**CONTINUED FROM IMMEDIATELY-PREVIOUS BLOG ENTRY, #51**

**Part**

**II**.:

**Intimations of a faster**-

**than**-

**light Inter**-

**Stellar Drive**-- "Side-Stepping" the

**V**

**=**

**c**Singularity -- An

**F**.

**.**

__E__**. Hypothesis.**

__D__
[

**¿**A*"*Pathway from the**-**__Non__**Celeritarian**"*"*, through the**Meta-Phase"**__Tard__yonic*"*, to the**Meta-Phase"**__Lux__onic*"*of "Matter-Energy", or of "Energy-Matter", and back again**Meta-Phase"**__Tach__yonic**?**]
[

__Note__: as usual in this thread, I use visible-light-spectrum color-**to highlight categorial, or system,***ord*__inality____dialectical__**-- "***ord*__inalities__**ROY****G**.**BIV**"].
Dear Readers,

. . .

A little further "hyper-numerical" pattern recognition may lead us to some further clues as to what

Matter-energy of this

There is a "Tachyon Theory" that predicts the existence of "particles" of "imaginary mass", but that "Tachyon Theory" asserts that such "particles" must travel "backwards" in time, and, therefore, is not the same as the theory described here.

Indeed, the whole idea that, because approaching the speed of light is empirically associated with a relative "slowing down" of clocks/time, that "reaching" the speed of light must mean the "stoppage" of time/change, and that "exceeding" the speed of light must mean a speeding up, again, of time/change, but in a "negative" sense of time/change

This "Parmenidean hang-over" meme "wants" us to view time as really being like space, only more so, such that experiential, empirical time, change, dynamics, etc., are all merely human, sensuous delusions, and such that true reality is "statical", "changeless", "immutable", and "eternal".

Goedel's thought was deeply infected with this quasi-Parmenidean meme, leading him, for example, to interpret his "time-travel solution" to the Einstein Equations of General Relativity accordingly, viewing it as a kind of neo-Zenoan, neo-Parmenidean, <<

The initial concept of "

He thus allowed "a mere observationalist", Hubble, to "score the coup" of announcing to the world the world-historic discovery of the self-expanding nature of universal space[-

. . .

A little further "hyper-numerical" pattern recognition may lead us to some further clues as to what

**1/****(**__i__**+**__E__**)**might signify in a**sense, once we place in mind the following**__physical__**. Consider the following**__physical__information*"*of**-**__tri__**chotomy**"**categories:**__physical__**1**. Bodies of mass-energy, including "particles" of mass-energy, that characteristically exhibit Velocity magnitudes**V****<****c**, are characterized as being composed of*"*matter-energy, or of matter-energy in the**"**__Tard__yonic*"*state. Matter-energy which has "non-zero" [e.g.,**"**__Tard__yonic*"*] "rest mass" [as well as,**positive**"**, matter-energy that has***possibly**"*rest-mass"] -- including all of the "ordinary matter" that we experience -- is constituent of this category of**negative***"*matter-energy.**"**__Tard__yonic**2**. Bodies of mass-energy, including "particles" of mass-energy, that characteristically exhibit Velocity magnitudes**V**=**c**, are characterized as being composed of*"*, or "Light-like", matter-energy, or of matter-energy in a**"**__Lux__onic*"*state. Matter-energy that has "zero" rest mass, such as the "photons" that are defined to be the <<**"**__Lux__onic**>> of light-"wave" <<***monads***>>, are constituent of this category of***arithmoi**"*matter-energy.**"**__Lux__onic**3**. Bodies of mass-energy, including "particles" of mass-energy, that characteristically exhibit Velocity magnitudes**V****>****c**, if such are ever observed, are to be characterized as being composed of*"*matter-energy, or of matter-energy in a**"**__Tach__yonic*"*state.**"**__Tach__yonicMatter-energy of this

*"*category has not, at least not so far, been encountered experientially / experimentally, to my knowledge.**"**__Tach__yonicThere is a "Tachyon Theory" that predicts the existence of "particles" of "imaginary mass", but that "Tachyon Theory" asserts that such "particles" must travel "backwards" in time, and, therefore, is not the same as the theory described here.

