Saturday, October 17, 2026

Seldon: «Monads» Everywhere, hence «Arithmoi» Everywhere: A Latter-Day ‘Meta-Pythagorean’ Vision of Our «Kosmos». GLOBAL STRATEGIC HYPOTHESES.

 

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Seldon:

 

«Monads» Everywhere,

 

hence

 

«Arithmoi» Everywhere:

 

A Latter-Day

‘Meta-Pythagorean’

Vision

of

Our «Kosmos».

 

 

 

GLOBAL STRATEGIC HYPOTHESES.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Reader, 

The text below, by our co-founder, Karl Seldon, ‘explicitizes’ the connection -- by means of a concurrent, ‘«aufheben»-ating’ immanent-critique/‘ideic scale’ elevation/conservation of the ideology of the ancient Pythagoreans -- to the Foundation’s ‘Dialectical Theory of Everything’ .

 

 

 

Seldon –

 

“All is «Arithmos».” 

 

“The «Monads» of being arise by kinds, in multiples.”

 

“Absolutely-unique, «sui generis» units are vanishingly rare.”

 

“Everything is made of «monads», even the «monads» themselves [Except for the «arché-monads»’ «arithmos»], but these «monads» are not Democratean “atoms”.”

 

“These «monads» include units which not only differ from one another with “individual differences”, but which collectively differ qualitatively, differ in kind – i.e., which differ ontologically.  Thus, they are groupable into categories by their shared qualities, i.e., they are mentally-groupable into kind-«arithmoi» .

“«Arithmos», a word from the ancient Greek language, means ‘‘‘number’’’, but not quite in our modern sense.”

 

“A «monad» is a unit of an «arithmos»/‘‘‘number’’’, of a given kind.”

 

“Thus, “All is number’’, in a quite concrete, reasonable, and even sensuous sense – no mysticisms required.”

 

“An «Arithmos», made up out of units, all of one kind, is a ‘kind-number’, an ‘ontological number’, an «onto-arithmos».”

 

“A ‘‘‘kind’’’ [cf. Platon’s, dialectical, «arithmoi eidetikoi»] is a mental assemblage of units, all of the same, qualitative, ontological ‘“species”’ – a ‘qualitative number’.”

 

“Arithmetic”, «Arithmetikê», was, anciently, ‘‘‘the science of [such] number(s)’’’.”

 

“The Foundation’s ‘NQ Arithmetic’ is an arithmetic/algebra for representing, and ‘non-quantitatively calculating’ with, especially the, concrete, ontological, hence “purely”-qualitative, ‘‘‘[[meta-]Natural] [meta-]numbers’’’, i.e., indefinite numerosities of kind-«monads», by means of its ‘‘‘[meta-]numerals’’’.”

 

“Each symbolic unit/«monad» of the finite-indefinite ‘‘‘number of idea-units’’’/«ideo-arithmos» named NQ is, in its uttermost root meaning, a symbolic, ideographical, ‘‘‘[meta-Natural-]numeralic’’’ representation of a ‘qualitative finitary ordinal number’.” 

 

“That is, the generic symbol-unit/«monad» of the NQ «arithmos», namely qn, incorporates the generic “natural” number, n, as denoting the nth order-count/order-place/order-number.  But the symbol qn as a whole denotes the ordinal quality of ‘nth-ness’.”

 

“Interpreted/applied for mathematical-models of categorial progressions, generic qn denotes the nth category in [any] such, strictly-ordered, categorial progression.” 

 

“That is, in set-theoretic language, qn denotes the set of all categories such that each one occupies the nth order-place in its native categorial progression; the nth category generally; the ‘ideic’ quality of categorial nth-ness – the intension of the extension of all nth-in-order-place categories.”  

 

“This generic ‘categorial-ordinal arithmetical language’ can therefore be used to symbolize strictly-ordered categorial progressions of myriad kinds, for myriad ontological Domains – for ‘[ideo-]physi[c]o-ontological’ Domains, for myriad “pure” ‘ideo-ontological’ Domains, and for myriad ‘‘‘mixed’’’, i.e., for ‘ideo-physio-ontological’ Domains as well.”

 

“Starting from a chosen, specific-Domain «arché»-category, or starting-category/‘categorial premise’, which is always assigned to generic NQ category-symbol q1, the generic NQ arithmetic/algebra can be used/specified so as to help elicit, from Domain-expert user(‘)s(’) mind(s), the entire progression of categories, synchronic, systematic or diachronic, historical – reflecting the progression of the kinds of units of the actual reality of that Domain – which if achieved by a given user, constitutes the, user-comprehended, ontological content-analysis of that Domain.”

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For more information regarding these Seldonian insights, and to read and/or download, free of charge, PDFs and/or JPGs of Foundation books, other texts, and images, please see:

www.dialectics.info

and

https://independent.academia.edu/KarlSeldon

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For partially pictographical, ‘poster-ized’ visualizations of many of these Seldonian insights -- specimens of ‘dialectical art’ – as well as dialectically-illustrated books published by the F.E.D. Press, see –

https://www.etsy.com/shop/DialecticsMATH

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

¡ENJOY!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Regards,

 

Miguel Detonacciones,

Voting Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.];

Elected Member, F.E.D. General Council;

Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison;

Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.

 

 

 

 

 

 

YOU are invited to post your comments on this blog-entry below!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 









No comments:

Post a Comment