Part 02: Seldon’s Message Series -- ‘Evoluteness AND CONVOLUTENESS of NQ_-Dialectical-Ideography-Mapped Categorial Progressions/Possibility-Spaces’.

Part 02:  Seldon’s Message Series --

‘Evoluteness AND CONVOLUTENESS of _NQ_-Dialectical-Ideography-Mapped Categorial Progressions /Possibility-Spaces’.

Dear Reader,

It is my pleasure, and my honor, as an officer of the Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.] Office of Public Liaison, to share with you, from time to time, as they are approved for public release by the F.E.D. General Council, key excerpts from the internal writings, and from the internal sayings, of our co-founder, Karl Seldon.

The second such release in this new series is entered below [Some E.D. standard edits have been applied, in the version presented below, to the direct transcript of our co-founder’s discourse].

For more information regarding, and for [further] instantiations of, these Seldonian insights, please see --

www.dialectics.info

ENJOY!

Regards,

Miguel Detonacciones,

Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.],

Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison,

Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.

“For historical-dialectical meta-model meta-equations in general, for virtually any Domain, an _NQ_ ‘dialectical-ideography’-formulated ‘possibility-space’ progression/‘cumulum’, while it is always ‘‘‘evolute’’’ syntactically, may also be ‘‘‘convolute’’’, or partially ‘‘‘convolute’’’ [i.e., ‘covolute’], semantically.”

“This is because some, or, in the most extreme case, all, of the units of the externally ‘‘‘conserved’’’ ontological categories, say those first arising in epochs t < t_present, may have ‘‘‘gone extinct’’’ in or before epoch t_present.”

“Starting from the first-order-logic “Natural” Numbers axioms-systems category, N_ [---> q₁, of ‘vestigially-dialectical’ arithmetic as ‘«arché» axioms-systems’ category, first evoked in presentation-step _#s₂ = 0 -- of our ‘Axioms-Systems-Progression Dialectical Method of Presentation of the F.E.D. Axioms-Systems of Dialectical Ideography’, itself also formulated as a dialectical meta-model meta-equation in the language of its own second system, namely, the _NQ_ [---> q₂ dialectical-ideography, first evoked in presentation-step _#s₂ = 1 -- the degree of ‘‘‘convoluteness’’’ of such ‘possibility-spaces’ becomes EXplicitly expressible, for the very first time, in & via its third axioms-systems category/ideographical language, first evoked in its presentation-step _#s₂ = 2.”

“I.e., explicit ‘expressibility’ of quantitative degrees of semantical ‘‘‘convoluteness’’’ is first evoked in & via its third, _NU_ [---> q₃ ‘actualizations-space’ ideographical language-system, in that step-wise, dialectical-ideographical axioms-systems' categories ‘possibility-space’/‘axioms-systems-progression/‘cumulum’ dialectical method of presentation of the F.E.D. axioms-systems' categories of ‘dialectical ideography’.”