The Most Difficult Dialectic.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The

 

Most

 

Difficult

 

Dialectic.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

GLOBAL STRATEGIC HYPOTHESES.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Reader,

 

 

The most difficult dialectic, in terms of the human production  of the ‘uni-category’, the ‘dialectic synthesis category’ of that dialectic’s ‘categorial antithesis’ is the dialectic of the political ideologies of ‘Rightisms’ versus ‘Leftisms’ within the majority class.

 

This “divide-and-conquer” ideological division, within the majority class – of the majority class divided against itself – is the most powerful, most effective asset of rule that the ‘Rocke-Nazi’ ruling faction of the capitalist ruling class wields against the majority class.

 

As long as the ‘Rocke-Nazis’, their global mass media, and their ‘ideology engineering’ institutions in general, have we of the majority class “at one another’s throats”, fighting among ourselves over “Left versus Right” ideologies, we will never be able to mount a sustained defense, let alone an electoral overthrow, against the horrific plans, for us, of the ‘Rocke-Nazi’ ruling faction, despite the fact that it is now, perhaps only transiently, under internecine attack by the nascent ‘Trump Faction’ in the USA, and by other, related rising electoral movements in the UK, France, Germany, and elsewhere. 

 

The majority class cannot become a class-for-itself, acting concertedly in its own interest, and in its own right, until it solves, within itself, the ‘Left-versus-Right’ antithesis.

 

The ‘Rocke-Nazi’ faction, and the nascent ‘Trump Faction’, of the capitalist ruling class, have achieved “class-for-itself” self-consciousness, and concerted action as such – long-since in the case of the ‘Rocke-Nazi’ faction.

 

The ‘Rocke-Nazi’ faction, in their utter contempt for the ability to resist of the majority class – a contempt that has now been upstaged by the electoral revolt, and the electoral successes, of the ‘Trump Faction’, and of the related factions in other nations – see the majority class as the enemy of their continued power to rule, and plan to politically dis-empower, then to impoverish, and then, ultimately, to exterminate most of the majority class.  Their contempt had once led them, in the past, even to the point of stating their “exterminationist”  goals publicly, much to their present chagrin –

Capitalism's Fatal Flaw, and the Way Forward: 'Rocke-Nazi' Plutocracy Publicly Proclaims Planned Planetary Population Plummeting. GLOBAL STRATEGIC HYPOTHESES.   

 

The majority class remains a “class-in-itself”, a class for its other, the capitalist ruling class, but not yet for-itself.  With the exception of, in the USA, an “extreme” minority of the MAGA movement, and of some tiny remnants of the anti-Leninist Marxian movement, and of a few other fragments, the majority of the majority class have not yet realized the reality of the capitalist ruling class rule over them, and of their mortal peril at the hands of the plans of the ‘Rocke-Nazi’ faction of that capitalist ruling class.

 

To win in this fight against the, ‘Rocke-Nazi’, mortal enemy,   of which most of the majority class are, as yet, not even aware, the majority class must develop a new, unified worldview – of course admitting to internal variation and ongoing debate – that transcends the “left versus right” divide, and that also conceives and implements a positive program for the realization of what we call ‘Political-ECONOMIC DEMOCRACY’, whatever name the majority class may give to it in its fruition.

 

Nonetheless, there are, emerging lately, the first “Spring buds” of a theoretical solution, prelude to a practical solution, to the ideological antithesis of ‘Rightisms versus Leftisms’.  This emergence is most visible, to us, at the moment, in Europe.  Last year, for example, the prolific author Alain de Benoist published a book entitled “The Populist Moment: The End of Right vs. Left”.

 

This book is introduced, on its back cover, as follows –

“Populism” is what democracy is called when the people vote for the “wrong” things, like Brexit or Donald Trump or Bernie Sanders.  Since 2015, populisms of both the Right and the Left have been challenging Western liberal democratic “elites”.  Thus we are living in “the populist moment”.  But what does “populism” mean, and where is it likely to take us?

In The Populist Moment: The End of Right vs. Left, Alain de Benoist argues that populism is not a political ideology like Marxism or liberalism.  Nor can it be fundamentally understood in terms of the distinction between Right and Left.  Instead, populism is a confrontation between “the people” and political “elites” that have become estranged from or hostile to the people.  At the core of populism is the demand that governments actually reflect the interests and identities of the people they are supposed to serve.

