YOU ARE A FRACTAL – The «Aufheben»-Dialectical, [finitary] Scaled Self-Similarity Content-Structure of YOUR VERY BODY!

 

YOU ARE A FRACTAL –

The «Aufheben»-Dialectical, [finitary] Scaled Self-Similarity Content-Structure of YOUR VERY BODY!

 

 

 

Dear Reader,

 

The _NQ dialectical ideography-/mathematics-for-dialectics describes what we call ‘qualo-fractals’ – ‘qualo-fractal content-structures’ – “purely”-qualitative and finitary ‘‘‘fractals’’’ [see illustrations below, covering both synchronic and diachronic ‘qualo-fractals’].

By a ‘qualo-fractal’, we mean a finitary self-similarity regress -- a regress of scales or levels, encompassing a finite number of scales/levels, such that each scale bears a resemblance to all of the other scales/levels so encompassed.

 

The _NQ ‘first dialectical arithmetic/algebra’ is an ideographical language that is limited, in its powers of expression, to “purely”-qualitative, ontological aspects of actuality.  [This arithmetic/algebra is not really qualitative- only, because ordinal quantity is «aufheben»-contained and implicit within it, via the first-order-logic-only Natural Numbers’ “Peano Postulates” axioms-systems category, which we denote by N_, that the _{N_}Q_ axioms-systems category subsumes.]

 

However, reality is not so constrained [nor are the higher axioms-systems categories in the dialectical categorial progression of the E.D. ‘mathematics for dialectics’]. 

 

More richly-described, more determinate actual fractals can better be described as ‘quanto-qualo-fractals’, because their levels/scales occupy distinct “niches” -- e.g., in terms of quantitative size -- although all scales remain united together and interconnected, each scale to its next higher scale, and each scale to every other scale, in its native fractal ‘content-structure’, via the «aufheben» processes and relations of ‘meta-«monad»-ization’, or ‘meta-unit-ization’.  

 

Consider your self – your own body. 

 

At its deepest presently-known, root scale, your body contains “non-composite bosons and fermions” -- e.g., electrons, gluons and quarks.

 

In the next scale up, these “non-composite bosons and fermions” are contained in the protons and neutrons of atomic nuclei, and in the atoms which include those atomic nuclei.

 

Next up, you contain molecules, made up out of the atoms of the immediately-previous scale.

 

Raise your attention one discrete unit of scale higher, and you will know/see that your body contains life-giving sub-cellular organelles – e.g., the mitochondria – that are the «aufheben»-conserved remnants of once free-living “prokaryotic” cells, ‘aufheben-ated’ in the formation of the eukaryotic cells of which your body’s tissues and organs are genomically made.

 

Next scale up: Organs and tissues, made up out of the eukaryotic cells that all contain your same genotype.

 

Final somatic scale: Your body as a whole, made up out of the organs and tissues of the immediately-preceding scale.

 

Thus, all of exo-human Nature – all of the scales and kinds of ontological units or «monads» that are still present and «aufheben»-conserved externally to your body, outside of your body and all around you – are also «aufheben»-conserved internally, inside you body, including the micro-organisms of your gut micro-biome.

 

This ‘quanto-qualo-fractality’ -- this ontological, finitary fractality -- expresses the dialectical, «aufheben»-relations of ‘The, Systematic, Dialectic Of Nature NOW’, built up by, and the result of, the dialectical, «aufheben»-processes of the ‘The, Historical, Dialectic Of Nature PAST.

 

 

The ‘dialectograms’, and their commentaries, posted below, expand upon our view of the phenomenon of ‘dialectical qualo-quanto-fractality’ more generally.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For ongoing updates regarding F.E.D. content, please see -- www.dialectics.info .

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For F.E.D. books, and for  partially pictographical, ‘poster-ized’ visualizations of many of our hypotheses -- specimens of ‘dialectical art’ -- see:

https://www.etsy.com/shop/DialecticsMATH

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

¡ENJOY!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Regards,

 

 

Miguel Detonacciones,

 

Voting Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.];

Elected Member, F.E.D. General Council;

Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison;

Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

UPDATE: ‘The Abortion Conundrum’— Proposed Historic ‘Dialectical Compromise’ – Toward a Dialectical Defeat of the 'Rocke-Nazi' “Life” vs. “Choice” Divide-and-Conquer “Antinomy”. GLOBAL STRATEGIC HYPOTHESES.

 

UPDATE: ‘The Abortion Conundrum’— Proposed Historic ‘Dialectical Compromise’ –

Toward a Dialectical Defeat of the 'Rocke-Nazi' “Life” vs. “Choice”

Divide-and-Conquer “Antinomy”.

 

GLOBAL STRATEGIC HYPOTHESES.

 

 

 

 

Dear Reader,

 

The ruling, ‘Rocke-Nazi’, ‘human anti-humanist’, exterminationist faction of the capitalist ruling class has set the majority class at each others’ throats, dividing us, and conquering us, for far too long already -- distracting us from noticing them, “behind the curtains”, striving to arrange for their planned, Malthusian, “People Are Pollution”, “Global Warming” ideologies-based extermination of “95%” of us.

 

[For background on this ruling faction, and their ultra-criminal plans, see, for example –

 

Capitalism's Fatal Flaw, and the Way Forward: Plutocracy Publicly Proclaims Planned Planetary Population Plummeting. GLOBAL STRATEGIC HYPOTHESES. (capitalismsfundamentalflaw-wayforward.blogspot.com)].

