Thursday, December 19, 2024

Part 06: Seldon’s Cosmology Series. ‘Space-as-Vacuum--vs.--Space-as-Plenum’.

 

 




 

 

 


Part 06: Seldon’s Cosmology Series.

 

 

 Space as Vacuum

 

vs.

 

Space as Plenum.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Reader,

 

 

 

It is my pleasure, and my honor, as an elected member of the Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.] General Council, and as a voting member of F.E.D., to share, with you, from time to time, as they are approved for public release by the F.E.D. General Council, Seldon’s commentaries on key Encyclopedia Dialectica concepts of Seldonian Theory.

 

 

The 6th text in this new such series is posted herewith, together with supporting text-images and diagrams [Some E.D. standard edits have been applied, in the version presented below, by the editors of the F.E.D. Special Council for the Encyclopedia, to the direct transcript of our co-founder’s discourse].

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Seldon –

 

What if:

“Empty” Space is not empty?”

“Empty” Space is not “void”?

“Empty” Space is substance?

“Empty” Space is not “vacuum”, but plenum?”

 

“If “empty” space is actually a substance, e.g., if it is the root substance at the foundation of all other/later substances, then it must be a substance so ultra-primitive, so ultra-minute, so almost-vanishing in its scale, that we, with our ‘Darwinianly-formed’ sensoria, cannot detect its “granularity”, because it does not interact “strongly”, as per the “strong nuclear force”, nor “weakly”, as per the “weak nuclear force”, nor electrically-magnetically, as per the “electromagnetic force”, nor even ‘gravitically’, except to oppose gravity -- but detectably so, only on the grandest of the accessible scales of our “visible universe”.”

 

“Thus it was only at the uttermost end of the 20th Century that humanity became aware of, discerned, detected this possible “substance of space”, this “Dark Energy”, via our scientists’ discernment of the accelerating expansion of the cosmos, of space itself, on a cosmological scale”

 

“Suppose that “Dark Energy”, this apparent non-dilutive stuff accelerating the expansion of space, with an apparently constant energy-density in each increment of added space, is not just a “property” of “empty” space.  Suppose that it IS space; that “Dark Energy” is what, actually-nonempty-space, really is.  Suppose that space is nothing other than ‘the spandetron expanse’ – an «arithmos» of ultra-minute «monads» [‘spandetrons’, because they both ‘span’ and “expand”] whose nature and whose only activity is to continually self-replicate, and whose rate of self-replication is diminished only by gravity, and, in the first instance, only by the ur-gravity that is “Dark Matter”.”

 

“But “Dark Matter’s” energy-density dilutes and diminishes as space expands – as “Dark Energy” expandedly reproduces itself.  Thus, “Dark Energy”, over time, gets the upper hand over “Dark Matter”, and the self-expansion of space thus accelerates again.”

 

“And, suppose further that an initial ‘cosmological inflation’ was no “inflaton” phenomenon, but simply “Dark Energy”, unopposed by as yet non-existent “Dark Matter”.  And suppose that the ‘excession’ of “Dark Energy” spatial self-expansion acceleration, to beyond a vastly superluminal velocity-of-expansion limit, but a finite limit nonetheless, was what gave birth to the first “Dark Matter”, which then restrained further expansion-acceleration.  Until continued, albeit slower, spatial self-expansion sufficiently diluted its “Dark Matter” opposition to allow accelerated spatial self-expansion to manifest again, albeit not as robustly as in the initial “inflationary” expansion, given the continued if diluted presence of “Dark Matter” [and, later, of “Bright Matter” as well].”

 

“Will ‘excession’ eventually ensue again?  Will the cosmos again, thereby, be flooded with “Dark Matter” negentropy; “Dark Matter” free energy [and, again later, also with some
“Bright Matter” and “Bright Energy” negentropy, born, once again, from out of the core of “Dark Matter”]?”   

 

“That is the dialectical-cosmological hypothesis that we are pursuing.   It is an hypothesis of a ‘‘‘dialectic of Nature’’’ grounded and founded in an initial cosmological antithesis, that of “Dark Energy anti-gravity” as the expansive ‘self-force’ of accelerating spatial self-expansion, soon countered by – as born out of the “Dark Energy” process itself – the ‘anti-anti-gravity’ contractive force known as “Dark Matter”.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For more information regarding these Seldonian insights, and to read and/or download, free of charge, PDFs and/or JPGs of Foundation books and other texts, please see:

 

www.dialectics.info

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For partially pictographical, ‘poster-ized’ visualizations of many of these Seldonian insightsspecimens of dialectical artas well as dialectically-illustrated books published by the F.E.D. Press, see:

 

https://www.etsy.com/shop/DialecticsMATH

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

¡ENJOY!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Regards,

 

 

 

Miguel Detonacciones,

 

Voting Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.];

Elected Member, F.E.D. General Council;

Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison;

Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.

