F.E.D. Dialectics: “Cosmological Inflation” and ‘Contra-Occamian Inflation’.

Thursday, March 23, 2023

“Cosmological Inflation” and ‘Contra-Occamian Inflation’.

“Cosmological Inflation” and

‘Contra-Occamian Inflation’.

Dear Reader,

In his 2019 book Einstein’s Monsters: The Life and Times of Black Holes, Chris Impey writes [p. 149] –

“There’s some observational support for [M.D.: the hypothesis of early cosmological ]inflation, but still no good theory for what caused it.”

But, suppose that, rather than positing, e.g., a so-far entirely imaginary “inflaton field”, we give our speculations a little shave with Occam’s razor?

Suppose that we consider that the so-called “Dark Energy”, which names the still-unknown-in-detail cause of the presently-observed acceleration of the rate of expansion of the ‘‘‘radius’’’ and ‘‘‘volume’’’ of our observable-universe, was also the cause of the early rapid expansion of the ‘‘‘size’’’ of our universe.

What if “Dark Energy” is such that, while unopposed by the “gravity” of, especially, so-called “Dark Matter”, in the very early universe, before any “Dark Matter” yet existed, it drives an accelerating rate of universe ‘“radius”’ expansion that by far exceeds the speed of light, but that does eventually exceed a finite limiting rate, and that the breaching of that rate limit in fact precipitates “Dark Matter” itself, as a form of “damaged space” – damaged by that very excess in the rate of universe expansion. Suppose further that this irruption of “Dark Matter” leads later to a first birth of “normal”, ‘Bright Matter’.

Suppose that the “gravity” of “Dark Matter” [and of ‘Bright Matter’] initially decelerates that “Dark Energy”-driven universe expansion rate.

However, if the “energy-density” of “Dark Energy” remains constant in each increment of new space that it adds to the universe, but gravitating “Dark Matter” and ‘Bright Matter’ are progressively diluted by each such increment, then suppose that the accelerated universe expansion therefore eventually resumes, because the gravitating mass becomes insufficient to restrain it from so re-accelerating, in a way similar to the way in which it accelerated in the “inflationary” beginning.

If so, then we might conjecture that, eventually, the accelerating rate of this ‘second accelerated expansion’ of the universe might eventually reach a rate which again exceeds the finite limit of the universe expansion rate, beyond which a new infusion – or ‘efusion’ – of/into the universe, of a new increment of “Dark Matter”, leading later also to a second birth of another increment of ‘Bright Matter’, will eventually ensue.

If so, then we have a cosmological hypothesis of expanding self-regeneration of universe “free energy”, one that escapes the mechanistic, linear-extrapolative obsessions with “Entropic Doom”, with “Big Crunches” or “Big Rips”, etc., that have so far imprisoned and exhausted the hypothesizing imaginations of main stream physicists.

For ongoing updates regarding F.E.D. content, please see --

www.dialectics.info .

For F.E.D. books, and for partially pictographical, ‘poster-ized’ visualizations of many of our hypotheses -- specimens of ‘dialectical art’ -- see: