Categorial Progression Progress: That in which the Progress of a Dialectical Categorial Progression Consists -- Part 08: ‘Seldonisms’
Series.
Dear Reader,
It
is my pleasure,
and my honor, as an officer of the Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.] Office of Public Liaison, and as a voting member of F.E.D.,
to share, with
you, from
time to time, as
they
are approved
for public release by
the F.E.D.
General Council, key
excerpts
from the internal writings, and from the internal sayings, of our co-founder,
Karl Seldon.
The eighth
release in this new such series is posted below [Some E.D. standard edits have been applied, in the version presented below, by the editors of
the F.E.D. Special Council for the Encyclopedia, to the
direct transcript of our co-founder’s discourse].
In this 8th installment, Seldon describes that in
which the progress of a dialectical categorial progression consists.
Seldon --
“Per our method, a dialectical categorial
progression is that which is generated by the self-[re-]iterated
self-involution of the «arché» ‘categorogram’ of a given Domain, within
the known cosmos, or for the known cosmos as a whole as that Domain [i.e., ‘The
[singular] Dialectic of Nature’], when the so-generated,
combinatorically possible, initially algebraic-unknown symbol-formations can be
defined, by the modeler, i.e., assigned to known categories of distinct kinds
of units -- to known ontology; to known «arithmoi» of «monads» -- inhering in
that Domain.”
“Such a categorial progression
consists of an ordered ‘ontological categorial analysis’ of the ontological
contents of that Domain, expressed as a ‘consecuum-cumulum’ series of
solved/defined ‘category-symbols’, exhibiting consecutively-increasing
determinateness, consecutively-increasing complexity, consecutively-increasing
thought-concreteness, up until the ultimate extant category of the given Domain
is reached, after a finite count of ‘category-symbols’ has been generated
and defined/solved.”
“Such a non-amalgamative
‘‘‘sum’’’ or “series” of ‘category-symbols’ consists of a single ideographic ‘archeogram’ symbol, representing the «arché»
category of the Domain, followed by an alternating series of [[partial
and] full] ideographic ‘contragrams’
and [partial and full] ideographic ‘unigrams’.”
“The ‘‘‘progress’’’ of such a
dialectical categorial progression, whether systematic/~synchronic, or historical/macro-diachronic...,
consists in the movement/ontological growth/ontological expansion, modeled via
the consecutive escalation in value of the whole-number independent
variable involution parameter, that counts the successive, stage-wise expansion
-- whether the step-wise s or the
epoch-wise tau -- of the model
of that progression, from an «arché»-category/kind-«arithmos»
that explicitly encompasses, perhaps, only a small part of the «monads»
that inhere in the given Domain that is to be ontologically
modeled/comprehended/explained, expanding toward, and, finally, expanding
to, a ‘qualitative superposition’/“non-amalgamative sum” of
qualities/‘category-symbols’/kind-«arithmoi» that, as defined/solved by
the modeler, together encompass all of the ‘essence-ial’ «monads» that
are implicitly represented by this categorial partitioning of the Domain’s ontological
«arithmoi», i.e., that inhere in that Domain, including the exceptional,
“tail of the distribution” «monads», also ‘essence-ial’ rather than
‘‘‘accidental’’’ to that Domain.”
For more
information regarding these
Seldonian insights, please see --
For partially pictographical, ‘poster-ized’ visualizations of many of these Seldonian insights -- specimens of ‘dialectical art’ -- see:
¡ENJOY!
Regards,
Miguel
Detonacciones,
Voting Member, Foundation Encyclopedia
Dialectica [F.E.D.],
Participant, F.E.D.
Special Council for Public Liaison,
Officer, F.E.D.
Office of Public Liaison.
No comments:
Post a Comment