Ubiquitous ‘Onto-Dynamasis’: Our Everywhere Self-Creative Cosmos.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ubiquitous

‘Onto-Dynamasis’:

 

Our  

Everywhere

Self-Creative

Cosmos.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Reader,

 

 

This blog-entry is inspired via a YouTube presentation by Bruce Director of Promethean Action, a group of followers of the late Lyndon LaRouche, who “got religion”, but whose views are also rooted in LaRouche’s theory of “physical economy”, which was rooted, in turn, for LaRouche, originally, in Marx’s work, so that the Promethean Action group is a pro-productive-force-growth, pro-MAGA group.

 

LaRouche himself converted to Catholicism after his incarceration by the U.S. Federal Government.

 

In his 28 February 2026 presentation, entitled “A New Scientific Revolution, 150 Years of Materialism is Ending”, Bruce Director states the following regarding the “LaRouche-Riemann Method”, for “advancing man’s [sic] power in and over nature” –

 

“…it basically boils down to a simple, basic idea, that the universe is everywhere creative, …that the fundamental characteristic of the universe is creativity, not just human creativity, but creativity everywhere in the universe, that everything in the universe is in the process of being creative.”

 

With this statement, we of F.E.D. most heartily agree!

 

I will explain why and how it is that we agree with that statement a little further below.

 

Bruce Director then goes on to say that the above-quoted statement implies: “…that, if the universe is creative, that it has a Creator, and [that] there [was] an act of Creation.”

 

With regard to that, latter statement, we cannot, in the discipline of science, be sure that anyone can empirically, reproducibly, or logically demonstrate its truth – can either prove or dis-prove it.  We therefore remain scientifically agnostic about it.

 

Bruce Director also states his conviction that human ideas cause physical changes in the universe, especially in the human “physical economy”, with which Marx, in his theory of “universal labor”, and with which  we – in the perspective that we call ‘psychohistorical materialism’ – also heartily agree, but Bruce’s ‘Idea-ism’ asserts that such ideas are also “immaterial”.

 

We hold that such ideas are, indeed, ‘psychē-ic’, born from the human psyche, but without knowing, as yet, given the current degree of advancement in the cognitive and neurological sciences, whether or not they are “immaterial”.

 

¿Why and how do we so heartily agree with Bruce and the Prometheans, that our cosmos, “Nature” – including ‘human Nature’, the human part of “Nature” – is “everywhere creative”?

 

This is why and how:  Per our fundamental ‘meta-model’ of nature, of ‘‘‘the Dialectic of Nature’’’, our cosmos is, not only quantitatively self-expanding and [pro]creative, but is qualitatively – ONTOLOGICALLY – self-creative, its predecessor ontology ceaselessly interacting and self-interacting, continually ‘[self-]«aufheben»-ating’, and thereby giving birth to ever new successor ontology; to ever new kinds of beings, to [humans’] ever new ontological categories of «monads», that ‘cumulate’ together with [most of] that [«aufheben»-]conserved predecessor ontology.

 

If one wishes to model from the deepest starting category that is well-known to contemporary science – i.e., excluding, e.g., the ontological categories of “Dark Energy” and “Dark Matter” – then one can begin with the ontological category of pre-atomic “particle” units/«monads», r.  

The self-interaction of the category of such “particle”, r(r), or r², conserves many such “particles” in existence, but also gives rise to their [self-]combinations, known as the r self-«aufheben» successor ontological category of atoms –

r²  |-=  r + a.

 

Next, the ‘duo-ontological cumulum’ 

(r + a) 

itself begins to self-interact, yielding a doubled, ‘tetra-ontological cumulum’ –

(r + a) ® (r + a)²  |-=   

(r + a + q_ar + m)

– wherein m stands for the ontological category of molecule units, and q_ar for the ontological category of units which combine pre-atomic “particle” units and/with atom units, e.g., [initially first-generation] stars as units –

(r + a + s + m)

– for a four-fold ontological-categorial ‘cumulum’, which then, next, begins its own self-interaction –

(r + a + s + m)¹ ® 

(r + a + s + m)²

– and so on, up to the most advanced ontological-categorial ‘cumulum’ of which we humans so far widely know, the cosmological ‘cumulum’ that includes us, i.e., that includes ‘human meta-societies’, and that has already begun its own self-«aufheben» self-interaction/[self-]combinations, whose new ontologies, whose new ‘merely-hybrid’ as well as ‘self-hybrid’ units/«monads» – whose new kinds of being – are not yet fully known to us:

(r + a + s + m +…+ h)²  |-=   

(r + a + s + m +…+ h +???)¹.

 

One can abbreviate this ‘meta-model’ progression of, ‘purely-ontological’, “purely”-qualitative, ‘purely-categorial’ and epochal ‘mere models’ as follows.

Understand the, underscored, symbol å  to stand for a purely-ontological-categorial ‘“sum”’ – and therefore for a ‘non-amalgamative sum’ – of ontological category-symbols, without specifying, i.e., by abstracting from, the details of the “operands”, of the category-symbols so ‘‘‘summed’’’.

 

Then the categorial progression detailed above might be ‘abbreviatively’ summarized as the recurrent iteration of –

å ® å²

 

– and the above symbolization could well serve as a kind of ‘‘‘logo’’’, or generic image of cosmological ‘onto-dynamasis’; of ‘the Dialectic of Nature’, and even of ontological-categorial-progression [historical-]dialectic in general: of the, ‘«aufheben»-ic’, ‘‘‘self-creativity’’’ of our cosmos as a whole!

 

The following link links to Bruce Director’s presentation:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gos4G5ZXTGo

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For more information regarding these Seldonian insights, and to read and/or download, free of charge, PDFs and/or JPGs of Foundation books, other texts, and images, please see:

 

www.dialectics.info

 

 

and

 

 

https://independent.academia.edu/KarlSeldon

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For partially pictographical, ‘poster-ized’ visualizations of many of these Seldonian insights – specimens of ‘dialectical art’ – as well as dialectically-illustrated books published by the F.E.D. Press, see:

 

https://www.etsy.com/shop/DialecticsMATH

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

¡ENJOY!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Regards,

 

 

Miguel Detonacciones,

 

Voting Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.];

Elected Member, F.E.D. General Council;

Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison;

Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.

 

 

 

 

 

 

YOU are invited to post your comments on this blog-entry below!