Thursday, January 29, 2026

“Economics” is Really POLITICAL-Economy: What Would Have Happened if the ‘Roosevelt Faction’ Had Prevailed over the 'Rocke-Nazis'? Part 01: Seldon on Capitalism’s ‘DescendEnce Phase’ Series.

 

 

 



 

 

Part 01: Seldon on 

Capitalisms Descendence Phase Series.

 

 

 Economics

 

is Really

 

POLITICAL-

Economy:


What

Would Have

Happened
if t
he

Roosevelt

Faction

Had

Prevailed?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Reader,

 

 

It is my pleasure, and my honor, as an elected member of the Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.] General Council, and as a voting member of F.E.D., to share, with you, from time to time, as they are approved for public release by the F.E.D. General Council, Seldon’s commentaries on capitalism’s descendence phase, and its transcendence.

 

 

This 1st text in this new such series is posted herewith, together with supporting text-images and diagrams [Some E.D. standard edits have been applied, in the version presented below, by the editors of the F.E.D. Special Council for the Encyclopedia, to the direct transcript of our co-founder’s discourse].

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

“No force…has done more to shape the myths of [e.g., Peak Oil] scarcity, the myth of CO2 global warming danger from combustion of petroleum and coal, than the family Rockefeller, the founders, more than a century ago, of what became a global Anglo-American world oil cartel.”

 

– F. William Engdahl, A Century of War: Anglo-American Oil Politics and the New World Order, 2011 Edition, Author’s Introduction, p. iii.

 

 

 

Seldon –

The causation of the post-1913 careening into the catastrophe of the global ‘descendence phase’ of the capitalist system; the dive into the vast, ongoing destruction of the ‘Hundred[+]-Years[] [of] War[s]’ ever since – by name, the technodepreciation-induced, productive-force-growth-induced fall of the general rate of profit on capital – is not a matter of economic mechanisms alone.

 

It is a matter of politics, or, more precisely, a matter of ‘POLITICAL-Economy’, as Marx would say, and the mainly ideological, ‘psychē-ic’, psychohistorical “mechanisms” thereof. 

 

It is a matter of the hideous response, by the prevailing faction of the capitalist ruling class, that we call ‘The Rockefeller Faction’, and of their –well hidden, in plain sight – ‘invisible dictatorship’. 

 

First becoming enemies of “the growth of the social forces of production” [Marx], especially in the “semi-periphery” of the geographical core of industrial capitalism in the U.K., France and the U.S., and striving, via two, consecutive, hyper-destructive “World Wars”, to de-industrialize Germany, aiming to throw Germany back into a low-productivity, low-productive-force exporter of agricultural and other extractive products, as the U.K. imperial ruling faction had tried to do with “their” American colonies, and then graduating to funding industrialization-suppressing ‘servant-dictatorships’ all over the “semi-periphery”, the “Third World” of grinding poverty and famine that the Rockefeller Faction and their ‘servant-dictators’ imposed, and with the failure of that pogrom in the BRICS and elsewhere, this ‘Rocke-Nazi’ Faction has “graduated” to targeting the “95%” [CNN founder, Ted Turner] “population reduction” of the human race, through their planned, and already dress-rehearsed, global germ warfare ‘designer disease’ pandemics, through ‘stealth humanocide’ via adulterated pseudo-foods, pseudo-vaccines and other, deadly-side-effects-cascading pseudo-medicines, and smuggled-in deadly/illegal drugs [e.g., fentanyl], and via “Federal Reserve” exponential inflation, followed by “Fed” interest-rate-inflation/sudden-escalation-induced recessions and depressions, plus “Global Warming” Austerity, by hyper-inflating monthly household energy utility bills to the point of mass majority class homelessness, followed by concentration camp, “protective custody” incarceration/extermination of 95%* of the majority class. 

*[For more about this ‘Rocke-Nazi’ agenda, see –

Capitalism's Fatal Flaw, and the Way Forward: 'Rocke-Nazi' Plutocracy Publicly Proclaims Planned Planetary Population Plummeting. GLOBAL STRATEGIC HYPOTHESES.]


Once this ‘Rocke-Nazi’ Faction had decapitated and overthrown the ‘Roosevelt Faction’, in the 1960s, with their whole-sale slaughter of the leadership of the ‘Roosevelt Faction’ – John Kennedy, Martin Luther King Jr., and Robert Kennedy – plus that of unreported hundreds of their followers besides, the ‘Rocke-Nazis’ had all but free reign, to stealthily impose their many global, ‘humanocidal’ pogroms ever since, until the new Trump Faction of the capitalist ruling class rose to threaten the ‘Rocke-Nazis’ climactic overthrow, now underway, with increasingly violent and now burgeoning counter-action by the ‘Rocke-Nazis’.

