Thursday, March 11, 2021

The ‘Ideo-«Gene»-sis’ of the 'subscript-N_Q' from the N -- Part 03: ‘Seldon on the Record’ Series.



From Numbers-«Genos»’ N to Meta-Numbers-«Genos»’ NQ:  The Ideo-«Gene»-sis of the NQ from the N  -- Part 03: Seldon on the Record Series.




Dear Reader,

It is my pleasure, and my honor, as a member of the Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.] General Council, and as a voting member of F.E.D., to share, with you, from time to time, as they are approved for public release by the F.E.D. General Council, key excerpts from the internal writings, and from the internal sayings, of our co-founder, Karl Seldon.


The third release in this new such series is posted below [Some E.D. standard edits have been applied, in the version presented below, by the editors of the F.E.D. Special Council for the Encyclopedia, to the direct transcript of our co-founder’s discourse].


In this 3rd installment, Seldon describes the dialectical, determinate ideo-self-negation character of the transition from the N to the NQ.




Seldon --


The first dialectical-arithmetical, number-spaces-transition in our long-form version of the systematic-dialectical method of presentation of the Encyclopedia Dialectica arithmetics for dialectics, namely --

{n} ---))* {qn}, or

N ---)) NQ

-- does not represent an “abstract [self-]negation” [cf. Hegel’s critique thereof] of N = {n}.”


“It is not an ‘obliteration’ or “annihilation”, a “demolishment” or ‘obliviation’ of N = {n}.”


“Instead, that transition, with its syntactic operation of the ‘under-turning’ of n and N in the formation of qn and NQ, is a syntactic cue for a semantic «aufheben» determinate-negation/conservation/elevation of n as of N.”


“Such ‘under-turning’, as a syntactic operation, has, as its semantic correlate, the «aufheben» operation itself.”


“This «aufheben» principle of syntactic ‘under-turning’ can, in fact, be used to construct the entire ‘self-hybrids sub-sequence of the system-categories-progression/dialectical-mathematical spaces-progression/axioms-systems-progression of the [meta-]systematic-dialectical method of presentation of the Encyclopedia Dialectica arithmetics for dialectics.


*[‘---))’, versus ‘---)’, captures the ‘‘‘convolute’’’ aspects of ontological transition only.].





For more information regarding these Seldonian insights, please see --








For partially pictographical, ‘poster-ized’ visualizations of many of these Seldonian insights -- specimens of dialectical art -- see:














Miguel Detonacciones,


Voting Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.],

Member, F.E.D. General Council

Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison,

Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.





Please post your comments on this blog-entry below!








No comments:

Post a Comment