Indeed, the whole idea that, because approaching the speed of light is empirically associated with a relative "slowing down" of clocks/time, that "reaching" the speed of light must mean the "stoppage" of time/change, and that "exceeding" the speed of light must mean a speeding up, again, of time/change, but in a "negative" sense of time/change

*, bespeaks a mis-apprehension of the very nature of actual "time", and a <<*__reversal__*mentalite**'*>> with profound and ancient -- Parmenidean -- dissonances, which still vitiate "modern" science and mathematics to this very day.This "Parmenidean hang-over" meme "wants" us to view time as really being like space, only more so, such that experiential, empirical time, change, dynamics, etc., are all merely human, sensuous delusions, and such that true reality is "statical", "changeless", "immutable", and "eternal".

Goedel's thought was deeply infected with this quasi-Parmenidean meme, leading him, for example, to interpret his "time-travel solution" to the Einstein Equations of General Relativity accordingly, viewing it as a kind of neo-Zenoan, neo-Parmenidean, <<

**>>***reductio ad absurdum*__denial__**, as well as to adopt a kind of "Mathematical Platonism" regarding mathematical [idea-]objects, regarding these objects, and the truths about them, as hailing from an "immutable"/"change-less", "transcendental", "immaterial", "eternal" and "eternally statical", domain, one akin to Plato's <<***of the very existence of*__time__**>> "causal heaven".***arithmoi eidetikoi*The initial concept of "

__space__*-*time", and the [**,**__x__**,**__y__**,**__z__**c**__i__**] four-vector formalism for that "time-**__t____space__*"*, worked out by Hermann Minkowski, one of Einstein's teachers, for the**Theory of Relativity, re-stimulated that meme in Einstein, and led Einstein to**__Special__**-- his rejection of the startling, but empirically correct,***what Einstein himself designated as his greatest scientific blunder***,***prediction***in the tensor equations -- in the system of ten "simultaneous"**__immanent__**partial differential equations -- that express the system of Einstein's**__nonlinear__**Theory of Relativity, the**__General__**of a spatially self-expanding universe of time/energy-matter/space, which led Einstein, in a panic, to superimpose a***prediction***upon those equations, by the value he chose for the "cosmological constant" that he then added to those equations.**__static__equilibriumHe thus allowed "a mere observationalist", Hubble, to "score the coup" of announcing to the world the world-historic discovery of the self-expanding nature of universal space[-

**], a "coup" which Einstein could have been the one to score, years earlier, simply by holding to the manifold integrity of his work, of his vast,**__time__*General**-*Relativistic, discovery, by proudly and publicly announcing the prediction of the universal*non**-*equilibrium that was**in his General-Relativistic equations.**__immanent__It is, of course, a deep irony of human, scientific history, and, perhaps, a manifestation of the "cunning of human history", that Einstein's "cosmological constant" is today being used to provide an approximate, empirical model of the option, regarding the self-expansion of the universe, that -- given the "Parmenidean over-hang" still vitiating modern, "mathematico-science" -- no "serious" physicist even considered, but yet the option that has now been discovered, empirically, to be actual.

The "serious" physicists considered a -- quasi-Parmenidean -- "steady state" universe, one that filled-in with new matter as space expanded, so as to maintain a constant density of matter.

The "serious" physicists considered an -- again, quasi-Parmenidean -- "net positive-curvature" universe, one that expanded, but ever-more slowly, until the expansion stopped, and then even reversed, into a universal contraction, eventually reproducing the

*"*dense and contracted state from which the previous expansion had begun, thus positing an "eternally cyclical" universe of expansion followed by contraction, followed by expansion followed by contraction again. Perhaps not Parmenidean enough for Parmenides, who favored

**infinitely**"**, but '[quasi-]Parmenidean enough for these "modern" physicists.**

__absolute__universal stasisThe "serious" physicists even considered a -- still quasi-Parmenidean -- "net negative curvature" universe, one that expanded "eternally", but ever-more slowly, never enough to stop expanding, let alone enough to reverse expansion, into contraction, in all finite time, but one which slowed/

**celerated its expansion "asymptotically" -- such that it would "reach" stoppage only "at"**

__de__**t**"

**=**" "

**oo**", and, in the "mean"-"time", grow only ever more rarefied in its mass-energy density.

**,**

*Wrong***, and**

*wrong***!**

*wrong again*
Parmenides, or even "quasi-Parmenides", has a

What the "serious" physicists

In short, and ironically, Einstein's "cosmological constant" -- conceived by Einstein for a quite opposite -- for a quasi-Parmenidean -- purpose, once appropriately re-valued, has come to supply an early approximation to an empirically accurate model of the

Empirical actuality seems to be

If "modern" scientists want a "philosophy", they had better start from Heraclitus!