The Populist Moment is a unique contribution to contemporary debates on populism.  Scholarly treatments of populism tend to be hostile, while friendly treatments tend to be naïve.  Benoist, however, combines down-to-earth populist sympathies with high-level debates in political theory…

– and the translator of this book, from French into English, writes about it as follows –

“Alain de Benoist is an author of the highest intellectual and scholarly standards, yet he is also fully independent of the Western world’s inbred and complacent academic establishment.  Thus his explication of our ‘populist moment’ is reliable, fascinating, and fearless.”

 

For our part, we have designed the constitutional provisions of our writings on ‘Equitist Political-Economic Democracy’ with incorporation of a transcending synthesis of the “grains of truth” in both Rightist and Leftist ideologies front-of-mind, aiming at the formulation of a concrete, detailed envisioning of the higher successor system to the capitalist system.  We plan to continue, also, our ongoing campaign of clarifying and promoting the dialectical method of human creative thought, which, we hold, will prove capable of guiding humanity in solving the apparent “antinomies”, “radical diremptions”, “unsolvable contradictions”, and the seemingly “irreconcilable dualisms” – the dialectical antitheses – of human life, if enough of the majority class transcend the Boolean, Aristotelian “Either/Or” mentality, in time.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For more information regarding these Seldonian insights, and to read and/or download, free of charge, PDFs and/or JPGs of Foundation books, other texts, and images, please see:

 

www.dialectics.info

 

 

and

 

 

https://independent.academia.edu/KarlSeldon

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For partially pictographical, ‘poster-ized’ visualizations of many of these Seldonian insights -- specimens of ‘dialectical art’ – as well as dialectically-illustrated books published by the F.E.D. Press, see –

 

https://www.etsy.com/shop/DialecticsMATH

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

¡ENJOY!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Regards,

 

 

Miguel Detonacciones,

 

Voting Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.];

Elected Member, F.E.D. General Council;

Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison;

Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.

 

 

 

 

 

 

YOU are invited to post your comments on this blog-entry below!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SOLUTION –

 

‘Equitist Political-ECONOMIC DEMOCRACY’; 

 

BOOK:

 

MARX’S MISSING BLUEPRINTS

Free-of-Charge Download of Book PDF –

http://www.dialectics.info/dialectics/Applications.html

http://www.dialectics.info/dialectics/Applications_files/Edition%201.,%20DPCAIT_,_Part_1_,_%27THE_MISSING_BLUEPRINTS%27_,_begun_22JUL2022_Last_Updated_08AUG2023.pdf

 

Hardcover Book Order –

http://www.dialectics.info/dialectics/F.E.D._Press.html

https://www.etsy.com/shop/DialecticsMATH

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Dialectic of Euclidean Geometry. Part 8.: Cases of Dialectic Series.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

      The Dialectic

 

of

 

Euclidean

Geometry.

 

 

 

Part 8.:

 

Cases of Dialectic Series.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Reader,

 

 

 

In the ‘dialectogram’ posted above, the depicted «arché» category, or ‘premise category’, is the category whose units are the axiomatic systems of the Euclidean Geometries, color-coded ‘red-ish’.

 

For those geometries, based upon Euclid’s fifth axiom, or “5th postulate”, the number of lines parallel to a given line is exactly one, or, in the ‘dialectogram’s short-hand,

#(||) = 1.

 

The depicted ‘first contra-category’ to this «arché» category is the category whose units are the axioms-systems of the standard, classical “Non-Euclidean Geometries”, color-coded orange, and placed at a higher elevation in the ‘dialectogram’, to signify the greater ‘thought-complexity’ of this second category, and of its units.

 

The key characteristic of these classical “Non-Euclidean Geometries” is that the number of lines parallel to a given line is different from one, or, in the dialectogram’s short-hand, #(||) ~= 1. 

 

Two sub-species of this species of “Non-Euclidean Geometries” are also depicted in that ‘dialectogram’. 

 

The left-most sub-species category depiction is that for the axioms-systems units of the “Elliptic” Non-Euclidean Geometries, for which the number of lines parallel to a given line is less than one, or, in the dialectogram’s short-hand, #(||) < 1; in fact, for which #(||) = 0.   

 

The right-most sub-species category depiction is that for the axioms-systems units of the “Hyperbolic” Non-Euclidean Geometries, for which the number of lines parallel to a given line is less than one, or, in that dialectogram’s short-hand, #(||) > 1; in fact, for which #(||) = “¥”.   

