Part 09: The Seldon Dialogues, Excerpts --
human
“self-consciousness”
as an advanced
«species» of ‘self-reflexivity’/‘self-refluxivity’.
Dear Reader,
FYI --
It is my pleasure, and my
honor, as an Officer of the Foundation
Encyclopedia
Dialectica [F.E.D.]
Office of Public Liaison, to share with you, from time to time, as they are approved
for public release by the F.E.D. General Council, key
excerpts from the internal writings, and sayings, of our
co-founder, Karl Seldon.
The ninth such release in this new series is pasted in
below [Some E.D. standard edits have been applied, in the version presented below, to the direct
transcript of our co-founder’s discourse].
ENJOY!
Regards,
Miguel Detonacciones,
Member, Foundation Encyclopedia
Dialectica [F.E.D.],
Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.
“... Many of our
readers wonder how, on the one hand, we “see only a single
science, the science of history” [Marx and
Engels, The German Ideology.], and, on the other
hand, include,
in natural history, also human history -- i.e., include ‘psych[e]ohistory’, the [later] parts of natural history, involving «arithmoi» of «monads» that contain psyches; «monads» that exhibit “self-consciousness”.”
“Some also wonder what is all this talk about ‘‘‘self-reflexive functions’’’, and ‘self-refluxive functions’.”
“Well, it all has to do with the fact that human,
‘‘‘proprioceptive’’’, ‘self-perceiving’, ‘self-biased totality-perceiving’,
‘self-cognizing’ consciousness
is an advanced
special case, and kind, of high-frequency,
continual ‘‘‘self-reflexivity’’’ and ‘‘‘self-refluxivity’’’.”
“As Bertrand Russell would have it, in terms of the logical
and set-theoretical paradoxes that, for him, were to be suppressed [but which we see as rudimentary formal
models immanently-critically
pointing to ‘logical
nonlinearity’, i.e., to dialectic, and to human self-consciousness]:
“In all
of the above contradictions (which are merely selections from an indefinite
number) there is a common characteristic, which we may describe as
self-reference or reflexiveness.” [Bertrand
Russell, Alfred North Whitehead, Prinicpia Mathematica, vol.
I, Merchant Books, LaVergne, TN, 2010, p. 64.].”
“Elsewhere, Russell noted that the “propositional function”
expressing, in the Principia Mathematica formalism, the
famous “Russell Paradox”, which crashed Frege’s system -- the proposition about
the set of all sets which are not members of themselves [Is it or isn’t it a member of itself?] -- is of a peculiar, “quadratic”, kind,
instead of being of the ordinary, first degree, or “linear”, kind.”
“That is, this “paradoxical”, or “contradictory” propositional
function is of second
degree -- it
is a nonlinear logical function. ...”
No comments:
Post a Comment