All physical processes, regardless of their

Now, at this point in their argument,

The phase of

Raising, sufficiently, the

Further raising the

Further raising the

Next, they consider a possible [speculative] analogy, of the

They re-describe the trichotomy described above as that of the

Then they note, in the

That is,

So far, we have only seen that the

Well, "looky here" --

**track record as a guide to science!**__dismal__What the "serious" physicists

**considered -- but what expanded empirical observation has recently shown to be the actual -- is a --**__never____contra__*-*Parmenidean -- universal space that*self**-*.**expands at a**-__self__**accelerating****rate**In short, and ironically, Einstein's "cosmological constant" -- conceived by Einstein for a quite opposite -- for a quasi-Parmenidean -- purpose, once appropriately re-valued, has come to supply an early approximation to an empirically accurate model of the

*"***"**__dark____self__*-*of the universal -- and universally-**force**__self__*-*--**accelerating**__self__*-*of the cosmos!__expansion__Empirical actuality seems to be

*"screaming to be heard"*, trying to*"tell"*"modern" scientists -- if only they were listening -- that that actuality is**: far more***dynamical***-- and, indeed, far more***dynamical**"*; even**-**__meta__**dynamical**"*ever*__ontologically__self*-*-- '''than was ever dreamt of in your__revolution__izing**, Horatio'''!**__philosophy__If "modern" scientists want a "philosophy", they had better start from Heraclitus!

All physical processes, regardless of their

*"meta-phase"*, occur in "forward time", per these**F**.**.**__E__**. hypotheses.**__D__Now, at this point in their argument,

**F**.**.**__E__**. recalls the so-called**__D__*"*of ordinary matter, and their "phase transitions".**phases**"The phase of

*lowest**"temper*ature" is the*"*phase".**solid**Raising, sufficiently, the

*temper*ature of matter-energy that was in the*"*phase", to beyond its**solid***"***next higher**"*temper*ature threshold, "transitions" that matter-energy, "raising" it from the*"*phase", into the**solid***"*phase".**liquid**Further raising the

*temper*ature, of matter-energy that was in the*"*phase", to beyond its**liquid***"***next higher**"*temper*ature threshold, "transitions" that matter-energy, "raising" it further, from the*"*phase", into the**liquid***"*phase".**gaseous**Further raising the

*temper*ature, of matter-energy that was in the*"*phase", to beyond its**gaseous***"***next higher**"*temper*ature threshold, "transitions" that matter-energy, "raising" it further, from the*"*phase", into the**gaseous***"*phase".**plasma**Next, they consider a possible [speculative] analogy, of the

*temper*ature "phases" of the ordinary kind of matter, to the velocity/momentum "states" of ordinary, and of extraordinary, kinds of matter-energy.They re-describe the trichotomy described above as that of the

*"*, the**meta-phase"**__Tard__yonic*"*, and the**meta-phase"**__Lux__onic*"*of matter-energy, and suggest that there may be exotic "field processes", analogous to**meta-phase"**__Tach__yonic*"temper*ature rises", and "induce-able" by means of an appropriately-engineered "fields machine", that would induce*"meta-phase*transitions" in bodies of matter-energy, moving them between any one of these*"meta-phases"*and its two "neighboring" -- one on either "side" --*"meta-phases"*, with the associated,*meta-phase specific*velocity characteristics ensuing.Then they note, in the

