¿[Meta-]Evolution’s Next “Endo-Symbiosis”/“Symbiogenesis”? GLOBAL STRATEGIC HYPOTHESES.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

¿[Meta-]Evolution’s

 

Next

 

“Endo-Symbiosis”/-

“Symbiogenesis”?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

GLOBAL STRATEGIC HYPOTHESES.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Reader,

 

The consensus of the evolutionary biology community now holds that a dialectical, or [auto-]«aufheben», ‘self-meta-unit-ization’ process – though not recognizing that process as such – among prokaryotic, living single-cell units, gave rise to eukaryotic living single-cell units, through cases of the internalization of respirating prokaryotic cells by other, but non-respiration-capable prokaryotic cells, in a process named “endosymbiosis” and “symbiogenesis”.  In our ‘dialectic of Nature’ short-hand, that looks like this –

 

…p¹ ®…p² = …p¹ Ä p¹ |-º …p¹…Å…e¹.

 

That same kind of process – of “endosymbiosis” and “symbiogenesis” – is also held to have given rise to the first, single-cell plant units, when already-respirating, i.e., already mitochondria-organelles-including, eukaryotic single-cell units internalized photosynthesis-capable prokaryotic single-cell units, that eventually became their photosynthesizing “chloroplast” organelles.  In our ‘dialectic of Nature’ short-hand, that process looks like this –

 

…e Å…p…®…e Ä p… |-º …p Å q_ep…

 

– which describes, in our terms, also another dialectical, or [allo-]«aufheben», ‘meta-unit-ization’ process, creating single-celled plant units, in ontological category q_ep.

 

We argue that further forms of “endo-symbiosis” and “symbiogenesis” generated new ontologies in local Nature, beyond the 2 described above, via (3) the self-incorporation of eukaryotic single cell units to form ‘multi[-eukaryotic] cellular’ organisms, as initially asocial ‘meta-biotic’ units, in (4) the self-incorporation of asocial ‘meta-biotic’ units, “meta-zoa” and “meta-phyta”, to form “animal society” ‘meta-units’ [and ‘plant society meta-units’], and in (5) the incorporation of humans-led animal society units, into humans-led ‘meta-society’ units, by means of, thereby becoming-former animal society units of the human species. This began with the wolves-to-dogs domestication, in the Paleolithic, and thereafter, later burgeoned-forth into the social-animal domestications, ‘social-plant’ domestications, and human-social-self-domestications, of the Neolithic.

 

¿Is that it, then; the end of “symbiogenesis” and of “endo-symbiosis” in the ‘meta-evolution’ of the ontologies of Nature; in the ‘dialectic of Nature’? 

 

¿Are there to be no, predictable, future such “endo-symbioses” yet to come?

 

We say no.

 

We hold that a next such “endo-symbiosis” is now predictable, in humanoid ‘meta-evolution’ – potentially throughout our cosmos, but at least “locally” – notwithstanding that no other humanoid planets than planet Earth are conclusively known, to we the planet-Earth-dwelling humanoids, as yet.

 

We predict a coming ‘meta-humanoids’-engendering “endo-symbiosis”, as part of the end of the ‘human meta-society’ units epoch of the ‘dialectic of Nature’; its ‘dialectic of humanit(y)(ies)’, in the formation of the units of the ontological category of ‘meta-humanity’.  

 

Per our short-hand, this will be a part of the ‘meta-evolutionary onto-dynamasis’ process described by –

 

h¹ ® h²  =  h Ä h  |-º  h Å y.

 

In particular, as part of the foundational process of the formation of y, we predict a, triadic, ‘dialectical speciation’ of ‘meta-human’ body-forms –

 

_yg¹ ® _yg³  =  _yg¹  Ä  _yg¹ Ä _yg¹   ¶|-º 

 

_yg  Å _yr Å _yq_rg

 

– in which _yg stands for the predicted future category of genomically self-reengineered ‘meta-humans’, _yr for its ‘antithesis-category’, of AI android robot ‘meta-humans’, and _yq_rg for the categorial dialectical synthesis of the first two: “cyborg” ‘meta-humans’, “endo-symbiotically” unifying ‘genomically reengineered meta-human’ biological bodies, inside an ‘exoskeleton’ of non-biological modules, sourced from android-robot humanoid body-parts.

 

The resulting ‘_yq_rg |-º _yc categorial units, we hypothesize, might even have a kind of ‘intra-dual brain’, in the form of an advanced, genomically reengineered human brain, in continuous consultation and mutual checking-and-balancing with a, non-biological, AI robot “brain”.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For more information regarding these Seldonian insights, and to read and/or download, free of charge, PDFs and/or JPGs of Foundation books, other texts, and images, please see:

 

www.dialectics.info

 

and

 

https://independent.academia.edu/KarlSeldon

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For partially pictographical, ‘poster-ized’ visualizations of many of these Seldonian insights -- specimens of ‘dialectical art’ – as well as dialectically-illustrated books published by the F.E.D. Press, see –

 

https://www.etsy.com/shop/DialecticsMATH

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

¡ENJOY!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Regards,

 

 

 

 

Miguel Detonacciones,

 

Voting Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.];

Elected Member, F.E.D. General Council;

Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison;

Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.

 

 

 

 

 

 

YOU are invited to post your comments on this blog-entry below!