 

The updated JPG texts, posted below, present a second draft of our proposed ‘Reproduction Rights’ Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America, proposed, in coordination with our two other proposed Equitist Amendments, as Article of Amendment # 30. 

 

The “Right to Live” versus “Right to Choose” controversy is not only driven by the ‘ideology-engineering’ and ‘divide-and-conquer engineering’ of the ‘Rocke-Nazis’.

 

It is so effective as a ‘divide-and-conquer’ tool for them, precisely because there is a genuine dialectical contradiction – even an apparent ‘Kantianoid’ “antinomy” – within the advanced conception of the totality of human rights that humanity has rather recently achieved.

 

Thesis:  The people and their government have an obligation to protect the “right to live” of Citizens, e.g., against the crime of murder, that extends to protecting the life of a yet-to-be born but gestating human being and ‘proto-Citizen’.  They must therefore criminalize abortion, the crime of a mother killing her unborn baby, as a form of murder.

 

Anti-Thesis:  The mother of that unborn child has the sovereign right to the disposition of her own body, and thus of its parts, and that fetus, during its gestation, is part of her body, and nourished by her body.  She should therefore have the right to dispose of her unborn child in any way she chooses, with no interferences from governments.

 

Synthesis: The draft constitutional amendment, posted below, locates a ‘complex unity’ [cf. Hegel] of the above-stated, opposing, mutually-contradictory propositions, and proposes, on that basis, a dialectical synthesis of the two antithetical propositions and positions, in the form of a constitutional amendment.

 

We urge you to consider this updated, second-draft amendment, to improve upon it, and to campaign for its constitutional adoption as so improved, so that the majority class can stop warring within itself, especially over this “life” vs. “choice” apparent antinomy, and can turn our attention instead to defeating the ‘Rocke-Nazi’ exterminationist pogrom, e.g., by non-violently and constitutionally establishing ‘Equitist political-economic democracy’.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For ongoing updates regarding F.E.D. content, please see -- www.dialectics.info .

 

 

 

 

 

For F.E.D. books, and for  partially pictographical, ‘poster-ized’ visualizations of many of our hypotheses -- specimens of ‘dialectical art’ -- see:

https://www.etsy.com/shop/DialecticsMATH

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

¡ENJOY!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Regards,

 

 

Miguel Detonacciones,

 

Voting Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.];

Elected Member, F.E.D. General Council;

Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison;

Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SOLUTION –

‘Equitist Political-ECONOMIC DEMOCRACY’; 

 

BOOK:

MARX'S MISSING BLUEPRINTS

Free Download of Book PDF --

http://www.dialectics.info/dialectics/Applications.html

http://www.dialectics.info/dialectics/Applications_files/Edition%200.,%20DPCAIT_,_Part_1_,_%27THE_MISSING_BLUEPRINTS%27_,_begun_22JUL2022_Last_Updated_18FEB2023.pdf

 

Hardcover Book Order --

http://www.dialectics.info/dialectics/F.E.D._Press.html

https://www.etsy.com/shop/DialecticsMATH

The ‘WAVE versus PARTICLE ANTINOMY’ in Modern Microcosmic Physics – Toward a Dialectical Synthesis Solution.

 

The ‘WAVE versus PARTICLE ANTINOMY’ in Modern Microcosmic Physics –

Toward a Dialectical Synthesis Solution.

 

 

 

Dear Reader,

 

In contemporary “Particle Physics” theory, the objects of the theory – the “fundamental” objects that manifest the nature of ‘Microcosmic Objective Nature’ -- are taken to be BOTH “classical, linear wave-like”, and “classical” ‘[linear] point-particle-like’, sometimes manifesting as classical waves, sometimes manifesting as particles, sometimes manifesting as “both”. 

 

But this “complementarity” of these two classically mutually-exclusive models is far from a dialectical synthesis.

 

We suspect that better models would likely be more about ‘‘‘eventities’’’ which are NEITHER classical “waves” nor classical particles, and would be nonlinear models, as suggested by the somewhat recently discovered “solitary wave” and “soliton” closed-form solutions of many “weakly-nonlinear” partial differential equations.

We suspect that the ‘“Waves versus Particles Paradox”’ – perhaps even a latter-day example of a Kantianish ANTINOMY – is more a human, collective-subjective, psychohistorical, cognitive problem than an objective, ‘nature of Microcosmic Objective Nature’ problem.  

 

We suspect that this “paradox” arises from believing that real microphysical objects must conform either to our idea of a classical wave, or to our idea of a “point particle”, and “never the twain shall meet”. 

 

On the contrary, real microphysical objects may be, and may have always been, a tertium quid, something qualitatively, ontologically different from either of our opposing ideas of real such objects, but ‘‘‘containing’’’ an ‘intra-duality’ which makes them manifest, sometimes as somewhat fitting our idea of a “wave”, and sometimes as somewhat fitting our idea of a “particle”.

 

We need a conceptual dialectical synthesis whose concept of real microphysical objects better fits both their ‘wave-ish’ side and their ‘point-ish’ side, but as an integral unity, not as a syncretic “complementarity”.

 

The ‘dialectogram’ posted below begins to articulate this problematique.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For ongoing updates regarding F.E.D. content, please see -- 

www.dialectics.info .

 

 

 

 

 

For F.E.D. books, and for  partially pictographical, ‘poster-ized’ visualizations of many of our hypotheses -- specimens of ‘dialectical art’ -- see:

https://www.etsy.com/shop/DialecticsMATH

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

¡ENJOY!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Regards,

 

 

Miguel Detonacciones,

 

Voting Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.];

Elected Member, F.E.D. General Council;

Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison;

Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.