**,***Einsteinian**special**-*, that the**relativistic momentum equation****V****<****c***"*is**meta-phase"**__Tard__yonic*"*ified" by__qual__**1/****, i.e., by**__E__**, that the**__E__**V**=**c***"*is**meta-phase"**__Lux__onic*"*ified" by__qual__**1/****(****+**__i____E__**)**, and that the**V****>****c***"*is**meta-phase"**__Tach__yonic*"*ified" by__qual__**1/****, i.e., by**__i__**-****, leading them to re-characterize**__i__*"*matter-energy as that of**meta-phase"**__Tard__yonic*"*mass-energy",**Epsilonic***"*matter-energy as**meta-phase"**__Lux__onic*"*mass-energy", or**meta-phase**__Mixed__*"*mass-energy", and**meta-phase**__Hybrid__*"*matter-energy as**meta-phase"**__Tach__yonic*"*mass-energy" [after "iota", the name for the Greek, ancestral version of the English letter "i"].**Iotic**That is,

*"*,**meta-phase"**__Tard__yonic**V****<****c**matter-energy is*"*,**Epsilonic**"*"*,**meta-phase"**__Tach__yonic**V****>****c**matter-energy is*"*, and these two**Iotic**"**"meet in the middle", or "mediate in the middle", and "mix", or "hybridize", so that***opposites**"*,**meta-phase"**__Lux__onic**V**=**c**matter-energy is__both__*"*and**Epsilonic**"*"*-- a "combination", or "hybrid", or "mixture", of the**Iotic**"**1/**__E__**and of the****1/**__i__*"*, and of their associated**ifiers"**__qual____physical__*:***ities**__qual__**1/****(****+**__i____E__**)**, or**1/****(****+**__E____i__**)**[the**and**__E__**hypernumber operators are**__i__*additively***commutative**, even though they are*multiplicatively*__anti__*-***commutative**].**¿**But, where do they get off asserting that the**V****<****c**values of the**,***Einsteinian**special**-*, involve a**relativistic momentum equation****1/**__E__*"*, and that the**ifier"**__qual__**V****>****c**values of that momentum equation involve a**1/**__i__*"***ifier"**__qual__**?**So far, we have only seen that the

**V**=**c**values of that momentum equation involve a**1/****(****+**__i____E__**)***"*.**ifier"**__qual__Well, "looky here" --

**1**. For bodies of mass-energy residing/moving "in" the*"*,**meta-phase"**__Tard__yonic**V <****c**, the argument -- the difference -- inside the**ator-resident**__denomin__*function is always a*__square-root__*positive*number, "greater than"**0**, or "to the right of" the origin-"point", and labeled by "**0**", on the "**eal" number-line, because**__R__**1**[or, e.g.,**(****c****^2)/(****c****^2)**], the "minuend" therein, is always greater than its "subtrahend" --**(**

**V**

**^2)/(c^2)**

-- precisely because

Now, given that a "factor" of

**V <****c**.Now, given that a "factor" of

**1**can always be "factored out" of a*positive*"**eal" number difference, such as --**__R__**( 1**

**-**

**(V^2)/(**

**c**

**^2) )**

-- or equivalently, such as --

**((**

**c**

**^2)/(**

**c**

**^2)**

**-**

**(V^2)/(**

**c**

**^2) )**

-- we can equivalently rewrite this Momentum equation, for

-- and, taking the

-- and since, as we have noted above,

Now notice that we can go on in this way, repeatedly factoring

**V <****c**, as --**p(V)**=**MV/( ( (1)( 1****-****(V^2)/(****c****^2) ) )^(1/2) )**-- and, taking the

*of that*__square-root__**(1)**factor,**( (1)^(1/2) )**, to be equal to**, we then obtain --**__E__**p(V)**=**MV/(****x**__E__**( ( 1****-****(V^2)/(****c****^2) )^(1/2) ) )**-- and since, as we have noted above,

**+****=**__E____E__**/1****=****, the**__E__**in the**__E__**ator can "rise up" to become, equivalently,**__denomin__**in the**__E__**tor --**__numera__**p(V)**=__E__**MV/( 1****-****(V^2)/(****c****^2) )^(1/2) )**.__F____.__:**.***E***. conclusion***D**"*matter-energy is**"**__Tard__yonic*"*ified" by__qual__**in the**__E__**tor, or, equivalently, by**__numera__**in the**__E__**ator, or by**__denomin__**1/****=**__E____E__**/1**overall, and the*"*of matter-energy is therefore also the "**meta-phase"**__Tard__yonic**psilonic**__E__*meta-phase"*of matter energy,**these***if***ifiable, "convolute", arithmetical**__quant__*"*ifiers" do turn out to have__qual____qual__itative**significance.**__physical__Now notice that we can go on in this way, repeatedly factoring

