Saturday, January 11, 2025

The Value Hidden Behind the Valuing of [Economic] Value.

 









The Value Hidden Behind the Valuing of [Economic] Value. 

 

 

 

Dear Reader,

 

Marx’s analysis, in his «Grundrisse», and in the four volumes of his Capital: A Critique of Political Economy, three of which were still incomplete at the time of his death, reveals the core of qualitative use-value to be the creative concrete labor of human beings, and the core of quantitative [economic exchange-]value to be ‘“abstract labor; enough hour units of abstract labor-time, presently socially necessary to reproduce the good or service quantity in question”’.

 

A seldom-noted implication of this, Marx’s dialectical, immanent critique of the ideology-vitiated science of classical capitalist political-economics, is the following.

 

Even those, e.g., Scrooges, who say – or who do not say, but betray, by their conduct – that they value only ‘value-able’ objects, and/or only money/capital/profit, and despise human beings; who value only the ‘object-ifications’ of capitalist production, divorced from the human subjects, the ‘subject-ive’ sources, from which those ‘object-ifications’ issue, are actually inadvertently valuing and celebrating human creativity, albeit in an estranged form.

 

Greed for capitalist wealth, greed for profits, greed for monies, greed for ‘value-able’ objects, including for luxury and status commodities – for expensive jewelry, palatial homes, luxurious automobiles, huge yachts, high-end fashions, prestigious works of art, and high status objects of many other kinds – to be enjoyed and celebrated individualistically, or within wealthy families, etc., expresses a kind of humanism, albeit in an estranged and inverted form.

 

It does so because, behind all of these objectifications is the creative, productive power of humanity, of human activity, of human labor – of human living time.

 

Direct valuing and celebration of ‘object-ive’ wealth is an indirect valuing of ‘subject-ive’ wealth, of the human subjects who create that object-wealth, of the creative power of the activity of human subjects in their well-used living time.

 

Such individualistic ‘valuing activity’ is an unconscious and inverted form of collective human solidarityinverted because expressed in a privatized, individualistic, exclusionary form.  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

¡Enjoy!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Regards,

 

 

Miguel Detonacciones,

 

Voting Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.];

Elected Member, F.E.D. General Council;

Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison;

Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For more information regarding the Seldonian insights, please see

www.dialectics.info

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For partially pictographical, ‘poster-ized’ visualizations of many of these Seldonian insightsspecimens of dialectical artas well as dialectically-illustrated books published by the F.E.D. Press, see:

 

https://www.etsy.com/shop/DialecticsMATH

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

YOU are hereby cordially invited to post your comments on this blog-entry below!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Thursday, January 09, 2025

ANTI-“anti-physis”.

 










ANTI-anti-physis. 

 

 

 

Dear Reader,

 

Ancient Greek philosophers named Nature – including Nature as «Kosmos»; Nature as a whole – by the word «physis», or «phusis».

 

Some ancient Greek philosophers described “humanity”, including the physical plant of the city-state, as «anti-physis»; as the “artificial”; as the un-natural”.

 

Even in those ancient times, some saw that humanity was an outgrowth of Nature, an extension of Nature, hence also as “natural” – as part of Nature.

 

Since those ancient times, it has become ever more clear that humanity is a predictable, Darwinian self-extension of Nature, and not some alien in Nature; not, somehow, some force from outside of Nature, somehow from “outside of the universe”, and destined to destroy Nature, as the ‘Rocke-Nazi’, ‘humanocidal’ “eco”-ideologues would imply.

 

Thus, the correct formulation of the relationship of humanity to [the rest of] Nature is not the radical diremption [‘ß|à’] –

Anti-physis ß|à Physis

– or the absolute dualism [‘ß|à’] –

Artificial ß|à Natural

– or the “antinomy”   

 Humanity ß|à Nature

– but, on the contrary, is the dialectical «auto-aufheben», diachronic process of/within NATURAL HISTORY  


Pre-Human                  Pre-Human                   Pre-Human

Nature1 ®  Nature2  |-=  Nature  ~Ã…~ Humanity

 


– & the synchronic, systematic categorial relationship – 

 

Human Nature ~Ã…~ Exo-Human Nature.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

¡Enjoy!

 

 

 

 

Regards,

 

 

Miguel Detonacciones,

 

Voting Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.];

Elected Member, F.E.D. General Council;

Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison;

Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For more information regarding the Seldonian insights, please see

www.dialectics.info

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For partially pictographical, ‘poster-ized’ visualizations of many of those Seldonian insightsspecimens of dialectical artplease see:

 

https://www.etsy.com/shop/DialecticsMATH

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

YOU are hereby cordially invited to post your comments on this blog-entry below!