Dear Reader,
Another of Karl Seldon’s most important statements, to we of
F.E.D., is the following [E.D.
edits applied], about whose topic more will be stated, soon, in the Foundation literature
forthcoming --
“The natural formations that persist in nature are
those that are self-reproductively,
and
‘meta-reproductively’, more fecund, in terms
of their reproductive and
‘meta-reproductive’* rates, relative to
other such formations.
*[They
thereby -- by their ‘onto-dynamical meta-reproductivity’
-- persist,
at the very least, as ‘‘‘«aufheben»-contained/conserved’’’ inside their
‘meta-descendants’; their ‘meta-genealogical meta-progeny’.].”
at the very least, as ‘‘‘«aufheben»-contained/conserved’’’ inside their
‘meta-descendants’; their ‘meta-genealogical meta-progeny’.].”
-- including to the effect that the Darwinian principle [that those «arithmoi» whose «monads» exhibit the higher sustained rates of expanded self-reproduction are -- as so
often misnomered
-- naturally “selected”
[“selected” by
whom, by what agent? by God? -- thus the misleading phrase "natural selection" exhibits yet another instance of the characteristic ideological ‘pseudo-agent posit’], i.e., expand
their ‘onto-mass proportion’
in/of the «kosmos», or at least within
some ‘‘‘loci’’’
thereof, relative to those «arithmoi»
whose «monads»
exhibit lower sustained rates of self-reproduction]
is not at all restricted to biological,
e.g., to DNA-based,
«kosmo-monads», hence is a 'META-Darwinian Principle'.
Regards,
Miguel
No comments:
Post a Comment