Three
Errant
Cosmological
Ideologies.
Part 9. of the
Series on the
‘Regenerist
Hypothesis’.
Dear Reader,
This blog-entry is for the
purpose of offering, for your consideration, the following comment from our
co-founder, Karl Seldon.
Seldon –
“Three errant
“scientific” ideologies have dominated “scientific” cosmology, due, we
hold, to ‘‘‘psychohistorical’’’ causations, during the, still present, ‘descendence-phase’
of capitalism’s history –
1. “Steady-State
Theory” – An attempt to uphold a crypto-‘Parmenideanoid stasis’, ironically
though admitting a kind of – steadying – eternal change in an expanding
universe.
2. Cyclical
“Big Bang”/“Big
Crunch” Theories – Attempting to limit cosmological change to an
eternally-repeating cycle of [re-]expansion followed by re-contraction; another
form of rescue for ‘Parmenideanoid stasis’, when viewed «sub specie
aeternitatis».
3. “Entropic
Doom”/“Big Rip” – Both of these are ‘Doomist’
paradigms, befitting the mood of the ‘descendence-phase’, capitalist-anticapitalist
ruling class [especially that of the later, ‘Rocke-Nazi’, ‘humanocidal’ ruling faction],
positing a universal death of our universe, hence a universal death of humanity
as part and parcel thereof, albeit in two, somewhat distinct, or even opposite,
ways.”
“But what astronomers and
cosmologists have actually found out about our universe, empirically, is
that it is self-accelerating, and has self-accelerated, in its self-expansion,
albeit at varying rates, throughout its directly, empirically known [measured]
& indirectly-inferred
existence, leading toward a new, profoundly unexpected, fourth paradigm of cosmology.”
“This, the anti-entropic
continual self-expansion of our cosmos, continually adding new energy-density
to itself; to the- already-dominant- component of the energy-density of this
cosmos [named, aptly enough, for its namers, “Dark Energy”] -- THIS right option was the only option that the physics,
astronomy and cosmology “scientific” communities NEVER EVEN CONSIDERED in any
serious way, if at all.”
“Doesn’t this fact suggest
that there is something deeply wrong, deeply amiss, deeply misguided, with the “instincts”,
with the “intuitions” – and about the biases, partly conscious, partly
probably not conscious – of those “scientific communities”?”
“This fourth paradigm has
precursors, albeit unscientific, mystical precursors, in
the philosophy of Hegel’s erstwhile mentor, Schelling, and in the [“secret”] Mormon
doctrine of “Eternal Progression”. But
these are, of course, not scientific hypotheses.”
For more
information regarding these
Seldonian insights, and to read and/or download, free
of charge, PDFs and/or JPGs of Foundation books, other texts, and images, please see:
and
https://independent.academia.edu/KarlSeldon
For partially pictographical, ‘poster-ized’ visualizations of many of these Seldonian insights -- specimens of ‘dialectical art’ – as well as dialectically-illustrated books
published by
the F.E.D. Press, see –
https://www.etsy.com/shop/DialecticsMATH
¡ENJOY!
Regards,
Miguel
Detonacciones,
Voting Member, Foundation Encyclopedia Dialectica [F.E.D.];
Elected Member, F.E.D. General Council;
Participant, F.E.D. Special Council for Public Liaison;
Officer, F.E.D. Office of Public Liaison.
YOU are invited to post
your comments on this blog-entry below!



No comments:
Post a Comment