 

 

 

 

 

 

YOU are invited to post your comments on this blog-entry below!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tuesday, December 17, 2024

Part 08: Marxian Theory Series. Marxian Algebra.

 

  





 

 

 



Part 08: Marxian Theory Series.

 

 

Marxian Algebra.

 

 

GLOBAL STRATEGIC HYPOTHESES.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Reader,

 

 

 

It is my pleasure, and my honor, as an elected member of the Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.] General Council, and as a voting member of F.E.D., to share, with you, from time to time, as they are approved for public release by the F.E.D. General Council, Encyclopedia Dialectica definitions of the key themes of Seldonian Theory.

 

The 8th text in this such series is posted below [Some E.D. standard edits have been applied, in the version presented below, by the editors of the F.E.D. Special Council for the Encyclopedia, to the direct transcript of our co-founder’s discourse].

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Seldon –

 

Karl Marx developed, for the exposition of his dialectical, immanent critique of the ideology-vitiated science of classical bourgeois political economy, a remarkable algebra, to convey his discoveries, which he deployed in the volumes of his world-historic treatise, «Das Kapital», to aid in the human comprehension of the human social praxis which IS capitalism, which comprehension was the aim of [t]his work.  The fuller import of this ‘Marxian Algebra’ oft goes unrecognized and unappreciated, still even today.”

 

“The texted illustrative diagrams posted above are meant to help readers to recall the essentials of this ‘Marxian Algebra’.”

 

“Thus, Marx’s “Cs” and “Ms” are algebraic variables that represent, all at once, (1) different quantities of economic values; (2) different qualities of economic values, i.e., packaged in the more concrete forms of either Commodities or Monies; (3) different human personifications of economic values – human agents, human subjects, enacting and re-enacting these value-characters; (4) economic value-relations; value “social relations of production”, all inside the “present” capitalist system, first, albeit mostly inadvertently, growing the “social forces of production”, and then, later in the “present” capitalist epoch, enfettering and even contracting those “social forces of production”.”

 

“Marx’s symbols ‘¾’, as in Marx’s –

C ¾ C’;

C ¾ M ¾ C’;

M ¾ C ¾ M’, and;

M ¾ M’

 

– represent human acts of exchange or interchange; social acts of mutually-advantageous use-value quality and/or exchange-value quantity ‘exchange-value exchange’; exchanges of exchange-values between human agents who both need, or both desire, to change the form of their exchange-valuable properties, each’s form with the form owned by the other.”

 

“Because Marx’s algebraic symbols – C, M, C’, M’, L, MP, and P, etc. – and his ‘‘‘parsing’’’ of their economic values into c, v, s, s’, etc., and into their “dimensionless” [value unit of measure ‘degree 0’] ‘r[el]atios’, (s/v), (c/v), and s’/(c+v), etc., still represent the praxis of human social individuals in their acts of reproduction of the capital social relation of production; social acts of ‘exchange-value exchange’ and its consequences, many of which were not well-noted until the work of Marx – because of all of the above – Marx’s ‘Value Algebra’; his ‘social relations of [social re-]production Algebra’, or ‘exchange-value-based human social intercourse Algebra’, is also a ‘human Praxis Algebra’.”

 

In summary: C and M, etc., represent us – represent capitalist human subjects, capitalist “social individuals” [Marx], acting, mostly unwittingly, so to serve as agents of the capitalist «energeia» and «entelecheia»; acting as “personifications” [Marx] of human “social relations of production” [Marx] – of the “Commodity-relation” [Marx], of the “Money-relation” [Marx], and, integrating and ‘«aufheben»-ating’ both, of the “Capital-relation” [Marx].” 

 

“But these ‘qualo-quantitative’ Algebraic symbols also represent human-social objects, economic value-objects, physical objects upon which capitalist humanity collectively and individually projects its semi-conscious construct of economic value, and which our practice, if scrutinized with sufficient intensity, reveals itself as revolving around the “abstract labor-time presently socially necessary to reproduce” those objects “of value”; objects also “holding” a certain definite quantity of economic value; of that “presently socially-necessary abstract labor-time”, although, as algebraic variables, these symbols do not reveal any specific quantity of that value.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For more information regarding these Seldonian insights, please see --

 

www.dialectics.info

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For partially pictographical, ‘poster-ized’ visualizations of many of these Seldonian insights -- specimens of dialectical artas well as dialectically-illustrated books published by the F.E.D. Press, see

 

https://www.etsy.com/shop/DialecticsMATH

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

¡ENJOY!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Regards,

 

 

 

 

Miguel Detonacciones,

 

Voting Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.];

Elected Member, F.E.D. General Council;

Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison;

Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.