 

The depicted third category, the ‘first uni-category’, uniting or unifying the «arché» category and its ‘first contra-category’, is the category whose units are the axioms-systems of the “Riemannian Geometries”, color-coded ‘yellow-ish’, and placed at the highest elevation in that ‘dialectogram’, to signify the greater ‘thought-complexity’ of this third category, and of its units, relative to the other categories depicted in this ‘dialectogram’, and to their units.

 

The “manifolds’ – the spaces of Riemannian Geometries – can combine regions of “flat”, Euclidean-like geometry, with regions of “curved”, Elliptic-like geometry and with other regions of “curved”, Hyperbolic-like geometry, as well as with other kinds of “curved” geometries!

 

Humanity’s presently-known best – most observationally and experimentally corroborated – mathematical model of large-scale physical space[-time]; of the large-scale universe, and of universal gravity, uses the “pseudo-Riemannian” or “semi-Riemannian” geometry, developed by Albert Einstein in his theory of universal gravitation, “The General Theory of Relativity’.

 

The Domain of this case of dialectic, ‘the dialectic of Euclidean versus Non-Euclidean geometries’, we name “Euclidean and Related Geometries-in-General”, or ERG for short – D = ERG.

 

The category-symbol that we have adopted for the «arché» category, of “Euclidean Geometries”, is ‘q_E’.  The category-symbol that we used, above, for the second category, the ‘first contra-category’, of “Non-Euclidean Geometries”, is ‘q_N’, or, equivalently, is ‘q_EE’, connoting the immanent critique, or self-critique, of the “Euclidean Geometries”.  The category-symbol that we used, above, for the “Riemannian Geometries”, is ‘q_R’, or, equivalently, is ‘q_NE’, signifying the mutual critique, mutual conversion, combination or unification of category ‘q_N’ and category ‘q_E’.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For more information regarding these Seldonian insights, and to read and/or download, free of charge, PDFs and/or JPGs of Foundation books, other texts, and images, please see:

 

www.dialectics.info

 

 

and

 

 

https://independent.academia.edu/KarlSeldon

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For partially pictographical, ‘poster-ized’ visualizations of many of these Seldonian insights -- specimens of ‘dialectical art’ – as well as dialectically-illustrated books published by the F.E.D. Press, see –

 

https://www.etsy.com/shop/DialecticsMATH

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

¡ENJOY!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Regards,

 

 

 

 

Miguel Detonacciones,

 

Voting Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.];

Elected Member, F.E.D. General Council;

Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison;

Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.

 

 

 

 

 

 

YOU are invited to post your comments on this blog-entry below!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ubiquitous ‘Onto-Dynamasis’: Our Everywhere Self-Creative Cosmos.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ubiquitous

‘Onto-Dynamasis’:

 

Our  

Everywhere

Self-Creative

Cosmos.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Reader,

 

 

This blog-entry is inspired via a YouTube presentation by Bruce Director of Promethean Action, a group of followers of the late Lyndon LaRouche, who “got religion”, but whose views are also rooted in LaRouche’s theory of “physical economy”, which was rooted, in turn, for LaRouche, originally, in Marx’s work, so that the Promethean Action group is a pro-productive-force-growth, pro-MAGA group.

 

LaRouche himself converted to Catholicism after his incarceration by the U.S. Federal Government.

 

In his 28 February 2026 presentation, entitled “A New Scientific Revolution, 150 Years of Materialism is Ending”, Bruce Director states the following regarding the “LaRouche-Riemann Method”, for “advancing man’s [sic] power in and over nature” –

 

“…it basically boils down to a simple, basic idea, that the universe is everywhere creative, …that the fundamental characteristic of the universe is creativity, not just human creativity, but creativity everywhere in the universe, that everything in the universe is in the process of being creative.”

 

With this statement, we of F.E.D. most heartily agree!

 

I will explain why and how it is that we agree with that statement a little further below.

 

Bruce Director then goes on to say that the above-quoted statement implies: “…that, if the universe is creative, that it has a Creator, and [that] there [was] an act of Creation.”

 

With regard to that, latter statement, we cannot, in the discipline of science, be sure that anyone can empirically, reproducibly, or logically demonstrate its truth – can either prove or dis-prove it.  We therefore remain scientifically agnostic about it.

 

Bruce Director also states his conviction that human ideas cause physical changes in the universe, especially in the human “physical economy”, with which Marx, in his theory of “universal labor”, and with which  we – in the perspective that we call ‘psychohistorical materialism’ – also heartily agree, but Bruce’s ‘Idea-ism’ asserts that such ideas are also “immaterial”.

