The MEANING of ‘Subscript Duality’ in the Seldonian First Algebra for Dialectics. -- Part 6: Quoting Seldon Series.

 

The MEANING of ‘Subscript Duality’ in the Seldonian First Algebra for Dialectics.

 

-- Part 6: Quoting Seldon Series.

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Reader,

 

 

 

It is my pleasure, and my honor, as an elected member of the Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.] General Council, and as a voting member of F.E.D., to share, with you, from time to time, as they are approved for public release, by the F.E.D. General Council, key excerpts from the internal writings, and from the internal sayings, of our co-founder, Karl Seldon.

 

This sixth release of this new such series is posted below [Some E.D. standard edits have been applied, in the version presented below, by the editors of the F.E.D. Special Council for the Encyclopedia, to the direct transcript of our co-founder’s discourse].

 

In this 6th installment, Seldon discusses the meaning, and the perhaps unexpected meaningfulness, of repeated-subscript, ‘self-hybrid’ dialectical-algebraic category-symbols in the Encyclopedia Dialectica first algebra for dialectics.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Seldon –

 

“In our _NQ arithmetic/algebra for dialectical modeling, the doubling, the repetition, the repeated-occurrence of a subscripted category-quality-connoting character – the duality of the connotational subscript of an _NQ symbol representing an ontological category, for either a category-symbol of the ‘synchronic context’ [e.g., for systematic dialectics], or of the ‘diachronic context’ [e.g., for historical dialectics], signifies, systematically, the key element of dialectical ‘qualo-fractal’ elevation, and, historically, the key driver of dialectical progression: ‘the genesis of the antithesis ontos’, or of ‘the <<arithmos>> of contra-category <<monads>>’.”

 

“It signifies the ‘self-meta-<<monad>>-ization’ of [some of] those <<monads>> that constitute[d] the ontic <<arithmos>> -- the ontological category – which that subscript, in its ‘undoubled’, singular occurrence, connotes.”

 

“It signifies the ‘self-subsumption’ and ‘self-internalization’ -- the combined, ‘self-pro-motion’-cum-self-de-motion’ [Hegel] -- of that ontic <<arithmos>> and of the <<monads>> that the single subscript connotes.”

 

“For the ‘diachronic context’, it signifies the resulting “primitive accumulation”/“original accumulation” [Marx] of the <<monads>> of its successor ‘self-hybrid’ <<arithmos>>.” 

 

“For the ‘synchronic context’, the double-subscript algebraic unknown-to-be-solved-for, signifies an already existing accumulation of the <<monads>> of a ‘self-hybrid category’ <<arithmos>>, that, if solvable, is present in the present that the systematic dialectic presents.”

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For more information regarding these Seldonian insights, please see --

 

www.dialectics.info

 

 

 

 

 

For partially pictographical, ‘poster-ized’ visualizations of many of these Seldonian insights -- specimens of ‘dialectical art’ – as well as dialectically-illustrated books by the F.E.D. Press, see --

https://www.etsy.com/shop/DialecticsMATH

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

¡ENJOY!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Regards,

 

 

Miguel Detonacciones,

 

Voting Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.];

Elected Member, F.E.D. General Council;

Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison;

Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.

 

 

 

 

YOU are invited to post your comments on this blog-entry below!