 

For all of these reasons, it can be instructive to mentally simulate what would likely have happened had the Kennedys inheritance of ‘The Roosevelt Faction’, and the movements led by Dr. Martin Luther King, prevailed against the ‘Rocke-Nazis’.

 

As we see it, what would likely have happened is, in broad outline, the following.

 

1.  The geographical periphery of the ‘capitalist geo-core’ would have rapidly industrialized.  Rooseveltian programs like John Kennedy’s “Alliance for Progress” would have likely helped mightily to overcome the fetters – in, e.g., Latin America, and, by their extension, in other parts of the “Global South” – against that industrialized growth of the social forces of production there.  John Kennedy’s Space Program would have continued to accelerate advanced technological progress in the U.S. and the rest of the capitalist ‘geo-core’.

 

2.  The owners of legacy, hyper-concentrated industrial and banking capital would have been overthrown, economically, from their stranglehold on political power, due to the ‘‘‘techno-depreciation’’’ ‘de-profit-ization’ of their obsolescent fixed capital plant and equipment.

 

3.  With rapidly-advancing productivity/productive-force, the wages and salaries of the majority class in the geo-core would have risen steadily, and would have gradually-risen in the industrializing geo-periphery of capitalism as well.

 

4.  The pseudo-Marxian, ‘Lenino-Stalinoids’ of the “Second World” would not have been able to hold-out in suppressing their peoples under a parasitic, vampiric state-bureaucratic ruling class, in view of the rapid social progress in the ‘geo-core’ and in the rest of the, rapidly-industrializing, ‘geo-periphery’, and those police states would have succumbed long before 1989.

 

5.  With advancing wages, the advancing ‘technical composition of labor, and the overthrow of the ‘Rocke-Nazis’ “divide-and-conquer” ideology-engineering “industry”, electoral, political power would have shifted markedly to the majority, working class.  The working class would then be in a position, and feel the need, for deep reforms of capitalism, such as the ‘Equitist’ reforms that we have proposed, amounting to a peaceful, rule-of-law-based, electoral transformation of the “social relations of production” [Marx], beyond the “capital-relation” [Marx].

 

6.  The time would have come to be able to implement Marx’s prescriptions for the transition to from capitalist plutocracy power, to majority class electoral power, in the advancing industrial nation-states that had adopted universal adult suffrage –

When Marx and Engels participated, personally and signally, in the European continent-wide revolutionary uprisings of 1848, Europe was ruled largely by violently-repressive monarchical police states.  Marx and Engels thus saw no way forward for humanity’s evolution other than by way of violent revolution.  But the progress of capitalist representative democracy during Marx’s lifetime led him later to revise his views regarding the necessity of violent revolution for the supercession of capitalism --

 

Someday the worker must seize political power in order to build up the new organization of labor; he must overthrow the old politics which sustain the old institutions, if he is not to lose Heaven on Earth, like the old Christians who neglected and despised politics.  But we have not asserted that the ways to achieve that goal are everywhere the same.  You know that the institutions, mores, and traditions of various countries must be taken into consideration, and we do not deny that there are countries – such as America, England, and if I were more familiar with your institutions, I would perhaps also add Holland – where the workers can attain their goal by peaceful means. [Marx, 8 Sep. 1872, Amsterdam, Address after the Fifth Congress of the International Working Men’s Association [“First International”]].

 

The key to the “institutions, mores, and traditions” that make possible a relatively peaceful transition to what we name ‘political-economic democracy is, according to Marx, the advancement of capitalist representative democracy to the point of universal suffrage -- to the right of the “propertyless” [e.g., ‘capital-less’] working-class majority to vote in national and local elections...the first step in the revolution by the working class, is to raise the proletariat to the position of ruling class, to win the battle of democracy. [Marx and Engels, 1848, The Communist Manifesto]; But universal suffrage is the equivalent of political power for the working class of England, where the proletariat forms the large majority of the population, where, in a long though underground civil war, it has gained a clear consciousness of its position as a class, and where even the rural districts know no longer any peasants, but only landlords, industrial capitalists (farmers) and hired labourers.  The carrying of universal suffrage in England would therefore be a far more socialistic measure than anything which has been honoured with that name on the continent.  Its inevitable result, here, is political supremacy of the working class. [Marx, 1852, commenting on the Chartist movement].