 

 

 

 

 

 

YOU are invited to post your comments on this blog-entry below!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SOLUTION

 

Equitist Political-ECONOMIC DEMOCRACY; 

 

BOOK:

MARXS MISSING BLUEPRINTS


Free of Charge Download of Book PDF

http://www.dialectics.info/dialectics/Applications.html

http://www.dialectics.info/dialectics/Applications_files/Edition%201.,%20DPCAIT_,_Part_1_,_%27THE_MISSING_BLUEPRINTS%27_,_begun_22JUL2022_Last_Updated_08AUG2023.pdf

 

Hardcover Book Order

http://www.dialectics.info/dialectics/F.E.D._Press.html

https://www.etsy.com/shop/DialecticsMATH








Sunday, December 15, 2024

Part 05: Seldon’s Cosmology Series. ‘Self-Involution Drives the Self-Meta-Evolution of Our Cosmos’.

 


 












Part 05: Seldon’s Cosmology Series.

 

 

 Self-Involution Drives the

Self-Meta-Evolution

of Our Cosmos.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Reader,

 

 

 

It is my pleasure, and my honor, as an elected member of the Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.] General Council, and as a voting member of F.E.D., to share, with you, from time to time, as they are approved for public release by the F.E.D. General Council, Seldon’s commentaries on key Encyclopedia Dialectica concepts of Seldonian Theory.

 

 

The 5th text in this new such series is posted herewith, together with supporting text-images and diagrams [Some E.D. standard edits have been applied, in the version presented below, by the editors of the F.E.D. Special Council for the Encyclopedia, to the direct transcript of our co-founder’s discourse].

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Seldon –

 

Self-Involution is the self-interactive, mutually-interactive self-multiplication of the population numbers, and of the kinds, of existing «monads», with new kinds of «monads» originating from the «aufheben» self-re-entry, self-internalization, or self-incorporation of the «monads»-kinds previously produced.”

 

“Escalating epochally for each ordinal epoch t,

t ÃŽ W = {0, 1, 2, 3,}

the self-iterating self-involution, a2t, of the «arché-monads» «arithmos», a, of a given Domain of reality, or of our known cosmos as a whole, is an «aufheben» process of the epochally self-iterating ‘meta-«monads»-ization’ of those «arché-monads», that encompasses both the «auto-aufheben» [self-hybrid-izing’] and the «allo-aufheben» [merely hybrid-izing] momenta of the «aufheben» process, and that resolves into the self-involution of each successive new ‘self-hybrid’ «arithmos» of «monads», while also ‘evolutely’ conserving and superposing/amalgamating therewith the previous-epochs-generated «auto-aufheben» and «allo-aufheben» t-generations of the self-involution process.”

 

“Thus, our cosmos “builds upon itself” as its own foundation, a.” 

 

“It is the self-iterated, t-iterated, epochally-iterated, ever-higher-degree self-involution of the «arché-monads» of the «arché-arithmos» – of that first known kind of units in our cosmos – that drives the, ontologically-revolutionary, ‘self-meta-evolution’ of our cosmos; that drives the ever-expanding qualitative, ontological diversity of its post-«arché» «monads»; that drives the ever-deepening ‘nested-ness’ of those post-«arché» «monads»; that drives its ever-rising progression of escalating ‘qualo-fractal scales’, and its ever-interconnecting, ever-re-connecting and cross-connecting ‘meta-genealogy’, in both the physical sense of the term “[self-]involution”, and the mathematical sense of the term “[self-]involution”, the latter in terms of the dialectical-mathematical models of that “physical” – of that «physis»; of the manifold of its ‘meta-«physes» as a whole.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For more information regarding these Seldonian insights, and to read and/or download, free of charge, PDFs and/or JPGs of Foundation books and other texts, please see:

 

www.dialectics.info

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For partially pictographical, ‘poster-ized’ visualizations of many of these Seldonian insightsspecimens of dialectical artas well as dialectically-illustrated books published by the F.E.D. Press, see:

 

https://www.etsy.com/shop/DialecticsMATH

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

¡ENJOY!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Regards,

 

 

 

Miguel Detonacciones,

 

Voting Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.];

Elected Member, F.E.D. General Council;

Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison;

Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.

 

 

 

 

 

 

YOU are invited to post your comments on this blog-entry below!