Monday, April 27, 2026

STEADY DENSITIES -- ‘Regenerism’ &/vs. “Steady State Theory”. Part 6. of the Series on the ‘Regenerist Hypothesis’.

 

 

 





 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

STEADY

DENSITIES --

 

Regenerism

   and/versus

Steady State Theory.

 

Part 6. of the

Series on the

Regenerist

Hypothesis.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Reader,

 

In thinking about the Seldonian ‘Self-Resurging Big Surge’ Hypothesis – which we also call ‘The Spandetron Hypothesis’ about “Dark Energy”, or ‘The Regenerist Hypothesis’ on the thermodynamic self-regeneration of our cosmos, we find it interesting to consider it in relation to the modern models of the “Steady State” theories in cosmology.

 

These “steady state” models emerged in the 1940s in published work, and even as early as 1931 in an unpublished manuscript by Albert Einstein, which he decided not to publish.

 

“Steady state” theory was designed to reconcile the observed, Hubble, expansion of the universe with a static universe in the sense that the observable part of the universe would “forever” look the same from any time of observation, and from any place of observation: thus an eternal observable universe, with no beginning and no end, hence an already infinitely old universe.  It met the preferences of ‘parmenideanoid’ “scientists”, whose archaic mentalities wanted as much of the “immutable” and the “eternal” as could be reconciled with physical observations of the actual cosmos. 

 

“Steady State” models [including the later “Quasi-Steady State”, or “QSS”, models, published in 1993, aimed to reconcile “eternal” ‘staticism’ with later observations that contradicted the initial “Steady State” models] posit a continuous creation of new ordinary matter [what we call ‘Bright Matter’, because of its affinity with photonic and electrically-charged electromagnetism, in contrast to “Dark Matter”], so that the density of that matter would not be diluted by the Hubble expansion of space, i.e., so that new such matter fills in as older matter moves away with space self-expansion, keeping the energy-density of ordinary matter Constant.

 

The opposing, rival “Big Bang” models, emerging in the same period, granted, on the contrary, that ordinary [‘Bright’] matter is Diluted in terms of its density [mass/spatial volume] by the Hubble self-expansion of space.

 

Ironically enough, and dialectically enough, as we shall see, the Seldonian ‘Self-Resurging Big Surge’ model, i.e., our ‘Regenerist’ model – of the ‘Thermodynamic Self-Regeneration of our Cosmos in the Dialectic of Nature’ –

exhibits affinities with aspects of both of these, opposing, cosmological models, forming an unexpected, triadic, ideo-ontological-categorial’ dialectic, as diagrammed in the ‘dialectogram’ posted above.

 

Per that, ‘Regenerist’, model, not ‘Bright Matter’, and not “Dark Matter” either, but the energy density of “empty” space, i.e., of the expanse of incessantly self-replicating, hence space-expanding, ‘spandetron’ Planck-scale quanta, thus do exhibit continuous creation, as continuous self-reproduction, and do, indeed, thereby, maintain the energy-density of the thus self-expanding “empty” space in  Constancy, or near-Constancy, in a rate of spatial self-expansion which is modulated and moderated by the energy-density of proximate matter, “Dark” and ‘Bright’ alike.

 

However, both “Dark” and ‘Bright’ mass-energy are continually Diluted – now, once again, at an accelerating rate, in their energy-density – by that ‘spandetrons’-driven self-expansion of space.

 

Per that, ‘Regenerist’, model, once the dilution of matter energy-density crosses a critical threshold, the rate of acceleration of spatial self-expansion will once again return to that exhibited in the earlier, so-called “Cosmological Inflation” incident.

 

That, with the excession of the limiting velocity of spatial self-expansion, will cause a renewed self-damaging of cloud-halos of thereby denatured ‘spandetrons’, no longer ‘anti-gravitic’, but ‘gravitic’ instead, and no longer able to self-replicate, and also, e.g., gravitically, inhibiting the rate of self-replication of the main ‘spandetron expanse’, still intact.

 

That is, these, self-damaged ‘meta-spandetrons’ are, per the ‘R’ model, the substance of “Dark Matter”. 

 

The cosmos will thus be flooded, after that critical spatial self-expansion velocity limit is breached, with new thermodynamic free-energy, in the form of “Dark Matter” mass-energy, that will soon, in turn, partly «aufheben» ‘meta-monad-ize’ again, as new, ‘meta-meta-spandetron’ ‘Bright Matter’ mass-energy as well.  

 

Thus, as indicated in the ‘dialectogram’ posted herewith, the ‘Regenerist’ model is a dialectical ‘complex unity’ of the two, major, preceding cosmological models – the “Steady State” model and the “Big Bang” model.

 

But the ‘Regenerist’ model is an anti-Steady-State model, just as much as it is an anti-Big-Bang model.  The “Steady-State” model is a model of eternal universal stasis for our observable universe. 

 

The ‘Regenerist’ model, on the contrary to both of its predecessor models, is a model of, not even “cyclical”, but of a qualitatively-changing, not just quantitatively changing, helical-vortical pattern; a model of ongoingly unprecedented, ultimately irrepetitive, universal self-transformation.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For more information regarding these Seldonian insights, and to read and/or download, free of charge, PDFs and/or JPGs of Foundation books, other texts, and images, please see:

 


www.dialectics.info

 

 

 

and

 

 

 

 

https://independent.academia.edu/KarlSeldon

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For partially pictographical, ‘poster-ized’ visualizations of many of these Seldonian insights -- specimens of dialectical artas well as dialectically-illustrated books published by the F.E.D. Press, see

 

https://www.etsy.com/shop/DialecticsMATH

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

¡ENJOY!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Regards,

 

 

 

Miguel Detonacciones,

 

Voting Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.];

Elected Member, F.E.D. General Council;

Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison;

Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.

 

 

 

 

 

 

YOU are invited to post your comments on this blog-entry below!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

No comments:

Post a Comment