 

7.  To blunt the devastating impact of ‘technodepreciation-driven, growth-of-the-productive-forces-driven profit-rate-fall’ on legacy industrial and banking capitalists, due to competition from new industries in the ‘geo-periphery’, as well as from innovative upstarts in the original ‘geo-core’ of capitalism itself, risk-management programs of national-state provided, and partially state-subsidized, ‘techno-depreciation insurance’ policies might be legislated, with the full consent of the majority class.  However, these ‘techno-depreciation insurance’ programs would be unfair to the majority-class/majority-electorate if their premiums and/or subsidies were to be paid-for primarily by income taxes on the wages and salaries and other incomes of that majority class, and not, primarily, by the insurance premiums paid-for by the capitalists directly benefitting from those insurances.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For more information regarding these Seldonian insights, and to read and/or download, free of charge, PDFs and/or JPGs of Foundation books, other texts, and images, please see:

 

www.dialectics.info

 

and

 

https://independent.academia.edu/KarlSeldon

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For partially pictographical, ‘poster-ized’ visualizations of many of these Seldonian insightsspecimens of dialectical artas well as dialectically-illustrated books published by the F.E.D. Press, see:

 

https://www.etsy.com/shop/DialecticsMATH

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

¡ENJOY!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Regards,

 

 

 

 

Miguel Detonacciones,

 

Voting Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.];

Elected Member, F.E.D. General Council;

Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison;

Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.

 

 

 

 

 

 

YOU are invited to post your comments on this blog-entry below!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SOLUTION

 

Equitist Political-ECONOMIC DEMOCRACY; 

 

BOOK:

 

MARXS MISSING BLUEPRINTS



Free-of-Charge Download of Book PDF

http://www.dialectics.info/dialectics/Applications.html

http://www.dialectics.info/dialectics/Applications_files/Edition%201.,%20DPCAIT_,_Part_1_,_%27THE_MISSING_BLUEPRINTS%27_,_begun_22JUL2022_Last_Updated_08AUG2023.pdf

 

 

Hardcover Book Order

http://www.dialectics.info/dialectics/F.E.D._Press.html

https://www.etsy.com/shop/DialecticsMATH

 


 


 


 


 


 

 

 

 

 

  

Wednesday, January 28, 2026

The Algorithmics of Dialectics, via a simplified Short-hand Notation. Part 05: Seldon on ‘Dialectical Categorial Progressions’ Series.

  

 





 

 

Part 05: Seldon on 

Dialectical Categorial Progressions Series.

 

 


 The Algorithmics

 

of

 

Dialectics,

 

via a simplified

 

Short-hand

Notation.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Reader,

 

 

It is my pleasure, and my honor, as an elected member of the Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.] General Council, and as a voting member of F.E.D., to share, with you, from time to time, as they are approved for public release by the F.E.D. General Council, Seldon’s commentaries on key Encyclopedia Dialectica concepts of Seldonian Theory.

 

 

This 5th text in this new such series is posted herewith, together with supporting text-images and diagrams [Some E.D. standard edits have been applied, in the version presented below, by the editors of the F.E.D. Special Council for the Encyclopedia, to the direct transcript of our co-founder’s discourse].

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 Seldon –


We have been busy developing an algorithmic dialectical ideography, via a much-simplified short-hand, much easier to learn, and not so evocative of the intimidating and even traumatizing teaching of mathematics that so many have suffered in contemporary society, almost worldwide.

 

We use, for this short-hand, a dual notation, with a capital Greek letter Kappa, bolded and underscored – K – to signify a category in general, together with one or more – preferably just one – subscript(s), for example, ‘a’, to specify the specific category being addressed, hence, for example, Ka.  The letter Kappa comes from the first letter of Aristotle’s term for his categories, “Kātegoríai. 

 

In this, simplified, short-hand notation, a dialectical categorial progression can be expressed compactly, with Ka as «arché»-category, or starting-category, viz. –

 

Ka ® Ka& Kaa ® Ka& Kb ® Ka& Kb& Kba ® Ka & Kb & Kc ®

Ka & Kb& Kc& Kca ® Ka& Kb& Kc& Kbb ® Ka& Kb& Kc& Kd  .

– wherein the categorial, evolute advance is driven by copying the latest category abbreviation, and appending that copy to the right-most of the preceding series of short-hand category abbreviations, then appending the subscript of the starting category to the single subscript of the copy of the former latest category abbreviation, now becoming the new latest category abbreviation in the series.

