Wednesday, December 11, 2024

Part 12: Seldon on Dialectical Method Series. The Dialectics of Algebraic Logics & of Volutenesses’.

 












Part 12: Seldon on Dialectical Method Series.

 

 

The Dialectics of Algebraic Logics & of Volutenesses.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Reader,

 

 

 

It is my pleasure, and my honor, as an elected member of the Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.] General Council, and as a voting member of F.E.D., to share, with you, from time to time, as they are approved for public release by the F.E.D. General Council, Encyclopedia Dialectica insights into key concepts of Seldonian Theory.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The text posted below describes the interconnexion between the Seldonian systematic dialectic of the algebras of logic and the Seldonian systematic dialectic of ‘volutenesses.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Seldon –

 


…The Boolean algebra of logic is about the ‘‘‘convolute’’’ ‘voluteness’: the factors of a Boolean product disappear into that product –

white times birds equals white-birds;

w x b   =   c.”


 

“Our first contra-category to the category of Boolean algebra, the ‘contra-Boolean’ algebra of the WQ arithmetic for modeling «aufheben» dialectics, is strictly about the ‘‘‘evolute’’’ ‘voluteness’ for the ‘possibility-space’ of ontological categories.  For its ‘meta-genealogical «aufheben» evolute product rule’ variant, both factors of the product/combination of two ontic category-symbols reappear explicitly in the product –

 

a x b = a + b + qab  |-=  a + b + c.”

 


“The dialectical-synthesis combination of Boolean Algebra with our ‘contra-Boolean Algebra for dialectical logic’ is about the ‘covolute voluteness’.  In it, each category or class term, denoting a qualitatively, ontologically distinct class or ontological category, is ‘coefficiented’ by a Boolean factor that can take on the value of either Boolean 1 or Boolean 0.  If the value of the ‘Boolean coefficient’ of a category term is 1, it means that this category of ontology, its «monads», are still present for the t-value of its Domain’s categorial/class progression.  If the value of the ‘Boolean coefficient’ of a category term is 0, it means that this category of ontology, its «monads», are no longer present for the t-value of the categorial/class progression of its Domain.

 

“That «arithmos» of «monads» has become extinct by that t-value [as well as, possibly, before] –

 

D(t)  =  a(t)a + b(t)b + c(t)c .

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For more information regarding these Seldonian insights, and for free-of-charge download of Seldonian books, essays, images, and other texts, please see --

 

www.dialectics.info

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For partially pictographical, ‘poster-ized’ visualizations of many of these Seldonian insights -- specimens of dialectical artas well as dialectically-illustrated books published by the F.E.D. Press, see

 

https://www.etsy.com/shop/DialecticsMATH

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

¡ENJOY!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Regards,

 

 

 

Miguel Detonacciones,

 

Voting Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.];

Elected Member, F.E.D. General Council;

Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison;

Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.

 

 

 

 

 

 

YOU are invited to post your comments on this blog-entry below!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

No comments:

Post a Comment