**1**, out of the*"positive"*--**( 1**

**-**

**(V^2)/(**

**c**

**^2) )**

-- argument of the

If we do so, we obtain the following "cycle" of alternating, "oscillating",

*function --*__square-root__**( 1****-****(V^2)/(****c****^2) )^(1/2) )**.If we do so, we obtain the following "cycle" of alternating, "oscillating",

*"*ification" of__qual__**p(V)**, ... by**r**

__=__

**1**, then by

**=**

__E__

**((1)^(1/2))**, then by

**r**again, then by

**again, then by**

__E__**r**again, . . ., a "cycle", or "oscillation", which, if these arithmetical

*"*ifiers"

__qual__**turn out to have**

__do__**significance, oscillates with a "frequency" which is completely indeterminate from the rest of the equation, and which is completely independent of the**

__physical__**t**argument in

**P**=

**p( V )**=

**p( v(t) )**, thus suggesting an "oscillation of

**ities" -- an oscillation back-and-forth, between two related**

__qual__**ities, that of the**

__qual__**"arithmetical**

__E__**ifier", and that of the**

__qual__**r**"arithmetical

**ifier", and one reminiscent of the de Broglie "matter-waves" -- one that is intrinsic to matter-energy of, or "in", the**

__qual__*"*--

**meta-phase"**__Tard__yonic**p(V)**=

__E__**MV/( 1**

**-**

**(V^2)/(**

**c**

**^2) )^(1/2) )**=

__E__**MV/( ( (1)( 1**

**-**

**(V^2)/(**

**c**

**^2) ) )^(1/2) )**=

__E__**MV/(**

**x**

__E__**( ( 1**

**-**

**(V^2)/(**

**c**

**^2) )^(1/2) ) )**=

__EE__**MV/( 1**

**-**

**(V^2)/(**

**c**

**^2) )^(1/2) )**=

**1MV/( 1**

**-**

**(V^2)/(**

**c**

**^2) )^(1/2) )**=

**MV/( ( (1)( 1**

**-**

**(V^2)/(**

**c**

**^2) ) )^(1/2) )**=

**MV/(**

__E__**x**

**( ( 1**

**-**

**(V^2)/(**

**c**

**^2) )^(1/2) ) )**=

__E__**MV/( 1**

**-**

**(V^2)/(**

**c**

**^2) )^(1/2) )**=

**. . .**.

**3**. For bodies of mass-energy residing/moving "in" the

*"*,

**meta-phase"**__Tach__yonic**V >**

**c**, so that the argument -- the difference -- inside the

**ator-resident**

__denomin__*function is always a*

__square-root__*negative*number, "less than"

**0**, or "to the left of" the origin-"point", labeled "

**0**", on the "

**eal" number-line, because**

__R__**1**[or, e.g.,

**(**

**c**

**^2)/(**

**c**

**^2)**], the "minuend" therein, is always less than its "subtrahend" --

**( (**

**c**+

**delta**-

**c**

**)^2 )/(**

**c**

**^2)**

-- a fraction which is always greater than

**1**, because**(****c**+**delta**-**c****)**is**>****c**, i.e., precisely because --**(**

**c**+

**delta**-

**c**

**)**=

**V >**

**c**.

Now, given that a "factor" of

**-**

**1**can be "factored out" of a

*"negative"*"

**eal" number difference, such as --**

__R__**( 1**

**-**

**((**

**c**+

**delta**-

**c**

**)^2)/(**

**c**

**^2) )**

-- or equivalently, such as --

--

**( (****c****^2)/(****c****^2)****-****((****c**+**delta**-**c****)^2)/(****c****^2) )**--

*leaving a "positive" version of the formerly "negative" value of that difference*, we can equivalently rewrite this Momentum equation, for**V >****c**, as --**p((****c**+**delta**-**c****))**=**(M**x