 

It is then a matter of solving for the meaning, in the context of the Domain being analyzed, of that new-latest, now bi-vocal”, dual-subscript short-hand category description, an replacing that dual subscript with a single new subscripted character, one that mnemonically abbreviates the character-string that spells the name or the phrase that defines that new-latest category, uni-vocally.

 

This procedure can be iterated until you reach a category-description abbreviation that you cannot solve for, or define, in terms of widely-known, extant category names.

 

The self-«aufheben» dialectical process is signified by category description abbreviations of the form Kxx, solved as, say, Ky, which can be interpreted as meaning that each unit of category Ky is made up out of a heterogeneous multiplicity of [some] of the [former] units of category Kx, forming ‘self-hybrid’ category Ky.

 

Note that many of our ‘dialectograms’ terminate their dialectic’s depictions at the ‘Ka  &   Kb &   Kba’ stage, typically because we cannot see any solution for Kca or Kbb, or for anything beyond it – i.e., for Kcaa, Kcaaa, Kcaaaa, etc.

 

The five rules for generating such dialectical categorial progression analyses of a subject-matter Domain are as follows –

 

Rules-System.  This short-hand dialectical method, described generally, is the combined, sequential application of the following 5 rules:

§1.  First write down your short-hand category description for your starting-category for the subject matter field that you want to learn, or to present – call it, generically, Ka

§2.  Next, place, to its right, an ampersand, and a second short-hand category description, but with the subscript for your first category description re-appended, again, next to that initial subscript, with the ‘&’ sign, for ‘concrete addition’ – i.e., for “non-amalgamative” addition – placed between these, now two, shorthand category descriptions, thus forming a second short-hand category description with a double, repeat subscript added: generically Ka & Kaa

§3.  Next, replace that repeat-subscript of that second short-hand category description with a single, different subscript, a subscript that abbreviates and stands for a widely-know name for your meaning for the new kind of units signaled by the new, second short-hand category description – standing for each such new category’s new kind of unit, that was generated by the unifying mutual combination of some of the former units of your starting-category: generically, Ka & Kb

§4.  From then on, to construct each next short-hand category description, just copy your last, right-most short-hand category description, and place it immediately to the right of itself, after an ampersand, ‘&’, but then simply juxtapose the subscript for your starting category to the right of the subscript of your copy of your most recent previous short-hand category description.  

Then try to find a single character that characterizes, or abbreviates the name of, and thus can aptly replace, the resulting multiple subscripts by a lesser number of subscripts; best by a single subscript.

For example, the next step to the generic example of step 3, above, generically, is to form the series  

Ka & Kb & Kba.  


Then find a single-word, widely-known name for category description Kba, and abbreviate that name by its initial letter, if non-redundant, perhaps “c”, as subscript, thus rewriting your now three-fold categorial series as 

 Ka & Kb & Kc.  


If “c” is redundant with respect to previously used subscripts, try using a letter embedded within the character-string that spells the widely-known name or phrase that defines this third category. 

Continue iterating this step, together with rule §5., below, wherever it is applicable, until a short-hand category description results whose potential meaning you do not recognize, and cannot name or define.

§5.  If this adding of the subscript of the starting short-hand category description creates a double subscript in the form of a repeat subscript, then, for consistency, replace that repeat subscript with the single subscript by which you replaced that repeat subscript previously, in your short-hand category descriptions progression so far.  Or, if this repeat subscript is appearing for the first time, replace it with a single subscript abbreviating the widely-known name or phrase which defines the category for that next higher-level, higher-scale ‘self-hybrid’ kind of units.

 

The following example applies this short-hand dialectical-ideographical method to the dialectic of Nature as a whole, using the category of Standard Model “particles” as starting category.

 

1.  “particles” (short-hand: Kr).

  2.  atoms (short-hand: Krr or Ka).

  3.  molecules (short-hand: Kaa or Km).

  4.  prokaryotic living cells (short-hand: Kmm or Kp).

  5.  eukaryotic living cells (short-hand: Kpp or Ke).

  6.  multicellular organisms, asocial (short-hand: Kee or Ko).

  7.  social organisms [“social animals” & ‘social plants’] (Koo or Ks).

  8.  human, or super-social’, societies (short-hand: Kss or Kh).

