-«monad»-ize’, self-constructing the ‘meta-genealogical’, ‘meta-evolving’, ‘qualo-quanto-fractal’ of our total cosmos; of our observable cosmos as a whole. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For more information regarding these Seldonian insights, and to read and/or download, free of charge, PDFs and/or JPGs of Foundation books, other texts, and images, please see:

 

www.dialectics.info

 

 

and

 

 

https://independent.academia.edu/KarlSeldon

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For partially pictographical, ‘poster-ized’ visualizations of many of these Seldonian insights -- specimens of ‘dialectical art’ – as well as dialectically-illustrated books published by the F.E.D. Press, see –

 

https://www.etsy.com/shop/DialecticsMATH

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

¡ENJOY!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Regards,

 

 

Miguel Detonacciones,

 

Voting Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.];

Elected Member, F.E.D. General Council;

Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison;

Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.

 

 

 

 

 

 

YOU are invited to post your comments on this blog-entry below!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Seldonian ‘Dialectical Ideography’ is a MATHEMATICAL Dialectical Method.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Seldonian

 

‘Dialectical Ideography’

 

is a

 

MATHEMATICAL

 

Dialectical Method.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

GLOBAL STRATEGIC HYPOTHESES.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Reader,

 

The determinations of Seldonian Dialectical Method –

 

Seldonian ‘Dialectical Ideography’ is a mathematical ‘‘‘Dialectical Method’’’.

 

It is a “non-standard”-mathematical ‘‘‘Dialectical Method’’’.

 

In its initial ‘‘‘instar’’’ and instance, that of the _NQ dialectical arithmetic/algebra, it is also a “purely”-qualitative mathematical, algorithmic Dialectical Method.

 

In that first ‘‘‘instar’’’, it is devoid of all cardinal quantities.

 

However, in that first instance, it builds upon ordinal quantities – upon the arithmetic thereof – at the ‘subscriptal’ level of its qualitative ‘meta-numerals’, by way of their representation of ‘ordinal qualities’.

 

It does so as a kind of categorial ideography, for categorial knowledge representation, and for categorial knowledge representation condensation. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For more information regarding these Seldonian insights, and to read and/or download, free of charge, PDFs and/or JPGs of Foundation books, other texts, and images, please see:

www.dialectics.info

 

 and

 

https://independent.academia.edu/KarlSeldon

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For partially pictographical, ‘poster-ized’ visualizations of many of these Seldonian insights -- specimens of ‘dialectical art’ – as well as dialectically-illustrated books published by the F.E.D. Press, see –

 

https://www.etsy.com/shop/DialecticsMATH

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

¡ENJOY!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Regards,

 

 

 

Miguel Detonacciones,

 

Voting Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.];

Elected Member, F.E.D. General Council;

Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison;

Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.

 

 

 

 

 

 

YOU are invited to post your comments on this blog-entry below!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Part 04: Seldon on ‘Dialectical Categorial Progressions’ Series. Categories and Their Units: What Categories are NOT.

 

 

 

 

 

Part 04: Seldon on

 

 

‘Dialectical Categorial Progressions’ Series.

 

 

 Categories

 

and

 

Their Units:

 

What Categories are NOT.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Reader,

 

 

 

It is my pleasure, and my honor, as an elected member of the Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.] General Council, and as a voting member of F.E.D., to share, with you, from time to time, as they are approved for public release by the F.E.D. General Council, Seldon’s commentaries on key Encyclopedia Dialectica concepts of Seldonian Theory.

 

 

This 4th text in this new such series is posted herewith, together with supporting text-images and diagrams [Some E.D. standard edits have been applied, in the version presented below, by the editors of the F.E.D. Special Council for the Encyclopedia, to the direct transcript of our co-founder’s discourse].

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Seldon –

“A category is not a physical-spatial grouping of physical objects, close enough together in space so that all of them can be seen by our naked eyes; all of them at once”

 

“A category is a human, mental grouping-together of mental representations of, e.g., physical objects/units/«monads», many of which may be widely dispersed in physical space.” 

 

“But we group these units together, in the “interior” space of our imaginations, because of their mutual similitude; because of their “kind”, of their ‘-ness’, that they share, despite their ‘‘‘individual differences’’’.”

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For more information regarding these Seldonian insights, and to read and/or download, free of charge, PDFs and/or JPGs of Foundation books, other texts, and images, please see:

 

www.dialectics.info

 

 

and

 

 

https://independent.academia.edu/KarlSeldon

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For partially pictographical, ‘poster-ized’ visualizations of many of these Seldonian insights – specimens of ‘dialectical art’ – as well as dialectically-illustrated books published by the F.E.D. Press, see:

 

https://www.etsy.com/shop/DialecticsMATH

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

¡ENJOY!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Regards,

 

 

 

 

Miguel Detonacciones,

 

Voting Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.];

Elected Member, F.E.D. General Council;

Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison;

Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.

 

 

 

 

 

 

YOU are invited to post your comments on this blog-entry below!