**(**

**c**+

**delta**-

**c**

**))/( (**

**-**

**1)(**

**-**

**1**+

**((**

**c**+

**delta**-

**c**

**)^2)/(**

**c**

**^2) )^(1/2) )**

-- and, taking the

*of that*

__square-root__**(**

**-**

**1)**factor,

**( (**

**-**

**1)^(1/2) )**, to be equal to

**, we then obtain --**

__i__**p((**

**c**+

**delta**-

**c**

**))**=

**(M**x

**(**

**c**+

**delta**-

**c**

**))/(**

__i__**x**

**( (**

**-**

**1**+

**( (**

**c**+

**delta**-

**c**

**)^2 )/(**

**c**

**^2) )^(1/2) )**

-- and since, as we have noted above,

**1/**

**=**

__i__**-**

**, the**

__i__**+**

**in the denominator can "rise up" to become, equivalently,**

__i__**-**

**in the numerator --**

__i__**p((**

**c**+

**delta**-

**c**

**))**=

**-**

__i__**MV/( (**

**-**

**1**+

**(V^2)/(**

**c**

**^2) )^(1/2) )**.

__F____.__:

**.***E***. conclusion***D**"*matter-energy is

**"**__Tach__yonic*"*ified" by

__qual__**-**

**in the**

__i__**ator, or by**

__numer__**in the**

__i__**ator, or by**

__denomin__**+1/**

**overall, and the**

__i__*"*of matter-energy is therefore also the

**meta-phase"**__Tach__yonic*"*meta-phase" of matter energy,

**Iotic****these**

*if***ifiable, "convolute", arithmetical**

__quant__*"*ifiers" have

__qual__

__qual__itative**significance.**

__physical__Note that there is, for this "meta-phase", no equivalent "oscillation" between the

**+1/**

**and the**

__i__**r**qualifiers, because the "factoring out" of the

**-**

**1**"factor" from the difference argument of the "denominated"

*function leaves the remaining, other "factor" of that argument "negated" by the factor of*

__square-root__**-**

**1**, and thus turned into a

*"positive"*value.

One could thus "factor out" a "factor" of

**((**+

**1)^(1/2))**=

**from the remaining,**

__E__*"positive"*, argument-factor, thereby obtaining an indeterminate oscillation, back-and-forth between a

*"*ifier" of

__qual__**-**

**in the**

__i__**ator, and a**

__numer__*"*ifier" of

__qual__**-**

__E__**=**

__i__**+**

__i__**in the**

__E__**ator, for the**

__numer__*"*, or

**"**__Tach__yonic*"*,

**Iotic**"*"meta-phase"*of matter-energy, again,

**these**

*if***ifiable, "convolute", arithmetical**

__quant__*"*ifiers" have

__qual__

__qual__itative**significance.**

__physical__Now, the core of

**F**.

**.**

__E__**. 's hypothesis regarding this possibility for an "inter-stellar drive" hereby is their speculation that there may exist a**

__D__*"*, or

**-**__non__**"**__celer__itarian*"*, "field-state-based" pathway -- a pathway that is

**-**__non__**velocitarian**"**by way of**

__not__*"*ity", by way of "ac

__celer__**ation", or by way of increasing velocity**

__celer__**, "propulsively", for an initially**

*directly**"*body of matter-energy, to pass from --

**"**__Tard__yonic
[

**V <****c****]**
-- through --

[

**V**=**c****]**
-- to --

[

**V >****c**].That is, increasing velocity would not be the

*"*of a starship's transition from the "

**cause**"

__Tard__yonic*meta-phase"*, through the

*"*, [in]to the

**meta-phase"**__Lux__onic*"*.

**metaphase"**__Tach__yonicOn the contrary, the action of the starship's "engine", by manipulating "exotic force-fields", in changing the starship's own "field-state", would be the

*"*of these successive

**cause**"*"meta-phase*transitions".

The "quantum jump-like" increases in the velocity of the starship, from

*"*, through

**-luminal velocities"**__sub__*"*, to

**velocities"**__luminal__*"*, would be the

**-luminal velocities"**__super__*"*of that

**effect**"*"*.

**cause**"That is, this

*"*pathway" would "translate" a body of

**-**__non__**velocitarian***"*matter-energy -- say a starship, and its contents -- by way of a "field machine" that would "heat it up" passing beyond the critical point where the

