Wednesday, September 08, 2021

‘Strict Ordinality, Opposition, and Reconciliation/Resolution of Opposition’. -- Part 01: Seldon’s ‘In-seeings’ Series.


Strict Ordinality, Opposition, and Reconciliation/Resolution of Opposition.


-- Part 01: Seldon’s In-seeings Series.






Dear Reader,



It is my pleasure, and my honor, as an elected member of the Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.] General Council, and as a voting member of F.E.D., to share, with you, from time to time, as they are approved for public release, by the F.E.D. General Council, key excerpts from the internal writings, and from the internal sayings, of our co-founder, Karl Seldon.


This first release in this new such series is posted below [Some E.D. standard edits have been applied, in the version presented below, by the editors of the F.E.D. Special Council for the Encyclopedia, to the direct transcript of our co-founder’s discourse].


In this 1st installment, Seldon describes the non-incompatibility of strict progressional order, with opposition, and with the concrete transcendence of that opposition, in the context of ontological-categorial [self-]presentations.


Seldon --

Realize: ontological categorial progressions – series of internally-related ontological categories – can embody strict, Peanic ‘ordinality’ – can be ‘exceptionlessly’ ordinal – while also seamlessly embodying recurrent categorial oppositions, as well as reconciliations/resolutions/concrete transcendences of those oppositions.








For more information regarding these Seldonian insights, please see --








For partially pictographical, ‘poster-ized’ visualizations of many of these Seldonian insights -- specimens of dialectical art -- see:
















Miguel Detonacciones,


Voting Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.];

Elected Member, F.E.D. General Council;

Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison;

Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.





YOU are invited to post your comments on this blog-entry below!












No comments:

Post a Comment