 

We hold that such ideas are, indeed, ‘psychē-ic’, born from the human psyche, but without knowing, as yet, given the current degree of advancement in the cognitive and neurological sciences, whether or not they are “immaterial”.

 

¿Why and how do we so heartily agree with Bruce and the Prometheans, that our cosmos, “Nature” – including ‘human Nature’, the human part of “Nature” – is “everywhere creative”?

 

This is why and how:  Per our fundamental ‘meta-model’ of nature, of ‘‘‘the Dialectic of Nature’’’, our cosmos is, not only quantitatively self-expanding and [pro]creative, but is qualitatively – ONTOLOGICALLY – self-creative, its predecessor ontology ceaselessly interacting and self-interacting, continually ‘[self-]«aufheben»-ating’, and thereby giving birth to ever new successor ontology; to ever new kinds of beings, to [humans’] ever new ontological categories of «monads», that ‘cumulate’ together with [most of] that [«aufheben»-]conserved predecessor ontology.

 

If one wishes to model from the deepest starting category that is well-known to contemporary science – i.e., excluding, e.g., the ontological categories of “Dark Energy” and “Dark Matter” – then one can begin with the ontological category of pre-atomic “particle” units/«monads», r.  

The self-interaction of the category of such “particle”, r(r), or r², conserves many such “particles” in existence, but also gives rise to their [self-]combinations, known as the r self-«aufheben» successor ontological category of atoms –

r²  |-=  r + a.

 

Next, the ‘duo-ontological cumulum’ 

(r + a) 

itself begins to self-interact, yielding a doubled, ‘tetra-ontological cumulum’ –

(r + a) ® (r + a)²  |-=   

(r + a + q_ar + m)

– wherein m stands for the ontological category of molecule units, and q_ar for the ontological category of units which combine pre-atomic “particle” units and/with atom units, e.g., [initially first-generation] stars as units –

(r + a + s + m)

– for a four-fold ontological-categorial ‘cumulum’, which then, next, begins its own self-interaction –

(r + a + s + m)¹ ® 

(r + a + s + m)²

– and so on, up to the most advanced ontological-categorial ‘cumulum’ of which we humans so far widely know, the cosmological ‘cumulum’ that includes us, i.e., that includes ‘human meta-societies’, and that has already begun its own self-«aufheben» self-interaction/[self-]combinations, whose new ontologies, whose new ‘merely-hybrid’ as well as ‘self-hybrid’ units/«monads» – whose new kinds of being – are not yet fully known to us:

(r + a + s + m +…+ h)²  |-=   

(r + a + s + m +…+ h +???)¹.

 

One can abbreviate this ‘meta-model’ progression of, ‘purely-ontological’, “purely”-qualitative, ‘purely-categorial’ and epochal ‘mere models’ as follows.

Understand the, underscored, symbol å  to stand for a purely-ontological-categorial ‘“sum”’ – and therefore for a ‘non-amalgamative sum’ – of ontological category-symbols, without specifying, i.e., by abstracting from, the details of the “operands”, of the category-symbols so ‘‘‘summed’’’.

 

Then the categorial progression detailed above might be ‘abbreviatively’ summarized as the recurrent iteration of –

å ® å²

 

– and the above symbolization could well serve as a kind of ‘‘‘logo’’’, or generic image of cosmological ‘onto-dynamasis’; of ‘the Dialectic of Nature’, and even of ontological-categorial-progression [historical-]dialectic in general: of the, ‘«aufheben»-ic’, ‘‘‘self-creativity’’’ of our cosmos as a whole!

 

The following link links to Bruce Director’s presentation:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gos4G5ZXTGo

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For more information regarding these Seldonian insights, and to read and/or download, free of charge, PDFs and/or JPGs of Foundation books, other texts, and images, please see:

 

www.dialectics.info

 

 

and

 

 

https://independent.academia.edu/KarlSeldon

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For partially pictographical, ‘poster-ized’ visualizations of many of these Seldonian insights – specimens of ‘dialectical art’ – as well as dialectically-illustrated books published by the F.E.D. Press, see:

 

https://www.etsy.com/shop/DialecticsMATH

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

¡ENJOY!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Regards,

 

 

Miguel Detonacciones,

 

Voting Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.];

Elected Member, F.E.D. General Council;

Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison;

Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.

 

 

 

 

 

 

YOU are invited to post your comments on this blog-entry below!