Friday, June 01, 2018

Part 09: Seldon Presents Series -- ‘Exo-human Nature’: ‘‘‘Dead Robotics’’’ or Self-Making «Physis-Nomos»?










Part 09:  Seldon Presents Series --

Exo-human Nature:  ‘‘‘Dead Robotics’’’ or Self-Making «Physis-Nomos»?







Dear Readers,



It is my pleasure, and my honor, as an officer of the Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.] Office of Public Liaison, to share with you, from time to time, as they are approved for public release by the F.E.D. General Council, key excerpts from the internal writings, and from the internal sayings, of our co-founder, Karl Seldon.

The ninth such release in this new series is entered below [Some E.D. standard edits have been applied, in the version presented below, to the direct transcript of our co-founder’s discourse].


For more information regarding, and for [further] instantiations of, these Seldonian insights, please see --



In particular, regarding The Gene-ral ‘‘‘Law’’’ of Nature and Its Seven Epochal Species to-date -- A NO Meta-Laws Perspective, please see --







ENJOY!




Regards,


Miguel Detonacciones,

Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.],
Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison,
Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.







...The momentaneous ontology of our «kosmos» continually gives birth to new ontology, thus producing a future as a new present, and that new ontology alters the very laws of Nature, that is, it re-sets the behavioral limitations of the ontological content of our «kosmos».

Many today still view exo-human Nature as a Domain of deadmatter, of zombie-like «stoff», robotically repeating the same laws of Nature patterns of behavior over and over again, in utter monotony.

But what if that matter makes its own ‘‘‘laws’’’?  What if it produces and reproduces those ‘‘‘laws’’’, in ever-modified forms, and even creates brand new ‘‘‘laws’’’, new ‘‘‘laws’’’ corresponding to the new ontology that it epochally creates, and thus as a consequence of its own actions, of its inherent, immanent, ineluctable activit(y)(ies), which manifest(s) its intra-duality, and, indeed, its intra-multiality?”

Such a view is akin to one about which Charles Saunders Peirce wrote -- about Natures ‘‘‘laws’’’ as habitual rather than as eternal; as ultimately transitory, more or less enduring ‘‘‘habits of Nature’’’.







No comments:

Post a Comment