It is my pleasure to share with you, from time to time, selections from the seminal
sayings, shared by him among we of F.E.D.,
by our co-founder, Karl Seldon [main site: www.dialectics.info].
Such is the following --
". . . Dialectic is also «aufheben», in its movement from the constituents of an ‘«arché»-category’ to that again, plus those of a ‘contra-category’ of that ‘«arché»-category’.
It is so not just in its movement from the
resulting opposition/sum of
those two categories
to those again plus/versus their,
and its, ‘uni-category’.
Dialectic is
that very alternation, of «auto-aufheben» operations, net-yielding ‘contra-categories’,
followed by «allo-aufheben» operations, net-yielding ‘uni-categories’,
both partial and full, but with more and more ‘merely-hybrid’, ‘partial synthesis’ categories generated with
every passing step or epoch of the dialectical categorial progression.
In the dyadic function model, only one new, full ‘auto-hybrid’, «auto-aufheben» ‘contra-category’
is generated in each new step or epoch, together with just one new, full ‘uni-category’.
The «auto-aufheben» operation represents, via the self-interaction of the «arché»-category, the interaction, and ‘self-hybridization’, of its constituents.
The new, higher, opposing constituents of the resulting contra-category are, typically, «aufheben» transformations by elevation-preservation, of constituents of the «arché»-category, in the form of 'meta-constituent-izations' of constituents of the «arché»-category.
The «allo-aufheben» operation represents, via the interaction of the contra-category and/with its «arché»-category, the interaction, and mutual hybridization, of the mutually disparate constituents represented by the one category vis-a-vis the/its other.
The «auto-aufheben» operation represents, via the self-interaction of the «arché»-category, the interaction, and ‘self-hybridization’, of its constituents.
The new, higher, opposing constituents of the resulting contra-category are, typically, «aufheben» transformations by elevation-preservation, of constituents of the «arché»-category, in the form of 'meta-constituent-izations' of constituents of the «arché»-category.
The «allo-aufheben» operation represents, via the interaction of the contra-category and/with its «arché»-category, the interaction, and mutual hybridization, of the mutually disparate constituents represented by the one category vis-a-vis the/its other.
It is the breaking out of each last-achieved full ‘uni-category’ into ‘intra-duality’ again, as constituting, in effect, a new, higher ‘«arché»-category all over again, hence one breaking out into «auto-aufheben» irruption into «arché»-category plus/versus contra-category all over again, but at a higher level, i.e., forming a higher ‘qualo-fractal scale’, than [did] that(those) of the previous outbreak(s) . . ."
Regards,
Miguel
No comments:
Post a Comment