**meta-phase"**__Tard__yonic*"meta-phase*transition", from the

*"*, to the

**meta-phase"**__Tard__yonic*"*, is breached, so that the spatial translation velocity of the

**meta-phase"**__Lux__onic__b__ody/starship would "automatically" transit, or "jump", to

**V**

**b**

**>**

**c**, in the "vector direction" in which that

__b__ody/starship was already traveling, as that "heat-up" threshold was crossed.

Next, that

__b__ody's/

__s__tarship's in-board "field machine" would further "heat up" that

__b__ody/

__s__tarship, passing beyond the critical point where the

*"meta-phase*transition", from the

*"*, to the

**meta-phase"**__Lux__onic*"*, is breached, so that the spatial translation velocity of the

**meta-phase"**__Tach__yonic__b__ody/

__s__tarship would "automatically" transit, or "jump", to

**V**

**b**

**>**

**c**, or

**V**

**s**

**>**

**c**, in the "vector direction" in which that

__b__ody/

__s__tarship was already traveling, as that "heat-up" threshold was crossed.

The starship would "rest" in the

*"*, in, e.g., transiting between two mutually "distant" stellar/planetary systems, for the main duration of its voyage.

**meta-phase"**__Tach__yonicWhen the starship achieved sufficient proximity to its destination stellar/planetary system, it would begin to "down-shift", reversing its previous

*"meta-phases*progression", as it was "cooled down" by its in-board "field machine", first transitioning from the

*"*back to the

**meta-phase"**__Tach__yonic*"*, and then from the

**meta-phase"**__Lux__onic*"*back to the

**meta-phase"**__Lux__onic*"*, which is the

**meta-phase"**__Tard__yonic*"meta-phase"*that it would "occupy" upon landing, e.g., on the surface of one of the planets in its destination stellar/planetary system.

The "engine" of such an "inter-stellar drive", based upon the foregoing hypothetical principles --

**those principles hypotheses turn out to be**

__if__**significant, and**

__physically__**validated -- would be a "exotic fields generation machine", capable, ultimately, of generating a**

__empirically__*"*

**tunable****ity", or a**

__celer__*"*velocitation", in the

**tunable***"*, or

**meta-phase"**__Tach__yonic*"*, i.e., one

**Iotic**meta-phase"*"*though a whole "continuum" of "

**tunable**"**s**uperluminal" velocity "factors",

**s**in

**R**+, such that

**s > 1**, and --

**V**

**s**

**=**

**s**

**c**

**>**

**c**

-- where --

**c**+

**delta**-

**c**=

**c**+

**(s**

**-**

**1)**

**c**=

**s**

**c**

-- so that --

**delta**-

**c**=

**(s**

**-**

**1)**

**c**.

One must quickly inquire, at this point, as to whether or not this "engine" -- the "field-generation machine" itself, that would supposedly induce these

*"meta-phase*transitions" -- could survive its own "transitions" -- let alone the starship that houses it as a whole; let alone the human passengers, and the cargo, of that starship.

There are many questions to be asked -- and many

**experiments to be performed -- in the pursuit of the question as to whether or not such an inter-stellar drive could become "real" -- and practical.**

__physical__We will leave off of those considerations for now, for the purposes of this blog entry, and, in the next blog entry of this sub-series, turn to validating the

*"hypernumber computations"*upon which the

**F**.

**.**

__E__**. inter-stellar drive hypotheses are based.**

__D__We will then, finally, consider whether or not the results of this

*"hypernumber*[re-]

**ification" of**

__qual__

*the Einsteinian special**-*, are in agreement with the results of

**relativistic momentum equation****F**.

**.**

__E__**.'s canonical**

__D__*"*,

__dialectical__

*metrical*

*meta**-*re-

**number****ification" of singularity-prone, "purely-**

__qual__**itative" [and usually**

__quant__**] differential equations, using the "metrical**

__nonlinear__**ifiers", or "dimensional**

__qual__**ifiers" -- i.e., the "metrical**

__qual__**/<<**

*units***>>", or the "dimensional**

*monads***/<<**

*units***>> -- of**

*monads***F**.

**.**

__E__**.'s "Mu" --**

__D__

__R__

__q__**/**

**M**

**Q**

**N**

__=__

__R__

__q__**/**

**M**

**U**

-- system of

**.**__dialectical__arithmetic
Regards,

Miguel

**TO BE CONTINUED NEXT POST**

## No comments:

## Post a Comment