 

For the first eight cosmological-ontological, dialectic of Nature categories, with both ‘self-hybrid’ and “merely-hybrid” categories included, we generate, by the given rules, the following dialectical categorial progression representation –


To begin this example, apply the five rules given above, beginning with our chosen starting short-hand category description, kr.


1.  Write  kr, describing, in that dialectical-ideographic short-hand, the category of pre-atomic, and, later, of sub-atomic particle units, as your chosen starting short-hand category description for presently-known cosmological objects.

 

2.  Write kr & krr, with krr describing a category each unit of which is a combination of “particles” units, i.e., “atoms units, which combine former, unbound “particles” units known as electrons, protons, and neutrons.

 

3.  Re-write kr & krr as kr & ka, with subscript a standing for, and ‘mnemonizing’, the category of “atoms units. 


4.  Write  

kr & ka& kar.  


Hybrid subscript ar suggests those known cosmological objects that convert some particle units, i.e., “Hydrogen ion” units, that is, proton particle units, into atom units, i.e., into Helium atomic nuclei units, by means of “stellar nucleosynthesis”.  Of course, stars also involve r in that they continually generate and emit photons, neutrinos, and charged particles.  Thus, you can replace subscript ar with s, for a category beginning with “first-generation stars” units.  Later generation star units also start with proton-electron plasma cores, but their core-surrounding outer layer consists of Helium units, but also, increasingly, of atomic species units higher than Helium, due to accumulating “metallization” from generations of “stellar nucleosynthesis”.  [Stars are macro-scopic objects.  There are also microscopic, proto-molecules that kar also describes, that catalyze and accelerate star formation].  The kar category is best grasped as a genus category, with potentially many distinct species categories included in it.  Replacing karwith just ks may leave non-explicit key species that figure significantly in later categories.  Your category ‘descriptors’ series now extends to 

 kr & ka& ks.

 

5.  Write    

kr & ka & ks& ksr.  


As ksr is also karr, since you replaced ar with s in the last step, and as you previously replaced subscript rr with subscript a, you can now rewrite ksr as kaa, and, using rule 5., you can interpret kaa as describing a category each of whose units is a unifying combination of multiple “atom” units, i.e., whose units are “molecule” units, km.  The short-hand “genus”-category described by kaa also describes other species of combinations of atoms, such as crystals and metals, but we see molecules as the principal species of the kaa genus.  Your series now describes our cosmos when it contained only four kinds of units: kr & ka & ks & km.


6.  Write  

kr & ka & ks & km & kmr.  

As kmr suggests combinations of molecule units with particle units, assign this short-hand category description as fitting mainly and initially for the impacts of particle units fluxes on the molecule units forming in interstellar “molecular clouds”, and the results of such [inter]actions, e.g., involving ultraviolet photon particles: molecule units’ photo-disintegrations.  Your series now describes our universe when it contained only objects fitting the following 5 category descriptions – kr & ka & ks & km & kmr.  We leave the 5th short-hand category description in 2-subscript form, since a single name for that category is not extant or widely familiar. The 2-subscript form is thus more mnemonic.

 

7.  Write 

 kr & ka & ks & km & kmr & kmrr.  


We previously replaced, in step 2, above, subscript rr with subscript a.  So, applying rule 5., replace kmrr with  kma. The latter genus-category short-hand describes, as one of its species, the, still ongoing, conversions/combinations of chemically-unbonded atom units into new, chemically-bonded, molecule units, inside interstellar molecular cloud units, as catalyzed or promoted by the molecule units already formed inside those “molecular cloud” units.  Recall that “molecular cloud” units must have had to start out as, i.e. – ‘molecule-less – ‘atomic cloud’ units.  So the later, mostly-molecular clouds still contain, and are also episodically replenished, e.g., by stars’ mass expulsions, and by molecules’ photo-dissociations, with fresh, chemically-un-bonded atoms.  Conversions of atom units into molecule units are thus ongoing within interstellar cloud units.  But genus-category description kma also describes the composition of a sub-species of the planet units species, for planets whose composition lacks particle-emitting heavy and radioactive atom units, such as Thorium, so that unbound “particle” units, subscript r, are not also part of their make-up.  It may be that many “ice giant” planets, such as Neptune and Uranus, are of this class.  So it may be best to leave this category’s short-hand description in 2-subscript form.  Your purely-qualitative cosmos model now sums up our cosmos when it contained only objects/units of one of the following six categories/kinds – 

kr & ka & ks & km & kmr & kma.

 

8.  Write  

 kr & ka & ks & km & kmr & kma & kmar.  


As we have previously interpreted subscript ar as subscript s, consistency with that earlier interpretation would lead us to replace subscript mar with the two-place subscript ms, describing the combinations, or interactions, between molecule units and “first-generation” star units.  This subscript can be interpreted as describing the conversion, into new, advancing, more-complex species of molecules, fostered or catalyzed by some of the molecules already produced in intra-galactic, interstellar “molecular/atomic clouds”, of the atoms of advancing, more-complex atomic species, created by, and initially inside, slowly ‘self-metallizing’ star units.  Includes supernova explosion’s particles’-impacts, producing high proton-count atoms, then available to bond with lighter atoms in molecular clouds. 

In short, subscript ms suggests the further ‘molecularization’ of the stars-produced, higher species – “metallic” species –  of atoms; of atomic species beyond Helium.  Subscript ms can also suggest the catalytic actions of certain kinds of molecule units on the formation of later-generation star units, e.g., now accompanied by planet units, made possible by, more “metallic”, atomic and molecular species.  The mar subscript also describes planets, especially “rocky” planets that have “particles”-emitting heavy, radioactive atoms, such as Thorium, in their cores.  More specifically, the short-hand category description, kms, can be grasped as describing the actions, by molecules, in the molecular clouds that precipitate “proplyds” [proto-planetary discs], that accelerate the transformation of those proplyds into stars [e.g., with orbiting planets] as the accumulating “metallization” of successive generation stars, and therefore also of the “molecular clouds” that they supply with higher atomic-number atoms, proceeds. 

However, the full short-hand category description, kmar, describes more than this.  It describes cooler stars, and even cooler portions of some hotter stars, cool enough for molecules to form and persist inside such stars.  It describes the composition of galaxies, and even of galactic clusters, galactic super-clusters, and super-cluster filaments, in their pre-biological stages.  In their, hypothesized, later, biologic stages, they become kpmar, kepmar, and so on. Better, then, that we keep this step’s new category description in its full, more general, 3-subscript form.  Your purely-qualitative cosmos content inventory now describes the universe when it contained only objects/units fitting the following seven short-hand category descriptions –

kr & ka & ks & km & kmr & kma & kmar.


9.  Write  

kr & ka & ks & km & kmr & kma & kmar & kmarr.  


As we have, previously, using rule 5., replaced subscript rr with subscript a, subscript marr is therefore replaceable by subscript maa.  As we have previously replaced subscript aa, using rule 5., with subscript m, subscript maa is thus replaceable by subscript mm.  Subscript mm, per rule 5., suggests a new category composed of a yet new type of units, beyond the molecule units’ category – units each of which is, typically, a unifying combination of myriad molecule units.  Thus, subscript mm can describe trans-molecular, prokaryotic cell units, e.g., bacterial cell units.  Such units are presently known to exist, so far, only “locally”, on our own home planet – on planet Earth.  If we hypothesize that such cell units will be found, in the future of human deep space observation and exploration, to be plentiful across our home galaxy, and across the cosmos, in galaxy after galaxy, then we are conjecturing the category of prokaryote units to be a cosmological category in its own right, not just a Terran category.  Your “purely”- qualitative cosmos history description now fits for the universe when it contained only objects that fit the following 8 short-hand category descriptions:

kr & ka & kar & km & kmr & kma & kmar & kp.

 

Further iterations, using rules 4. and 5., can reach to a total sequence of 128 ‘anded’ short-hand category descriptions, up to a final, 128th short-hand category description, that for “humanitys”, or of ‘human super-societies’ as its units, with its short-hand category description as kh. 

 

One might, of course, choose to speculate about what – possibly future-born – category might be signified, and, indeed, ‘pre-constructed’ symbolically, or “predicted”, by category description abbreviation khh.

 

 

 

 

 

 


For more information regarding these Seldonian insights, and to read and/or download, free of charge, PDFs and/or JPGs of Foundation books, other texts, and images, please see:

www.dialectics.info

and

https://independent.academia.edu/KarlSeldon

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For partially pictographical, ‘poster-ized’ visualizations of many of these Seldonian insightsspecimens of dialectical artas well as dialectically-illustrated books published by the F.E.D. Press, see:


https://www.etsy.com/shop/DialecticsMATH

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

¡ENJOY!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Regards,

 

 

Miguel Detonacciones,

Voting Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.];

Elected Member, F.E.D. General Council;

Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison;

Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.


 

 

 

 

 

 

YOU are invited to post your comments on this blog-entry below!